Anti-Globalist Alliance

Anti-Globalist Alliance

Anti-Globalist Alliance

I offer the following post for your information and interest only with regards to  Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò who is calling for the creation of an Anti-Globalist Alliance.

My religious beliefs are mostly in conflict with those of the Catholic church but when truth is spoken I believe we should support it.

The content in this post includes:

 – A call from Archbishop Viganò to establish and join what he terms an ‘Anti-globalist Alliance’,

– A more detailed documented interview with Viganò

– An indepth interview (video) conducted by Planet Lockdown.

– An article reporting Pope Francis receiving the Pfizer vaccine and his call to all to follow his example.

NB: Notice the blasphemous slogan on the Pope’s facemask which reads ‘In Pfizer we trust’. We read in the Psalms that David put his trust in the Almighty, and so do I:

Psalms 56:11 ‘In God have I put my trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me.’

Psalm 91:2  ‘I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.’

Trust in the Father with all your heart:

Proverbs 3:5  Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

Again we read in the New Testament:

2 Corinthians 1:10  ‘Who delivered us from so great a death, and doth deliver: in whom we trust that he will yet deliver us;’

How can the Pope endorse such a compromise on Biblical teaching?

Before you scroll down any further to the video I would like to caution you with ragards to reacting with emotion to the call from Viganò to join his or any resistance movement.

There are many Christians who possibly follow the belief (as it seems  Viganò does), that we, as supposed representatives of our Almighty Father on earth, must actively make war with what we perceive as evil. I believe that we are required to expose evil but standing up in battle (albeit verbal) may not be the Biblical thing to do.

Scripture tells us in Proverbs 14:12 that There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.’

The previous verse 11 states The house of the wicked shall be overthrown: but the tabernacle of the upright shall flourish.’

It is however not at our hands that ‘the house of the wicked shall be overthrown’. Scripture teaches us that what we are required to do is stand:

Ephesians 6:10-13  Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

11  Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

12  For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

13  Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

1Corinthians 16:13  Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.

In fact, it is made very clear in the Old Testament book of 2 Chronicles that what is required is for us to humble ourselves, pray, seek the Father’s righteousness and turn from our wicked ways. Then and only then, will the Almighty Father respond to our prayers and save us from this tyranny:

2 Chronicles 7:14  If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

I have previously posted a ‘disclaimer’ in some of my previous posts related to this Covid scam which will provide some more information on why I believe that we should not actively resist this globalist tyranny.

I personally will not participate in any resistance movement or any protest action. I believe that what we are witnessing in the world today is a repeat of history i.e. a repeat of the Biblical pattern of the Babylonian captivity as described in the book of Jeremiah the Prophet. Our example in this regard should be Daniel who accepted his captivity but remained steadfast in the way of righteousness. Daniel understood that the Babylonian captivity was ordained by his Heavenly Father as a result of the nations disobedience.

We are told in the Bible that our battle is not against flesh and blood:

Ephesians 6:12  For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

We are up against a spiritual enemy. This enemy is the ‘adversary’, the satan/devil (1 Peter 5:8), which indwells each and every one of us. Why is it then that believers always want to accuse others and not see that it is through our very own adulterous and idolatrous wickedness, as believers, that the Father has brought about this end time chastisement. Our Father is not concerned with the wicked and evil non-believers. They will be destroyed in the fullness of time. Our Father is calling on us, the believers, to repent and to seek Him.

When it states in James that we must resist the devil it is referring to a mental resistance. This is how we overcome the devil. The devil exists in our thoughts. Those who commit evil deeds are those who have not resisted the devil and have followed through with their evil thoughts and manifested physical evil deeds. We all suffer this same challenge. We must submit to the will of our Father:

James 4:7  Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

For one to take up a physical battle against this force of evil is once again disobedience and rebellion. This will not end well for those who can not see this reality. I am not just preaching to you the reader on this matter either. This is something that I personally struggle with and have to constantly remind myself about and reign myself in.

Scripture is very clear from the books of Daniel and Revelation that there is going to be a global ‘beast’ empire ruling the world in the last days. There is nothing that we can do to change this prophesied reality.

Let us rather stand firm in our faith, pray and seek the face of the Almighty. He will deliver us according to His grace and timing.

Archbishop Viganò is telling the truth but I believe that he is wrong in calling for any other action other than to expose the truth to the world.

Please read my ‘Disclaimer’ below:

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

The reason for my anti-activist or anti-resistance stance is due to the fact that I believe what is taking place in the world today with regards to this scam plandemic is part of prophesied end time Biblical events. I believe that what we are witnessing is the rise of the end-time Babylonian world empire as foreshadowed in the book of Genesis with Nimrod’s Tower of Babel.

King Solomon said in the book of Ecclesiastes 1:9 ‘ The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun’

This final world empire is described in the books of Daniel and Revelation as the ten toes or ten horns  of the beast. This final world empire is mans evil attempt to grasp dominion over the whole of humanity in rebellion against the Almighty Creator who had, in the Genesis account, destroyed this type of ‘collective’, godless rulership and dispersed the people acorss the world. 

We witness through the lives of Joseph, Daniel and our Messiah Yahushua that they did not resist the governmental powers during their time and in fact Yahushua rebuked Peter for attempting to interfere in the Divine plan of the Almighty. We read of this event in Matthew 16:

21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Again in John 18 we read how Peter took it upon himself to interfere with divine destiny:

10 Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus. 11 Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?

We must learn the lesson from these accounts and understand that our Heavenly Father uses  the wicked rulers of this world for His purposes and often to chastise His people and draw them back, though persecution and trials, to Him.

The Almighty even called the tyrant Nebuchadnezzar His ‘servant’ in Jeremiah 27:6 and 43:10. This was because Nebuchadnezzar was used to serve the Almighty’s overall and greater purpose. When this purpose was however completed  Nebuchadnezzar was brought down. The same will happen to this final world empire when the divine timing and plan reaches the fullness of time. This is foretold in Revelation:

  And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.

Revelation 14:8

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

Revelation 18:2  

For those Christians who believe that they must fight the battle for justice on behalf of the Almighty please bear the following verse in mind:

‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.’

Revelation 17:17  

  ‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will’ 

It could be that your self-righteous actions are in direct conflict with the will and divine plan of the Almighty Father. When we come across a verse with a double numerical reference, in this case 17:17, this should draw special attention to what is being stated.

As faithful believers we must stand firm in faith, adhere to the Biblical commandments and continue to be a light to the nations. This is all that we are required to do. The wise man Solomon put it to us this way:

Ecclisiastes 12:13  Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

Having stated the above, I must clarify that like Daniel, there is a line that I will not cross in terms of following the Covid rules and regulations. I will not participate in the supposed vaccine program at all. What is fraudulantly called a Covid vaccine is not a vaccine by definition. Or at least according to the definition before the CDC changed it to allign with this Covid jab.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention modified its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website. Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” 

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html#storylink=cpy

It was traditionally explained that a small sample of the virus would have been included in the vaccine to enable the body to build up aantiboied against the weakened/smaller viral load. In this way the body would be able and ready to ward off a greater attack from the same virus. This is however not the case with the covid virus as this virus has never been identified and isolated in terms of Koch’s postualtes. Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease. 

Koch’s Postulates

Developed in the 19th century, Robert Koch’s postulates are the four criteria designed to assess whether a microorganism causes a disease. As originally stated, the four criteria are:

(1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals;

(2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual;

(3) Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulated the disease; and finally

(4) The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism.

Koch’s postulates have been critically important in establishing the criteria whereby the scientific community agrees that a microorganism causes a disease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775492/

‘Koch’s postulates’ was never followed in the Covid pandemic process. ‘If you have worked your way through my ‘Babylon Rising’ series you will also understand that no virus has ever satisfied Koch’s postulates because viruses are not the cause of disease. It is all a lot of voodoo science. Anyway here is another ‘traditional’ definition of a vaccine:

Vaccination: Injection of a killed microbe in order to stimulate the immune system against the microbe, thereby preventing disease. Vaccinations, or immunizations, work by stimulating the immune system, the natural disease-fighting system of the body. The healthy immune system is able to recognize invading bacteria and viruses and produce substances (antibodies) to destroy or disable them. Immunizations prepare the immune system to ward off a disease. To immunize against viral diseases, the virus used in the vaccine has been weakened or killed. https://www.medicinenet.com/vaccination/definition.htm

We are told that the Covid ‘vaccine’ neither protects you from the virus or prevents you from spreading it. It is useless. The Covid jab is an experimental gene therapy injectable and a sinister one at that. I do not believe that our Heavenly Father would condone anyone taking a vaccine. Science and the medical professionhas become a ‘god’ in this world with many Christians putting all their faith in it. I believe that ‘science’ is the new global religion that the ‘globalists’ want everyone to submit to in a form of reverence and worship.

How often have you heard it proclaimed from the mouths of the medical, scientific and political leaders that we must ‘listen to the science’ and ‘follow the science’?

Well, as for me, I listen to my Heavenly Father through His Word and I follow my Messiah Yahushua. The Creator of the universe is my God whom I listen to and I follow His Son.

My ‘god’ is not science.

As for wearing a mask, it is very seldom that I wear one as I resist places that require me to put one on. I do however wear one for very short intervals every now and then even though I understand that they are more detrimental to one’s health and reflect ones obedience to the rulers rather than provide any safety from a non-existent contagion.

Although we must expose evil (Ephesians 5:11) and not participate in any way with this evil plot, we must not assume that it is our duty to wage war against the evil rulers and ungodly practices in this world.  Justice and righteousness will only return and prevail in this world when the allotted time arrives and the Sovereign Father rules through His Son  – Yahushua. 

I believe that we are now very close to this time which is the seventh and final day or the seven thousandth year period i.e. the Millennium reign of the Messiah.

Until then I will continue to watch the signs with keen interest and will try my very best to wait patiently.

‘And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them’.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

s*(expose, bring to the light)

Video

Viganò calls for Anti-Globalist Alliance to stop global enslavement of humanity

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is calling for the creation of an Anti-Globalist Alliance “under the Cross of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the only King and Savior,” to fight back against the establishment of the New World Order.

Viganò:

”those who resist the NWO will have the help and protection of God”

by Cesare Sacchetti

There is a man that in this moment terrifies the hierarchy of the anti-Catholic church of Bergoglio. This man has been the object of tremendous and evil attacks by the mainstream media. They have been trying to smear him and depict him as a criminal or like someone who is putting in great danger to society. This man is Archbishop Viganò. His Excellency has become like a polar star of hope for those Catholics and even non-believers who have thirst for justice and common sense in this upside-down world. Viganò has been speaking calmly but his gentle voice has terrified the powerful people of the world. Viganò has exposed the Great Reset and the plan to destroy mankind. He clearly denounced the infiltration of Freemasonry into society and into the Church.

In other words, Vigano’s guilty is the one of having said the truth like a humble pastor of God. In this interview that His Excellency granted us, he once again tells us in what kind of historical period we are living. He also consoles us by reminding us that being persecuted for loving God and having Faith is the greatest honor that we may have. This is probably why so many people look at this man in this historical period. He’s one of the few pastors that can speak simply to the hearts of the common men. Here you can find his words addressed to any one of us.”

Your Excellency, in recent days you have been the victim of harsh attacks in the Italian media, and the attacks seem to be increasing in intensity. Massimo Giannini, editor of La Stampa of Turin, went so far as to call you a “scoundrel.” Another prominent Italian journalist, Bruno Vespa, said God should “forgive you” for your statements about the vaccines and the so-called pandemic. Could you explain why Italy’s mainstream media increasingly seems to consider you a sort of “public enemy”? Why are they seemingly so afraid of you?

 As I have previously noted, it is typical of any totalitarian regime to seek to delegitimize any and every form of dissent, at first by ridiculing the adversary, making him the object of derision so as to discredit him before the eyes of the public opinion. Then, after delegitimizing the person as pathological, or in need of psychiatric care, suggesting that the adversary is mentally unstable who should be hospitalized in a mental institution. Finally, this process ends with the complete criminalization of all dissenters. In this way, the regime creates the necessary premises to separate all its adversaries from civil society.

 Lies, insults and personal attacks — like the most recent that I have received from the Italian magazine “Venerdì” (published by the newspaper “La Repubblica”) — are part of this charade, a type of theatrical production in which the “high priests” of COVID tear their vestments, lamenting every objection to their lies. We should recall that “La Stampa” and “La Repubblica” belong to the Elkann family, a family related to the Rothschilds since the 1500s. As a matter of fact, John Elkann wrote the preface to Klaus Schwab’s book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, in which the WEF (World Economic Forum) chairman describes the “Great Reset” in minute detail. In their adherence to the official narrative, the spokesmen for the elite also end up employing this tactic of discrediting and smearing those who oppose them, a typical practice of conspiratorial groups.

Certainly, given the deafening silence of the bishops and the propaganda of Santa Marta (Editor’s Note: the residence of Jorge Bergoglio), it is clear that a discordant voice that denounces the ongoing coup d’état being carried out by the globalist élite irritates and seems intolerable for those who ask for an unreasoning approval to their contradictory declarations. 

In this context, the Italian media has gone so far as to send spies to attend the Masses celebrated by those priests, like Fr. Giorgio Ghio, who are denouncing the harm caused by the vaccines and the general anti-Christian spirit that seems to becoming ever more to dominate Western society. It seems that the spirit of the real, traditional Church is not only not dead, but even being rekindled. Do you believe that the globalist power is particularly afraid of this renewal of the traditional Catholic faith?

 I would like to point out first of all that intrusion by the civil authorities in Church affairs is in direct violation of the Concordat between the Holy See and the Italian Republic. Moreover, the Episcopal Conference of Italy (CEI) does not have any authority to negotiate with the government protocols and agreements, so such agreements, in so far as agreed to by those who have no right to negotiate or ratify such agreements, have no validity whatsoever. Having said that, I think that every priest has the right, or rather the duty, to warn his faithful about the real danger – not at all merely hypothetical – represented by the inoculation of this experimental medical product. This is especially the case when the entire psycho-pandemic farce clearly aims to lead toward the establishment of a dictatorship, whose purpose is to control the citizens through a violation of their constitutional and natural rights under the guise of a health emergency.

The submission of the Catholic Hierarchy, of the Episcopal Conferences, of the Bishops and the Priests to this official narrative, is so brazen and servile as to make evident that infiltration by the “deep church” that I have denounced many times. This infiltration began at least 70 years ago, and today has become quite obvious due to its arrogance and to its persecution of all dissenting voices concerning both the alleged pandemic emergency and the even graver doctrinal, moral, and disciplinary deviations (of the present Church leadership) and the disturbing complicities of this leadership with the “deep state.”

This blatant betrayal by the Church’s pastors has sparked, as also has occurred in the area of civil government, a spontaneous opposition from the “base,” from the people, both ordinary lay people, and ordinary priests, and this opposition has concerned, significantly, both the response to the pandemic and the crisis of the Church hierarchy. On one hand, we have the promoters of the “Great Reset” with their anti-Catholic and anti-Christic ideology, supported by the Bergoglian church. On the other hand, we have those who are standing against the New World Order and who see their moral values and vision fulfilled in the perennial Catholic magisterium and in the traditional Catholic liturgy. The two cities, the City of the Devil and the City of God: the division is always the same because the opposing forces are drawn up based on positions that are ontologically opposed and inimical to one another.

 A Russian Colonel who once served in the Soviet secret services, Vladimir Kvachov, has called the pandemic as a sort of “terrorist operation” that has been expressly conceived to enforce a global population reduction and usher in a global dictatorship. In an article published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 whose title is “Operation Lockstep”, the outbreak of a pandemic is expressly mentioned. This pandemic allows world governments to implement authoritarian and repressive measures against personal freedom that are essential to move toward a one-world government. These restrictive measures are basically the same that we have been seeing enforced during the last year and a half, such as face masks and social distancing, which have brought mass psychosis and social hate seemingly unprecedented in Western societies. Do you think that this entire situation is an engineered crisis conceived by the globalist powers to drag mankind towards a state of constant fear and pave the way for the global Leviathan?

I do think so, and I have been saying this since the beginning of the psycho-pandemic, when in May 2020 I exposed the dangers and the absurdities of this grotesque farce. I am quite familiar with the scenarios of the Rockefeller Foundation, as well as with the ones depicted by the “Great Reset” of the World Economic Forum (WEF), whose president met the former Italian Prime Minister, Giuseppe Conte, in November of 2019 and the present Italian Prime Minister, Mario Draghi, just a few days ago. Likewise, I am also aware of the UN plan called Agenda 2030.

This operation required meticulous preparation and needed the participation of large parts of the public institutions and the private sectors, including the complicity of the Judiciary, of law enforcement and the media. These combined efforts are a real coup d’état and the pandemic is just a pretext – the profasis – through which is introduced the seeming inevitability of the violation of fundamental rights and the consequent establishment of the totalitarian regime of the New Order. In this New Order the pandemic superstition reigns supreme, with its magicians, its vaccine temples, its irrational rituals and its excommunications of sinners vitandi (“to be avoided” or “to be shunned”) — those who do not agree to give up their reason even before apostatizing from their Faith in order to embrace this insane ideological madness.

 In the “Great Reset” society that Your Excellency has denounced on numerous occasions, the “transhumanist” ideology plays a fundamental role. Modern technology is advancing at a very fast pace and we are now speaking openly about the possibility of controlling human behavior through brain microchip implants. One who favors this new model of “human/robot” is Klaus Schwab, a character whom we have met in the previous questions, the head of the World Economic Forum. Do you think that the final purpose of transhumanism is really this, to deprive man of his God-given free will?

Transhumanism is a hellish project, in which the Devil mocks the creation of God by perverting and corrupting it. Obedience to the “easy yoke” of the Law of God is replaced by the enslavement and submission to Satan’s tyranny, in which there is no tolerance for good and everyone is forced to commit evil, accept evil, and legitimize evil. And despite the fact that only God can read our consciences, Satan tries to violate the sanctuary of our inner spiritual part in order to control it and induce us to commit evil even against our own will. In his recent book, The Great Reset, Klaus Schwab wrote the following:

“We are also studying new ways to use and implant internal devices that monitor our levels of activity, the hematochemical values and the ways in which these can be associated to wellbeing, to mental health, and to productivity at home and at work. We are also learning better the functioning of the brain and witnessing exceptional developments in the neurotechnology area.”

It is a delirium that only Lucifer can conceive, and it is destined to complete failure because of it Antichristic matrix, its defying of the divine Kingship of Jesus Christ. It is a delirium where the creature, rebelling against the divine laws, pretends to reach the place of the Highest and repeats, with the same disgraceful determination, the “Non serviam” (“I will not serve”) of Lucifer.

Satan is simia Dei (“an ape of God”): in everything that he does to keep us away from God and drag us toward Hell, we can always see his mocking attempt to imitate the Savior, to usurp His sovereignty, to pervert His teachings and to steal souls from Him. The Devil wants to be worshipped in the place of God. He wants the Antichrist to rule over the world and subjugate mankind to his tyranny by replacing the Church of Christ with the anti-Church of Satan, which is the Religion of Mankind, an ecumenical and ecological one.

In your videos and articles, you have spoken about the threat represented by the New World Order (NWO). Several statesmen and prime ministers, such as George H. Bush, Henry Kissinger, Nicolas Sarkozy, and David Rockefeller – just to name a few– used this expression in their public statements. These politicians describe the NWO as a sort of “Eden” we all should aim for. During the COVID crisis, we have been often hearing these words. Can you explain the idea that drives the New World Order and why the vaccines play a very important role in the fulfillment of this goal?

 The New World Order is neither New nor Order: it represents the foolish ambition of Satan to overthrow the providential plan of God, to cancel the true Religion that leads to eternal salvation and finally to replace the “ordo christianus” (“the Christian order”) with infernal chaos. In this disorder, the lie replaces the Truth, injustice and abuse of power replace justice, whim instead of obedience to the law of God, death instead of life, illness instead of health, the legitimization of Evil and the condemnation of Good, the persecution of good people and the praising of evil ones, ignorance in the place of culture and wisdom, ugliness and horror instead of beauty, division and hatred instead of harmony and love. Satan doesn’t want to be worshipped by adopting the qualities of God, but by demanding to be an object of adoration through everything that is evil, obscene, false, absurd, and monstrous. He seeks complete subversion, a subversion ontologically devilish and Antichristic: a “New Order” obtained by means of a global coup d’état imposed under the guise of an engineered planned emergency.

The vaccine campaign, lacking any scientific validity, serves first of all as the apparent legitimization for implementing global tracking and controls, today under the pretext of limiting COVID spread (a pretext which is false, because, among other reasons, the vaccinated can still become infected and be contagious). But tomorrow, this campaign aims to expand its reach, extending the “Green Pass” to include information used in a “social credit system” to confront a “green emergency,” which will be likewise false and specious. The “Green Pass” is being conceived as something like the Mark of the Beast mentioned in the Apocalypse of Saint John to allow or forbid people to buy, sell, travel, spend, eat and live.

Secondly, the inoculation of people with an experimental genic serum that provokes a weakening of our natural immune system represents a very grave crime, because it turns ordinary healthy people into chronically ill people, and consequently into customers of the health care companies and private care. This situation hugely inflates the profits of the globalist élite and brings a general impoverishment of the population. Even this aspect, apparently secondary, reveals the subversive character of the “Great Reset,” because the “Great Reset” does not represent only an attack against the health of an individual, but also an attack against the national security of the States, because their armed forces are harmed by the side effects of the vaccine, while the not-vaccinated soldiers are banned from active duty. I think that this is a point not enough considered by those who are analyzing the present crisis, and it shows the malice of those who. Once in power, cooperate for the destruction of nations in order to subjugate them to the New Order.

Speaking again about the New World Order, Your Excellency said in one of your videos that Vatican II played a fundamental role in the early 1960s in paving the way for this plan. In this regard, the Council may be considered as the event that built a “new liberal Church” separated from the Catholic tradition. This “liberal Church” has embraced the spirit of the modern world, rather than trying to contain it. Essentially, the institution that should have been the “katechon,” the force that impeded the manifestation of the Antichrist, instead became the spokesman and promoter of the Antichrist. Is it possible to say the masonic forces that infiltrated the Church planned this transition? Do you think that the present Church is living the apostasy predicted by Leo XIII in 1884, and predicted by other relevant prophecies such as the ones of Fatima in 1917 and Akita in 1973?

As one of the main characters of Vatican II (1962-1965), Cardinal Leo Joseph Suenens said, the conciliar revolution represented “the 1789 of the Catholic Church” [Editor’s note: The year 1798 was the beginning of the French Revolution which overthrew the entire pre-French Revolution society.] In this view, ever since Vatican II, the Church has embraced the revolutionaries’ principles, liberal ideology, Communism, collectivism, and more generally “the spirit of the world”; gender theory, and the dissolution of Christianity, not only in the doctrinal area but also in the moral and cultural area, that is, as the vital element of Christian Civilization. This betrayal was accomplished in ways not unlike the ones that were used by the masonic Lodges against the Catholic Monarchies, and it was realized through an infiltration plan that was unfolded on two fronts: one ideological, and one practical.

On the ideological side, we witnessed the corruption of orthodoxy through heresies and philosophical errors of which we are still suffering the nefarious consequences; on the practical side, we witnessed the corruption of people’s morality, subjecting individuals to passions to dominate them, enslaving them to their own vices in order to blackmail them, promoting the most corrupt to the highest posts of institutions which, through their outrageous conduct, were delegitimized and discredited. What kind of credibility may the Church claim in matters of moral sexuality when its highest prelates are corrupt perverts? What kind of credibility may the Church claim, when officials of the Holy See are implicated in financial scandals and obscure market speculations?

Therefore, a return to Tradition is necessary, and to those values that have today been removed and forgotten, such as honesty, the sense of duty, fidelity, love of Country, honor, discipline. It would be a return to the ordo christianus in the civil sphere, which would involve a radical reform of the States; the same should be done in the ecclesial sphere with the removal of the false pastors and the restoration of everything that was destroyed by the ideological fury of Vatican II. If we want to end the hard test that Providence is demanding of us, it is fundamental that we remove the cause of the chastisements that the Lord is inflicting upon us. And the inner cause is this entire Antichristic system that was conceived by masonic principles and by the Revolution.

We must restore authority as an expression of the power of Christ, and we must give a moral and spiritual education to those who govern us. It is certainly a hard task, but we should do it if we really want to transmit to our children the values that make them good Christians and good citizens, accountable before God and desirous of obeying Him, of proclaiming Him King, and of giving Him public honors. Once we have acknowledged Him again as King, Our Lord will not allow His children to perish in battle, and He will reward them with a great victory. However, until we understand the error that lies at the base of the present horrors, we cannot hope in the intervention of God.

 Recently, Bergoglio has clearly said that it will be necessary to give birth to the “Great Reset,” and he has also pointed out that there will not be a return to normal. Bergoglio has turned himself into an apostle of the universal religion desired by the masonic lodges, whose ultimate goal is to completely remove Christianity. Does it have sense to state that Bergoglio is the natural conclusion of Vatican II? Do you think that the apostasy of the Church, which was foreseen in several prophecies and in the visions of the Venerable Holzhauser, has already reached its peak and is close to its conclusion?

Bergoglio is one of the most convinced adherents of the globalist religion: he embraces all of its goals, he pushes its plans, he promotes its doctrines, and he fights its enemies. If he were not to have the role that he has within the ecclesial hierarchy, he could be considered the prophet of the New World Order and the main enemy of the Church of Christ. The fact that he is universally considered as the head of the Church shows us an evident contradiction, an extremely grave conflict of interests, a blatant betrayal of the authority he possesses.

The same ways that allowed him to replace the outgoing Benedict XVI reveal the intervention of forces hostile to the Church. The manipulations of the so-called Saint Gallen mafia are a direct proof of this hostile intervention, planned beforehand also by the “deep state,” as emerges from the emails of John Podesta, who spoke about a “springtime of the Church” in which the Church would embrace the spirit of the world and abandon the proclamation of the Gospel.

This “pontificate” is the coherent application of the principles of Vatican II, as Bergoglio himself has proudly claimed. Everything that he has said and done since 2013 is aligned with the errors woven into various ambiguous passages of the Conciliar texts, from his intransigent silences to his misleading ambiguities. But like everything that comes from the Devil, this project has no hope to succeed and serves only to allow us to understand a very clear truth that we are still not able to recognize: the only hope of Salvation rests in the complete embracing of the Catholic Faith, as Our Lord taught it to the Apostles and as the Holy Church has proposed it for belief for 2000 years. All the errors, all the attempts to adapt the faith to the mentality of this age, all the compromises to carve out a place for the Church in the world, and all the betrayals in exchange for power come from Satan, and as such are destined to failure.

If Christ the King will return to reign in the Church, even before coming back to reign in civil society, He will grant the Church good and holy Pastors, a courageous Pontiff who will denounce apostasy, fight errors, gather around the Cross of Christ the good. Because the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, is also destined to suffer Her own Passion, but in the dignity and wholeness of Her being, precisely, the Bride of the Immaculate Lamb, and not the concubine of the eternal defeated.

This is why I hope and pray that Providence would grant the world a time of peace and conversion, in order to lead back the Pastors and the Flock to fidelity to the Gospel, so that they will be able to face with dignity the final persecution before the Universal Judgement. If this propitious time were to be ushered in by the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart, I think that we could truly read the present facts in that eschatological vision that finds fulfillment in the victory of Christ over the Devil.

Your Excellency has launched a public appeal in recent days in which you call for the formation of an “anti-globalist Alliance.” Do you think that the headquarters of this alliance should be Italy, a country that is historically hated by Freemasonry and by the globalist powers?

 Italy is a nation blessed by God and by the presence of the papacy. Its civilization — represented by the historical, cultural and artistic legacy of its cities, but also united in the bond of the Catholic Faith – has always been the object of the dissolving action of satan and his servants. Freemasonry hates Italy, hates its glorious history, which is intrinsically tied to the birth of Christianity, first, and then its later spread. Freemasonry also hates the traditions of this country, which are impregnated by Christianity, hates its art, deeply Christian, hates its culture and civilization, which is an eloquent voice of the power of the Faith in influencing every walk of life. It hates its Saints, who through their preaching and their example drew away from hell millions of souls; it hates its people, whose character seems still to hint to show that authenticity and passion that is profoundly  Catholic, expressed by small gestures, by generosity, by a moral sense that is truly Christian.

 This is why I believe Italy should have a key role in the opposition against the tyranny of the New Order, by proposing itself as a natural headquarters for this World Anti-Globalist Alliance. And considering the fact that the return of a Catholic Monarch seems quite hard to imagine in this moment, I think that the form of government of the pre-Union Communes and States [Editor’s note: the form of government of the Italian city states prior to the uniton of Italy in 1870] could greatly inspire those who would like a reform of Italian civil society aligned with Christian principles and, at the same time, compatible with the needs of modern society. In this regard, I think in particular at The Allegory of Good Government fresco in Siena’s town hall [Palazzo Comunale], in which the theological Virtues enlighten and guide the cardinal and civic Virtues.

Many people are suffering serious personal problems due to the discrimination caused by the “Green Pass” that was enforced by Draghi’s government. Many people are giving up their jobs and salaries to avoid taking this vaccination, and many others are protesting in the streets against this unprecedented authoritarian society. What would you like to say to those who are suffering the consequences of this dystopic society and to those who are giving in to loss of hope, indeed, to desperation?

I would like to answer with the words of Our Lord: “I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world (John, 16, 33).

To those who are suffering their own discrimination and the one of their beloved ones; to those who were forced to take a vaccination because the civil authority shamefully blackmailed them, with the outrageous complicity of the ecclesial authority; to those who with courage refuse to surrender to illegitimate and tyrannical laws; to those who are deprived of their means of support due to their coherence, I say this: you are the proof that the strength and the violence of Evil can possibly affect you in your belongings, in your body and in your family; but they cannot ever, ever, strip away from you the peace of having stayed loyal to the Lord.

Do you think that the martyrs were people gifted with special powers? The real martyrs were, are, and will be persons like you and I, persons with a thousand flaws maybe, but driven by the love for Christ, that is, driven by Charity, who are ready to sacrifice their lives in order to not renounce that supernatural and divine love. And if they were able, with the help of God, to face death accompanied by horrible pains, do you think that you today are not able, under the mantle of the most holy Virgin Mary, to stand up against these tyrants, as cruel as they are cowardly? Feel honored by the privilege that is granted to you of meriting Heaven: your fidelity, your strength against the impositions of a hostile power, will merit you the help and protection of Heaven even in the littlest things.

Remain in the Grace of God, which is the only good that no one can ever take away from you: all the rest will be in the hands of Her whom we invoke as the Help of Christians. And when the Virgin intervenes, Hell trembles.

source: https://web.archive.org/web/20211203160334/https://www.theyeoftheneedle.com/2021/12/03/viganothose-who-resist-the-nwo-will-have-the-help-and-protection-of-god/

Video 2

ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANÒ | FULL INTERVIEW | PLANET LOCKDOWN

In this exclusive interview we were able to speak with Carlo Maria Viganò, an Archbishop of the Catholic Church. Although not Catholic ourselves, we were struck by the archbishop’s release of the most encompassing text on the myriad issues related to the Covid-19 saga to date last May of 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lEIDfMfS0I&t=14s

He has been in secret seclusion for the last 4 years over a combination of his speaking out against corruption in the church and entering retirement. His detractors accuse him of personal ambitions, but regardless, the man has a powerful message and is one of the most contemporary controversial and critics of our our current situation and of the Catholic political hierarchy. We asked him about the current situation and how can we historically understand it in context. It is a must listen to understand where we are today.

The interview was done remotely with prerecorded questions and in this release Robert Moynihan is the host.

The interview runs one and a half hours and is dense. We would like to encourage people to broaden their intellects and perspectives and is why we release full interviews to encourage a more thoughtful discourse.

VATICAN ANNOUNCES TODAY THAT POPE FRANCIS, THE KING OF VATICAN CITY, WILL TAKE THE PFIZER COVID-19 VACCINE, SAYS IT ‘MUST BE UNIVERSAL’ FOR WHOLE WORLD

The Vatican will launch its vaccination program against the coronavirus during the first quarter of 2021, which will also allow the pope to travel safely to Iraq in March. The vaccination will not be mandatory for Vatican workers and residents, noted the head of the Vatican’s health department, Andrea Arcangeli, but will be made available for anyone who wishes to receive it. “It must be universal, for everyone,” he said. The pope has reiterated that in the race to produce a coronavirus vaccine, successful results must be shared by all.

by Geoffrey Grider

The Vatican has announced that Pope Francis will receive the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine in January, which will also be made available to the 800 residents and nearly 3,000 workers of the Roman Vatican City state.

The king of Vatican City, Jorge Bergoglio, has announced that he will receive the Pfizer COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine in early January, and that it is his desire this vaccine become universal, and given to everyone in the whole world. This is nothing more than grooming for the coming Mark of the Beast which will also be distributed by the Vatican in the very near future.

“For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.” Revelation 17:17,18 (KJB)

The Vatican did not say if Pope Francis will pretend to receive his vaccine jab publicly like Netanyahu and Pence did last week, or if his pretend vaccination will happen privately. But does it really matter? It doesn’t. The important thing is that you never forget all this is COVID Theater, it’s not real, but it comes with very real and very deadly consequences.

Pope Francis to Receive Pfizer Vaccine Against Coronavirus

FROM BREITBART NEWS: The Vatican will launch its vaccination program against the coronavirus during the first quarter of 2021, which will also allow the pope to travel safely to Iraq in March. The vaccination will not be mandatory for Vatican workers and residents, noted the head of the Vatican’s health department, Andrea Arcangeli, but will be made available for anyone who wishes to receive it.

The pope has spoken often of the vaccine, emphasizing the need to make sure it reaches the groups that need it most. In September, Francis called for universal distribution of coronavirus vaccines, insisting that the “richest” individuals should not be first in line to receive them.

“The recent experience of the pandemic, in addition to a major health emergency in which almost a million people have already died, is turning into a serious economic crisis, still giving rise to poor people and families who do not know how to move forward,” the pope said. “While charitable assistance is being carried out, it is also a question of combating this pharmaceutical poverty, in particular with a widespread distribution of new vaccines in the world,” he continued. “I repeat that it would be sad if the richest people got priority when giving out the vaccine, or if this vaccine became the property of this or that nation and was no longer for everyone.”

“IT MUST BE UNIVERSAL, FOR EVERYONE,” HE SAID.

The pope has reiterated that in the race to produce a coronavirus vaccine, successful results must be shared by all.

“Those who live in poverty are poor in everything, including medicines, and therefore their health is more vulnerable,” Francis said. “Sometimes there is the risk of not being able to be treated for lack of money, or because some populations of the world do not have access to certain drugs.”

“On the ethical level, if there is the possibility of curing a disease with a drug, this should be available to everyone, otherwise an injustice is created,” he declared. “Too many people, too many children still die in the world because they cannot have a drug or a vaccine available in other regions.”

According to a September survey by the Pew Research Center, nearly half of the U.S. population would not accept a coronavirus vaccine if one became available.

“About half of U.S. adults (51%) now say they would definitely or probably get a vaccine to prevent COVID-19 if it were available today; nearly as many (49%) say they definitely or probably would not get vaccinated at this time,” Pew declared. “Intent to get a COVID-19 vaccine has fallen from 72% in May, a 21 percentage point drop.”

Last Monday, leaders of the U.S. Bishops’ Conference released a controversial statement declaring it a “moral responsibility” for everyone to be vaccinated against the coronavirus. The bishops did not say whether this same moral obligation exists in the case of all vaccines against any possible illness, or how to determine which vaccines are morally compulsory and which are not.

In their statement, the bishops specifically addressed the case of the Pfizer vaccine, declaring that in  view of the gravity of the current pandemic and the lack of availability of alternative vaccines, the  reasons to accept the new COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer are “sufficiently serious” to justify its use, despite its “remote connection to morally compromised cell lines.” In the early stages of testing, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was tested on cells lines produced from cells that originally came from an aborted fetus. The vaccine, however, is not one of those that use abortion-derived cell lines in the manufacturing process.

https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/vatican-announces-today-pope-francis-king-of-vatican-city-will-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/

Nuremberg 2

Nuremberg 2

Nuremberg 2

I offer the following post for your information and interest only with regards to the action taken across the world to legally challenge the Covid fraud and government tyranny. 

I have previously posted a ‘disclaimer’ in some of my previous posts related to this Covid scam which reads as follows:

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

The reason for my anti-activist or anti-resistance stance is due to the fact that I believe what is taking place in the world today with regards to this scam plandemic is part of prophesied end time Biblical events. I believe that what we are witnessing is the rise of the end-time Babylonian world empire as foreshadowed in the book of Genesis with Nimrod’s Tower of Babel.

King Solomon said in the book of Ecclesiastes 1:9 ‘ The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun’

This final world empire is described in the books of Daniel and Revelation as the ten toes or ten horns  of the beast. This final world empire is mans evil attempt to grasp dominion over the whole of humanity in rebellion against the Almighty Creator who had, in the Genesis account, destroyed this type of ‘collective’, godless rulership and dispersed the people acorss the world. 

We witness through the lives of Joseph, Daniel and our Messiah Yahushua that they did not resist the governmental powers during their time and in fact Yahushua rebuked Peter for attempting to interfere in the Divine plan of the Almighty. We read of this event in Matthew 16:

21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Again in John 18 we read how Peter took it upon himself to interfere with divine destiny:

10 Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus. 11 Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?

We must learn the lesson from these accounts and understand that our Heavenly Father uses  the wicked rulers of this world for His purposes and often to chastise His people and draw them back, though persecution and trials, to Him.

The Almighty even called the tyrant Nebuchadnezzar His ‘servant’ in Jeremiah 27:6 and 43:10. This was because Nebuchadnezzar was used to serve the Almighty’s overall and greater purpose. However, when this purpose was completed; Nebuchadnezzar was brought down. The same will happen to this final world empire when the divine timing and plan reaches the fullness of time. This is foretold in Revelation:

  And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.

Revelation 14:8

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

Revelation 18:2  

For those Christians who believe that they must fight the battle for justice on behalf of the Almighty please bear the following verse in mind:

‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.’

Revelation 17:17  

  ‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will’ 

It could be that your self-righteous actions are in direct conflict with the will and divine plan of the Almighty Father. When we come across a verse with a double numerical reference, in this case 17:17, this should draw special attention to what is being stated.

As faithful believers we must stand firm in faith, adhere to the Biblical commandments and continue to be a light to the nations. This is all that we are required to do. The wise man Solomon put it to us this way:

Ecclisiastes 12:13  Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

Having stated the above, I must clarify that like Daniel, there is a line that I will not cross in terms of following the Covid rules and regulations. I will not participate in the supposed vaccine program at all. What is fraudulantly called a Covid vaccine is not a vaccine by definition. Or at least according to the definition before the CDC changed it to allign with this Covid jab.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention modified its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website. Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” 

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html#storylink=cpy

It was traditionally explained that a small sample of the virus would have been included in the vaccine to enable the body to build up aantiboied against the weakened/smaller viral load. In this way the body would be able and ready to ward off a greater attack from the same virus. This is however not the case with the covid virus as this virus has never been identified and isolated in terms of Koch’s postualtes. Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease. 

Koch’s Postulates

Developed in the 19th century, Robert Koch’s postulates are the four criteria designed to assess whether a microorganism causes a disease. As originally stated, the four criteria are:

(1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals;

(2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual;

(3) Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulated the disease; and finally

(4) The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism.

Koch’s postulates have been critically important in establishing the criteria whereby the scientific community agrees that a microorganism causes a disease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775492/

‘Koch’s postulates’ was never followed in the Covid pandemic process. ‘If you have worked your way through my ‘Babylon Rising’ series you will also understand that no virus has ever satisfied Koch’s postulates because viruses are not the cause of disease. It is all a lot of voodoo science. Anyway here is another ‘traditional’ definition of a vaccine:

Vaccination: Injection of a killed microbe in order to stimulate the immune system against the microbe, thereby preventing disease. Vaccinations, or immunizations, work by stimulating the immune system, the natural disease-fighting system of the body. The healthy immune system is able to recognize invading bacteria and viruses and produce substances (antibodies) to destroy or disable them. Immunizations prepare the immune system to ward off a disease. To immunize against viral diseases, the virus used in the vaccine has been weakened or killed. https://www.medicinenet.com/vaccination/definition.htm

We are told that the Covid ‘vaccine’ neither protects you from the virus or prevents you from spreading it. It is useless. The Covid jab is an experimental gene therapy injectable and a sinister one at that. I do not believe that our Heavenly Father would condone anyone taking a vaccine. Science and the medical professionhas become a ‘god’ in this world with many Christians putting all their faith in it. I believe that ‘science’ is the new global religion that the ‘globalists’ want everyone to submit to in a form of reverence and worship.

How often have you heard it proclaimed from the mouths of the medical, scientific and political leaders that we must ‘listen to the science’ and ‘follow the science’?

Well, as for me, I listen to my Heavenly Father through His Word and I follow my Messiah Yahushua. The Creator of the universe is my God whom I listen to and I follow His Son.

My ‘god’ is not science.

As for wearing a mask, it is very seldom that I wear one as I resist places that require me to put one on. I do however wear one for very short intervals every now and then even though I understand that they are more detrimental to one’s health and reflect ones obedience to the rulers rather than provide any safety from a non-existent contagion.

Although we must expose evil (Ephesians 5:11) and not participate in any way with this evil plot, we must not assume that it is our duty to wage war against the evil rulers and ungodly practices in this world.  Justice and righteousness will only return and prevail in this world when the allotted time arrives and the Sovereign Father rules through His Son  – Yahushua. 

I believe that we are now very close to this time which is the seventh and final day or the seven thousandth year period i.e. the Millennium reign of the Messiah.

Until then I will continue to watch the signs with keen interest and will try my very best to wait patiently.

‘And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them’.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

s*(expose, bring to the light)

There are however many moral and upstanding citizens across the world who have decided not to sit back and who have taken it upon themselves to challenge this global tyranny through the legal courts, albeit a newly established ‘fit for purpose’ legal council – ‘Nuremberg 2’.

This post provides some insight into who is behind this legal challenge and the progress made so far.

History

What were the Nuremberg Trials
After the second world war, Allied powers—United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union—came together to form the International Military Tribunal (IMT). From 1945 to 1946, Nazi Germany leaders stood trial for crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes.

APPOINTING THE COURT
In the days before Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945, President Harry S Truman appointed Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H Jackson to be the chief prosecutor representing the United States in the proposed trials for the European Axis powers. Jackson helped lead the Allies—American, British, French, and Soviet governments—to an agreement called the London Charter,setting the procedures for the Nuremberg Trials. The London Agreement created the International Military Tribunal (IMT) on August 8, 1945, where each of the four Allied nations appointed a judge and a prosecution team. 

Lord Justice Geoffrey Lawrence of Great Britain would serve as the court’s presiding judge. The proceedings would be simultaneously translated into English, French, German, and Russian. The trial would make history being the first of its kind with judges from four countries. 

NUREMBERG, GERMANY 
During the Moscow Conference on October 30, 1943, the Declaration of Atrocities was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin stating:

“The United Kingdom, the United States and the Soviet Union have received from many quarters evidence of atrocities, massacres and cold-blooded mass executions which are being perpetrated by Hitlerite forces in many of the countries they have overrun . . . those German officers and men and members of the Nazi party who have been responsible for or have taken a consenting part in the above atrocities, massacres and executions will be sent back to the countries in which their abominable deeds were done in order that they may be judged and punished according to the laws of these liberated countries and of free governments which will be erected therein…”
Nuremberg, Germany was chosen as the location of the trials for being a focal point of Nazi propaganda rallies leading up to the war. The Allies wanted Nuremberg to symbolize the death of Nazi Germany. The court convened in the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg that was previously expanded by German prisoners to fit up to 1,200 detainees. 

INDICTMENT
The indictment of 24 Nazi government officials and organizations was filed on October 18, 1945 by the four chief prosecutors of the International Military Tribunal: Robert H Jackson of the United States, Sir Hartley Shawcross of Great Britain, Francois de Menthon of France, and Roman A Rudenko of the Soviet Union. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal included crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The IMT defined crimes against humanity as “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation…or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds.” 

The indictment was read on November 20, 1945 with 21 defendants appearing in court. The suicides of top Nazi leaders such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, and Heinrich Himmler prevented them from standing trial. Head of the German Labor Front, Robert Ley, committed suicide the day before the trial. 

THE TRIAL
Between November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946, the Tribunal tried 24 of the most important military and political leaders of the Third Reich and heard evidence against 21 of the defendants. During the trial, the Tribunal—and the world—learned about the the Nazi Party and its “planning, initiating and waging of aggressive war” from the beginning. Footage of Nazi concentration camps taken by Allied military photographers during liberation was shown to the court. The graphic scenes of what had taken place in Europe were the most powerful evidence presented at the trial. Other memorable moments of the trial were the screenings of the Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps and The Nazi Plan films, the detailed description of the Final Solution, the murders of prisoners of war, atrocities in extermination camps, and countless cruel acts to prosecute Jews. 

VERDICT AND EXECUTIONS
On October 1, 1946, the Tribunal convicted 19 of the defendants and acquitted three. Of those convicted, 12 were sentenced to death. Three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and four to prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years. On October 16, executions were carried out by hanging in the gymnasium of the courthouse. Hermann Göring committed suicide the night before his execution. In 1947, the prisoners sentenced to incarceration were sent to Spandau Prison in Berlin.

SUBSEQUENT NUREMBERG TRIALS 
From December 1946 to April 1949, a series of twelve additional military tribunals for war crimes against Nazi Germany leaders were held by the United States in the Palace of Justice. The defendants were 177 high-ranking physicians, judges, industrialists, SS commanders and police commanders, military personnel, civil servants, and diplomats. The trials uncovered the German leadership that supported the Nazi dictatorship. Of the 177 defendants, 24 were sentenced to death, 20 to lifelong imprisonment, and 98 other prison sentences. Twenty five defendants were found not guilty. Many of the prisoners were released early in the 1950s as a result of pardons. Thirteen of the 24 death sentences were executed.

source: https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/topics/nuremberg-trials

10 Standards of the Nuremberg Code

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.

Introduction

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.

This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.

This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.

The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

source: https://edcdeveloper.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/bmj-no-7070-volume-313-the-nuremberg-code.pdf

Nuremberg 2

The greatest Nuremberg of all time is on its way

(NB: translated from German)

17/02/2021

By Jean-Michel Grau

Right now, a second Nuremberg tribunal that is in preparation, with a class action lawsuit being set up under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide behind the American-German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who is prosecuting those responsible for the Covid-19 scandal manipulated by the Davos Forum.

In this respect, it is worth recalling that Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who succeeded in condemning the automobile giant Volkswagen in the case of the tampered catalytic converters. And it is this same lawyer who succeeded in condemning Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise.

According to Reiner Fuellmich, all the frauds committed by German companies are derisory compared to the damage that the Covid-19 crisis has caused and continues to cause. This Covid-19 crisis should be renamed the “Covid-19 Scandal” and all those responsible should be prosecuted for civil damages due to manipulations and falsified test protocols. Therefore, an international network of business lawyers will plead the biggest tort case of all time, the Covid-19 fraud scandal, which has meanwhile turned into the biggest crime against humanity ever committed.

A Covid-19 commission of enquiry has been set up on the initiative of a group of German lawyers with the aim of bringing an international class action lawsuit using Anglo-Saxon law.

Here is the summarized translation of the last communication of Dr. Fuellmich of 15/02/2021

“The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue. Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt “Davos clique” by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.”

………………………………

According to the Nuremberg Code (1947),

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”

If your employer compels you to take the COVID-19 vaccine, invoke the following statement:

NOTICE: By authority of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, I do hereby exercise my right to refuse to submit to or to administer the COVID-19 vaccine.

The United States Government has prosecuted, convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation.

Aiders and abettors of Nuremberg Crimes are equally guilty and have also been prosecuted, convicted, and executed.

Dr Francis Boyle wrote the US Bio-medical Weapons Treaty > into American Law.

Dr. Francis Boyle wrote the above by mass request of “we the people”

Dr. Francis Boyle wrote the above as an actual Legal Defense for any and all civil attorneys _ to present to the Judge _ to remove any legal demands on the human subject

 

VIOLATION OF ANY 1 OF THESE 10 NUREMBERG CODES CARRIES A PENALTY OF DEATH.

SO BE IT.

They have violated all 10. If you are seeing this and have been a part of this, EVEN SOMEONE STANDING AT A DOOR TO A FACILITY ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENT A MASK FOR ENTRY ETC. you are guilty. If I have it my way you will hang. I don’t care who you are. I don’t care what our relationship might be. If you are guilty, I will seek the death penalty for you. As far as I am concerned there is no reason or excuse that will save you. You need to die like so many before you. In my mind it is that simple. I will show you NO MERCY. Don’t tell me you were “just doing your job”. Don’t tell me you were “just following orders”. I don’t care if you were ignorant, stupid, lied to, fooled, brainwashed have shit for brains or whatever else you say. If you are guilty, You need to hang.
Source: Greg Reese.

Reiner Füllmich:
Dr Reiner Füllmich is an international trial lawyer who has successfully 
sued large fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank. 
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will lead over 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 medical specialists 
and sue CDC, WHO and Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Update from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on progress

6th January 2022

Video 1

Dr. Fuellmich provides clear and rational analysis of today’s world wide psychological manipulation applications. CORONA FRAUD SCANDAL CASE.

DR. REINER FUELLMICH

Video 2

International Legal Offensive – Reiner Fuellmich

International Legal Offensive hosted by Reiner Fuellmich and featuring many scientists, professors etc

Video 3

JERM WARFARE INTERVIEWS REINER FUELLMICH

“WE’RE ABOUT TO REACH THE TIPPING POINT”

“I don’t think that all these adverse reactions to the vaccines are part of the plan; they’re trying to rush this thing through, and that’s why so many mistakes are happening.”

The Polish Nuremberg 2 Project

What is the Nuremberg 2.0 project?
The Nuremberg 2.0 project is a civic initiative created from the necessity of the moment and the need of the heart.

What are the goals of the project?
The goal of the project is to activate conscious and responsible Poles to collect historical and legal documentation describing acts of crimes, lawlessness, abuses and omissions of public authority and to document individual tragedies unknown to the wider public today, which you will want to voluntarily share with us.

How are we going to achieve the goals of the project?
We will collect and register documentation and individual legal acts will be prepared to formulate charges and indict specific persons directly or indirectly responsible for the committed crimes.  We will also register professional archival documentation and on its basis, we will publish historical journals under the collective name of “Journals Nuremberg 2.0”.

What was the reason for setting up the project?
As a consequence of the decisions of the Polish government, and in particular of the Ministry of Health and its subordinate agencies, many human injustices and grievances were caused and the victims were primarily Poles – citizens of the Republic of Poland.

Where does the name of our project come from?
The Nuremberg 2.0 project recalls the trial known from the history: the National Socialist system of the Third Reich was tried for the crimes committed by those who represented policies and rules implemented by this system . The name of our project is purely symbolic.

Video 4

Poland House of Representatives’ Investigation Committee: inauguration with dr Reiner Füllmich
We cordially invite you to a live broadcast of the first Republic of Poland Members of Parliament Investigation Committee as part of the Nuremberg 2.0 project with the special guest Dr. Reiner Füllmich attendance. 
The committee will be led by the Member of Parliament Grzegorz Braun and prof. Mirosław Piotrowski, Paweł Skutecki, attorney Jacek Wilk. 
Among other guests attending the committee you can find: attorney Arkadiusz Tetela, attorney Krzysztof Łopatowski and attorney Jarosław Litwin.

About Dr. Reiner Füllmich:
Dr Reiner Füllmich is an international trial lawyer who has successfully 
sued large fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank. 
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will lead over 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 medical specialists 
and sue CDC, WHO and Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Note: the following is a Youtube video and may therefore be removed at aany time due to their ridiculous ‘violation’ rules.

Doctors For Covid Ethics Symposium

Session 4: THE HOUR OF JUSTICE

Home

Video 5

Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics and hosted by UK Column, the COVID-19 Interdisciplinary Symposium took place on July 29th and 30th. Scroll down for links and time codes.

Session IV: THE HOUR OF JUSTICE with Patrick Henningsen, Reiner Fuellmich, Sucharit Bhakdi, Vera Sharav, and Robert F.Kennedy Jr.

00.00 Reviving the Nuremberg Codex
Conversation with Vera Sharav, Sucharit Bhakdi and Catherine Austin Fitts

17.19 The Hour of Justice
With Reiner Füllmich, Vera Sharav, Patrick Henningsen with a pre-recorded contribution from Robert F.Kennedy Jr.

48.13 https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/aiovg_videos/a-message-of-hope-and-freedom-robert-f-kennedy-jr/

50.38 Final Panel Discussion
with Sucharit Bhakdi, Thomas Binder, Catherine Austin Fitts, Reiner Fuellmich lead by Michael Palmer

2.01.19 Closing Remarks by Sucharit Bhakdi

Corrupt Pharma

Corrupt Pharma

Corrupt Pharma

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

John 8:32

The TRUTH is out.

The veil is lifted on this global Covid scamdemic. Read Robert Kennedy’s new book ‘ The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy‘ and find how these monsters have conspired, with big pharma and government officials, to deceive the worlds population into recieving a totally unnecessary injection – fraudulently referred to as a vaccine.

How long will it be before Dr Reiner Fuellmich (German American Lawyer and Doctor) and Robert F Kennedy Jr succeed in exposing this plandemic fraud in the highest courts in the world?

In this post:

– Big Pharma and Medical Device Manufacturers –

Recommended Books:

 – The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health –

 – Bad Pharma: How Medicine is Broken, and How We Can Fix It –

Video:

PLAGUE & THE BIG PHARMA MAFIA

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS

Additional Reading:

PHARMAKEIA: PRESCRIPTION FOR GLOBAL DECEPTION

The Satanic Agenda

Big Pharma and Medical Device Manufacturers
Big Pharma is the nickname given to the world’s pharmaceutical industry. It also includes the trade group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Big Pharma and medical device companies make billions of dollars every year. They’ve also spent billions on fines, settlements and jury verdicts.

Big Pharma is one of the most powerful industries in the world. The global revenue for pharmaceuticals was over $1 trillion in 2014. But nowhere else in the world do the drug and medical device industries have as much power and make as much money as in the U.S.

Six of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies for 2017 have their headquarters in the U.S. These include Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, Amgen and AbbVie.

But only 28 percent of Americans have a good opinion of Big Pharma. In fact, Big Pharma is the second most hated industry in America. It’s right behind the tobacco industry and the oil, gas and chemical industry.

Big Pharma is also the biggest defrauder of the Federal Government under the False Claims Act, according to consumer watchdog group Public Citizen.

The industry has a history of fraud, bribery, lawsuits and scandals. Despite criminal charges and fines, Big Pharma companies continue to do business.

What Is Big Pharma?
Big Pharma is a term for the world’s largest publicly traded pharmaceutical companies.

The biggest drug companies may also have subsidiaries that manufacture medical devices. Medical devices can be anything from syringes to hip and knee implants.

Prescription drugs and devices manufactured by these companies bring in billions in profits.

Pharmaceutical companies are usually larger than companies that focus on medical devices alone. Drug companies also tend to make more money.

Big Pharma Net Worth
By 2021, Big Pharma profits for prescription drugs are expected to reach $610 billion.

Medical devices are also lucrative. The U.S. makes about $148 billion, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. That’s about half of the world’s share of the market.
Americans spent $457 billion on prescription drugs in 2015. Drug prices continue to rise.
Americans spent an all-time high of $457 billion on prescription drugs in 2015. And drug pricescontinue to rise.

Consulting firm Segal Consulting expects drug prices to rise 11.6 percent in 2017. This estimate is for Americans under the age of 65.

In contrast, wages are only expected to rise 2.5 percent. This means many Americans won’t be able to afford their medications.

 

Who Owns Big Pharma?
Well, the better question is: Who does Big Pharma own?

Big Pharma contributes heavily to the annual budget of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Big Pharma does this through application fees (user fees) for its new products.

Experts say the industry contributes about two thirds of the FDA’s budget.

Big Pharma also uses its profits and an army of 1,378 paid lobbyists to spread its influence on Capitol Hill.

 

BIG PHARMA SPENDING
For every $1 spent on ‘basic research,’ Big Pharma spends $19 on promotions and advertising.
Source: BMJ 

 

From 1998 to 2016, Big Pharma spent nearly $3.5 billion on lobbying expenses — more than any other industry.

In 2016 alone, it spent about $246 million. That’s more than the defense industries and corporate business lobbyists combined.

Medical device manufacturers also have a lobbying group. Medical Device Manufacturers Association contributed $1.2 million in lobbying funds in 2016.

Its efforts concentrate on medical-device-friendly bills in Congress. They mostly relate to how companies pay taxes.

Critics say Big Pharma relies on manipulative tactics to increase sales. They say it uses expensive advertising to sway lawmakers, FDA and the public.

Notable Big Pharma Scandals
The long road to a Vioxx recall is arguably one of the most notable Big Pharma scandals in U.S. history.

Merck announced a voluntary worldwide recall of its painkiller in 2004. It came four years after evidence linked the drug to significant health risks.

The company’s executives decided not to study Vioxx’s cardiovascular risks. The FDA later found the drug may cause an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.
Merck paid the U.S. Department of Justice $950 million to resolve criminal charges related to the marketing and sales of Vioxx.
One agency scientist, Dr. David Graham, estimated that the use of Vioxx may have contributed to more than 27,000 heart attacks or deaths.

Both Merck and the FDA came under Congressional scrutiny.

In 2011, Merck pleaded guilty to criminal charges related to the marketing and sales of Vioxx. The company agreed to pay the U.S. Department of Justice $950 million to resolve its misconduct.

Merck settled with tens of thousands of injured patients in 2007. Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to plaintiffs and their families.

 

Top Big Pharma Lawsuit Verdicts and Settlements
In a 24-year period, Big Pharma companies paid 373 settlements for marketing fraud. The settlements totaled $35.7 billion.

Public Citizen published this data in 2013. It called its report Pharmaceutical Industry Settlements: 1991 through 2015.

In 2012, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) agreed to a $3 billion settlement. It was the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history.

The charges stemmed from certain prescription drugs, including Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia. GSK still ranks in the top ten for its pharmaceutical drug profits.

Johnson & Johnson is the world’s largest health care company. It paid $2.2 billion in 2013 for improperly marketing its drug Risperdal.

Big Pharma companies were also hit with million- and billion-dollar verdicts. These verdicts rarely impact the companies’ profits.

A jury ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly to pay $9 billion in 2014. The award went to an Actos user who developed bladder cancer.

Takeda still reported an underlying revenue growth of 6.7 percent in 2017. Eli Lilly saw sales of $22.87 billion the same year.

Talcum Powder Settlements and Verdicts
Johnson & Johnson faces nearly 20,500 federal talcum powder lawsuits and many more in state courts alleging Johnson’s Baby Powder and its other talc products led to ovarian cancer, according to the September 15, 2020 MDL statistics report from the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Plaintiffs have been awarded billions in jury verdicts, though some have been overturned. A St. Louis jury awarded $4.69 billion to 22 women, and this remains the largest single verdict so far.

Johnson & Johnson announced it would stop selling its talcum powder products in the Unites States and Canada in May 2020.

Billions in Hip Implant Settlements
Companies have paid billions in hip implant lawsuit settlements to people who claim they were injured by metal-on-metal hip implants.

The largest settlement came from DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson company. The implant maker paid about $4 billion to settle 8,000 ASR hip claims in 2013.

Bayer Settles Essure Lawsuits
In August 2020, Bayer agreed to pay $1.6 billion to resolve about 90 percent of 39,000 Essure birth control claims. Bayer stopped selling the device in December 2018, but providers could still implant Essure up to one year from the device’s purchase date.

source: https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturers/

WRITTEN BY Kristin Compton

The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

(Children’s Health Defense)

– Robert F. Kennedy Jr. –

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr is the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice.

Mr. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times’ bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto, as well as in the DuPont Case that inspired the movie “Dark Waters” (2019).

Pharma-funded mainstream media has convinced millions of Americans that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a hero. He is anything but.

As director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Anthony Fauci dispenses $6.1 billion in annual taxpayer-provided funding for scientific research, allowing him to dictate the subject, content, and outcome of scientific health research across the globe. Fauci uses the financial clout at his disposal to wield extraordinary influence over hospitals, universities, journals, and thousands of influential doctors and scientists—whose careers and institutions he has the power to ruin, advance, or reward.

During more than a year of painstaking and meticulous research, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unearthed a shocking story that obliterates media spin on Dr. Fauci . . . and that will alarm every American—Democrat or Republican—who cares about democracy, our Constitution, and the future of our children’s health.

The Real Anthony Fauci reveals how “America’s Doctor” launched his career during the early AIDS crisis by partnering with pharmaceutical companies to sabotage safe and effective off-patent therapeutic treatments for AIDS. Fauci orchestrated fraudulent studies, and then pressured US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators into approving a deadly chemotherapy treatment he had good reason to know was worthless against AIDS. Fauci repeatedly violated federal laws to allow his Pharma partners to use impoverished and dark-skinned children as lab rats in deadly experiments with toxic AIDS and cancer chemotherapies.

In early 2000, Fauci shook hands with Bill Gates in the library of Gates’ $147 million Seattle mansion, cementing a partnership that would aim to control an increasingly profitable $60 billion global vaccine enterprise with unlimited growth potential. Through funding leverage and carefully cultivated personal relationships with heads of state and leading media and social media institutions, the Pharma-Fauci-Gates alliance exercises dominion over global health policy.

The Real Anthony Fauci details how Fauci, Gates, and their cohorts use their control of media outlets, scientific journals, key government and quasi-governmental agencies, global intelligence agencies, and influential scientists and physicians to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19 virulence and pathogenesis, and to muzzle debate and ruthlessly censor dissent.

 

 

Editorial Reviews

“Dr. Joseph Goebbels wrote that ‘A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.’ Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Fauci and his minions. RFK Jr exposes the decades of lies.”
—Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate

“Bobby Kennedy is one of the bravest and most uncompromisingly honest people I’ve ever met. Someday he’ll get credit for it. In the meantime, read this book.”
—Tucker Carlson

“As a trial lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken on the world’s most powerful corporations and held them accountable for harming people and the environment. Those companies denied any wrongdoing—but time and again, judges and juries were persuaded that Kennedy’s position was the right one. Kennedy’s information should always be considered, and agree or disagree, we all learn from listening.”
—Tony Robbins, New York Times bestselling author

“Bobby Kennedy and I famously disagree about many aspects of the current debates surrounding Covid and vaccines. We also disagree about Dr Fauci. But I always learn when I read or hear Bobby’s take. So read this book and challenge its conclusions.”
—Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School; author of The Case for Vaccine Mandates 

“If you have any interest in doing a deep dive into the more than 100-year history of what led up to the COVID-19 pandemic, then The Real Anthony Fauci is an absolute must-read. In addition to exposing Fauci, the book reveals the complex web of connections between Gates and Big Pharma and many of the most important players that were responsible for seeking to implement global tyranny and profit enormously from the propaganda behind the COVID injections, masks, and lockdowns.”
—Dr. Joseph Mercola, founder of Mercola.com

“Bobby Kennedy’s book on The Real Anthony Fauci speaks truth in times when health care becomes health harm, untruth rules through anti-science and fake news.”
—Dr. Vandana Shiva, director of Navdanya and author of Oneness vs. the 1%

“I thought I understood what was going on from an insider POV. But this is mind-blowing. Anthony Fauci is playing precisely the strategy that he developed and tested during the HIV days. Bobby is on fire in this manuscript. The depth of information and facts, all carefully cited, is mind-blowing. It is a must-read. I think it will really help clarify what has been going down here. Thanks to the consistently dysfunctional COVID-19 response by Fauci and USG/HHS (US Government Health and Human Services Department), we have all become familiar with the terms “regulatory capture” and “Noble Lie.” The personal opinion and bias of Dr. Fauci has been repeatedly substituted for evidence-based medicine, and we are all living with the consequences. But beyond this mundane incompetence, what this book clearly documents are the deeper forces and systemic, pervasive governmental corruption, which have led us to this point. Not since the reign of former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, have we seen such empire building by a corrupt, longstanding federal employee who is long past retirement age. Dr. Fauci’s apparent need to bolster a fragile ego has led to the almost complete systemic corruption of not only US HHS, but the entire world public health system. The consequences will be lasting damage to the reputation of the United States of America, US FDA, and US CDC as honest, independent guardians of public health, which has been carefully nurtured over many decades. The world is now able to clearly see that the US HHS has been captured and compromised by commercial interests. One unintended consequence of allowing and enabling this tragedy will be further erosion in domestic trust in the Public Health System, and in particular, in the entire vaccine enterprise. Global impacts are likely to include accelerating loss of trust in US and western pharmaceutical companies and regulators, and more rapid rise of Asian, Indian, and Middle Eastern pharmaceutical competitors.”
—Robert W. Malone, MD, virologist, immunologist, molecular biologist

“Standing as a pivotal work for the history of science and medicine, this book unveils the astonishing, twisted truth about a man (Fauci) and a corrupt institution (NIH) that have betrayed humanity at every turn in order to achieve profits and power. If the American people knew the truth that’s documented here, they would be marching by the millions, demanding criminal prosecutions of all those who are complicit in these outrageous betrayals of humanity. RFK Jr’s book closes the loop on one of the most disastrous and truly evil schemes in the history of medicine and science. If humanity does not now demand investigations and prosecutions across this vast landscape of science fraud and pathological ‘authority,’ we are truly beyond hope.”
—Mike Adams, a.k.a. the “Health Ranger,” founder of NaturalNews.com

“If you’ve ever wondered why so many good scientists and doctors have been silenced for discoveries that don’t fit the mainstream Big Pharma narrative, look no further than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s tour de force exposé of Anthony Fauci. This book reads like a John Grisham legal thriller. Except that it is not fiction. Read it with your eyes wide open. It’s time the world woke up to the truth.” 
—Christiane Northrup, MD, former assistant clinical professor of Ob/Gyn, University of Vermont College of Medicine; New York Times bestselling author of Women’s Bodies, Women’s Wisdom

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did a great job. I don’t agree with everything, but his case is well laid out and copiously documented. The most disturbing things are the unbelievable financial entanglements, the shoddy treatment of patients in clinical trials, and the culture of intimidation. Overall a very good book and a call to overhaul the CDC/NIH.”
—Dr. Thomas B. Hakes

“To give great responsibility and power to those with no accountability is a recipe for disaster.”
—K Paul Stoller, MD, FACHM, Hyperbaric & Integrative Medicine

“Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” 
—Mahin Khatami, PhD

“Kennedy’s book proves beyond a shadow of doubt what many Americans have come to learn about Fauci: that he has stifled open debate to the point of utter stagnation of biomedical science. Fauci issues knowledge by decree. This most uninquisitive Fauci is far more concerned with being right and with making sure that the solutions adopted to problems come from his circle rather than in discovering fundamental truths, regardless of the completely externalized cost of his ‘solutions.’ The evidence shows plainly that Fauci has been wrong on matters of life and death far more than he has been right. Fauci’s resulting body count is such that he should have a statue erected with him posing and hanging his head in eternal shame. Thanks to this book, historians will mark Fauci down as the most dangerous threat to global public health in the 20th and 21st Centuries.”
—James Lyons-Weiler, biomedical research scientist

“RFK Jr.’s story of Fauci’s failure as the government’s AIDS coordinator is a highly disturbing prologue to his COVID mandate as head of NIAID. So, who is Dr. Fauci in the end? Has American medicine truly become a ‘racket,’ as corrupt as a mafia organization? Does everything in our country turn on the size of the money involved? How can we begin to solve this? The Real Anthony Fauci is a fascinating starting point. RFK Jr. has written a strong, strong book.” 
—Oliver Stone, award-winning director, producer, and screenwriter

“As I read Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s book I thought a discreet and thorough criminal investigation into Fauci should occur. Having observed Fauci’s flip-flops on his statements on the COVID pandemic, coupled with the book’s descriptions by former coworkers as ‘neither a competent manager . . . nor skilled or devoted scientist . . . with a domineering nature toward subordinates and rivals that discouraged dissent, a foundation for an investigation exists. The conduct cited, involving the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices approval of a vaccine and how Fauci and his Pharma partners use their PIs to control the key FDA and CDC panels that license and ‘recommend’ new vaccines, is a red flag that warrants this investigation. The book cites an approval of a vaccine, whereby there was no testing of a vaccine against a placebo in pre-approval trials that is a standard scientific process to ‘predict’ and/or determine risks if the vaccines would avert more injuries than they would cause—and the vaccine was approved. This appears to be similar to what happened with the Covid vaccines. The Covid clinical trials were not in accordance with prescribed regulations. It brought back memories of criminal bid-rigging schemes conducted by Organized Crime in New York City. If an investigation identified intentional rampant fraud, vaccine deaths could be considered murders and the federal forfeitures would be billions of dollars.”  
—Mike Campi, former FBI agent and retired coordinator of the Organized Crime branch of the New York Division

“Who—or what—is the real Anthony Fauci? That may be the most important question facing us today, as We the People struggle to survive the lethal care of ‘America’s Doctor.’ This essential book reveals—at last!—that Dr. Fauci is, on the one hand, a severely twisted person, in his fiendish cunning, vindictiveness, and ruthlessness, a covert blend of Stalin and Iago; and yet, far more importantly, the story of Dr. Fauci’s rise and reign is really all about the absolute corruption of our major institutions—government, medicine, academia, and (above all) the press—by Big Pharma (and the Gates Foundation). Those of us who really do believe in science and democracy, now have this book to help us break his fatal spell on everybody else, and start to rid the world of that corruption.”
—Mark Crispin Miller, professor of media studies at New York University; editor, News from Underground

“RFK Jr is a tireless champion of Americans’ rights to be informed about their medical choices and has been way out front in warning us of the dangers of an out-of-control pharmaceutical industry. In his new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, he turns the same relentless insider scrutiny on an out-of-control bureaucracy.”
—Naomi Wolf, bestselling author of The Beauty Myth, Give Me Liberty, and Outrages

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written the Rosetta Stone that will help the public finally understand the machinations of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and how he has acted as the puppet master of science for the last half-century—pulling the strings of public health and Big Pharma influence and causing both sides of the political aisle to dance to his tune. A must-read to understand the fake news about medicine and therapies, bought and paid for by corporations with billions of dollars at stake.”
—Kent Heckenlively, attorney, science teacher, and New York Times bestselling author

“Throughout history, fear has been used to manipulate and control populations. In a democracy, we have the privilege and responsibility to question the things we are encouraged to fear. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. provides something denied to most Americans in recent years: the opportunity to hear more than one perspective. You can accept or reject the new information in this book—but at least listen.”
—Gavin de Becker, bestselling author of The Gift of Fear

“If you want to understand the role Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the CDC, WHO, intelligence agencies and others played in planning, launching, and profiting from the COVID pandemic, drop what you’re doing and read this powerful and meticulously researched book! Your future, your family’s future, and the future of our democracy are at stake.”
—Ralph Pezzullo, bestselling author of Jawbreaker, Zero Footprint and other books

“At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, a leader rose to the stage, and his soft voice and welcoming smile drew us in, and we trusted him emphatically. After reading Bobby Kennedy’s earth-shattering book, The Real Anthony Fauci, it is clear that our trusted COVID leader shouldn’t be on a pedestal and should instead be on trial. This book is a must-read for anyone wondering why the United States of America refused to mandate wellness and instead pushed a problematic vaccine.”
—Rachael Ross, MD, PhD
About the Author
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the chairman of the board and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense. He is also counsel to Morgan and Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice, and the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times bestseller, Crimes Against Nature, as well as American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family and Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak. Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto, as well as in the DuPont case that inspired the movie Dark Waters (2019).

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1510766804/ref=as_li_qf_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=emedia&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=1510766804&linkId=89bf12f99bdee089cb99ac490373972f

THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI WITH ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.

The Corbett Report

Bad Pharma: How Medicine is Broken, and How We Can Fix It

– Ben Goldacre –

Ben Goldacre is a doctor and science writer who wrote the ‘Bad Science’ column in the Guardian from 2003 to 2011. He has made a number of documentaries for BBC Radio 4, and his first book Bad Science reached Number One in the nonfiction charts, has sold over 500,000 copies. . His second bestselling book, Bad Pharma, was published in 2013.

 

‘Bad Science’ hilariously exposed the tricks that quacks and journalists use to distort science, becoming a 400,000 copy bestseller. Now Ben Goldacre puts the $600bn global pharmaceutical industry under the microscope. What he reveals is a fascinating, terrifying mess.

Doctors and patients need good scientific evidence to make informed decisions. But instead, companies run bad trials on their own drugs, which distort and exaggerate the benefits by design. When these trials produce unflattering results, the data is simply buried. All of this is perfectly legal. In fact, even government regulators withhold vitally important data from the people who need it most. Doctors and patient groups have stood by too, and failed to protect us. Instead, they take money and favours, in a world so fractured that medics and nurses are now educated by the drugs industry.

The result: patients are harmed in huge numbers.

Ben Goldacre is Britain’s finest writer on the science behind medicine, and ‘Bad Pharma’ is the book that finally prompted Parliament to ask why all trial results aren’t made publicly available – this edition has been updated with the latest news from the select committee hearings. Let the witty and indefatigable Goldacre show you how medicine went wrong, and what you can do to mend it.

Review
‘This is a book to make you enraged – properly, bone-shakingly furious – because it’s about how big business puts profits over patient welfare, allows people to die because they don’t want to disclose damning research evidence, and the tricks they play to make sure doctors do not have all the evidence when it comes to appraising whether a drug really works or not. A work of brilliance.’ Max Pemberton, Daily Telegraph

‘This is a brilliant piece of work’ Evening Standard, William Leith

‘This is an important book. Ben Goldacre is angry, and by the time you put ‘Bad Pharma’ down, you should be too.’ New Statesman

‘Nailing the compromise between too much detail and too little, Goldacre’s brilliantly enraging study unpeels how the pharmaceutical giants routinely misrepresent science in their quest for profit.’ Sunday Telegraph

‘What keeps you turning its pages is the accessibility of Goldacre’s writing … his genuine, indignant passion, his careful gathering of evidence and his use of stories, some of them personal, which bring the book to life.’ Luisia Dilner, Guardian

‘This is a book that deserves to be widely read, because anyone who does read it cannot help feeling both uncomfortable and angry.’ Economist

‘’Bad Pharma’ will confirm his status as a thorn in the side of the medical Establishment – Goldacre’s detailed research would be hard for any drug-company executive to contradict’ Lois Rogers, Sunday Times
From the Inside Flap
Paperback. Pub Date :2013-08-29 Pages: 448 Language: English Ben Goldacre puts the 600bn global pharmaceutical industry under the microscope What he reveals is a fascinating. terrifying mess *** Now updated with the latest government responses to the.. bookDoctors and patients need good scientific evidence to make informed decisions. But instead. companies run bad trials on their own drugs. which distort and exaggerate the benefits by design. When these trials produce unflattering results. the data is simply buried. All of this is perfectly legal. In fact. even government regulators withhold vitally important data from the people who need it most. Doctors and patient groups have stood by too. and failed to protect us. Instead. they take money and favours. in a world so fractured that medics and nurses are now educated by the drugs industry.The result: patients are harmed in

PLAGUE & THE BIG PHARMA MAFIA

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS

Plague of Corruption:

Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science (Children’s Health Defense)

“Kent Heckenlively and Judy Mikovits are the new dynamic duo fighting corruption in science.” —Ben Garrison, America’s #1 political satirist

Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.

From her doctoral thesis, which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS, saving the lives of millions, including basketball great Magic Johnson, to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses, and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health, Dr. Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science.

With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology, Dr. Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science. When she was part of the research community that turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one, she saw science at its best. But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases, such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome, she saw science at its worst. If her suspicions are correct, we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices, including how we study and treat human disease.

Recounting her nearly four decades in science, including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology, this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity.

Review
“One of the main problems of our time is the public loss of confidence in the scientific community because of a too often corrupt coalition of  governmental and corporate entities. Judy Mikovits’s and Kent Heckenlively’s book delves into the midst of this rampant corruption, which hides  from the public scientific truths which might go against these corporate economic interests.”
—Dr. Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Laureate for the isolation of the HIV retrovirus

“Kent Heckenlively and Judy Mikovits are the new dynamic duo fighting corruption in science.”
— Ben Garrison, America’s #1 political satirist

“What this book teaches you more than anything else is that science is a dangerous game. The notion that science is precise and unambiguous is wrong. When there is doubt, there is the potential for powerful interested parties to make life miserable for a scientist with integrity. Throughout the book, intrigue is seamlessly intertwined with fascinating revelations about the still poorly understood science behind the potential role of retroviruses in mysterious debilitating diseases like chronic fatigue syndrome and autism.”
—Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist, MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

“The breathtaking story of an extraordinary scientist who discovered the most likely cause of chronic fatigue syndrome, only to witness a cover-up and character assassination emanating from the highest levels of the scientific community. An incisive critique of what’s wrong with science today, and yet a hopeful portrait of how science still has the means to find the truth. It leaves you overwhelmed by the insidious methods and players corrupting science, but hopeful for truth-seekers in the scientific community like Dr. Mikovits who are persevering against all odds.”
— J.B. Handley, co-founder of Generation Rescue and author of How to End the Autism Epidemic

“This book is a jaw-dropping excursion through the lies of Big Money, Big Government and Big Pharma. God bless Dr. Mikovits for her courage in sharing this story!”
— Max Swafford, author and educator

“Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and Big Pharma don’t want you to read this book. Get PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION now and learn the truth about public health industrial complex’s decades of research fraud and vaccine cover-ups.”
— Michelle Malkin, New York Times bestselling author and political commentator

PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION is a once-in-a-generation eye-opener that is likely to have a profound impact on how Americans view their country’s public health and scientific establishment.
— Preston Flemming, author of Maid of Baikal and Forty Days at Kamas –This text refers to the hardcover edition.

About the Author
Judy Mikovits, PhD, spent twenty years at the National Cancer Institute, working with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founding fathers of human retrovirology, and has coauthored more than forty scientific papers. She co-founded and directed the first neuroimmune disease institute using a systems biology approach in 2006. Dr. Mikovits lives in Southern California with her husband, David.

Kent Heckenlively, JD, is a former attorney, a founding editor of Age of Autism, and a science teacher. During college Heckenlively worked for US Senator Pete Wilson, and in law school he was a writer and an editor of the school’s law review and spent his summers working for the US Attorney’s Office in San Francisco. Kent and his wife Linda live in Northern California with their two children, Jacqueline and Ben. –This text refers to the hardcover edition.

 

Israel

Israel

Israel

Israel – The ‘Miracle Birth’

Most Bible believing Christians and for that matter many others as well, have heard of the supposed miraculous birth of the nation state of Israel in the middle east in 1948. A prophetic verse from the book of Isaiah is claimed as one of the supporting Scripture passages which seemingly foretells the birthing of a nation in one day:

Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children.

Isaiah 66:8

Most believers are fully persuaded by many church pastors/preachers that the establishment of the state of Israel as a sovereign homeland for the Jewish people is the fulfillment of this Bible prophecy and was realised through the miraculous work of our Heavenly Father.

Christians are further encouraged to support Israel, both financially through tithes and also through moral support including prayer offerings. A verse from the book of Genesis is often quoted to motivate and encourage this support from Christian communities:

romGenesis 12:3

The Christian Church has established a huge group of believers who ‘stand with Israel’ with unwavering devotion. With the recent outbreak of violence between Israel and the Palestinians many Christians have openly declared their support for Israel on many social media platforms using the phrase ‘I stand with Israel’. 

 

It is however not just Christian congregations that believe this prophecy to apply to the state of Israel. Many Jewish leaders and Rabbis have been sharing this Bible Prophecy ever since the establishment of Israel and possibly even long before 1948. They are fully convinced that Isaiah 66 is a reference to the Jewish people and their return to their own land as a soveriegn nation and a united people. I say ‘many’ Jewish leaders because there is also a large community of traditional Jewish Bible scholars and Rabbis who are not in support of the establishment of Israel as a nation state. They are in fact very outspoken against such a state arguing that the Jewish people are still living  as a dispersed people, under the judgement of the Most High. They claim that the time has not arrived for their return to a land of their own.

I won’t elaborate on this fact any further in this post as it is already covered in detail in my previous post entitled ‘Christian Zionism Part 1’ .

Below is an extract from a speech given by the late Rabbi Sacks from the website ‘Aish.com’ and a further statement form ‘One for Israel’. These two statements will provide evidence from a Jewish perspective in support of the nation state of Israel.

 

CAN A NATION BE BORN IN A DAY?

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

God has brought His people home and promised to one day give them peace. No people need it more. No people have earned it more.

The Chief Rabbi of Great Britain delivered this speech in London on Shabbat, Rosh Chodesh Iyar, 5762, (April, 13, 2002). Its relevance still rings loud and clear.

The return to Zion didn’t begin in 1938; it is as old as the words of Isaiah. Jews did not voluntarily leave Israel. They were driven out by other powers: first Babylon, then Rome, then by the Crusaders. Whenever they could, they returned, even in the dangerous days of the Middle Ages, as did Judah Halevi, as did Nachmanides, as did the family of Maimonides until they were forced to leave for Egypt. Jews never renounced their right to the land, and never once, in all the centuries, stopped praying for the day they would return. Long before the Holocaust, the Balfour Declaration in 1917 gave expression to that right. And yet there can be no doubt that what led the United Nations, in 1947, to vote for a Jewish state, was the knowledge that after the greatest crime of man against mankind, Jews needed a home in the sense defined by the poet Robert Frost as the place where, ‘when you have to go there, they have to let you in.’

It was a simple acknowledgement, tragically overdue, that Jews, too, have rights, among them the most basic right of all: to live, to exist, to be able to walk the streets, go on a bus, have a meal in a restaurant, go into a shop, without the fear that someone will attack you, injure you, murder you, because you are what and who you are. No people was denied that right for longer than the Jewish people. And without that right, there are no others. And after the Holocaust, the nations of the world finally recognized that this meant that the Jewish people needed a home, a place where they could defend themselves, and not rely on the goodwill of others; because when they needed it, in 1938, it was not there.

source:  https://www.aish.com/h/iid/48906257.html

 

CAN A NATION BE BORN IN A DAY?

MIRACLE BIRTH

The British began to remove their troops towards the end of April 1948. On May 14 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, announced the formation of the new state of Israel. He said,

“The Nazi Holocaust, which engulfed millions of Jews in Europe, proved anew the urgency of the reestablishment of the Jewish State, which would solve the problem of Jewish homelessness by opening the gates to all Jews and lifting the Jewish people to equality in the family of nations.”

Ben Gurion saw the horrors of the Holocaust as paving the way to the birth of a Jewish State, and he was not alone in making such a suggestion. Would the miracle of the recreation of Israel ever have happened without such an atrocity on a scale that we can still barely comprehend? These questions are impossible for earth-bound humanity to answer, but again, we see the closely bound bitter and sweet, almost too close for comfort.

And what was a day of astonishing joy for the Jewish people was also a day of sorrow and anguish for the Arabs who suddenly no longer owned the land they had been living in for generations. Again, joy and pain uncomfortably closely together. Whilst we can rejoice in God’s fulfilled promises and a new start for Israel, we also know that this day is not an easy one for all of her inhabitants. God still cares deeply for all the peoples of this area and seeks to give them their blessing, hope and salvation. Whilst many Arab Christians will struggle with celebrating this day, there are numbers of Arab believers who truly rejoice in God’s physical restoration of Israel, and seek her spiritual restoration promised in the scripture. This too, is a miracle, and the handiwork of an awesome God.

For God had determined that he would regather his people and plant them back in the land he had chosen for them. And he promised that it would happen in one day flat:

“Who has ever heard of such things? Who has ever seen things like this? Can a country be born in a day, or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor than she gives birth to her children. Do I bring to the moment of birth and not give delivery?” says the LORD. “Do I close up the womb when I bring to delivery?” says your God. “Rejoice with Jerusalem and be glad for her, all you who love her; rejoice greatly with her, all you who mourn over her.” (Isaiah 66:8-10)

The Amplified Bible notes about this verse give this comment:

“Never in the history of the world had such a thing happened before–but God keeps His word. As definitely foretold here and in Ezekiel 37:21, 22, Israel became a recognized nation, actually “born in one day.”

After being away from their homeland for almost 2,000 years, the Jews were given a national homeland in Palestine by the Balfour Declaration in November, 1917. In 1922, the League of Nations gave Great Britain the mandate over Palestine. On May 14, 1948, Great Britain withdrew her mandate, and immediately Israel was declared a sovereign state, and her growth and importance among nations became astonishing.”

source: https://www.oneforisrael.org/holidays/can-a-nation-be-born-in-a-day/

Miracle or Misinterpretation?

The question that I would like to put to you here is whether or not the state of Israel is really the fulfilment of Isaiah 66 or if this prophecy has somehow been misinterpreted. My personal belief is that the prophecy from Isaiah pertaining to the birthing of a nation has nothing to do with the state of Israel at all. In fact I hold a very different view and understanding as to what and who ‘Israel’ is – from a New Testament perspective anyway.

In this regard I would like to provide you with some material to watch which provides the historical background for the establisment of the state of Israel in the middle east. You will learn from this documentary, included at the end of this post, that it was a devious and underhanded betrayal of the Arab people by the British during the first world war that ultimately led to the British governement offering their support to the Zionist movement and their subsequent occupation of Palestine.  It was the signing of the Balfour Declaration that intiated the further occupation of Palestine by many other Jewish people than those historically residing in the region at the time.

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government (by Lord Balfour) in 1917 during the First World War announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population.

 

Balfour Declaration
United Kingdom [1917]

Balfour Declaration, (November 2, 1917), statement of British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” It was made in a letter from Arthur James Balfour, the British foreign secretary, to Lionel Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild (of Tring), a leader of the Anglo-Jewish community. Though the precise meaning of the correspondence has been disputed, its statements were generally contradictory to both the Sykes-Picot Agreement (a secret convention between Britain and France) and the Ḥusayn-McMahon correspondence (an exchange of letters between the British high commissioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon, and Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī, then emir of Mecca), which in turn contradicted one another (seePalestine, World War I and after).

The Balfour Declaration, issued through the continued efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, Zionist leaders in London, fell short of the expectations of the Zionists, who had asked for the reconstitution of Palestine as “the” Jewish national home. The declaration specifically stipulated that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” The document, however, said nothing of the political or national rights of these communities and did not refer to them by name. Nevertheless, the declaration aroused enthusiastic hopes among Zionists and seemed the fulfillment of the aims of the World Zionist Organization.

The British government hoped that the declaration would rally Jewish opinion, especially in the United States, to the side of the Allied powers against the Central Powers during World War I (1914–18). They hoped also that the settlement in Palestine of a pro-British Jewish population might help to protect the approaches to the Suez Canal in neighbouring Egypt and thus ensure a vital communication route to British colonial possessions in India.

The Balfour Declaration was endorsed by the principal Allied powers and was included in the British mandate over Palestine, formally approved by the newly created League of Nations on July 24, 1922. In May 1939 the British government altered its policy in a White Paper recommending a limit of 75,000 further immigrants and an end to immigration by 1944, unless the resident Palestinian Arabs of the region consented to further immigration. Zionists condemned the new policy, accusing Britain of favouring the Arabs. This point was made moot by the outbreak of World War II (1939–45) and the founding of the State of Israel in 1948.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/event/Balfour-Declaration

 

 You will see from the article included below, ‘The Significance of The Balfour Declaration‘ from the Jewish Press, that this ‘Balfour Declaration’ was instrumental in the establishmnet of Israel as a soverieign homeland for the Jewish people.

 

The Significance Of The Balfour Declaration

Thursday, November 2, marks the centenary of the issuance of the Balfour Declaration, pursuant to which Arthur James Balfour (1848 – 1930), in his capacity as British foreign secretary, wrote to Lord Walter Rothschild, president of the British Zionist Federation, the following famous and historic lines:

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Many years ago, while conducting research at the British Library in London, I was privileged not only to see the original Declaration but also to make an official copy of it, which is shown here. I constantly strive in my Collecting Jewish History articles to share the thrill I experience when channeling the great men who live on through the ink and paper of their written words, and I trust readers will appreciate what an exhilarating moment it was for me to touch the living history represented by this uniquely important document.

The Balfour Declaration was important because it roused the Zionist movement into political and diplomatic action; ultimately formed the basis for the League of Nations’ Palestine Mandate; and, perhaps most important, lent legitimacy to Zionism on the world stage. Given Herzl’s failure to earn a commitment from the Ottoman Empire or any European government, the Declaration, despite its somewhat equivocal language, also constituted the first real step toward Zionism’s goal of establishing a home for the Jewish people in Eretz Yisrael secured under public law.

The Maccabean, an American Zionist newspaper, called it “the Jewish Magna Carta.” Rav Kook said, “I want to bless the British nation for having extended such honorable aid to the people of the Torah.” Abba Eban viewed it as “the decisive diplomatic victory of the Jewish people in modern history.”

And President Truman wrote in his Memoirs that he had carefully read the Balfour Declaration and familiarized himself with Jewish history. (See my Jewish Press column from July 7 of this year, “The Traveling Salesman Who Saved Israel,” which featured an original letter from Truman in which he declares that “I remain particularly gratified by the role I was fortunate to play in the birth of Israel as, in the immortal words of the Balfour Declaration, a national home for the Jewish people.”)

The critical importance of the Balfour Declaration to Jewish leaders may perhaps best be seen in a letter from Chaim Weizmann, whom many historians credit as the prime mover in influencing British leaders. (When the Israel Postal Authority marked the 50th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration in 1967, it issued a stamp with Balfour’s portrait – and another of Weizmann.)

In the October 10, 1949 correspondence shown here, Weizmann, as Israel’s first president, writes to Yosef Sprinzak, speaker of the Knesset, and recommends establishing the date of the Balfour Declaration as a national holiday for all time:

I have the most pleasant duty to propose to the Knesset that it should designate the day of the Balfour Declaration as a national holiday.

The important task that Lord Balfour fulfilled in consolidating the necessary instruments to realize our status as a nation – the essence of our national existence obligates us to remember and to commemorate those who were benevolent to us, and this should never be erased from our hearts.

The British government’s motivation for issuing the Balfour Declaration is highly disputed. The essence of the theory promoted by anti-Zionists is that Britain’s intention was far from altruistic and that the Declaration proved to be one of the greatest international relations blunders of all time.

First, according to this thesis, Britain regarded the Declaration as establishing a lawful basis for a British protectorate over Palestine. In fact, when the Balfour Declaration was formally approved at the San Remo conference (April 1920), the delegates recommended the creation of the British Mandate, which was later ratified by the League of Nations in the San Remo treaty (1922).

Second, the British believed the Declaration would engender support for their war efforts from the millions of Russian Jews and from American Jewry.

The truth, however, is that – as one recent commentator cogently put it – the Balfour Declaration was not “a British imperial grab” but, rather, “the outcome of a carefully constructed consensus of the leading democracies of the day” and “one of the first instances of [effective and successful] public diplomacy.”

In any case, there is no doubt Balfour himself genuinely supported the Jewish cause. Though his motivation is subject to conjecture, his interest began when Herzl negotiated with Joseph Chamberlain, the British colonial secretary, and Lord Landsowne, Britain’s foreign secretary, regarding Jewish settlement in Eretz Yisrael(1902 – 1903), and his interest in Zionism was revived through a meeting with Weizmann (1906). Balfour also spoke out against the persecution of the Jews – “the treatment of the [Jewish] race has been a disgrace to Christendom” – and saw the establishment of a Jewish state as a historic act of amends: “a great nation without a home is not right.”

At a rally at Albert Hall on Monday, July 12, 1920 – a public demonstration chaired by Lord Rothschild and attended by some 12,000 Jews – Balfour made it undisputedly clear that Eretz Yisraelwas designated exclusively for the benefit of the Jewish people for the eventual establishment of an independent Jewish state. Declaring in his address that “we will make Palestine as Jewish as England is English,” he said:

So far as the Arabs are concerned – a great, and interesting, and an attractive race – I hope they will remember that while this assembly and all Jews that it represents through the world desire under the aegis of Great Britain to establish this home for the Jewish people, the Great Powers, and among all the Great Powers most especially Great Britain, has freed them, the Arab race, from the tyranny of their brutal conqueror, who had kept them under his heel for these many centuries…. and I hope that, remembering all that, they will not grudge that small niche – for it is no more geographically, whatever it may be historically – that small niche in what are now Arab territories being given to the people who for all these hundreds of years have been separated from it – but surely have a title to develop on their own lines in the land of their forefathers, which ought to appeal to the sympathy of the Arab people as it, I am convinced, appeals to the great mass of my own Christian fellow-countrymen.

Shown here is the program issued by the English Zionist Federation for the Albert Hall rally, which contains a photo of Herzl with his famous line “And if you will it, it is no dream;” photos and quotes from Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow; a map of Eretz Yisrael “showing Jewish colonies;” and the “Hatikvah” (all four stanzas) in Hebrew and English.

Besides Balfour, Weizmann, and Sokolow, the list of speakers included Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz, Lord Robert Cecil, Major Ormsby-Gore, Dr. Max Nordau, M.M. Usishkin, and James de Rothschild. The following resolution was adopted:

That this Meeting, representing Anglo-Jewry, held at the Royal Albert Hall, on the 26th Tamuz, 5680 – 12th July, 1920 – expresses heartfelt joy at the decision of the Supreme Council to incorporate the Balfour Declaration in the Treaty of Peace with Turkey, and at the acceptance by Great Britain of the Mandate for Palestine as the Jewish National Home . . . and pledges the Jews of this country to spare no effort and no sacrifice for the rebuilding of Palestine as the Jewish National Home, in collaboration with the inhabitants of the country.

One of the proximate results of the Balfour Declaration was an influx of Jewish immigrants, primarily from Eastern Europe, which only served to exacerbate Arab opposition to the Declaration. In particular, Balfour’s visit to Eretz Yisrael in 1925 to attend the Hebrew University dedication ceremony, at which he delivered the opening address, aroused a storm of Arab protest. Balfour was, of course, enthusiastically welcomed by the Jews.

Shown here is a very rare invitation to the Wednesday, April 1, 1925 celebration of the opening of Hebrew University on Mount Scopus.

Many cards and associated memorabilia were created to mark the enactment of the Balfour Declaration. Shown here is a beautiful example from my collection, a hand-decorated card made on the second anniversary of the Declaration, at the center of which is a Magen David and two Israeli flags, over which is written “A new light shall shine on Zion” and under which is written “in commemoration of the declaration of Minister Balfour given on November 2, 1917.”

In the frame are beautiful verses from Shir Hama’alot, the psalm recited after Shabbat and festival meals, regarding the return of the Jewish people to Eretz Yisrael.

Finally, for Torah-true Zionists, the legacy of the Balfour Declaration may perhaps be best expressed by Rav Yitzchak Meir Levin, a founder of the Agudat Yisrael movement in Poland who signed Israel’s Declaration of Independence and joined Ben-Gurion’s provisional government as minister of welfare. In the Rosh Chodesh Kislev 1932 correspondence (he also dates it by using the Daf Yomi page, 32 Rosh Hashanah), shown below, Rav Levin writes to the editorial board of Hahod in Jerusalem that although the issuance of the Balfour Declaration was clearly a gift from God, it will come to naught unless the Jews return to the Torah and to faith in Hashem:

…author Mr. R. B. publicized in his lead article several matters that I said to him during a private conversation held at the Seashore Hotel…. I hereby undertake to correct and transmit these matters, all according to my recollection. I said to him, among other things: Absolutely, the Balfour Declaration was a hint from “the Supervision from on High” to remember our Holy Land, but it would seem that those involved in the building [of the land] did not understand this hint, [to wit:] to return with full repentance to the Torah and to the faith and to build the Holy Land upon these principles…. I stated this idea with these or similar words, and this idea I hold always, and at all times.

source: https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/front-page/the-significance-of-the-balfour-declaration/2017/11/01/

Video:

Independent Jewish Voices

100 Years After Balfour

100 Years After Balfour is a new talking heads film made by Independent Jewish Voices. The film spells out the troubling legacy of the Balfour Declaration, challenging the notion that this year’s centenary is cause for celebration, given the grave consequences of the document for Palestinians above all. The film goes on to explain how the decisions of the British government in 1917 are linked to the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, its fifty year occupation of the West Bank since 1967, and today’s political gridlock. 100 Years After Balfour features seven experts and activists: Professor Avi Shlaim, Professor Jacqueline Rose, Rabbi Howard Cooper, Professor Brian Klug, Antony Lerman, Barnaby Raine and Miri Weingarten.

Please watch the documentary below (How Britain started the Arab-Israeli Conflict) and decide whether you believe that our Heavenly Father endorsed this type of devious and corrupt behaviour to ultimately displace the Palestinian/Arab people from their land.

Am I against the Jewish people having their own land and self determination? Absolutely not.

What I am opposed to is the political ‘Zionist’ agenda with regards to the establishment of Israel in 1948 and their subsequent oppression/aggression towards the Palestian people. Zionism and Judaism are not the same thing.

—- My personal interest in this subject matter is one of determining accurate Biblical interpretation and Biblical prophecy. I am certainly not antisemitic.—-

I stand with all Bible believing Jewish people and see them as my lost brothers. I say ‘lost’ due to the fact that they reject the Messianic Gospel and the New Testamant. You may be surprised to find that many of these ‘religious’ Jews also reject the Zionist Sate of Israel (see my six part post series on ‘Christian Zionism for full disclosure – link below)

I must also however, make it very clear that I do not condone the aggressive Hamas attacks on Israel either. I believe that the Almighty Father will bring about justice in His time and according to His ways. Vengeance and judgement belong to Him only.

What I can not support however, is the treatment and persecution of other human beings in the way that the Palestinian people are being treated. It is my understanding that the land was supposed to be occupied peacefully by both groups of people i.e. Jew and Palestinian. That is how I understand the Balfour Declaration.

Have a look at the illustration below and see how the Jewish occupation of the territory has grown over the decades since 1946 – just prior to the formalisation of the independent state of Israel in 1948.

The Palestinians are clearly being forced out of the region.

Below is an extract from chapter 2 of a book entitled:

The Hidden History of Zionism

Ralph Schoenman (1988)

This study presents a forceful challenge to the conventional understanding of Zionism and the state of Israel: the notion that it is “a land without a people for a peoplle without a land”, the myth of Israeli democracy and the perception of the Zionists as the moral representatives of hte victims of hte Holocaust. Schoenman documents the series of massares enacted under the banner of Zionism to drive out the Palestinians. The author concludes by articulating his own formula for a just society in the future – a democratic and secular Palestine where rights flow from citizenship rather than ethnic or religious identity. Ralph Schenman was Executive Director of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation during which time he conducted negotiations with numerous heads of state to secure the release of political prisoners. He has also directed many campaigning groups such as the Committee of 100, the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, the Committee for Artistic and Intellectual Freedom in Iran and the Committee in Defence of the Palestinian and Lebanese Peoples. (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hidden-History-Zionism-Ralph-Schoenman/dp/0929675010)

(http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/)

Chapter 2
Zionist Objectives

The Iron Wall
The tension between the claim that the land was empty and the demand that the “non-existent” inhabitants be ruthlessly subjugated was less acute when Zionists discussed strategy among themselves. The reality of what was necessary to colonize Palestine took precedence over propaganda.

One of the ideological forbears of Zionism, Vladimir Jabotinsky, is known as the founder of “Revisionist Zionism”, the Zionist current which had little patience with the liberal and socialist facade employed by the “labor” Zionists. [Revisionist Zionism is represented today by Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir.]

In 1923 Jabotinsky wrote The Iron Wall, which could be called a benchmark essay for the entire Zionist movement. He set forth bluntly the essential premises of Zionism which had, indeed, been laid out before, if not as eloquently, by Theodor Herzl, Chaim Weizmann and others. Jabotinsky’s reasoning has been cited and reflected in subsequent Zionist advocacy – from nominal “left” to so-called “right”. He wrote as follows:

There can be no discussion of voluntary reconciliation between us and the Arabs, not now, and not in the foreseeable future. All well-meaning people, with the exception of those blind from birth, understood long ago the complete impossibility of arriving at a voluntary agreement with the Arabs of Palestine for the transformation of Palestine from an Arab country to a country with a Jewish majority. Each of you has some general understanding of the history of colonization. Try to find even one example when the colonization of a country took place with the agreement of the native population. Such an event has never occurred.

The natives will always struggle obstinately against the colonists – and it is all the same whether they are cultured or uncultured. The comrades in arms of [Hernan] Cortez or [Francisco] Pizarro conducted themselves like brigands. The Redskins fought with uncompromising fervor against both evil and good-hearted colonizers. The natives struggled because any kind of colonization anywhere at anytime is inadmissible to any native people.

Any native people view their country as their national home, of which they will be complete masters. They will never voluntarily allow a new master. So it is for the Arabs. Compromisers among us try to convince us that the Arabs are some kind of fools who can be tricked with hidden formulations of our basic goals. I flatly refuse to accept this view of the Palestinian Arabs.

They have the precise psychology that we have. They look upon Palestine with the same instinctive love and true fervor that any Aztec looked upon his Mexico or any Sioux upon his prairie. Each people will struggle against colonizers until the last spark of hope that they can avoid the dangers of conquest and colonization is extinguished. The Palestinians will struggle in this way until there is hardly a spark of hope.

It matters not what kind of words we use to explain our colonization. Colonization has its own integral and inescapable meaning understood by every Jew and by every Arab. Colonization has only one goal. This is in the nature of things. To change that nature is impossible. It has been necessary to carry on colonization against the will of the Palestinian Arabs and the same condition exists now.

Even an agreement with non-Palestinians represents the same kind of fantasy. In order for Arab nationalists of Baghdad and Mecca and Damascus to agree to pay so serious a price they would have to refuse to maintain the Arab character of Palestine.

We cannot give any compensation for Palestine, neither to the Palestinians nor to other Arabs. Therefore, a voluntary agreement is inconceivable. All colonization, even the most restricted, must continue in defiance of the will of the native population. Therefore, it can continue and develop only under the shield of force which comprises an Iron Wall through which the local population can never break through. This is our Arab policy. To formulate it any other way would be hypocrisy.

Whether through the Balfour Declaration or the Mandate, external force is a necessity for establishing in the country conditions of rule and defense through which the local population, regardless of what it wishes, will be deprived of the possibility of impeding our colonization, administratively or physically. Force must play its role – with strength and without indulgence. In this, there are no meaningful differences between our militarists and our vegetarians. One prefers an Iron Wall of Jewish bayonets; the other an Iron Wall of English bayonets.

To the hackneyed reproach that this point of view is unethical, I answer, ’absolutely untrue.’ This is our ethic. There is no other ethic. As long as there is the faintest spark of hope for the Arabs to impede us, they will not sell these hopes – not for any sweet words nor for any tasty morsel, because this is not a rabble but a people, a living people. And no people makes such enormous concessions on such fateful questions, except when there is no hope left, until we have removed every opening visible in the Iron Wall. [27] 

The Metaphor of Iron
The theme and imagery of coercive iron and steel evoked by Vladimir Jabotinsky was to be taken up by the nascent national socialist movement in Germany, even as Jabotinsky had, in turn, been inspired by Benito Mussolini. The mystical invocation of iron will in the service of martial and chauvinist conquest united Zionist, colonial and fascist ideologues. It sought its legitimacy in legends of a conquering past.

Cecil B. de Mille’s Samson and Delilah was more than a Hollywood biblical romance about the perfidy of woman and the virtue of manly strength. It carried, as well, the authoritarian values of the novel from which it was adopted, Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Samson, which trumpeted the necessity of brute force if the Israelites were to conquer the Philistines.

“Shall I give our people a message from you?” Samson thought for a while, and then said slowly: “The first word is iron. They must get iron. They must give everything they have for iron – their silver and wheat, oil and wine and flocks, even their wives and daughters. All for iron! There is nothing in the world more valuable than iron.” [28]
Jabotinsky, the siren of “an iron wall through which the local population can not break through” and of “the iron law of every colonizing movement … armed force”, found his call echoed in major Zionist forays against victim peoples in the decades to come.

Israel’s current Minister of Defense, Yitzhak Rabin, launched the 1967 war as Chief of Staff with “Iron Will”. As Prime Minister in 1975 and 1976 he declared the policy of Hayad Barzel, the “Iron Hand”, in the West Bank. Over 300,000 Palestinians were to pass through Israeli prisons under conditions of sustained and institutionalized torture exposed by the Sunday Times of London and denounced by Amnesty International.

His successor as Chief of Staff, Raphael Eitan, imposed the “Iron Arm” – Zro’aa Barzel – on the West Bank, and assassination was added to the repressive arsenal. On July 17, 1982, the Israeli cabinet met to prepare what the London Sunday Times would term “this carefully pre-planned military operation to purge the camps, called Moah Barzel or ‘Iron Brain’”. The camps were Sabra and Shatila and the operation “was familiar to Sharon and Begin, part of Sharon’s larger plan discussed by the Israeli cabinet”. [29]

When Yitzhak Rabin, who had supported the Revisionist Likud in Lebanon during the war, became Shimon Peres’ Minister of Defense in the current “national unity” government, he launched in Lebanon and the West Bank the policy of Egrouf Barzel, the “Iron Fist”. It is the “Iron Fist” which Rabin again cited as the basis for his policy of allout repression and collective punishment during the 1987-1988 Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza.

It’s interesting to recall, as well, that Jabotinsky located his colonial impulse in the doctrine of the purity of blood. Jabotinsky spelled this out in his Letter on Autonomy:

It is impossible for a man to become assimilated with people whose blood is different than his own. In order to become assimilated, he must change his body, he must become one of them, in blood. There can be no assimilation. We shall never allow such things as mixed marriage because the preservation of national integrity is impossible except by means of racial purity and for that purpose we shall have this territory where our people will constitute the racially pure inhabitants.
This theme was further elaborated by Jabotinsky:

The source of national feeling … lies in a man’s blood …in his racio-physico type and in that alone. …A man’s spiritual outlook is primarily determined by his physical structure. For that reason we do not believe in spiritual assimilation. It is inconceivable, from the physical point of view, that a Jew born to a family of pure Jewish blood can become adapted to the spiritual outlook of a German or a Frenchman. He may be wholly imbued with that German fluid, but the nucleus of his spiritual structure will always remain Jewish. [30]
The adoption of chauvinist doctrines of racial purity and the logic of the blood were not confined to Jabotinsky or to the revisionists. The liberal philosopher, Martin Buber, located his Zionism equally within the framework of European racist doctrine:

The deepest layers of our being are determined by blood; our innermost thinking and our will are colored by it. [31]

source: http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/ch02.htm

As mentioned earlier in this post, it is not my belief that the state of Israel is the fulfilment of Bible Prophecy (Isaiah 66).

I am currently in the process of finalising a booklet detailing my understanding of who New Testament ‘Israel’ is and how this group aligns with both Bible patterns and prophecy. I will link it in here when it is complete.

Please do not read this post in isolation either. I have additional detail on this subject matter in my other posts:

The Star of David: https://www.unleavenedbread.co.za/the-star-of-david/

Christian Zionism (a six part series): https://www.unleavenedbread.co.za/christian-zionsim-part1/

Part2; Part 3; Part4; Part5; Part6

Documentary video:

How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict | History Documentary

The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish emigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state of Israel. Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier – in British double-dealing during the First World War. This is a story of intrigue among rival empires; of misguided strategies; and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which determined the fate of the Middle East.

Rabbi speaking on Palestinian TV

Anti Zionist Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, on April 28, 2021

Palestine Under Attack

As the ‘both sides’ narrative crumbles, we discuss the latest attack on Palestine with…

Jeremy Corbyn MP Former leader of the Labour Party,

Dr Mustafa Barghouti Member of the Palestinian Legislative Council & Secretary General of Palestinian National Initiative,

Linda Sarsour Palestinian American Activist & Co-Founder of the Women’s March,

Andrew Feinstein Former South African MP & Author

ISRAEL EXPOSED: Colonialism, War Crimes & The Global Far Right

From death in Gaza to racism in the West, Lowkey exposes a very dark side of Israel

Rabbi Dovid Weiss on Palestinian Freedom, Anti Zionism and Anti Semitism

Babylon Rising – Notable Updates

Babylon Rising – Notable Updates

Babylon Rising – Notable Updates

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor nor a medical professional. I am also neither an activist nor a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

Due to the fast-moving developments on this subject matter, I thought that it would be of benefit to include some updated material and insight.

This post will be updated regularly as new content becomes available.

If you have not already read the earlier posts for this COVID series (parts 1-7) then please do – links at the end of this post.

In This Post:

– Déjà Vu – The Swine Flu and HIV/AIDS similarities to COVID 19 –

Klaus Schwab and his Great Fascist Reset

– The Great Reset – A glimpse into 2023 –

Can the ‘World Health Organisation’ (WHO) be trusted?

– BBC Funding and Biased Reporting –

– Care home Isolation –

– More on The Fear Pandemic –

………………………

Latest Updates by Date – Latest First

– Denis Rancourt on there being no evidence of a pandemic –

– A State of Fear –

– Misdiagnosis, Gross Negligence or Genocide? –

– The PCR Pandemic –

– America’s Frontline Doctors –Taking a Stand For the Truth –

– The COVID Vaccine – Ask The Experts –

– Catherine Austin Fitts – Planet lockdown Interview –

– The Future of Vaccines –

– 87,000 healthcare workers in Netherlands refuse Covid-19 vax –

– Global elites Planning ‘The Great Reset’ –

– COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud –

– Vaccine Debate – Kennedy Jr. vs Dershowitz –

– The Contagion Myth –

– Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers –

 – DR. ROGER HODKINSON ON COVID – ‘THIS IS THE BIGGEST HOAX EVER’ –

– Next Crisis Bigger than COVID –

– Is it true that there are vaccines produced using aborted fetuses? –

– Absolute Proof of a Global Conspiracy –

– ‘Great Reset’ in Davos at the forefront of a ‘great deception’ in the free world –

– We Will Win In The End –

– German Lawyer Sues The World Over Coronavirus –

– Message for Freedom and Hope – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr –

Government by decree – Covid-19 and the Constitution: Lord Sumption

The Great Barrington Declaration

Your Guide to the Great Reset – Corbett Report

Connecting the Dots: The Great Reset & The Fourth Industrial Revolution

The Great Reset and The Man Behind the Curtain

‘The Great Reset’: World leaders to harness COVID and pursue ‘sinister’ climate agenda

This is a Spiritual Battle

Vaccine Hydrogel & Clandestine Government Programs

The Global Agenda & Media Collusion

The Pandemic is a Test Run – Corbett Report

– Robert Kennedy Jr. Destroys Big Pharma, Fauci & Pro-Vaccine Movement –

– Déjà Vu –

 Is COVID 19 the first time that the World Health Organisation (WHO) has cried wolf and declared a global pandemic?

Let us revisit the 2009 ‘Swine flu’ and the HIV/AIDS pandemics of the past and uncover the COVID shadow or forerunner pandemics.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

 

Dave Cullen, in his latest video report (Connecting the dots – 14 October – video included below) recalls how there was a major backlash to the 2009 declaration of a global ‘swine flu’ pandemic by the WHO. 

The BMJ website contains an article which states:

‘Council of Europe condemns “unjustified scare” over swine flu

The Council of Europe heavily criticised the World Health Organization, national governments, and EU agencies for their handling of the swine flu pandemic.
The parliamentary assembly of the council—the international organisation that protects human rights and the rule of law in Europe—published a draft of a report that reviewed how the H1N1 pandemic was handled.
National governments, WHO, and EU agencies had all been guilty of actions that led to a “waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public,” says the report.
The conclusion came in the parliamentary assembly’s social, health and family affairs committee report published on 4 June.
The report was prepared by Paul Flynn, socialist member of the assembly and Labour MP for Newport West and approved by the committee ahead of a plenary debate at the end of this month. It says there was overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly over-rated by WHO.’

https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c3033

 

I strongly recommend that you familiarise yourself with the late Paul Flynn’s report (included pdf below) and the resistance to the WHO’s declaration of the 2009 global pandemic.

Let me not comment any further. I attach for your perusal the late Paul Flynn’s report and some additional literature, as well as a link to a BBC Assignment audio report from 2010.

As the wise Solomon once said ‘there is nothing new under the sun’ – Ecclesiastes 1:9

 

Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee

= The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed =

Memorandum
Rapporteur: Mr Paul FLYNN, United Kingdom, Socialist

23 March 2010

‘a sampling from the report – sound familiar anyone ??:

’13. When looking at the still very moderate expression of the pandemic almost one year after its outbreak, the way in which scientific and empirical evidence has been interpreted can be seriously questioned. The main question is whether WHO overstated the threat posed by the virus, ignoring the practical evidence that the pandemic seemed to be of “moderate severity” from its very start. With regard to such a possible overstatement, the rapporteur would notably like to point out that, in many countries, no clear distinction had been made between patients dying with swine flu (i.e. showing symptoms of swine flu whilst having died of other pathologies) and patients dying of swine flu (i.e. swine flu being the main lethal cause).’

= The Pandemic That Never Was =

Swine Flu: Panic or Pandemic?
Assignment – BBC WORLD SERVICE ONLINE

Sun 23 May 2010 11:05 Local time

In June 2009 the head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared swine flu a global pandemic.

Governments around the world sprang into action and ordered millions of doses of vaccine. But in the event thousands – not millions died – and swine flu proved to be less dangerous than ordinary seasonal flu. So why did the WHO announce a pandemic and were they right to do so?

For Assignment Imogen Foulkes visits two countries in Europe, one of which ordered 90 million doses of vaccine and used just 10% of them – the other of which ordered none.

Swine Flu: Panic or Pandemic?

BBC – Imogen Foulkes

 

THE JAB: Featuring GlaxoSmithKline

Robert Kennedy – Children’s Health Defense 27th August 2020

It’s deja-vu all over again with the W.H.O. declaring “pandemics” that result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies who swoop in with vaccines to save the day. But are they actually saving anyone? Or do serious adverse events such as the very real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu “pandemic” of 2009—which many researchers tie to GSK’s Pandemrix—counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines? The Jab breaks down what happened in 2009 and why it’s critical that we understand this today.

Covid-19 / SARS-CoV-2 and the similarities to the 1980s panic over HIV-Aids

Dr Kevin Corbett Interview 4th October 2020

Retired nurse and health scientist Dr Kevin Corbett joins me to discuss Covid-19 / SARS-CoV-2 and the similarities to the 1980s panic over HIV-Aids. These similarities span the scientific investigation, clinical testing, elements of the care, and the governmental approaches employed.

Kevin explains how contagion fears have affected the medical profession, major elements of the scientific community and our political leadership alike.

He explains the rationale behind his view that the current crisis represents the corruption of medical actors and a Nazification of the NHS. He concludes that this is part of a wider move to expand centralised command and control measures across society.

 

BANNED FROM YOUTUBE:

PANDEMIC! (2012)

– NB: This video was made in 2012 –

The WHO has been trying for decades to introduce a fake global pandemic

 

Schwab and Malleret admit that Covid-19 is “one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years”, adding that “the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality will be mild compared to previous pandemics”. 

They add: “It does not constitute an existential threat or a shock that will leave its imprint on the world’s population for decades”. 

(Schwab, Malleret, Covid-19: The Great Reset).

Yet, incredibly, this “mild” illness is simultaneously presented as the excuse for unprecedented social change under the banner of “The Great Reset”!

 

The Power and Money Behind The Great Reset

Watch:

Monopoly – Follow The Money

 

The Great Reset – A glimpse into 2023

(p.s. read carefully and between the lines)

 – It’s 2023. Here’s How We Fixed the Global Economy –

https://time.com/collection/great-reset/5900739/fix-economy-by-2023/

Can the World Health Organisation (WHO) be trusted?

WHO and Ghebreyesus

Some do not hesitate to characterize WHO as “the most corrupt organization in the world” WHO’s director, the Eritrean Adhanom Ghebreyesus, seems closely linked to Bill Gates, himself very concerned to “get seven billion human beings vaccinated” with this chip that he designed not with health as the goal, but population control for extremely dubious political purposes – it is difficult to fail to mention this without betraying our humanity.

Indeed, Bill Gates is notorious for having paid huge sums of money to WHO, which many claim helped appoint in 2017 – with the support of China – someone with a genocidal past in his own country, who was a member of the political bureau of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPFL), an organization listed on the Department of US Homeland Security’s list of terrorist organizations.

In 2017, an Amhara ethnic rights organization, the Amhara Professional Union (APU), accused Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of carrying out a full-fledged genocidal policy through forced vaccination, chemical sterilization and abortion, when holding the post of Ethiopian Minister of Health between 2005 and 2012.

The population of this ethnic group fell by 2.5 million between the 1997 and 2007 censuses. At the same time, the other major Eritrean ethnic groups reportedly saw their population grow by 2.6 per cent annually.

The TPFL was also accused of plundering Ethiopia and using the 3.5 billion dollars in aid received by Ethiopia (amounting to 60% of the national budget) for political repression of opponents (belonging to two majority ethnic groups). This extraordinary WHO director, who seems to be devoted to the goals of Bill Gates and his Chinese friends, served as Ethiopia’s Minister of Health from 2005 to 2012, while at the same time serving as director – from 2009 to 2011 – of of an AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria programme funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Good reason perhaps to question the surprising position of WHO regarding its oft- repeated recommendation not to use anti-inflammatory drugs against Covid-19 and the oft-repeated statement of this world body that “there is no treatment to date” but that a vaccine is being studied.

The WHO Director, who as minister of health was caught red-handed covering up three cholera outbreaks, will do what he is told. This is the driving force behind this policy. WHO was, notably, established by the Rockefellers. WHO tells you the procedure to follow and you follow it. You follow the protocol.

http://ageoftruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/INVESTIGATIVE-REPORT-ON-THE-COVID-19-PANDEMIC-AND-ITS-RELATIONSHIP-TO-SARS-COV-2-AND-OTHER-FACTORS.pdf

Page vii

BBC Funding and Biased Reporting

Why does it appear that the mainstream media are only supporting one side of the COVID narrative and labelling anyone who challenges this narrative as ‘conspiracy theorists’. Well, for one example, one only needs to look into the BBC funding to understand why.

….click on the images below to be taken to the page info….

Care Home Isolation

 – A Monumental Crime Against The Vulnerable Elderly –

Are the lockdown and isolation measures in care homes protecting the vulnerable elderly of society or is this isolation hastening their lonely demise?

Let them hold hands: A loving wife is forced to kneel in the street to see her husband’s face – a heartbreaking picture of Britain’s chaotic care home visiting rules

Read more…

Actor films mother’s ‘distressing’ arrest for taking grandmother, 97, out of care home before lockdown

Read more…

– More on The Fear Pandemic –

As you read the following article and watch the video below, please keep in mind the fear propagated by the government and health agencies during this fake COVID pandemic. 

Fear: The Foundation of Every Government’s Power

All animals experience fear—human beings, perhaps, most of all. Any animal incapable of fear would have been hard pressed to survive, regardless of its size, speed, or other attributes. Fear alerts us to dangers that threaten our well-being and sometimes our very lives. Sensing fear, we respond by running away, by hiding, or by preparing to ward off the danger.

To disregard fear is to place ourselves in possibly mortal jeopardy. Even the man who acts heroically on the battlefield, if he is honest, admits that he is scared. To tell people not to be afraid is to give them advice that they cannot take. Our evolved physiological makeup disposes us to fear all sorts of actual and potential threats, even those that exist only in our imagination.

The people who have the effrontery to rule us, who call themselves our government, understand this basic fact of human nature. They exploit it, and they cultivate it. Whether they compose a warfare state or a welfare state, they depend on it to secure popular submission, compliance with official dictates, and, on some occasions, affirmative cooperation with the state’s enterprises and adventures. Without popular fear, no government could endure more than twenty-four hours. David Hume taught that all government rests on public opinion, but that opinion, I maintain, is not the bedrock of government. Public opinion itself rests on something deeper: fear

 Read on…

…………………………………

Fear and Social Control

In this video we examine how fear can be used as a tool to manipulate others, and how those in positions of power, past and present, have effectively used fear to control certain aspects of society.

……. Latest Updates (by date) …… 

Denis Rancourt on there being no evidence of a pandemic

– December 2021 –

About Denis:

I obtained BSc, MSc and PhD degrees in physics.  I held post-doctoral research positions at prestigious institutions in France and The Netherlands, before being a physics professor and lead scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years.

I am an experienced self-represented litigant at several levels of court and in many administrative tribunals, in both Ontario and Quebec.  I have been a volunteer Researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca) since 2014.

A State of Fear: How the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic

– November 2021 –

This is a book about fear. Fear of a virus. Fear of death. Fear of losing our jobs, our democracy, our human connections, our health and our minds. It’s also about how the government weaponised our fear against us – supposedly in our best interests – until we were the most frightened country in Europe.

But why did the government deliberately frighten us, and how has this affected us as individuals and as a country? Who is involved in the decision-making that affects our lives? How are behavioural science and nudge theory being used to subliminally manipulate us? How does the media leverage fear? What are the real risks to our wellbeing?

Ahead of any official inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, Laura Dodsworth explores all these questions and more, in a nuanced and thought-provoking discussion of an extraordinary year in British life and politics. With stories from members of the general public who were impacted by fear, anxiety and isolation, and revealing interviews with psychologists, politicians, scientists, lawyers, Whitehall advisers and journalists, A State of Fear calls for a more hopeful, transparent and effective democracy.

Misdiagnosis, Gross Negligence or Genocide?

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Dr Wolfgang Wodrag & Dr. Bryan Ardis
30/7/21

⁣https://www.fuellmich.com/

– August 2021 –

The PCR Pandemic

– Dr Claus Kohnlein –

– 19 January 2021 –

America’s Frontline Doctors

– Taking a Stand For the Truth –

– 18 January 2021 –

 

The COVID Vaccine – Ask The Experts

– 8 January 2021 –

 

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS | FULL INTERVIEW | PLANET LOCKDOWN GREAT RESET

– 6 January2021 –

What is really going on ? 

THE FUTURE OF VACCINES

– 24 December 2020 –

If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.

Nurses, no guinea pigs! 87,000 healthcare workers in Netherlands refuse Covid-19 vaccine

– 17 December 2020 –

Global Elites Planning ‘ The Great Reset’.

– 16 December 2020 –

COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud
Iain Davis

– 10 December 2020 –

The following is an extract from a rather conclusive article claiming that the whole COVID 19 Pandemic is a ‘Global Fraud’.

Please be sure to read the full article here.

COVID 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19.

Sometimes you have to go with your gut. I am not an expert in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding.

The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific. I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols. You can do the same.

D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless.

The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception. Ostensibly, there is no scientific foundation for any part of it.

If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic, merely the illusion of one. We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason, other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes.

In doing so this “parasite class” have potentially committed countless crimes. These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law.

………………………………

(The body of the article contains the technical discussion on the testing methods and the results – see link below to full article).

………………………………

CONCLUSIVE FRAUD
Fraud is a criminal act. The legal definition of fraud is:

“Some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him an injury.”

The Legal definition of a conspiracy is:

“A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing, by their joint efforts, some unlawful or criminal act”

It seems, those who claim we face a pandemic have not provided any evidence to show that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19. All of the information strongly suggesting this possibility is readily available in the public domain. Anyone can read it.

For there to be a fraud the deceit must be wilful. The intention must be to deliberately deprive others of their rights or injure them in some other way. If there is evidence of collusion between individuals ad/or organisations to commit fraud, then this is a conspiracy (in Common Law jurisdictions) or a Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) under International Law.

It seems COVID 19 has been deliberately used as a casus belli to wage war on humanity. We have been imprisoned in our own homes, our freedom to roam restricted, freedom of speech and expression eroded, rights to protest curtailed, separated from loved ones, our businesses destroyed, psychologically bombarded, muzzled and terrorised.

Worse still, while there is no evidence of unprecedented all cause mortality, there were unseasonable spikes in deaths. These correlate precisely with Lockdown measures which saw the withdrawal of the health services we pay for and a reorientation of public health services to treat one alleged disease at the exclusion of all others.

Further, it is proposed by those who have forwarded the COVID 19 story, that this alleged disease provides justification for the complete restructuring of the global economy, our political systems, societies, cultures and humanity itself.

To be allowed to participate in their so called “new normal,” which is the wholesale transformation of our entire society without our consent, they insist we submit to their conditions.

These include, but aren’t limited to, bio-metric surveillance of everyone, the centralised control and monitoring of all of our transactions, oppressive business and social restrictions and an effective demand that we have no right to sovereignty over our own bodies. This constitutes the condition of slavery.

There is no doubt that we have been deprived of our rights and injured. In Common Law jurisdictions innocence is presumed, but the evidence that harm has been deliberately caused by an international conspiracy is overwhelming. Destructive policies, enacted by governments across the world, clearly originated among globalist think tanks and supranational institutions long before the emergence of this non existent pandemic.

In Napoleonic Code jurisdictions, guilt is presumed. In order for the accused conspirators to prove their innocence they must show that, despite their immeasurable resources, they have collectively been unable to access or understand any of the freely available evidence suggesting COVID 19 is a myth.

Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried. If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us get on with trying to repair the damage they have already inflicted.

Please be sure to read the full article here.

Vaccine Debate – Kennedy Jr. vs Dershowitz

– 25 November 2020 –

Heated vaccine debate between Robert Kennedy Jr. and Alan Dershowitz moderated by Patrick Bet-David.

About the Guests:

(Against) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. serves as President of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice.

Mr. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times’ bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto last year, as well as in the DuPont Case that inspired the movie “Dark Waters” (2019).

(For) Professor Alan M. Dershowitz is Brooklyn native who has been called “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer” and one of its “most distinguished defenders of individual rights,” “the best-known criminal lawyer in the world,” “the top lawyer of last resort,” “America’s most public Jewish defender” and “Israel’s single most visible defender – the Jewish state’s lead attorney in the court of public opinion.” He is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Dershowitz, a graduate of Brooklyn College and Yale Law School, joined the Harvard Law School faculty at age 25 after clerking for Judge David Bazelon and Justice Arthur Goldberg.

The Contagion Myth

– 24 November 2020 –

Thomas S. Cowan, MD, and Sally Fallon Morell ask the question: are there really such things as “viruses”? Or are electro smog, toxic living conditions, and 5G actually to blame for COVID-19?

The official explanation for today’s COVID-19 pandemic is a “dangerous, infectious virus.” This is the rationale for isolating a large portion of the world’s population in their homes so as to curb its spread.  From face masks to social distancing, from antivirals to vaccines, these measures are predicated on the assumption that tiny viruses can cause serious illness and that such illness is transmissible person-to-person.

It was Louis Pasteur who convinced a skeptical medical community that contagious germs cause disease; his “germ theory” now serves as the official explanation for most illness. However, in his private diaries he states unequivocally that in his entire career he was not once able to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria (he obviously wasn’t able to purify viruses at that time). He admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous death bed confession that “the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.” 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Thomas S. Cowan, MD has a general medical practice in San Francisco, California.  He has served as vice president of the Physicians Association for Anthroposophical Medicine and was a founding board member of the Weston A. Price Foundation. He currently serves as vice president. Dr. Cowan has given countless lectures and workshops all over the United States and Canada about a variety of subjects in health and medicine. He is the author of five books, including Human Heart, Cosmic Heart, Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, and Cancer and the New Biology of Water; with Sally Fallon Morell, he’s co-authored The Fourfold Path to Healing and The Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby & Child Care.

Sally Fallon Morell is best known as the author of Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats (over 700,000 copies sold). She is the founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation and editor of the Foundation’s quarterly magazine.  She is also president and owner of NewTrends Publishing, serving as editor and publisher. She is the author of eight books, including Eat Fat Lose Fat, co-authored with Dr. Mary Enig; Nourishing Broth, co-authored with Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN; Nourishing Fats; and Nourishing Diets.

Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers

– 22 November 2020 –

WRITTEN BY

Prof Carl Heneghan & Tom Jefferson

Carl Heneghan is professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford and director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Tom Jefferson is a senior associate tutor and honorary research fellow at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford

DR. ROGER HODKINSON ON COVID

‘THIS IS THE BIGGEST HOAX EVER PERPETRATED ON AN UNSUSPECTING PUBLIC’

– 20 November 2020 –

Youtbube has removed the video of this. Below is a Bitchute recording. 

‘Next Crisis Bigger than COVID’

Power Grid/Finance Down – WEF Cyber Polygon

– 20 November 2020 –

The World Economic Forum warns of a new crisis of “even more significant economic and social implications than COVID19.” What threat could possibly be more impactful? Christian breaks down the WEF’s “Cyber Polygon” tabletop exercise, its participants, and predictive programming around a looming large scale cyberattack on critical infrastructure that would unleash a Dark Winter and help to usher in the Great Reset. Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director ( https://youtu.be/5ZRg5kiH9Is ): “I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” Klaus Schwab ( https://youtu.be/0DKRvS-C04o ) : “We all know, but still pay insufficient attention, to the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack. To use the COVID19 crisis as a timely opportunity to reflect on the lessons the cybersecurity community can draw and improve our unpreparedness for a potential cyber-pandemic.”

Is it true that there are vaccines produced using aborted fetuses?

– 19 November 2020 –

Some of the vaccines currently used to prevent diseases such as rubella, measles, rabies, poliomyelitis, hepatitis A, chickenpox or smallpox are produced using tissues from human abortions.

The vaccines consist of dead or attenuated live viruses that are introduced into the patient’s body to activate the body’s defences against that virus without becoming ill. Thus, if the patient subsequently enters into contact with the live virus, it will be unable infect him, since he has the necessary defences to cope with it, i.e. he is immunised.

To prepare the vaccines, the viruses must be cultured in cells in the laboratory. The ethical difficulty appears when these cells come from surgically-aborted human foetuse. Similarly, the viruses themselves can be obtained from aborted foetuses that have been infected with a particular virus. An article published in 2008 in Cuadernos de Bioetica includes detailed information on the different cells and viral strains originating from these sources.

Cells used and vaccines produced using aborted fetuses

The most widely used foetal cells are WI-38 and MRC-5. The WI-38 cells were derived by Leonard Hayflick in 1962 from the lung of a 3-month female foetus [2].The initials WI refer to the Wistar Institute, a body of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and number 38 to the foetus from which the cells were obtained. The MRC-5 cells were obtained in 1966 from the lungs of a 14-week male foetus [3].The initials MRC indicate Medical Research Council, a body from London. Other cells derived from surgically-aborted foetuses are: WI-1, WI-3, WI-11, WI-16, WI-18, WI-19, WI-23, WI-24, WI-25, WI-26, WI-27, WI-44, MRC-9, IMR-90, and R-17 (obtained from lung); WI-2, WI-12 and WI-20, (skin and muscle); WI-5 (muscle); WI-8 and WI-14, and WS1 (skin); WI-4, WI-9, WI-10, WI-13 and WI-15 (kidney); WI-6, WI-21 and WI-22 (heart); WI-7 (thymus and thyroids), WI-17 (liver); FHs74Int (small intestine); and PER.C6

Read more…

DO YOU WANT TO KNOW SOME OF THE INGREDIENTS IN THE COVID-19 VACCINE BY ASTRA-ZENECA?

This is a first look at some of the ingredients in one of the Corona Virus vaccines. Hint: there is no SARS-COV-2 virus in it…

There is still information to find out, such as what the adjuvants and preservatives are in this vaccine, e.g. mercury, aluminium, or glycophosphate, and what other chemicals they have added.

Some of the ingredients on the label are alcohol (ethanol), sucrose (sugar), sodium chloride (salt), magnesium chloride compounds, and amino acid compounds (strings of synthetically-created proteins).

What is known is that this vaccine contains genetically-modified cloned lung cells from an aborted 14-day old, white, male fetus. There is also genetically-modified material from an adenovirus (the type found in the common cold). There is no SARS-COV-2 in this vaccine as far as is known at this time.

source – https://www.bitchute.com/video/4BiCbjkugk8C/

VACCINE-MAKER PFIZER HAS A TRACK RECORD. WOULD YOU TRUST THEIR VACCINE AFTER WATCHING THIS?

The UK’s Mirror Project (https://www.mp-22.com/episode-1-prologue) has investigated past court cases of Big Pharma company Pfizer, who are making a ‘vaccine’ for SARS-COV-2. Review the information in this video and decide for yourself whether their track record warrants you trusting your health with their vaccine.

source – https://www.bitchute.com/video/f788gDCostVO/

Absolute Proof of a Global Conspiracy

– 18 November 2020 –

For those who are as yet not fully convinced that COVID 19 is a pre-planned fake pandemic, executed globally with nefarious intent, then have a browse through the 2020 ‘Sustainable Development Goals Report’. You will find that COVID 19 presented the perfect enabler for global social re-engineering and the erosion of our freedom.

In the summary pages (from page 6) for each of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals you will see that the report reflects both the ‘before’ and ‘after’ COVID 19 situation for each goal. From these comparisons, you will be able to see that this manufactured crisis provided the much-needed trigger to fast track the change into the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ and the ‘New Normal’. Life will never return to as it was pre-covid and drastic lifestyle changes will be the norm going forward to 2030 and beyond.

– Read the report –

On page 16 of the report (Goal 11) it is mentioned that 4.2 million people died prematurely from air pollution in 2016. Compare this figure of 4.2 million to the current death count of 1.34 million associated with COVID 19.

Why was the world not shut down from 2016 then with such shocking air pollution deaths which are more than treble that of COVID? Surely these air pollution deaths would have been similar from 2016 to 2020 making the total for the 5 years including  2016 21 million. 

It is really time for people to wake up.

R.I.P

– 18 November 2020 –

Democracy, National Sovereignty and Personal Freedom are Dead.

National Governments are now just mere puppets as the United Nations Organisations, Agencies and Affiliates dictate the future for mankind and the planet.

Who and what is UNHABITAT? Who voted them into power? Where does their authority come from?

Read about UNHABITAT

We Will Win In The End

Dave Cullen

– 15 November 2020 –

‘Great Reset’ in Davos at the forefront of a ‘great deception’ in the free world

– 15 November 2020 –

Powerful individuals, groups and large global organisations are at the forefront of a plan labeled ‘The Great Reset’ which intends to use the fear generated by the coronavirus to reshape the world and achieve net zero emissions says Sky News host Rowan Dean. “The Australian taxpayer spends a fortune sending top politicians and public servants year in year out in luxury style to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos to help map out global economic structures”. However, Mr Dean pointed out behind its lavish exterior the World Economic Forum is working with the UN, IMF and other high-profile globalist organisations to introduce online activist movements and compliant local and national governments through a vast network of connected corporations. “It is a global commitment they have made to use the panic and fear generated by the corona virus as a means to reshape all our economies and laws and move to a new form of capitalism that focusses on net zero emissions”. “To use all the tools of COVID to tackle climate change”. Mr Dean said “if implemented successfully, The Great Reset will undeniably and deliberately have extreme and possibly dire repercussions”. “‘You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy’ is just one of their marketing slogans,” he said. “The plan involves replacing shareholders of big companies with stakeholders, who happen to be left-wing bureaucrats and climate change zealots. Replacing Mum and Dad small businesses and private enterprises with big tech and big business”. “Remember, it’s not only a great reset, it’s a great deception.

German Lawyer Sues The World Over Coronavirus

– 13 November 2020 –

Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee.

Panic Paper https://bit.ly/3f3IZRF 

About the guest: Dr Reiner Fuellmich is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee, which since July 10, 2020, has been listening to large number of international scientists’ and experts’ testimonies, to find answers to questions about the pandemic, being asked by people worldwide.

Message for Freedom and Hope – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

– 4 November 2020 –

Citizens of all countries are paying an enormous price for the epidemic. They have not only lost their loved ones, but their freedoms, their livelihood, their joy. Children and youth are suffering due to this crisis too. Without their friends and social activities, mental health problems in our young is at an all-time high. People around the world are demanding to be spared from the devastating consequences of the epidemic. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, provides an inspirational message for freedom and hope to activists around the world.

‘Government by decree – Covid-19 and the Constitution’: Lord Sumption

– 27 October 2020 –

On 27 October 2020 Lord Sumption delivered the 2020 Cambridge Freshfields Lecture entitled “Government by decree – Covid-19 and the Constitution”. The disputes over Brexit last year saw an attempt to make the executive, not Parliament, the prime source of authority in the Constitution. The coronavirus crisis has provoked another attempt to marginalise Parliament, this time with the willing acquiescence of the House of Commons. Is this to be our future? Lord Sumption is an author, historian and lawyer of note. He was appointed directly from the practising Bar to the Supreme Court, and served as a Supreme Court Justice from 2012-18. In 2019, he delivered the BBC Reith Lectures, “Law and the Decline of Politics”, and is now a regular commentator in the media. He continues to sit as a Non-Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. Alongside his career as a lawyer, he has also produced a substantial and highly-regarded narrative history of the Hundred Years’ War between England and France (with volume V still to come).

More information about this lecture, including a transcript, is available from the Private Law Centre website: https://www.privatelaw.law.cam.ac.uk/...

The Great Barrington Declaration

– 18 October 2020 –

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. 

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. 

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Read more…

Your Guide to the Great Reset

– 16 October 2020 –

Connecting the Dots: The Great Reset & The Fourth Industrial Revolution

Dave Cullen

– 14 October 2020 –

The Great Reset and The Man Behind the Curtain

– 12 October 2020 –

‘The Great Reset’: World leaders to harness COVID and pursue ‘sinister’ climate agenda

– 11 October 2020 –

This is a Spiritual Battle

– 6 October 2020 –

NB: I have never really understood the following words of Y’Shua in Matthew 24:22. After watching the following video and the information pertaining to the inherent dangers within current vaccines I now have a much clearer understanding. 

For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.

Matthew 24:21/22

Vaccine Hydrogel & Clandestine Government Programs

Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Andrew Kaufman on nanotech EMF bio-sensors in the new generation vaccines. Discusses Hydrogel as a nanobot payload delivery system.

– 2 October 2020 –

Ted Kuntz and Rocco Galati On the Global Agenda & Media Collusion

– 2 October 2020 –

The Pandemic is a Test Run

– 23 September 2020 –

Robert Kennedy Jr. Destroys Big Pharma, Fauci & Pro-Vaccine Movement

– 2 May 2020 –

Previous Posts In This ‘COVID 19’ Series

- Part 1 - The Fear Pandemic

What exactly is this global enemy called COVID 19? Why is it only affecting mostly the elderly and the most vulnerable of society? Is this virus something to fear as has become so evident in society as everyone diligently obeys the lockdown regulations. Will we ever return to normal life again.
Allow me to share my findings from my research.d’.

Read more…

- Part 2 - What Really Makes One Sick

Are human beings really under regular attack by external invading viruses? Is the Divine design of the human body so feeble? Is there an alternative theory for the cause of illness that may be more logical and plausible?

Read more…

- Part 3 - The Vaccine Agenda
Through the lethal power of this poisoned needle, the simple zymotic (contagious) diseases of the past have been devolved into the horrors of the present — our terrifying and expanding crop of ‘killer diseases’. Many of these strange ‘mystery diseases’ that baffle the entire medical world, are the sordid products of vaccine poisons that disturb the chemical balance of the body and interfere with normal functioning.
Eleanor McBean

Read more…

- Part 4 - Order Out of Chaos

What is the link between the United Nations Sustainable Development plan and this COVID 19 Pandemic?
Is there an age-old ‘Hidden Hand’ with another ‘Order Out of Chaos’ master plan pushing for a dictatorial global rulership?

Read more…

- Part 5 - The Network of Global Control

COVID 19 has created the much needed opportunity to fast track the world towards global governance. This global governance infrastructure is already in place.

Read more…

- Part 6a - The Final World Dictatorship
 We are living in a world today that is fast being transformed before our very eyes. The world that we have grown accustomed to is about to radically change. COVID 19 has presented the opportunity for change and those individuals who have desired radical change for decades now will not let this manufactured crisis go to waste. We are being herded as human cattle into a ‘new normal’ that we are not going to like.
Our world of capitalism, democracy, sovereign nation-states and individual freedom is about to be changed. We are moving into a world of ‘technocratic governance’. This is a world where the ‘god’ is science and technology.

Read more…

- Part 6b - Transhumanism and A.I

Utilising science and technological discoveries for the benefit of man is nothing new. For decades now mankind has benefitted from technological advances in the medical fields with things like hearing aids, artificial limbs, heart pacemakers and the list goes on. The problem though is that science and technology are advancing so rapidly that mankind is about to cross the line into an age of self-destruction. Most people probably believe that the advances in science as it relates to transhumanism will benefit all of mankind.
Are we moving towards a perfect ‘science-fiction’ world where in excess of seven billion people on planet earth will reap the rewards of this technological progress? I do not believe so. I believe that this progress will be reserved for the benefit of an elite minority – those who are wealthy enough to secure the benefit (if you are someone who believes this direction of progress to be beneficial that is).

Read more…

- Part 7 - The biblical Perspective

Coming soon. The Prophetic warning and Promises from the Almighty.

Read more…

- Part 8 - Notable updates
Due to the fast-moving development of this subject matter, I thought that it would be of benefit to include some updated material.

Read more…

Babylon Rising – Notable Updates

Babylon Rising – part 6b Transhumanism and A.I

Babylon Rising – part 6b Transhumanism and A.I

 

Transhumanism, Artificial Intelligence and Gene Editing

Part 6b of 7

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

2Thessalonians 2:3-4

Utilising science and technological discoveries for the benefit of man is nothing new. For decades now mankind has benefitted from technological advances in the medical fields with things like hearing aids, artificial limbs, heart pacemakers and the list goes on. The problem though is that science and technology are advancing so rapidly that mankind is about to cross the line into an age of self-destruction. Most people probably believe that the advances in science as it relates to transhumanism will benefit all of mankind.

Are we moving towards a perfect ‘science-fiction’ world where in excess of seven billion people on planet earth will reap the rewards of this technological progress? I do not believe so. I believe that this progress will be reserved for the benefit of an elite minority – those who are wealthy enough to secure the benefit (if you are someone who believes this direction of progress to be beneficial that is).

It is my belief that in the very near future the scientific and technological advancements will be turned on the masses of the world as a weapon which will serve to rid the planet of the perceived useless eaters i.e. those who only consume and destroy. This is how I interpret the minds of the ‘globalist elite’ anyway. If you do not see this attitude manifesting in the world today then you have not been paying attention. The Georgia Guidestones are not some random joke or an idle threat made by a single madman. They reflect a message to mankind and represeent the will of the ‘elite’.

The science of gene editing is progressing at a tremendous pace and is probably nearing the point where there will be very little that science can not do in terms of creating customised human beings. This is a very scary science – for believers that is.

In the latter part of this post, you will find information pertaining to eugenics i.e. population control. Eugenics will not only determine the quality of the human gene pool in the near future but will also be used to reduce and limit the number of humans who inhabit the earth. Some may believe that the goal of eugenics is to create a superior race of humans. This may be true but one must understand that the goal is also to arrive at a limited number of superior humans – a drastically reduced human population with a remaining superior, elite race.

Consider these quotes:

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man.” – Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller foundation

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”  – Ted Turner – CNN founder and UN supporter – quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June ’96

Are these quotes just the random mumblings of a few, radical lunatics?

In my opinion, there are so many moral, ethical and Biblical reasons to resist this scientific ‘transhumanist’ progression.

The ungodly, secular masses of the world’s population are excited about the prospects of transhumanism and the reported future benefits of artificial intelligence and ‘super-humans’. Those who are familiar with Bible Prophecy and have some insight into the Devine will of our Almighty Creator will however hold to a very different view.

A world without the ‘God of Creation’ is a very dangerous place to be. A world in which I want no part other than to fulfill the purpose for which I was created and placed here for such a time as this.

There is a large amount of content in this post. Probably far too much to digest. Please make every effort though to work your way through it and follow through with your own additional research into the topics. There is tremendous amount of information online to further your understanding.

Are humans on the verge of becoming a sub-species?

Will there be a future ‘genetic upper class’ established through advanced scientific discovery and technology?

Bertrand Russel says in “The Impact of Science on Society” (1953) on pages 49-50 that,

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

 

“The GenRich–who account for 10 percent of the American population–all carry synthetic genes. Genes that were created in the laboratory….The GenRich are a modern-day hereditary class of genetic aristocrats….All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class.”

A future scenario in which humanity splits into two distinct classes, the “GenRich” and the “GenPoor.”

Lee Silver from his book “Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World”, 

What is Transhumanism?

Transhumanism is a way of thinking about the future that is based on the premise that the human species in its current form does not represent the end of our development but rather a comparatively early phase.

Transhumanism is a loosely defined movement that has developed gradually over the past two decades.

Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.

– Max More (1990)

Humanity+ formally defines it based on Max More’s original definition as follows:

The intellectual and cultural movement that affirms the possibility and desirability of fundamentally improving the human condition through applied reason, especially by developing and making widely available technologies to eliminate aging and to greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities.
The study of the ramifications, promises, and potential dangers of technologies that will enable us to overcome fundamental human limitations, and the related study of the ethical matters involved in developing and using such technologies.
Transhumanism can be viewed as an extension of humanism, from which it is partially derived. Humanists believe that humans matter, that individuals matter. We might not be perfect, but we can make things better by promoting rational thinking, freedom, tolerance, democracy, and concern for our fellow human beings. Transhumanists agree with this but also emphasize what we have the potential to become. Just as we use rational means to improve the human condition and the external world, we can also use such means to improve ourselves, the human organism. In doing so, we are not limited to traditional humanistic methods, such as education and cultural development. We can also use technological means that will eventually enable us to move beyond what some would think of as “human”.

https://whatistranshumanism.org

Transhumanism is a philosophical movement that advocates for the transformation of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies to greatly enhance human intellect and physiology.[1][2]

Transhumanist thinkers study the potential benefits and dangers of emerging technologies that could overcome fundamental human limitations as well as the ethical[3] limitations of using such technologies.[4] The most common transhumanist thesis is that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into different beings with abilities so greatly expanded from the current condition as to merit the label of posthuman beings.[2]

The contemporary meaning of the term “transhumanism” was foreshadowed by one of the first professors of futurology, a man who changed his name to FM-2030. In the 1960s, he taught “new concepts of the human” at The New School when he began to identify people who adopt technologies, lifestyles and worldviews “transitional” to posthumanity as “transhuman”.[5] The assertion would lay the intellectual groundwork for the British philosopher Max More to begin articulating the principles of transhumanism as a futuristphilosophy in 1990, and organizing in California an intelligentsia that has since grown into the worldwide transhumanist movement.[5][6][7]

Influenced by seminal works of science fiction, the transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives, including philosophy and religion.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism

“It is their belief that we can and should eradicate ageing as a cause of death; that we can and should use technology to augment our bodies and our minds; that we can and should merge with machines, remaking ourselves, finally, in the image of our own higher ideals.”

Mark O’Connell from his book To Be a Machine

Transhumanism: Could we live forever?

BBC News

The Victoria Derbyshire programme’s Benjamin Zand goes on the search for immortality and meets the people who think we could live forever. This film is part of BBC’s ‘Intelligent Machines Week’

Transhumanism and You

Transhumanism promises us a fantastic future in which humans overcome disease, aging, and even death. It just requires us to take the final step and merge fully with machines. But its secret past in crypto-eugenics reveals a darker future, one in which a GenRich elite rule over the GenPoor masses. Are you ready to give up your humanity?

Dr Carrie Madej Human 2.0

Dr Carrie Madej warns about transhumanism and untested DNA vaccines. Pentagon, DARPA and European Human Brain Project advisor Dr. James Giordano discusses nano-robotic brain to computer interface and electro-magnetic manipulation of human neural circuitry. In 1991 the U.S. govt issued a patent for a device capable of manipulating brainwaves through electro-magnetic frequencies for the purpose of altering a persons state of consciousness. U.S. Patent # 5356368.

DNA Frequency Bio-weapon Links Targeted Individuals to Artificial Intelligence

The Internet of Living Things. Making humans an extension of the internet but with A.I. in control, not the human.

No death and an enhanced life:

Is the future transhuman?

The aims of the transhumanist movement are summed up by Mark O’Connell in his book To Be a Machine, which last week won the Wellcome Book prize. “It is their belief that we can and should eradicate ageing as a cause of death; that we can and should use technology to augment our bodies and our minds; that we can and should merge with machines, remaking ourselves, finally, in the image of our own higher ideals.”

The idea of technologically enhancing our bodies is not new. But the extent to which transhumanists take the concept is. In the past, we made devices such as wooden legs, hearing aids, spectacles and false teeth. In future, we might use implants to augment our senses so we can detect infrared or ultraviolet radiation directly or boost our cognitive processes by connecting ourselves to memory chips. Ultimately, by merging man and machine, science will produce humans who have vastly increased intelligence, strength, and lifespans; a near embodiment of gods.

Read the full story: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/06/no-death-and-an-enhanced-life-is-the-future-transhuman

The Age of Artificial Intelligence

The Age of A.I. is a 8 part documentary series hosted by Robert Downey Jr. covering the ways Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Neural Networks will change the world.

The Age of A.I.

How Far is Too Far? | The Age of A.I.

Can A.I. make music? Can it feel excitement and fear? Is it alive? Will.i.am and Mark Sagar push the limits of what a machine can do. How far is too far, and how much further can we go?

Healed through A.I. | The Age of A.I.

The human body is not infallible, but through the wonders of A.I. research scientists are finding ways to address those imperfections. A.I. has the potential to heal, enhance and make up for the things our bodies lack.

Using A.I. to build a better human | The Age of A.I.

Through life changing accidents, and data minded through NASCAR, human beings are finding ways to rebuild one another so that we are better, faster, and stronger than ever before and all with the help of A.I.. Once nothing more than the stuff of comic books and TV shows, we truly have the technology to become modern superheroes.

Saving the world one algorithm at a time | The Age of A.I.

Many say that human beings have destroyed our planet. Because of this these people are endeavoring to save it through the help of artificial intelligence. Famine, animal extinction, and war may all be preventable one day with the help of technology.

Gene Editing

Genome Engineering and the CRISPR Revolution

It has become apparent to me, following my research into the subject, that gene editing is not a new scientific discovery. In fact, gene editing has been in existence for a few decades already and we should all be familiar with GM (genetically modified) food – or GMO (genetically modified organism). It was however the discovery of CRISPR in 2012 that provided the giant leap in understanding and potential for gene editing or gene surgery as I have heard it called.

Geneticist Jennifer Doudna was one of the co-founders of CRISPR-Cas9.

‘The tool allows scientists to make precise edits to DNA strands, which could lead to treatments for genetic diseases … but could also be used to create so-called “designer babies.”

Scientists battle for gene-editing patent
– Argument over who invented CRISPR-Cas9 method of editing genes heads to US Patent & Trademark Office –

The revolutionary gene-editing technique known as CRISPR, discussed recently in The New Economy, is thought to be potentially worth billions of dollars. Now a dispute has broken out between two sets of researchers over who was first to make the break-through with the technology that has been described as genetic scissors.

The University of California has contacted the US Patent & Trademark Office about a number of patents that were last year awarded to the Massachusetts-based MIT/Harvard Broad Institute, which it claims belong to them. It is likely that regulators will study laboratory notebooks in an effort to determine who uncovered the technology first, with potentially huge financial implications the result.

According to MIT Technology Review, CRISPR-Cas9 was first described in public by University of California biologist Jennifer Doudna and French biologist Emmanuelle Charpentier. However, MIT/Harvard Broad Institute’s Feng Zhang won a patent for the technology last year because of notebooks he submitted that he claimed proved he invented it.

Speaking to MIT Technology Review, Greg Ahoronian, director of the Centre for Global Patent Quality, said that the stakes were high for such a revolutionary technology. “Expect this battle to be very expensive, very contentious, given the stakes involved. Given the stakes with CRISPR, I can see many hundreds of thousands of dollars being spent fighting this battle.”

The technology has become hugely anticipated by the healthcare industry, with many believing it could transform the way many diseases and conditions are treated. Diseases that include cancer, diabetes, and heart disease could be treated through genetic editing, with much more tailored and specific medicines being offered to patients.

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats), has seen leading healthcare companies like AstraZeneneca invest huge amounts into furthering research earlier this year, while Swiss-based pharmaceutical firm Novartis also announced funding for two US biotechnology firms that are developing the technology. (https://www.theneweconomy.com/technology/scientists-battle-for-gene-editing-patent)

I have watched many interviews with Jennifer Doudna and I must say that she tends to steer away from discussing the possible negatives associated with gene editing and rather mentions the urgent need for guidelines and control measures. I have included some interviews below for your interest. There is a large number of resources and literature available on this subject online. What I have included below are some that I believe should provide an introductory framework.

It is clear to me that since the discovery of CRISPR in 2012 giant leaps of progress have been made in the field of gene editing. So much so that one scientist suggested in an interview that one would need to read at least sixty case documents a week to be able to stay abreast of developments.

For most people, gene editing may appear to be very exciting especially in terms of disease prevention and cure. Unfortunately, I tend to see the huge risks and the ‘ungodliness’ involved with this science. My resistance to this science is driven by my Biblical understanding and perspective – especially considering end-time prophetic warnings.

I am clearly not alone with my concerns on this science. Imagine this technology in the hands of the immoral and unethical practitioners. This science will undoubtedly be an enormous money-spinner. Look at what takes place in the narcotics underworld and the backstreet abortion clinics. In my opinion gene editing is going to present more problems than positives in the near future.

 

The U.S. Intelligence has even gone so far as to include ‘gene editing’ onto the list of threats posed by ‘weapons of mass destruction and proliferation’:

 

……………………..

 Top U.S. Intelligence Official Calls Gene Editing a WMD Threat

Easy to use. Hard to control. The intelligence community now sees CRISPR as a threat to national safety.

Antonio Regalado  February 9, 2016

Genome editing is a weapon of mass destruction.

That’s according to James Clapper, U.S. director of national intelligence, who on Tuesday, in the annual worldwide threat assessment report of the U.S. intelligence community, added gene editing to a list of threats posed by “weapons of mass destruction and proliferation.”

Gene editing refers to several novel ways to alter the DNA inside living cells. The most popular method, CRISPR, has been revolutionizing scientific research, leading to novel animals and crops, and is likely to power a new generation of gene treatments for serious diseases (see “Everything You Need to Know About CRISPR’s Monster Year”).

It is gene editing’s relative ease of use that worries the U.S. intelligence community, according to the assessment. “Given the broad distribution, low cost, and accelerated pace of development of this dual-use technology, its deliberate or unintentional misuse might lead to far-reaching economic and national security implications,” the report said.

The choice by the U.S. spy chief to call out gene editing as a potential weapon of mass destruction, or WMD, surprised some experts. It was the only biotechnology appearing in a tally of six more conventional threats, like North Korea’s suspected nuclear detonation on January 6, Syria’s undeclared chemical weapons, and new Russian cruise missiles that might violate an international treaty.

The report is an unclassified version of the “collective insights” of the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and half a dozen other U.S. spy and fact-gathering operations.

Although the report doesn’t mention CRISPR by name, Clapper clearly had the newest and the most versatile of the gene-editing systems in mind. The CRISPR technique’s low cost and relative ease of use—the basic ingredients can be bought online for $60—seems to have spooked intelligence agencies.

“Research in genome editing conducted by countries with different regulatory or ethical standards than those of Western countries probably increases the risk of the creation of potentially harmful biological agents or products,” the report said.

The concern is that biotechnology is a “dual use” technology—meaning normal scientific developments could also be harnessed as weapons. The report noted that new discoveries “move easily in the globalized economy, as do personnel with the scientific expertise to design and use them.”

Clapper didn’t lay out any particular bioweapons scenarios, but scientists have previously speculated about whether CRISPR could be used to make “killer mosquitoes,” plagues that wipe out staple crops, or even a virus that snips at people’s DNA.

“Biotechnology, more than any other domain, has great potential for human good, but also has the possibility to be misused,” says Daniel Gerstein, a senior policy analyst at RAND and a former under secretary at the Department of Homeland Defense. “We are worried about people developing some sort of pathogen with robust capabilities, but we are also concerned about the chance of misutilization. We could have an accident occur with gene editing that is catastrophic, since the genome is the very essence of life.”

Piers Millet, an expert on bioweapons at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., says Clapper’s singling out of gene editing on the WMD list was “a surprise,” since making a bioweapon—say, an extra-virulent form of anthrax—still requires mastery of a “wide raft of technologies.”

Development of bioweapons is banned by the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, a Cold War–era treaty that outlawed biological warfare programs. The U.S., China, Russia, and 172 other countries have signed it. Millet says that experts who met in Warsaw last September to discuss the treaty felt a threat from terrorist groups was still remote, given the complexity of producing a bioweapon. Millet says the group concluded that “for the foreseeable future, such applications are only within the grasp of states.”

The intelligence assessment drew specific attention to the possibility of using CRISPR to edit the DNA of human embryos to produce genetic changes in the next generation of people—for example, to remove disease risks. It noted that fast advances in genome editing in 2015 compelled “groups of high-profile U.S. and European biologists to question unregulated editing of the human germ line (cells that are relevant for reproduction), which might create inheritable genetic changes.”

So far, the debate over changing the next generation’s genes has been mostly an ethical question, and the report didn’t say how such a development would be considered a WMD, although it’s possible to imagine a virus designed to kill or injure people by altering their genomes.

source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/02/09/71575/top-us-intelligence-official-calls-gene-editing-a-wmd-threat

You won’t be able to blame it on your genetics anymore: with CRISPR, it’s so easy to hacn into your DNA. CRISPR technology is our future, and experiments with DNA hacking are booming. CRISPR biotechnology is not science fiction anymore, it is our very near future. Would you hack and reprogram your own DNA with CRISPR? Breaking the code of life, hacking DNA at home. Welcome to the world of a new nature. We can now literally cut and paste DNA with the new CRISPR technology. There is a revolutionary development going on that will have major consequences for humans, plants and animals. The new biotechnology is here. ‘Bio is the New Digital’. We are able to accurately reprogram the genetic code of our body cells, embryos, bacteria, viruses and plants. With the CRISPR technology we can adjust the characteristics of each organism to our needs. This allows us to permanently ban diseases, improve our body conditions and adapt plants to our food needs. The special feature of CRISPR technology is that it is relatively simple. In the past year, the number of experiments and applications has exploded. Around the world, people have been tinkering with CRISPR: experimenting at home with the ‘Do it Yourself CRISPR kits’. Scientists call for new ethical frameworks. The demand for the (un)desirable so-called designer babies is imminent. Although this is not yet the case, we can put an end to hereditary diseases in the short term. We may also want to make bacteria that can eat oil or plastic, pigs in which human organs can grow or bring extinct animals back to life. It looks like science fiction but it is now closer to our reality than ever. (VPRO Documentary)

 

DNA Opening Pandora’s Box Documentary

Jim Watson was asked to give a tour of the future. He believes that DNA science should be used to change the human race. His views are both extraordinary and extremely controversial. Watson argues for a new kind of eugenics — where parents are allowed to choose the DNA of their children — to make them healthier, more intelligent, even better looking. His vision may be disagreeable, yet it’s a natural consequence of the decades of scientific exploration launched by his and Francis Crick’s discovery of the double helix. It’s worth considering what effect the advancements in genetic science may have on our future.

Gene Drives

CRISPR Technology and Gene Drives

As you watch the following presentation imagine the potential impact on humanity of vaccines in the hands of deceitful and wicked  individuals who’s goal is to reduce the worlds population.

Gene editing can now change an entire species — forever

CRISPR gene drives allow scientists to change sequences of DNA and guarantee that the resulting edited genetic trait is inherited by future generations, opening up the possibility of altering entire species forever. More than anything, this technology has led to questions: How will this new power affect humanity? What are we going to use it to change? Are we gods now? Join journalist Jennifer Kahn as she ponders these questions and shares a potentially powerful application of gene drives: the development of disease-resistant mosquitoes that could knock out malaria and Zika.

Gene Drive Documentary

Gene drive technology, enabled by new genetic engineering techniques like CRISPR/Cas9, are perhaps one of the most powerful and risky environmantal applications of genetic engineering ever developed, as they are designed to permanently genetically engineer or even eradicate entire wild species. To safeguard against potential desaster, we need a critical, ethical, social and political debate and a thorough technology and risk assessment. This 15 minute documentary examines key aspects of gene drive technology, including its future applications, its possible ecological consequences, the societal ramifications, the lack of knowledge and uncertainties of the technology and of current research, as well as obstacles to risk assessment and the regulatory steps required to prevent harm.

GUESS WHO’S FUNDING AND PROMOTING GENE DRIVES…

Jonathan Latham of Independent Science News joins us to discuss his 2017 article, “Gates Foundation Hired PR Firm to Manipulate UN Over Gene Drives.” We talk about gene drives, the dangers inherent in this technology, how the UN is involved, and why the Gates Foundation and DARPA are so interested in introducing genetic modifications into various species.

How CRISPR lets us edit our DNA | Jennifer Doudna

Geneticist Jennifer Doudna co-invented a groundbreaking new technology for editing genes, called CRISPR-Cas9. The tool allows scientists to make precise edits to DNA strands, which could lead to treatments for genetic diseases … but could also be used to create so-called “designer babies.” Doudna reviews how CRISPR-Cas9 works — and asks the scientific community to pause and discuss the ethics of this new tool.

HARDtalk Jennifer Doudna

Sarah Montague speaks to biochemist Jennifer Doudna. Crispr-Cas9 is a gene editing tool that has been described as the greatest biological breakthrough in decades. The hopes that rest on it are immense: that it can be used to cure cancer and other intractable diseases, stop mosquitoes carrying malaria, create drought-resistant crops and food that does not rot – even that it can recreate extinct animals. What does Jennifer make of the breathtaking pace of innovation since her discovery and does she fear where it may lead?

Genetic Engineering Will Change Everything Forever – CRISPR

Designer babies, the end of diseases, genetically modified humans that never age. Outrageous things that used to be science fiction are suddenly becoming reality. The only thing we know for sure is that things will change irreversibly.

Transhumanism or Eugenics?

Eugenics Moves to the Twenty-First Century

From the elimination of undesirables from the human race; mass culling in the name of saving the earth; to altering the genetic code of humanity with advanced technology; eugenics has moved into a new era.

Old-thinker news | August 27, 2007

By Daniel Taylor

This report is not meant to be a comprehensive history of eugenics. The initial article that I was going to write was less than half of what you will read here, but as I investigated this area I discovered how ignorant I was as to how expansive this topic is. Initially researching John D. Rockefeller, a Pandora’s box of information opened up, inevitably leading to the topic of this article. I hope that this information will help you come to a greater understanding of this subject, and to warn others of its grave dangers.

From the elimination of undesirables from the human race; mass culling in the name of saving the earth; to altering the genetic code of humanity with advanced technology: Eugenics has moved into a new era.

What is eugenics?

The word eugenics comes from the Greek words eus (good or well) and genēs (born) meaning “well born”. The American Heritage dictionary of the English language describes eugenics as, “The study of hereditary improvement of the human race by controlled selective breeding.” Sir Francis Galton was the man who coined the term, and developed the first eugenic policies. Galton expressed distress at the lack of emphasis on the betterment of the human race during his time, comparing men and women of his day to “pariah dogs”. In 1864, Galton wrote in an article titled “Hereditary Character and Talent,” published in two parts in MacMillan’s Magazine,

“If a twentieth part of the cost and pains were spent in measures for the improvement of the human race that is spent on the improvement of the breed of horses and cattle, what a galaxy of genius might we not create! We might introduce prophets and high priests of civilization into the world, as surely as we can propagate idiots by mating cretins. Men and women of the present day are, to those we might hope to bring into existence, what the pariah dogs of the streets of an Eastern town are to our own highly-bred varieties.”

The history of eugenics in America is filled with controversy and harrowing stories of forced sterilization throughout many U.S. states. In 2002 Mark R. Warner, the governor of Virginia issued an apology for the thousands of individuals that the state had sterilized from 1924 to 1979. USA Today reported on the governors statement,

“With the governor’s statement Thursday, Virginia becomes the only of the 30 states that conducted eugenics sterilizations to apologize. There are believed to be more than 60,000 eugenics victims nationwide.

‘Today, I offer the commonwealth’s sincere apology for Virginia’s participation in eugenics,’ Warner said.

‘As I have previously noted, the eugenics movement was a shameful effort in which state government never should have been involved,” he said. ‘We must remember the commonwealth’s past mistakes in order to prevent them from recurring.’”

The aristocratic, wealthy elite of America played a central role in the development of eugenics in America and abroad. Two such elite families are the Rockefellers and the Carnegies.

In 1902, Andrew Carnegie founded the Carnegie Institute which among other things, funded the Eugenics Record Office in America. The ERO (1910-1944) operated from Cold Spring Harbor in New York. Eugenics policies, which led to the sterilization of thousands of Americans, were developed in this office.

The Rockefellers, perhaps more so, were also heavily involved with eugenics. Rockefeller influence in American eugenics can be traced to the beginnings of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. John D. Rockefeller, along with Averell Harriman gave $11 million to create the facility in the early 1900’s. Rockefeller influence also spread overseas to Germany, where the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry, and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity resided. Much of the money used to run these facilities came from Rockefeller. These weren’t just average scientific institutes; the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes would become the center for Nazi eugenics programs.

As documented by Gary Allen in “The Rockefeller File” the Rockefellers continue to give money to eugenics and population control related organizations,

“In 1970, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave $500,000 to the Population Council. The Rockefeller Foundation gave ecology grants of $10,000 to the New School for Social Research, and $10,000 to the Population Reference Bureau.”

In 1973, the Rockefeller Foundation again gave $500,000 to the Population Council and $25,000 to the Population Crisis Committee, while the Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave $250,000 to the Population Council, and $250,000 to the Population Institute.

The Population Council was founded by John D. Rockefeller the 3rd in 1952. The first president of the Council, Frederick Osborn, was appointed by Rockefeller. Osborn was the leader of the American Eugenics Society, and member of the Galton Society, founded in 1918.

Osborn stated in the 1956 edition of “The Eugenics Review” that,

“…the reasons advanced must be generally acceptable reasons. Let’s stop telling anyone that they have a genetically inferior genetic quality, for they will never agree. Let’s base our proposals on the desirability of having children born in homes where they will get affectionate and responsible care, and perhaps our proposals will be accepted. It seems to me that if it is to progress as it should, eugenics must follow new policies and state its case anew, and that from this rebirth we may, even in our own lifetime, see it moving at last towards the high goals which Galton set for it.”

Killing to save the earth

Since the early days of eugenics, a new “brand” of this science has emerged in modern times. The environmental branch of eugenics believes that, due to overpopulation, measures must be taken to either impede population growth through various eugenic policies, or take drastic measures to eliminate living human beings from the earth. Unlike those who advocate eugenics to strictly rid humanity of “undesirables,” some advocate the culling of humanity in general in order to save planet earth. Many globalist initiatives surround environmental issues, one of which has been population control and reduction.

John Glad, a professor of Russian studies who has taught at several universities and worked for the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, wrote a book titled “Future Human Evolution: Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century.” In the introduction, Glad writes,

“Eugenics views itself as the fourth leg of the chair of civilization, the other three being a) a thrifty expenditure of natural resources, b) mitigation of environmental pollution, and c) maintenance of a human population not exceeding the planet’s carrying capacity. Eugenics, which can be thought of as human ecology, is thus part and parcel of the environmental movement.”

Notable quotes:

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man.” – Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller foundation

“…The first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size.” – Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, p.130-131

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”  – Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund – quoted in “Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?,” Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December ’95

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”  – Ted Turner – CNN founder and UN supporter – quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June ’96

“Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” – Sir Julian Huxley, first director general of UNESCO (1946-1948)

 

News articles regarding sterilization:

UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds
KADUNA, Nigeria, March 11, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation.

U.N. Complicit in Forced Sterilizations
There is compelling evidence that the United Nations collaborated in the forced sterilization of poor, rural women in Peru from 1995 to 1997.

Video presentation by David Ayoub, M.D.: Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda

In 2004 the publication World Watch published an article titled, “Global Population Reduction: Confronting the Inevitable,” by Ken Smail, a professor in the Anthropology department of Kenyon College in Ohio. In this article, Smail proposes that the earth’s carrying capacity will reach, or has reached already, its limit. In what Smail calls a modern day “Malthusian dilemma”, he cites measures to merely slow population growth as being inefficient, stating that,

“Looking past the near-term concerns that have plagued population policy at the political level, it is increasingly apparent that the long-term sustainability of civilization will require not just a leveling-off of human numbers as projected over the coming half-century, but a colossal reduction in both population and consumption.” [emphasis added]

Smail says that a large scale global population reduction is inevitable, but that there are two possible ways for this to happen,

“That there will be a large-scale reduction in global human numbers over the next two or three centuries
appears to be inevitable. The primary issue seems to be whether this process will be under conscious human control and (hopefully) relatively benign, or whether it will turn out to be unpredictably chaotic and (perhaps) catastrophic.”

The new eugenics

“Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under another name than eugenics.” – Frederick Osborn

Since the founding of eugenics, the movement has changed, but it has retained its core goals over the years. Thomas H. Campbell of the University of California believes that the eugenics model of Galton is outdated and impractical, as do many other scientists. Instead of relying on breeding “better humans,” without the intervention of technology, many scientists believe that technological means should be employed to further our “evolution.” With the rise of advanced scientific technologies, the ability to alter the genetic code of living organisms, and the augmentation of human bodies has become a reality. Some individuals who are involved with the modern eugenics movement see the rise of these capabilities as an opportunity to create or alter human beings to acquire the most “desirable traits” and rid humanity of traits deemed “undesirable”.

Is there a link between eugenics and the Human Genome Project? If so, what does this mean for future generations?

During the 34 years (1910-1944) the Eugenics Records Office was active, it collected information on specific human traits in what was called The Trait Book. Also collected was information on “Pedigree” families and their specific traits. Today, the Human Genome project is in effect carrying on what the Eugenics Records Office could only dream of.

James Watson, who began the initial research for the Human Genome Project, directed the operation from 1988-1992. Watson then served as director at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and would eventually become president of the Laboratory in 1994. Watson’s beliefs about the betterment of mankind mirror those of past eugenics leaders.

Watson is quoted as saying at a 1998 UCLA conference that,

“I mean, sure, we have great respect for the human species …. But evolution can be just damn cruel, and to say that we’ve got a perfect genome and there’s some sanctity to it, I’d just like to know where that idea comes from. It’s utter silliness. And the other thing, because no one really has the guts to say it, I mean, if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn’t we do it?”

Celera Genomics

Craig Venter caused many to question his ethics when he moved to found Celera Genomics in 1998, carrying the study of the human genome into the private sector, using the “shotgun strategy” to sequence the human genome at a faster clip than the public project.

In a press release dated March 1, 2001, Celera Genomics announced that it signed a “multi-year agreement” with AMDeC LLC to “allow member institutions to access Celera’s database information [Human Genome data] through its Celera Discovery System.” Some of those member institutions included Rockefeller University, and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Interestingly, Rockefeller University was founded by John D. Rockefeller in 1901 with a dedication to biomedical research. Today, David Rockefeller, grandson to John D. Rockefeller Jr., is the Chairman of the Rockefeller University Council.

Venter further maddened fellow scientists when he moved to patent human genes. Serious ethical discussions took place after the first attempts to patent human genes, but ultimately the decision stood to allow patenting. The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued guidelines on patenting. The American Medical Association describes the guidelines,

“The rules are intended to help end a bitter debate on gene patenting. These regulations have put to rest any question about whether genes can be patented at all — making it clear that companies may indeed patent both whole genes as well as pieces of genes…”

The guidelines allow patenting when the those applying for a patent on a gene show a “utility” for the gene. The AMA goes on to state that arguments were heard opposing the decision based on the fact that these genes were not created by anyone, and thus could not be patented. The AMA describes how the Patent office rejected these ideas,

“The PTO firmly rejected this notion based upon the fact that a gene may be removed from a person, then a clone of that gene may be made in a machine, which is then not a part of nature, but a product of the lab.”

A search in the online patent database for “human genes” yields an astonishing 159021 results as of August 2007.

Designer babies

The apex of a futuristic eugenics program comes with the advent of designer babies, embryos that are genetically enhanced through various methods. The knowledge gathered through the study of the human genome will, according to some, lead to the ability to create such designer babies.

In 2000, the BBC aired a documentary called “Who’s Afraid of Designer Babies?” Featured in this clip is Lee M. Silver, professor at Princeton University and former investigator for Cold Spring Harbor (1980-1984).

There is still doubt among scholars and scientists that the Human Genome Project will lead to a new eugenics program, such as designer babies. They cite limitations on current technology and the need for further research as reasons for this position. However, unknown to many, genetically altered babies have already been born. The implications of this development are immense, but it has received little attention. Because these babies were “created” in the private sector and the lab did not receive government funding, there were no governmental restrictions on what could be done. As Wired magazine reported in 2001,

“Researchers have genetically-altered humans for the first time, but experts question the moral implications of tinkering with the unborn.

The scientists weren’t looking to create genetically-enhanced Michael Jordans or Anna Kournikovas. Rather, they repaired the defective eggs of prospective mothers by injecting them with DNA from the eggs of healthy donors.

But regardless of the scientists’ intentions, they’ve created the first human offspring with changes to their “germline,” or the genes they’ll pass on to future generations. In this case, the babies’ genes contain DNA from two women instead of just one.

Researchers at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas in West Orange, New Jersey, have achieved 15 births using the technique. In their paper, published in the March 2001 issue of the Human Reproduction journal, they say at least 15 additional healthy babies have been born as a result of this technique in other labs.

The researchers performed the fertilizations in 1997 and 1998. In March, they published data on the results of DNA fingerprint tests on two of the children, each one year old, confirming that they contain a small quantity of additional genes not inherited from either parent.

Most scientists consider altering the germline unethical, since no one knows what the long-term effects might be. The researchers, however, are confident the technique is safe.”

What will the future look like?

What will the future hold in a world in which eugenics, utilizing advanced technology, has become a reality?

Lee Silver describes in his book “Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World”, a future scenario in which humanity splits into two distinct classes, the “GenRich” and the “GenPoor.”

“The GenRich–who account for 10 percent of the American population–all carry synthetic genes. Genes that were created in the laboratory….The GenRich are a modern-day hereditary class of genetic aristocrats….All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class.”

Those who are not as fortunate to have access to genetic modification, called “Naturals” by Silver, will “…work as low-paid service providers or as laborers.”

Bertrand Russel says in “The Impact of Science on Society” (1953) on pages 49-50 that,

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

Hollywood has apparently been keeping up to date on genetic technologies, adding their own theatrical twist. The movie “Gattaca”, released in 1997, portrays a despotic future world in which designer babies are born every day, and the perfection of genes has become the center of society.

Watch the Gattaca trailer:

Thomas H. Campbell of the University of California believes that humanity is destined to gain access to methods of “autoevolution.” Writing in his paper, “The Moral Imperative of Our Future Evolution“, Campbell describes future technologies and their eugenic implications. Campbell praises eugenics policies, and cites the Human Genome Project as a positive development in the identification of “defective” genes.

“We have catalogued defective genes behind a variety of dreadful neurological and metabolic disorders as parts of programs to eliminate them eugenically. Our systematic mapping of the human genome will identify many others. Everyone applauds the goal of purging these defects in our heredity – notwithstanding quibbles over the ethics of the techniques of amniocentesis, abortion and even contraception. I emphatically embrace this eugenic program even though its evolutionary impact is insignificant. Most defective genes are rare, and their total elimination does little for evolution except squeeze the range of variation of humans.”

“We probably will begin our interventions into brain and embryonic development with drugs and hormones and subsequently engineer the desirable intrusions into the genome. Then, after a further generation of accumulating biological information about individual gene function, developmental pathways, and the neural substrate of brain function, evolutionists probably will write novel genes for these traits from scratch using a DNA synthesizer.”

“Of course, the methods for evolving our genetics extend beyond biotechnology. Ultra-sophisticated parallel processing computers and software programs will predictively model how particular gene configurations translate into phenotype, and how particular phenotypic traits can be engineered into developmental pathways. As a start, new computer technology is being developed today as an integral part of the human genome project.”

Campbell, like others, says that future genetic technologies will be extremely expensive, leaving the average person out of the loop. Campbell expresses his approval of this expense due to the fact that only the “most successful generative lines” will have access to these technologies.

“The costs will be enormous, far beyond what most people could afford. This has kept our democratic society from appreciating that these possibilities will be used and will be important. However, their feasibility cannot be judged from what the average person will be willing to pay to procreate. What matters are the resources that the most successful generative lines will be able to apply to their goals. A million dollars per conception seems a great underestimate to me for the beings who hold evolution’s frontier.”

The legacy of Galton, John D., and Carnegie lives on. Though terms have changed, the names of organizations altered, the methods of propagandizing the public reformed; the ideology behind eugenics is being carried into the twenty-first century, and a new eugenics is creeping into our society. Will humanity as we know it today become a fossil as some have proposed? Public awareness is the key. The information contained in this report needs to be spread far and wide, for the future of humanity as we know it depends on it.

source: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2007/08/27/eugenics-moves-to-the-twenty-first-century/

The Post-Human World Is Emerging, Will Free Humans Resist?

Old-Thinker News | May 3, 2020

By Daniel Taylor

Mainstream news says human resistance to losing jobs to automation “could dissipate” in response to pandemic.

Institutional anti-humanism has taken hold of the western world. Coronavirus could lock in a system of high tech tyranny.

A post-human world is emerging. AI systems are activating. The future needs real humans with a conscience and the ability to question authority.

Social distancing by it’s very nature is anti-human. Coronavirus has altered our society dramatically. Some of these changes were already under way, and anti-human forces were planning to implement them ahead of the AI robot tech revolution.

Social media was already distorting social norms well before the pandemic. Former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya stated in 2018 that:

It literally is at a point now we’ve created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works. That is literally where we are. I would encourage all of you how to internalize this is – if you feed the beast, the beast will destroy you.”

Hollywood predictive programming seeded the idea of virtual reality as an “oasis” in a crumbling world with the 2018 film Ready Player One:

Pentagon announces AI system in response to virus

A massive AI system has been rolled out by the Pentagon to organize logistics surrounding essential supplies from national to local areas. As reported, the project will be integrated into a wider military command and control AI weapons system:

“It may also become a part of the Joint All-Domain Command and Control, or JADC2, a massive effort to digitally interlink weapons, vehicles and personnel.”

Coronavirus response created a financial incentive for “non essential” human workers to stay home.

If the government can manage to get stimulus checks into the hands of millions of unemployed workers, a long standing goal of a universal basic income could be fulfilled.

Former President Barack Obama said in 2018 that a universal income through government handouts would be required in the age of artificial intelligence. Obama said:

“Artificial intelligence is here… the pace of change is going to require us to do more fundamental reimagining of our social and political arrangements…”

Multiple headlines from mainstream news are happily welcoming the robot AI takeover in response to the pandemic. Here are a few examples:

The New York Times: “Robots Welcome to Take Over, as Pandemic Accelerates Automation

The BBC: Coronavirus: Will Covid-19 speed up the use of robots to replace human workers?

Wired Magazine:The Covid-19 Pandemic Is a Crisis That Robots Were Built For

Business Insider: “How China, the US, and Europe are using robots to replace and help humans fight coronavirus…”

If we are to believe Elon Musk, Ray Kurzweil and other top Transhumanists, we will need to merge with the machines in order to survive.

In reality the exact opposite is true. Humanity’s survival depends on remaining human and defying the post human agenda.

The future needs real humans with a conscience and the ability to question authority.

The western world needs to develop a pro-human culture and accompanying world view to counter the anti-human programming of the past 100 years.

Free humanity; Unite for a pro-human future.

source: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2020/05/03/the-post-human-world-is-emerging-will-free-humans-resist/

………………………………………

It’s Time To Fight Institutional Anti-Humanism

Old-Thinker News | February 12, 2020

By Daniel Taylor

Pro-human renaissance could bring new era of prosperity.

Leftists have made profitable careers out of battling ghosts of institutional racism, transphobia and bigotry. This campaign has resulted in further division, but most importantly it misses the target entirely.

Institutional Anti-Humanism

The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century (rooted in an idea over 2,000 years old) that injected an anti-human philosophy into every western institution. Globalist social engineering programs infiltrated every level of our society. Academic, scientific, corporate, governmental, and religious institutions were all touched by its influence. Eugenics and population reduction was a primary goal.

The overarching ethos of this program was essentially anti human. It views humans as soul-less animals to be manipulated by a technocratic elite in pursuit of power.

This can fairly be labeled as institutional anti-humanism, and it still holds power over us in almost every way.

Dr. Lily E. Kay’s 1993 book “The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology” documents much of the early history behind the rise of eugenics and life sciences. Kay demonstrates that the drive for social control and eugenics was largely responsible for the emergence and growth of the science of molecular biology.

A key portion of Dr. Kay’s book concludes that large foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation shaped the development of culture and production of knowledge in the United States:

“…by the end of the Progressive Era, even before the large-scale commitment to the “advancement of knowledge” spurred by World War I, the human sciences received considerable support from the large foundations. Their numerous projects and the unprecedented scope of their financial and institutional resources shaped the development of culture and the production of knowledge in the United States. Through education, public opinion, stimulation of specific research agenda, and the promotion of selective categories of knowledge and research, the Foundation played a key role in the creation of a hegemonic bloc; the resources and prestige flowing into those fields relevant to problems of social control were instrumental in the formation of consensus between social and political elites, on the one hand, and academic interests on the other.”

The ripple effect of this program has sent waves to the present day, when the current global establishment is run by individuals who are completely bought in to this system of thought. Draining the swamp must include throwing out the entire thought system that has driven it.

Vaccines that sterilize women and cause spontaneous miscarriages came out of this system, as did massive projects that created deadly bioweapons world-wide.

Henry Kissinger’s notorious NSSM 200 came out of this institutional anti-humanism.

A secret project to use biological weapons against Southeast Asia in 1947 by the Australian government was spawned by this program.

Planned Parenthood also grew as a tentacle of the project.

The technological revolution currently enveloping the globe is rolling out as an anti human force. Big Tech, acting as an extension of globalist power, is seeking to draw humans into a matrix like existence while the real world crumbles.

We can course-correct and spark a new renaissance that views human beings as having immortal souls with innate value and potential.

We can build up individuals instead of creating victims.

We were simply not meant to live in constant comfort in an artificial environment. Our potential can never be fully expressed.

Technology needs to be developed for human exploration and colonization of space. We can take heart knowing that we are not yet at the end of the wilderness road.

source: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2020/02/12/its-time-to-fight-institutinal-anti-humanism/

Visions of The Future

– The Corbett Report – 

So what do the elitists have in store for humanity? You don’t need a crystal ball, you just need to read their own writings and watch their propaganda videos. Join James on this edition of The Corbett Report podcast as he takes a tour through the future to see the world that the globalists are seeking to create.

THE GREAT CONVERGENCE

– The Corbett Report – 

Haven’t heard of The Great Convergence yet? Oh, it’s just the plan to merge biology with digital technology and redefine what it means to be human, that’s all. Today on the podcast James covers the biodigital convergence that is already being rolled out and what it means for the future of homo sapiens.

Eugenics, Abortion, and Our Future – A Biblical Perspective

The Quest for Perfection

The eugenics movement lost momentum when it was associated with the horrors of the Nazi regime, but it did not die. Instead, it became “quiet and careful.” A resurgence of eugenics is brewing in America today, and modern Planned Parenthood still advocates many eugenic ideals. As Christians, it is our responsibility to view life from God’s perspective and to defend all of those who are created in His image. No matter how impaired a human life may seem, every person has value because they are made in God’s image.