Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

The Global ‘Technocratic’ Dictatorship

– The Technocracy –

Part 6a of 7

In this post:

 The Technocratic World   – The ‘New Normal’

Patrick Wood Exposes the Technocracy Agenda

 Capitalism Is Dead

 Technocracy – The Looming Global Scientific Dictatorship

Rebuilding Babel: Toward The Endgame of Technocracy

The Rise of Technocracy

Patrick Wood’s 12 Days of Technocracy

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

Due to the volume of content for this subject it has been necessary to extend this series to seven parts. In addition I have found it necessary to provide part 6 as two parts i.e. ‘6a’ and ‘6b’  due to the volume of subject content.

The final part 7 will cover the Biblical perspective – as I see it that is.

The Technocratic World   – The ‘New Normal’

We are living in a world today that is fast being transformed before our very eyes. The world that we have grown accustomed to is about to radically change. COVID 19 presented the opportunity for change and those individuals that have desired radical change for decades now will not let this manufactured crisis go to waste. We are being herded as human cattle into a ‘new normal’ that we are not going to like.

Our world of capitalism, democracy, sovereign nation-states and individual freedom is about to be changed. We are moving into a world of ‘technocratic governance’. This is a world where the ‘god’ is science and technology. Those who want to bring about this change are not looking to rule in any regular political fashion either. They want to rule from behind the curtain through the means of science and technology.

Technocracy is a concept that few people may understand and certainly before this pandemic I was not aware of what a Technocratic Dictatorship would look like. From my online research, it seems clear to me that most people fear an imminent ‘Communist’, ‘Fascist’ or a ‘Socialist’ styled world government of sorts ruled by an evil, ‘Antichrist’ tyrant. This anticipated central world government is often proclaimed as the ‘New World Order’ government or an overarching One World government.

Understanding ‘technocracy’ has been the missing piece of the puzzle for me and understanding the subject has helped me tremendously, especially with regards to an end-time global power and how it fits into the Biblical narrative. Understanding the goals of the technocrats will definitely assist you with understanding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and will also provide you with a much clearer understanding of why this pandemic ‘crisis’ was created/required in order to bring about the societal and behavioural changes necessary to advance the world toward a Technocratic authoritarian order. This will create the much desired ‘new normal’ for the globalists  – the Technocrats – the ungodly and super wealthy ‘super nerds’ who want to change the world based on their worship of science and technology.

The technocracy movement is a social and ideological movement that arose in the early 20th century. This technocracy movement proposed replacing politicians and business people with scientists and engineers who had the technical expertise to manage the economy. During this pandemic, we have often heard the media and politicians referring to the ‘experts’, either scientific or medical, for advice and guidance. We have witnessed the emergence of the ‘experts’ in science and technology as the real leaders i.e. the technocrats. We have been groomed to praise these ‘experts’ and also the ‘frontliners’ as our saviors in a time of need.

I must state however, that although many of these ‘technocrats’ are easily identifiable, it is my view that there is still a higher level of control behind the curtain of these power-hungry technocrat super nerds. There is a group of ‘elite’ who have longed for world rulership and control for centuries and are utilising technocracy as their means to an end. Anyway regardless of my view on this, these individuals will attain their goal of ruling the world albeit for a very short period of time. More on this though in the final part seven.

…………………………………………..

Technocracy is an ideological system of governance in which a decision-maker or makers are elected by the population or appointed on the basis of their expertise in a given area of responsibility, particularly with regard to scientific or technical knowledge. This system explicitly contrasts with representative democracy, the notion that elected representatives should be the primary decision-makers in government, though it does not necessarily imply eliminating elected representatives. Leadership skills for decision-makers are selected on the basis of specialized knowledge and performance, rather than political affiliations or parliamentary skills.

The term technocracy was originally used to advocate the application of the scientific method to solving social problems. Concern could be given to sustainability within the resource base, instead of monetary profitability, so as to ensure continued operation of all social-industrial functions. In its most extreme sense technocracy is an entire government running as a technical or engineering problem and is mostly hypothetical. In more practical use, technocracy is any portion of a bureaucracy that is run by technologists. A government in which elected officials appoint experts and professionals to administer individual government functions and recommend legislation can be considered technocratic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

…………………………………………..

Techies Have Been Trying to Replace Politicians for Decades

They want to replace politicians with engineers and our modern financial system with one backed by the laws of science. They dream of a world without scarcity, where the miracles of technology can easily meet the needs of everyone in the nation.

No, we’re not talking about today’s Bitcoin-hawking Silicon Valley techno-utopians. We’re talking about Technocracy Inc., an organization founded in 1931 to promote the ideas of a man named Howard Scott.

Scott saw government and industry as wasteful and unfair. He believed that a new economy run by engineers would be more efficient and equitable. His core idea was that what he called the “price system”—essentially the capitalist economy and the fiat currencies it uses—should be replaced with a new economic system based on how much energy it takes to produce specific goods. Under Scott’s plan, engineers would run a new continent-wide government called the Technate and optimize the use of energy to assure abundance. 

https://www.wired.com/2015/06/technocracy-inc/

…………………………………………..

The Global ‘Technocratic’ Framework of Power and Control

For those who may be struggling to visualise how a global Technocratic Dictatatorship will function, let me illustrate by using this COVID pandemic. It should be clear to everyone that the United Nations World Health Organisation provided all member nations with the guidelines and directives for the containment and treatment of the pandemic. There may appear to have been a slight amount of flexibility at the national level with regards to implementation of certain aspects, but the overall brief was the same. Even down to the jargon used. The World Health Organisation was positioned as the pandemic ‘expert’ who directed the international response to the crisis. It is clear that WHO possessed both authority and support from the international member states, which consists of most countries of the world. It is also evident from this pandemic that the political figures in our governments have been rendered powerless and have been reduced to mere figureheads in this meltdown. The briefing from the political leaders was only the reading of the script provided by the ‘experts’.

In part five under the header ‘The Global Governance Infrastructure of The United Nations,’ I provided an outline of the United Nation affiliates, Programmes and associated ‘Specialised Agencies‘. The list is vast. Consider that this list of affiliates contains disciplines including the World Monetary Fund, Environmental, Human Settlements, Food Programme, Agriculture, Labour, Maritime etc. The list is vast and comprehensive in terms of disciplines covered.

Below is a copy of the United Nations ‘overview’ from part five for reference:

Overview
The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945.  It is currently made up of 193 Member States.  The mission and work of the United Nations are guided by the purposes and principles contained in its founding Charter.
Due to the powers vested in its Charter and its unique international character, the United Nations can take action on the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century, such as peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism, humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality, governance, food production, and more.
The UN also provides a forum for its members to express their views in the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, and other bodies and committees. By enabling dialogue between its members, and by hosting negotiations, the Organization has become a mechanism for governments to find areas of agreement and solve problems together.
The UN’s Chief Administrative Officer is the Secretary-General.
2020 marks the 75th anniversary of the United Nations.
https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/overview/index.html

Consider then that these affiliate organisations, coupled with their perceived scientific and technical ‘expertise’, would serve to provide guidance to all member states in just about any discipline. This group of organisations will, therefore, provide the framework for an eventual Global Technocratic Dictatorship. We can also witness this UN centralised influence through the global warming/climate change initiatives. Eventually, member states will lose almost all authority in sovereign matters and will be dictated to by these organisations. This is to a large extent already happening, but the influence and authority will grow exponentially over the next ten years through the Sustainable Development goal initiatives – Agenda 2030.  The United Nations organisations and the ‘technocrats’  are well and truly positioned in the drivers seat.

Governments and societies have themselves created this web in which we will all be caught up in. The Technocrats will seize power and we will lose all freedoms as a result.

But fear not, our Heavenly Father has a Global Plan of His own. The days of Mans rule on this earth are numbered and is shortly coming to an end.

The Corbett Report - Patrick Wood Exposes the Technocracy Agenda

by Patrick M. Wood

Capitalism Is Dead

I am almost certain that most people do not realise that economic capitalism is dead. Well, it may not be absolutely dead yet but it is certainly on life-support and has been since 2008 and possibly long before that. The demise of the capitalist economic model has long been desired by the technocrats and there is no doubt in my mind that they are behind the destruction of it.

It was broken before the pandemic through dependency on the twin life-support mechanisms of central bank money and a mountain of debt. I found figures showing that available money, printed and digital, was in the region of $5-80 trillion whereas debt was surpassing $255 trillion. The money game has long been over.

The proclaimed COVID pandemic is the crisis that they have dreamt of. The economic fallout from the pandemic has sealed the fate of capitalism – it’s over. You will see from the Davos quotes listed below that the death of capitalism was already being proclaimed in sessions back in January. Niall Ferguson, the ‘expert’ who advised the UK government on the projected death rate from COVID 19 to be in the hundreds of thousands was one of those who announced the death of capitalism at Davos. This was even before COVID 19 was officially proclaimed as a global pandemic. Was he a very astute, ‘prophetic’ voice or was he preparing to play his part in destroying capitalism? You decide.

….Oh and let me again state that I do not deny that people are sick and dying of disease but my belief is that this is quite normal and is due to a lifetime of poor lifestyle and dietary choices coupled with environmental conditions, including stress. I reject the idea of a contagious virus…..

There is no doubt that the poor people of societies across the world are being severely economically affected by the pandemic but the major part of the financial effect is being felt in the middle classes of society. It is the middle class who operate high capital businesses whether in the manufacturing, tourism or hospitality sectors etc – or of course they may simply be employed in such businesses. It is mainly these ‘middle class’ businesses that are closing down or on the brink of closure as a result of the pandemic. The middle class is being marginalised by this pandemic.

You may not accept this as fact but either way, you will face this reality in the near future. If you are reading this article then you are that target ‘middle class’.

As I have said before in this series, the target of this pandemic is partly to reduce the impact that the ‘middle class’ is having on the planet through high consumerist habits and what is considered as the unnecessary consumption of excessive ‘luxuries’ – either entertainment, travel, dining out and luxury goods etc.

If you have not familiarised yourself with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as yet then I highly recommend that you do. The ‘middle class’ are perceived as generating a far larger than necessary carbon footprint, which in the minds of the technocrats is one of the areas contributing to an unacceptable and accelerated climate change and also widening the inequality gap.

Thousands of businesses have been culled from the surface of the planet through this pandemic, never to return. The hospitality, travel and many other small industries have been shattered. Why was this allowed to happen? The only reason that it was allowed is that it was the goal in the first place.

Another goal of the pandemic is to destroy capitalism and introduce a new ‘technocratic’ economic model serving all stakeholders – or so they claim. This model will be designed to meet the needs and not the desires of the world’s population. The only portion of capitalism that will be allowed to remain is that which is considered absolutely necessary for the collective.

The main problem is that our global economic model is broken. It was broken before the pandemic; already dependent on the twin life-support mechanisms of central bank money and a mountain of debt. 

Capitalism is on death row and will soon be put to death and replaced with a ‘technocratic’ economic system.

Isn’t it ironic that the super-wealthy on this planet are seemingly the ones who are now calling for the demise of capitalism. Those who have become extremely wealthy already, mainly through the capitalist system, now want a world free of excess for anyone else.

Ask yourself where all the diamonds, gold, oil and other resources which have been plundered for centuries are. Who possesses all these treasures? And we are expected to trust these same individuals to preserve the planet for future generations.

‘Those who control the resources will control everything in the future’

– Patrick Wood –

Quotes from the future of capitalism – World Economic Forum (Davos 2020)

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/quotes-on-the-future-of-capitalism-davos-2020/

“Capitalism as we have known it is dead. This obsession we have with maximising profits for shareholders alone has lead to incredible inequality and a planetary emergency.”

That was Marc Benioff at the ‘Stakeholder Capitalism: What Is Required from Corporate Leadership?‘ session.

…………………………

“Business leaders now have an incredible opportunity. By giving stakeholder capitalism concrete meaning, they can move beyond their legal obligations and uphold their duty to society. They can bring the world closer to achieving shared goals, such as those outlined in the Paris climate agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda. If they really want to leave their mark on the world, there is no alternative.”

Professor Klaus Schwab in his op-ed ahead of the meeting: Why we need the ‘Davos Manifesto’ for a better kind of capitalism

…………………………

“The whole way that we do business, that we live and that we have grown accustomed to in the industrial age, will have to be changed. We will have to leave that behind us in the next 30 years and we have to come to completely new value chains.”

Chancellor Angela Merkel told the audience at her special address.

…………………………

“Capitalism is the worst of all possible economic systems, apart from all the others that have been tried from time to time.”

In 1939, The Technocrat magazine wrote:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.

‘The magazine went on to explain that Technocracy eschewed capitalism, free enterprise, elected politicians and that it sought to create a resource-based economic system where scientists, engineers and technicians would be the sole planners and controllers of society.’ – Patrick Wood

“the fundamental basis of technocracy is a faith in an efficiency so great that maximum results are obtained by minimum effort.”

Professor Jean Meynaud (1914-1972)

Professor of Political Science at the University of Paris and widely known as a leading political scientist in Europe.

He further wrote,

‘Let us suppose that in a world in which the profit motive becomes more and more paramount, the political authorities (as is already partly true) failed to keep a close watch on the activities of technologists, who do not all have the public interest at heart; in the end, the effect would be a barely perceptible evolution towards a regime which would be democratic only on the surface. The elected representatives would be deprived of the substance of their power… The democratic principle would then be nothing more than the ‘front’ (as skeptics say it has always been) behind which the true leaders of the country would justify or disguise their domination.’ 

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

George Orwell – in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four: 

Technocracy – The Looming Global Scientific Dictatorship

 

 

Editor’s note – ‘technocracy.news’:

The ‘technocracy.news’ website is owned, operated and curated by Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington with the late Antony C. Sutton.

This website is not about bashing technology. It is about Technocracy. We love technology when it serves us. We resist all those who would use technology to control us against our will. Technocracy is the clear and present danger to humanity but it cannot be resisted until it is understood. Please read this entire page to kick-start your journey. – Patrick Wood, Editor, Author

Patrick Wood

Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.

https://www.technocracy.news/quick-start/

………………………………………………….

Rebuilding Babel:

Toward The Endgame of Technocracy

 

page1image316366496

 TN Note: This article was written by Patrick Wood on February 24, 2015, and is as relevant today as it was then.

When I was a young financial analyst in 1978, I met Antony Sutton at a gold conference in New Orleans. It took us about 30 minutes of discussion to realize that the Trilateral Commission was in process of hijacking the entire Administration of newly elected president, James Earl Carter.

Founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Commission openly and repeatedly stated that it wanted to create a “New International Economic Order.”

Neither Sutton nor I picked up on the thought that the big hijack was not really a political coup, but rather an economic one. It’s just that they needed the help of the Executive Branch of our government to pull it off.

As a result, they have maintained a hammerlock hold on the entire trade and economic policy machine that has driven the world into a seemingly broken international system of finance and economic development. Broken is an understatement: Perhaps “spiraling out of control” is a better description.

But, there is another side to the story that is much darker, presenting a clear and present danger to our Republic. That is, Technocracy.

It is plainly evident today, with 40 years of historical examination behind it, that the “New International Economic Order” was really “new” and envisioned historic Technocracy as replacing Capitalism altogether. Technocracy was based on energy rather than money and its system of supply and demand that regulates pricing.

Some distinctives of Technocracy include:

• Elimination of private property and wealth accumulation
• Replacing traditional education with workforce training
• Micromanaging all energy distribution and consumption
• Driving people to live in a limited number of cities and off of rural land

• Enforcing a balance between nature’s resources and man’s consumption of them.

Are you thinking that this list is vaguely familiar? You should because it represents the modern manifestation of programs like Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, Smart Grid, Cap And Trade, Climate Change, Common Core, massive surveillance operations and a whole lot more. All of this has been brought to us by the machinations of the Trilateral Commission and its members since 1973, and it is all part of its master plan to completely replace capitalism with Technocracy. This is their “New International Economic Order”!

What does Smart Grid have to do with Common Core? They are both elements of Technocracy. What does Sustainable Development have in common with Smart Growth? Technocracy. Climate change and total surveillance? You guessed it.

It is all part of the same economic coup started in 1973 and if left unchallenged, it is going to deliver us straight into a Scientific Dictatorship from which we will not be able to recover.

If I am even remotely correct in my analysis, then we had better figure out who the real enemy of the American Republic is.

Ignorance is not the enemy; Ignorance merely hides the enemy and his agenda, but it can be quickly remedied with sufficient illumination and knowledge.

Politicians are not the enemy, whether liberal or conservative. Technocrats hate politicians because they are incapable of running a technological society, but they use politicians whenever it can advance their agenda.

The government itself is not the enemy, but technocrats control certain parts of the machinery of government in order to implement their Technocracy agenda.

In fact, the enemy is Technocracy. Technocrats are human, embedded, entrenched, single-minded, amoral, highly trained, hardened, with unlimited funding. They are master strategists, master propagandists, fully networked and maintain a constant cover-up of their actions. They have worked their way into the fabric of our society from the highest levels of the Executive Branch down to the lowest levels of local government.

The hard-core technocrats in government have virtually neutered every elected body in our nation, from Congress down to state legislatures.

 Even when Congress passes legislation that gives direct marching orders to Obama and his Administration, they are simply ignored. When Obama wants his own action without going through Congress, he simply creates Executive Orders, Memorandums or Signing Statements.

To be fair to Obama, he is not a technocrat, but only a puppet thereof. All of the Technocracy puppet-masters are lurking and executing behind the scenes.

Take Trilateral Commission member John Podesta for instance. Podesta is Senior Policy Advisor to Obama for Climate Change. In the 1990s under Clinton, Podesta invented and perfected the policy of ruling by Executive Orders, and now he is coaching Obama. Just before he took this position last year, Podesta had just finished up working with a high-level climate-change planning group at the United

Nations that called for global reforms and renewed initiatives.

Even the New York Times acknowledges, “the architect of Mr. Obama’s climate change plan is none other than his senior counselor, John D. Podesta.” The same NYT article also quoted Speaker of the House John Boehner as saying, “This announcement is yet another sign that the president intends to double-down on his job-crushing policies no matter how devastating the impact for America’s heartland and the country as a whole.”

All complaining and whining aside, Congress remains completely impotent to stop or even slow either Podesta or his prodégé Obama. This is how Technocracy works: In the name of (false) science, they tell you what to do and you do it.

Please be clear on this – people like John Podesta are not socialists, Marxists, communists or fascists. They are Technocrats who are bent on imposing Technocracy that will ultimately destroy capitalism and install themselves as the unelected and unaccountable leaders of the New International Economic Order.

It’s a Scientific Dictatorship.

 For those who think this is all too inconceivable, consider what Christiana Figueres stated on February 3, 2015:

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution…That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation.” [Emphasis added]

Figueres is the Executive Secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and is the undisputed global driver for implementing climate-change policies and Sustainable Development.

Perhaps you can understand why I sub-titled my newest
book, Technocracy Rising, as “The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.” That’s what it is. People all over the world are rushing to climb aboard this “green” horse but the product being delivered is pure destruction. They are being played like fiddles in a symphony orchestra. They are collectively being deceived into thinking that Utopia is straight ahead – but instead of Utopia, they are going to get dictatorship.

Indeed, it’s time for a national discussion on Technocracy. The technocrats who are bent on transforming America must be identified, challenged and stopped.Maybe that’s what you want. Not me. However, understand that we will not uproot Technocracy as long as we think we are fighting communists, socialists, Marxists and Fascists. That’s the wrong enemy, and while you might knock them all into oblivion, the technocrats will quietly move toward their goal of transforming the world into a Technocracy.

© 2015 Patrick Wood – All Rights Reserved

………………………………………………….

 

The Rise off Technocracy

Technocracy Was a Big Movement in the 1930s

Technocracy was originally designed as a replacement economic system for Capitalism and Free Enterprise, masterminded by prominent engineers and scientists at Columbia University in 1932. It was to be a resource-based economic system that used energy credits as its accounting system, rather than currency as we know it today.

The Technocracy ideology turned into a movement when Technocracy, Inc. was founded in 1934 by Howard Scott and M. King Hubbert. Together, they wrote the Technocracy Study Course that became their go-to bible for all the meetings they held throughout the U.S. and Canada. At the peak, this membership organization had over 500,000 dues-paying members.

Technocracy Went Into Decline in the 1940s

Public appeal for Technocracy began to fizzle by the end of the 1930s, especially after the Hearst newspaper empire banned all of its writers from covering Technocracy. A parallel organization had a brief life in Nazi Germany before WWII, but it was squashed by Hitler when it was seen as competition. Individual Technocrats in America and Europe, however, continued to hold fast to the Utopian dream of Technocracy.

Trilateral Commission Adopts Technocracy in the 1970s

In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski was a young political science professor at Columbia University, the same place where Technocracy was born in 1932. He authored a book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era, that caught the eye of the global banker, David Rockefeller. Together, they subsequently co-founded the Trilateral Commission in order to create a “New International Economic Order.”

Technocracy is Fed to the United Nations in the 1980s

In 1987. Trilateral Commission member Gro Harlem Brundtland ended a United Nations-sponsored task force with the publication of Our Common Future. This book popularized the term Sustainable Development for world consumption. In 1992, when the UN convened the first Earth Summit in Rio De Janeiro, Agenda 21 was born as the “Agenda for the 21st century.” Brundtland’s book received praise and accolades from the UN for providing the framework for Agenda 21 and its related documents.

Today, Agenda 21 is still in force, but has been significantly expanded through the 2030 Agenda and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). More recently, the New Urban Agenda was adopted at the UN’s Habitat III conference.

Synonyms for Sustainable Development include Green Economy and Natural Capitalism. Collectively, they describe a new economic paradigm that is highly correlated with the original specification for Technocracy, namely, that it is is a resource-based economic system that uses energy as accounting. Cities are to be converted into ‘Smart Cities’ as the world is transformed into a borderless Utopia, and rural dwellers are to be forced into these cities. All areas of UN publications stress the doctrine of ‘No one left behind.”

The Purpose is to Replace Free Enterprise and Capitalism

This is not an idle speculation. In 2015, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Christiana Figueres, clearly stated,

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution.”

Thus, the saga of the Trilateral Commission’s New International Economic Order (NIEO) has come full circle, and yet it continues on a global basis at breakneck speed.

Tyranny of Science or Scientific Dictatorship

This new resource-based economic system demands that 100 percent of the means of production and consumption be placed into the hands of Technocrats who will make all decisions for manufacturers and consumers. The Technocrats said the same thing in 1938:

“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…” – The Technocrat Magazine, 1938

The intended global Technocracy will be thus operated by Technocrats (not politicians or representatives of the people) according to their narrow view of science, and it will simultaneously remove the need for elected officials.

In short, a Technocracy is operated as a Scientific Dictatorship.

Technocracy Endgame Confirmed

Technocracy In America: The Rise of the Info-StateIn January 2017, leading globalist scholar Dr. Parag Khanna published a book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State, that emphatically declares America’s need for a ‘direct Technocracy’. Among other things, he calls for the abandonment of the Senate and for the Supreme Court to directly modify the Constitution as it sees fit.

Khanna believes in a borderless world where global Smart Cities and mega-regions will be connected to create a global society, or a giant city-state.

 

 

Next, Listen to Some Videos

I have conducted many interviews on radio and video over the past two years, and here are several of the better ones. The last one, “Five Reasons Why You Should Read Technocracy Rising”, will give you a concise, 12 minute synopsis of some of what you are reading here.

 

A Few Related Articles that Patrick Wood has penned

Leading Scholar Outs Global Elite Endgame As Technocracy

Technocracy: The Real Reason Why The UN Wants Control Over The Internet

Technocracy Will Rise Out Of The Ashes Of Western Civilization

The ‘Pseudo-Ethics’ Of Social Justice In Economics, Politics And Religion

Whence Technocracy: Neofeudalism, Peasants And Pitchforks

How The Trilateral Commission Converted China Into A Technocracy

Technocracy, Smart Grid And The Green Economy

Carbon Currency: A New Beginning For Technocracy?

Global Smart Grid Is Technocracy’s Endgame

Rebuilding Babel: Toward The Endgame Of Technocracy

Reflexive Law: The New Legal System Driving Sustainable Development

https://www.technocracy.news/quick-start/

PATRICK WOOD’S 12 DAYS OF TECHNOCRACY
Day 1: We Were Warned About Technocracy
direct technocracy

After having written two books on Technocracy, reviewed over 230 important historical books and posted almost 4,000 related stories, there is a tendency to think that the subject is exhausted.

But, it is not.

Almost every day some new thing pops up that surprises me, whether from industry, academia or government. Historical tidbits constantly surface that show how analysts foresaw our current trajectory decades earlier. Modern scholars often write openly about Technocracy and Technocrats, especially in Europe or Asia, and yet America largely remains in the dark.

As I present my findings in public forums, whether speaking or writing, I am constantly aware of some kind of invisible wall that keeps the message from being fully understood or propagated. For instance, I have sent dozens of review copies of books to key centers of influence around the country, but how many reviews have actually been published? Hardly any. I have presented to elected officials, attorneys, civic leaders and scientists. How many have embraced any understanding of Technocracy? Again, hardly any.

However, for all the people who have confirmed their understanding and alarm of Technocracy, I am fully convinced that the material is easy enough to understand for anyone who is willing to understand it. Apparently, most are not willing. In some cases, people are too distracted with other things to pay attention. In other cases, people turn a blind eye because they find themselves profiting off some aspect of Technocracy and don’t want to upset their own applecart.

Whatever the case, America is largely missing the many siren calls for radical change in America. Here is a case in point.

Dr. Parag Khanna, a leading global scholar promoting Technocracy, speaks to elite groups all around the world. With bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and a PhD from the London School of Economics, Khanna has written several highly esteemed books on various aspects of globalization.

In 2017, Khanna released a book with the very pointed title Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State. Endorsed by many prominent globalists, it laid out the radical agenda of what a “direct Technocracy” would look like in America:

In America, direct technocracy would look like this: A collective presidency of about a half-dozen committee members backed by a strong civil service better able to juggle complex challenges; a multi-party legislature better reflective of the diversity of political views and using data technologies for real-time citizen consultation, and the Senate replaced by a Governors Assembly that prioritizes the common needs of states and shares successful policies across them; and a judicial branch that monitors international benchmarks and standards, and proposes constitutional amendments to keep pace with our rapidly changing times. 

How would we get to a direct Technocracy? Khanna states that “it is time again for a new constitutional convention” and concludes that “only utilitarian thinking can bring about another progressive era.”

Of course, Americans can ignore Khanna, but the global elite don’t, because he is writing to their long-established goals of doing exactly what he proposes! Abolish the Senate and give the Constitution to the Supreme Court? Have a committee of Presidents? Adopt utilitarian thinking to promote progressivism?

This is not Marxism, Socialism or Communism. It is Technocracy. Everything else going on around us is a sideshow that provides nothing more than a convenient cover for those behind the curtain who are the real movers and shakers in the world.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-1-we-were-warned-about-technocracy/

Day 2: Academic Backing Of Technocracy

Dr. Francis Schaeffer was an historian, Christian philosopher and one of the greatest thinkers of the last century. In Episode X (the final segment) of his video series, How Should We Then Live?, he stated that society was falling into a moral abyss with no fixed absolutes to provide form and structure for living. To replace that necessary structure and thereby avoid utter societal chaos, he accurately and clearly recognized that such absolutes would be supplied by an increasingly authoritarian, technocratic elite. (Yes, Schaeffer actually used the word “technocratic”.)

In other words, as people lost the ability to self-regulate their own life and behavior, someone or something would step into the vacuum and do it for them.

A younger contemporary of Schaeffer was Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era when he was a political science professor at Columbia University in the late 1960s. Brzezinski was the polar opposite of Schaeffer in that he eschewed Christianity, Christian philosophy and even the existence of God.

Brzezinski came to virtually the same conclusion as Schaeffer (for entirely different reasons) when he wrote,

Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits. (emphasis added)

Brzezinski further stated,

Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the stepping stones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society. (emphasis added)

Since Schaeffer was an avid reader, he likely had read Brzezinski’s work, but I can find no proof of that. He did, however, read Daniel Bell’s seminal 1973 book, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting.

Bell had received his PhD in sociology from Columbia University in 1961. We know he was well acquainted with Brzezinski’s work because he thoroughly critiqued it in his own book.

There are two reasons that I bring up Bell: first, he was a self-professed apologist for Technocracy and second, Schaeffer held up Bell’s book toward the end of Episode X and quoted from page 480:

The lack of a rooted moral belief system is the cultural contradiction of the society, the deepest challenge to its survival.

Bell was indeed a big thinker in the same vein as Brzezinski; both were Technocrats and both were educated at Columbia University where Technocracy was originally conceived in 1932. Bell, however, was much more direct than Brzezinski when he wrote,

The technocratic mode has become established because it is the mode of efficiency – of production, of program, of “getting things done.” For these reasons, the technocratic mode is bound to spread in our society. (p. 354)

It was Bell who first popularized and developed the concept of the “post-industrial” society:

Since the post-industrial society increases the importance of the technical component of knowledge, it forces the hierophants of the new society – the scientists, engineers and technocrats – either to compete with politicians or become their allies.

Bell’s 489-page “essay in social forecasting” presented the big picture of the future. It was ominously written in the same year (1973) that the Trilateral Commission was co-founded by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller.

Now, I had already cited Bell’s works in both of my books on Technocracy, but I had fallen short in examining who or what might have stimulated Bell to write his book in the first place. This became my 2019 surprise as I picked up my own copy of Bell’s The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (the same edition that Schaeffer referenced above) and read it’s Preface more carefully:

My greatest debt, institutionally, is to the Russell Sage Foundation and its president, Orville Brim. A grant from the foundation in 1967 at first released me from one-third of my teaching schedule at Columbia, and allowed me to organize an experimental graduate seminar at Columbia on modes of forecasting. The foundation also subsidized my research in the next few years. In 1969-1970 I spent a sabbatical year as a visiting fellow at the foundation, where this book began to take shape. (emphasis added)

Essentially, Bell was employed by the Russell Sage Foundation as he fleshed out his book.

The Russell Sage Foundation, launched in 1907, is one of the oldest foundations in America. It started as an ultra-progressive champion of “social sciences” and has been continuously connected to the most progressive elements of the global elite ever since. Its website currently states,

The Russell Sage Foundation is the principal American Foundation devoted exclusively to research in the social sciences. Currently, the Foundation dedicates itself exclusively to strengthening the methods, data, and theoretical core of the social sciences as a means of improving social policies.

Not surprisingly, the historical archives of the Russell Sage Foundation are housed at the Rockefeller Archive Center in New York.

The academic support for modern Technocracy is obvious and easily traced. The literature is pointed and definitive: they all envisaged a technocratic elite rising to dominate populations.

Given this vision, it is no surprise that the Trilateral Commission sprang forth in 1973 to “make it so” – with “Captain Brzezinski” at the helm as its first Executive Director.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-2-academic-backing-of-technocracy/

Day 3: Technocracy In Europe And America

Once upon a time, Jean Meynaud (1914-1972) was a professor of Political Science at the University of Paris and widely known as a leading political scientist in Europe. His works are still recognized as foundational in modern Europe, but you would be hard-pressed to find any American who ever heard his name.

In 1964, Professor Meynaud wrote a seminal book with the simple title of Technocracy. Indeed, Europe was not ignorant of the changes taking place that rankled institutions as well as the people they represented, and there was no love lost for unelected and unaccountable technocrats who were usurping power. At the time in France, this topic was even on the lips of political protestors who cried “Down with Technocracy”.

Meynaud noted that “the fundamental basis of technocracy is a faith in an efficiency so great that maximum results are obtained by minimum effort.” He wrote,

Let us suppose that in a world in which the profit motive becomes more and more paramount, the political authorities (as is already partly true) failed to keep a close watch on the activities of technologists, who do not all have the public interest at heart; in the end, the effect would be a barely perceptible evolution towards a regime which would be democratic only on the surface. The elected representatives would be deprived of the substance of their power… The democratic principle would then be nothing more than the ‘front’ (as skeptics say it has always been) behind which the true leaders of the country would justify or disguise their domination. 

In the intervening years from 1964 to 2019, Europe has continued this trend, transforming itself into a full-blown Technocracy controlled by unelected and unaccountable European Union Technocrats. Europeans widely recognize this today, laying their angst at the levers of the technocrat machine that dominates every single area of their lives.

Having entrenched themselves into an unmovable power structure, these Technocrats are now killing off democracy, free enterprise and capitalism in order to implement the economic system of Technocracy known as Sustainable Development or the Green Economy. This is a resource-based economic system, unlike the free market of supply and demand, where both production and consumption are controlled by a single entity – namely, those same Technocrats.

Knowing that mass resistance (after all, people were already crying “Down with technocracy”) would accompany the economic transition, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) was introduced as a fear mechanism to drive citizens into not only accepting, but demanding the one-and-only solution offered: Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy.

As his book clearly shows, Meynaud really understood what was about to take place. Technocratic encroachment would eventually dominate the political structure, while leaving its outward appearance in place to placate citizens into thinking nothing had really changed. Meynaud nails this:

I use the term ‘influence’ broadly, meaning the capacity possessed by some people to induce others to act, think and feel in a certain way or according to a predetermined suggestion. This aptitude enables technocrats to grasp a certain measure of authority over the politicians who are directly or indirectly chosen by the people to assume control of public affairs. This allows them to guide the lines of action which politicians adopt and the decisions they take. 

This is Social Engineering on the grandest scale. It is the tail that wags the dog. It is the wizard behind the curtain who pulls the levers.

Has this happened in America? Does anyone really think that our elected representatives in Congress have any substantive power to make key decisions that favor the people instead of other institutional interests? Is the Administration effective at turning back the growing infrastructure of Technocracy? Of course not! Technocrats are seen continuously asserting themselves: Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Banks, etc.

Furthermore, Meynaud nailed the societal impact of this Technocrat encroachment:

In a representative democratic system, the power of suffrage and the trust of the people tend to be eroded by the advance of technologists. (emphasis added)

In today’s America, lack of trust is a scourge nobody saw coming. Nobody trusts anyone anymore. Congress is so badly divided that some people are saying it can never be healed again. The hostile divide between government and citizens is at an all-time high. Families are breaking up as children turn against their parents. Employees are turning on their employers.

In short, trust has been destroyed at every level. But don’t think that this just happened by accident; it is a direct outcome of the growth of Technocracy in America.

Thankfully, Meynaud noted that “Technocratic power is not a permanent acquisition.” Of course, he said that in 1964, before Technocracy had fully asserted itself in Europe. How Europeans could throw off Technocracy today is a mystery and a seemingly impossible feat.

In America, we still have a short window of time to do something about it. We can join the earlier calls made in France of “Down with technocracy”. But… we had better be more certain to follow our rhetoric with tangible, concrete and forceful actions to ensure its demise.

In the meantime, spare me the criticism that Technocracy is just a myth and a conspiracy theory. Many great scholars and thinkers have written extensively about it over the decades, and we all are without excuse if we ignore them.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-3-technocracy-in-europe-and-america/

Day 4: Technocracy Vs. Communism/Socialism, Fascism

image_pdf

As individualists for the most part, Conservatives are scared to death of Socialism. As collectivists, Socialists are scared to death of falling short of the ‘common good’. Each group has a unique and strikingly different belief system and supporting logic. 

Those who believe that Socialism (or Communism) is the bogeyman just can’t get it out of their head. I have sat down with intelligent people and carefully gone through the following table of comparisons, and they have  eagerly nodded their heads in agreement. But the next day they revert right back to talking about the dangers of Socialism and Communism. Were they just not paying attention? Were they being disingenuous and only pretending to agree with me? Probably neither. 

The fact is, old habits of thinking and acting are very hard to change. All of us struggle to some degree when we are challenged with new thoughts that require a shift in our existing belief system. If we believe that Socialism or Communism is the biggest enemy of the state, we will be very resistant to any facts to the contrary. 

It is true that the trappings of former political systems are still visible in certain countries. China still has the hammer and sickle. Germany still has a few neo-Nazis running around. But how many times have we ever been told, “Don’t judge a book by its cover”? Times change. Things change. Our thinking about them must advance as well. Holding a world view from 10, 20 or 30 years ago is simply not adequate today. 

With that said, I was hoping hope to change readers’ mindsets when I wrote in Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, “The dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism: It is Technocracy.”

The ancient Chinese General Sun Tsu, who wrote The Art of War in the 6th century BC, noted that the enemy must be clearly identified before victory can be achieved.  This is still true today. Technocrats smile inwardly when you call them Communists, Socialists or Fascists because this allows them to continue on their way unthreatened and uninterrupted. 

Here are 25 comparisons that make the proper distinction between Technocracy, Communism/Socialism and Fascism. To correctly cement the features of each ideology into your worldview, I suggest reading and contemplating this list every day for 30 days straight.

TECHNOCRACY COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM FASCISM
Endgame: Scientific Dictatorship Endgame: Classless society Endgame: National strength
Hates Communists, favored Fascists Hates Fascists & Technocrats Hates all types of Marxists
Has contempt for electoral democracy Promotes electoral democracy Has contempt for electoral democracy
Seeks totalitarian system by scientific methods Seeks totalitarian system by communitarianism Seeks totalitarian system by nationalistic submission
Relies upon cult of science (Scientism) Relies upon cult of personality (Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Che) Relies upon cult of personality (Hitler, Mussolini)
Promotes Scientism Promotes atheism Promotes a form of Christianity
Promotes cities, is anti-rural Promotes rural development Anti-urban, promotes rural identity
Replaces Capitalism with resource-based economic system Managed Capitalism Generally supports Capitalism for its own purposes
Despises Capitalism Marx believed Capitalism was a necessary step to Communism Viewed as a ‘third way’ between Capitalism and Communism
Apolitical Mostly viewed as ‘left wing’ Often viewed as ‘conservative’
Racially agnostic Stalin condemned anti-Semitism Tends toward anti-Semitism and racism
Highly reveres intellectuals who agree with them Killed intellectuals in their own countries, on multiple occasions Killed intellectuals in other countries
Generally pacifist Mostly killed their own citizens Mostly killed citizens of other countries, plus Jews and other ‘undesirables’
Controls people with the system/technology Controls people with people Controls people with dictator
Population: over-populated Population: non-issue Population: non-issue
Genetic cleansing, general population reduction Ideological cleansing Genetic cleansing, but selective
Universal Basic Income (UBI) Stratified pay structure, according to the need of each citizen Stratified pay structure, according to merit and value to leadership
Advances according to the advancement of technology Advances according to the development of ideology Advances according to the strength of the nation
Human conditioning to live within the system Education supports ideology Education supports nationalism
Global citizen, city-state oriented Nation-state oriented Nation-state oriented
Dissolves the state Empowers the state Empowers the state
Science knows best People know best People know best
Social engineers hide behind facade of science Leadership easily identified Leadership easily identified

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…”  (The Technocrat, 1938)

Eradicates profit completely and all private property, establishes a resource-based economy controlled by a scientific elite using data-driven scientific method.

Communism: Political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society. (Encyclopedia Britannica)

Fascism, a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic
government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (Merriam-Webster)

A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on a relationship between business and the centralized government, business-and-government control of the marketplace, repression of criticism or opposition, a leader cult and exalting the state and/or religion above individual rights. By extension, Any system of strong autocracy or oligarchy usually to the extent of bending and breaking the law, race-baiting and violence against largely unarmed populations. (Wikitionary)

”We are building this global society without a global leader. Global order is no longer something that can be dictated or controlled from the top down. Globalization is itself the order.”  Dr. Parag Khanna Stepping-stone to Technocracy
Zbigniew Brzezinski stated in Between Two Ages: America’s Role In the Technetronic Era (1970), that Communism and Socialism were necessary stepping stones to get to the end game, but they were not the end game in themselves. The final stage was to be Brzezinski’s Technetronic Era, which is Technocracy

 

https://www.technocracy.news/day-4-technocracy-vs-socialism-communism-fascism/

 

Day 5: The Fitting Of Technocracy And Transhumanism
image_pdf

If society must be transformed into Technocracy, then the humans who live there must be transformed into Transhumans. In other words, a perfectly efficient, utopian society envisioned by Technocrats would be quickly soiled if it were inhabited by weak-minded and imperfect humans in their present form. This is exactly why we see many Technocrats who also identify as Transhumans as well. Some well-known names that come to mind include Elon Musk (Tesla), Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Ray Kurzweil (Google) and Peter Thiel (PayPal).

To grasp this larger picture, it is necessary to address three questions:

  1. What is Technocracy?
  2. What is Transhumanism?
  3. How is Scientism the glue that binds them together?

What is Technocracy?

In 1939, The Technocrat magazine wrote:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.

The magazine went on to explain that Technocracy eschewed capitalism, free enterprise, elected politicians and that it sought to create a resource-based economic system where scientists, engineers and technicians would be the sole planners and controllers of society.

Many Technocrats today have no idea of the deeper goals of Technocracy but nevertheless use their expertise to run portions of society without any regard for America’s traditional political processes. ‘Rule by experts’ is a rule, but it is only one subservient part of the overarching goal of replacing our current economic system with Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, Green Economy, Green New Deal, etc.

What is Transhumanism?

One modern champion of Transhumanism, Dr. Max More, wrote,

Transhumanism is a loosely defined movement that has developed gradually over the past two decades. “Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.” (Max More, 1990)

Transhumans seek to apply advanced technology to the condition of man in order to take over the evolutionary process and literally create Humans 2.0. The holy grail of Transhumanism is to achieve immortality, but in the process they intend to weed out the more negative characteristics of Humans 1.0: their warlike nature and their tendency to be argumentative,  inconsistent, unreliable, etc. This is genetic cleansing on the largest possible scale.

Scientism is the glue that binds them together

Scientism is a religious proposition that was first presented by the French philosopher Henri De Saint-Simon (1760-1825). He wrote,

“A scientist, my dear friends, is a man who foresees; it is because science provides the means to predict that it is useful, and the scientists are superior to all other men.”

While true science explores the natural world using the time-tested scientific method of repeated experimentation and validation, Saint-Simon’s Scientism is a speculative, metaphysical worldview about the nature and reality of the universe and man’s relation to it.

Saint-Simon proposed that the religious leadership of his day should literally be replaced by a priesthood of scientists and engineers, who would interpret the oracle of science in order to make declarations to society on the human actions necedssary to lead mankind to Utopia. Thus, science would be elevated to a state of immutable godhood, worshiped by its followers, who are led by its priests.

Technocracy and Transhumanism are both based on Scientism.

Both believe that advanced science, engineering and technology are the exclusive instruments of progress. Both are adept at promising benefits that are always just around the corner, but that never materialize. Both are expert at manipulating governments to supply taxpayer resources to fund their respective projects. Both believe they are hijacking evolutionary processes to create a future engineered by technologists.

No Future Here, Go to Mars…

An even more substantive connection between Technocracy and Transhumanism is that they both see no future for the world as it exists today. Radical environmentalists like Greta Thunberg believe the world has only 12 years left before a climate apocalypse destroys us all. Elon Musk uses his billions to escape Earth by funding his SpaceX rocket company with the ultimate intent of colonizing Mars. Jeff Bezos privately funds his Blue Origin for the same purpose – to colonize Mars. They both have stated that the only future for mankind is in outer space, populating the cosmos because Earth is going to hit a dead end when its natural resources run out.

In short, Technocracy and Transhumanism are both anti-human. Technocracy, channeled by the United Nations as Sustainable Development, believes that the earth can only support one billion or so humans. Furthermore, all humans are considered as mere resources on a par with herd animals such as cattle. Transhumanism believes Humanity 1.0 is as good as dead and the only hope for the future of man is for Transhuman scientists to invent Humanity 2.0 and leave Earth altogether.

In one sense, Technocracy’s strict allocation of resources and energy only mark a containment pattern while they build and test space travel technology.

This is not new thinking. In 1872 Winwood Reade wrote The Martyrdom of Man in which he stated as clearly as any modern Transhumanist or Technocrat could:

Disease will be extirpated; the causes of decay will be removed; immortality will be invented. And then, the earth being small, mankind will migrate into space, and will cross the airless Saharas which separate planet from planet, and sun from sun. The earth will become a Holy Land which will be visited by pilgrims from all the quarters of the universe. Finally, men will master the forces of Nature; they will become themselves architects of systems, manufacturers of worlds. 

These bodies which now we wear belong to the lower animals; our minds have already outgrown them; already we look upon them with contempt. A time will come when Science will transform them by means which we cannot conjecture, and which, even if explained to us, we could not now understand, just as the savage cannot understand electricity, magnetism, steam. (p. 179)

The word ‘radical’ doesn’t even scratch the surface

In light of the above, I hope you realize that you simply cannot look at Technocrats and Transhumanists and pin labels on them like Marxist, Socialist, Communist or Fascist. Transhumanists and Technocrats represent a new type of radicalness that the world has never seen before.

It means nothing when people gather to discuss philosophical issues and new ways of doing things, unless they have the means to do what they claim. Jeff Bezos isn’t waiting for NASA to colonize Mars; he is building his own spaceship with his own money. Likewise, Elon Musk is self-funding his own space fleet. The late global financier, David Rockefeller, didn’t wait for governments to flesh out a new economic order, but rather used his own funds to create the Trilateral Commission with its own economic transformations.

Thanks to the United Nations’ adoption of Technocracy as Sustainable Development, its Agenda 21 policies have been spread to every corner of the planet, including every town and county in America. In total ignorance of the trap being laid for them, people are now demanding more, not less. Global warming is being used as the battering ram to break down the current economic system, paving the way for the only alternative being offered: Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy.

Lest you think that the scientific elite are benevolent pure-hearted idealists simply working for the betterment of mankind, I would caution you to remember the late Jeffrey Epstein, who plumbed the depths of depravity, debauchery, sex trafficking and blackmail and who was also a member of the elitist Trilateral Commission for several years. Epstein was a Technocrat and Transhumanist who hoped to achieve eternal life within his lifetime. Alas, he failed.

To use the word ‘radical’ to describe Technocracy and Transhumanism would be a gross understatement. They are both outside the bounds of objective reality.  And worse, they are dragging the rest of us along with them.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-5-the-fitting-of-technocracy-and-transhumanism/

 

Day 6: Technocracy’s Necessary Requirements
image_pdf

Just like today, early Technocrats were obsessed with distribution of goods to a targeted region of the world that they called a Technate. In 1934, the North American Technate included Greenland, Canada, United States, Mexico, Cuba, the Caribbean, all of Central America and the northernmost countries of South America. However, no mention was ever made as to how those sovereign nations, each with their own particular type of government, would be persuaded to voluntarily discard those structures and cede control to a group of megalomaniac scientists and engineers.

Nevertheless, framers of Technocracy proceeded as if all of those nations would magically succumb to Technocracy’s scientific dictatorship, and they documented seven key requirements that must be met before the system could function properly.

These seven original requirements are obviously just as valid and operational today as they were back then. [Scott, Howard et al, The Technocracy Study Course, p. 232]

1. Register on a continuous 24-hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy

Conversion of energy means creating useable energy from stored energy like coal, oil or natural gas; when they are burned, electricity is generated. Hydroelectric and nuclear also convert energy. There were two reasons to keep track of useable energy: First, it was the basis for issuing “energy script” to all citizens for buying and selling goods and services. Second, it predicted economic activity because all such activity is directly dependent upon energy. (Note that Technocrats intended to pre-determine how much energy would be made available in the first place.)

2. By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load

Once available energy was quantified, it was to be allocated to consumers and manufacturers so as to limit production and consumption. Technocrats would have control of both ends, so that everything is managed according to their scientific formulas.

The modern Smart Grid, with its ubiquitous WiFi-enabled Smart Meters on homes and businesses, is the exact fulfillment of these two requirements. The concept of “energy web” was first revitalized in 1999 by the Bonneville Power Authority (BPA) in Portland, Oregon. A government agency, BPA had a rich history of Technocrats dating back to its creation in 1937. The “energy web” was renamed Smart Grid in 2009 during the Obama Administration. Note that Smart Grid was a global initiative that intended to blanket the entire world with this new energy control technology.

3. Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption

Technocrats were obsessed with aggregating inventory quantities in the economic system from beginning to end. Inventory would be stored in production facilities until it was ready to be delivered to consumers and producers. Only actual consumption by end-users would shrink inventory.

We see this concept used extensively in modern corporations, termed Supply Chain Management (SCM), where its goal is to minimize stored inventory (squeezing out the inefficiencies) and make for “just-in-time” manufacturing and consumption.

4. Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where produced and where used

This granular level of data tracking drills down to specific items and would ostensibly assign a trackable serial number to every item manufactured, shipped and ultimately consumed by individuals or other manufacturing processes. Such detailed item tracking is a core value of modern Supply Chain Management theory and practice.

The greatest enabler of Technocracy is the Internet of Things (IoT), where all connected devices are networked together via the latest 5G wireless technology. Tom Wheeler, former head of the FCC, praised 5G and the IoT in 2017: “If something can be connected, it will be connected”.  The harvesting of data from billions of sensors embedded in the IoT will, for the first time in history, provide real-time data collection. In turn, this data flow will put wind in the sails of Artificial Intelligence algorithms designed to control society and people in it.

5. Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and description of the individual

This requirement is a cross-check of inventory against actual consumption by a verified individual. Thus, if something is bought but not consumed immediately, the Technocrat overlords could take action to stop such behavior. It must be understood that Technocracy intended to altogether eliminate private property, savings, and inheritance, etc. The hoarding of consumable items was viewed as unauthorized savings.

The means of collecting this information is through monitoring and total surveillance. Surveillance and data collection are seen everywhere today, and according to Technocrats there is no such thing as “enough” data. The Intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA, DHS, etc.) are creating massive national databases that harvest real-time data from every conceivable source. Surveillance includes biometric data (i.e., facial scans, DNA, iris and voice scans), communications (email, phone calls) financial transactions, location tracking (geospatial intel), social media, psychographic data, etc.

6. Allow the citizen the widest latitude of choice in consuming his individual share of Continental physical wealth

We must understand this requirement from the perspective of a Technocrat. First, there would not be a wide range of selection of goods and services because there would be no competition between manufacturers. Products would be designed and manufactured by Technocrats at their sole discretion. The real thing in view here is the aggregate amount of “Continental physical wealth” and how much of it you deserve to consume. Technocrats largely view humans as so many cattle in a feed lot, existing only to be fed a managed diet from birth to death, housed and shielded from the weather, medically treated for maximum efficiency, etc.

7. Distribute goods and services to every member of the population

The key to this last requirement is that Technocrats demanded that every single person in the Technate would be forced to participate. As today, outliers were not to be allowed. We see the tagline “No person left behind” throughout the UN’s literature on Sustainable Development.

The Predicted Outcomes

According to The Technocracy Study Course, the anticipated and promised “end products” would be:

  1. A high physical standard of living
  2. A high standard of public health
  3. A minimum of unnecessary labor
  4. A minimum of wastage of non-replaceable resources
  5. An educational system to train the entire younger generation indiscriminately as regards all considerations other than inherent ability – a Continental system of human conditioning. (Ed. Note: human conditioning is not education but rather propaganda-style indoctrination.)

Not surprisingly, these outcomes overlap perfectly with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted at the 2030 Agenda conference in September 2015:

  1. Goal #1 – No poverty
  2. Goal #3 – Good health and well-being (the banner on Goal #3 states: “Vaccinate your family to protect them and improve public health”)
  3. Goal #8 – Decent work and economic growth
  4. Goal #12 – Responsible Consumption and Production
  5. Goal #4 – Quality education

At the United Nations 1992 conference in Rio De Janeiro which produced the Agenda for the 21st Century (known as Agenda 21), few realized that it was firmly rooted in Technocracy. Nor did they suspect that its interim name had been changed to “New International Economic Order” by the Trilateral Commission in 1973.

In sum, the above seven requirements are being implemented throughout the world, although Americans should be most concerned about their own country. Look past the thinly veiled utopian promises and you will see only an authoritarian scientific dictatorship run by megalomaniac Technocrats. George Orwell said it best in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

Epilogue

Google is a thoroughly Technocrat organization. In 2018, an internally produced video was leaked, called The Selfish Ledger. The concepts presented are futuristic yet centered on managing all of society and all of its inhabitants.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-6-technocracy-and-total-surveillance/

 

Day 7: China Is A Technocracy
China Technocracy
image_pdf

Thanks to early members of the Trilateral Commission, China was brought out of its dark ages Communist dictatorship and onto the world stage. Furthermore, the Trilateral Commission orchestrated and then facilitated a massive transfer of technology to China in order to build up its non-existent infrastructure.

Professor Antony C. Sutton and I co-authored Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II between 1978 and 1979, and in those books we thoroughly documented the so-called “China trade”:

Tri­lat­erals pro­pose to build up Com­mu­nist China. Tri­lat­er­alist policy is clear cut. The West must aid the con­struc­tion of Com­mu­nist China: this is expressed in An Overview of East-West Rela­tions (Tri­angle Paper No. 15, 1978, p. 57) as follows:

“To grant China favor­able con­di­tions in eco­nomic rela­tions is def­i­nitely in the polit­ical interest of the West” adding “…there seems to exist suf­fi­cient ways for aiding China in accept­able forms with advanced civilian technology.”

Tri­angle paper 15 also adds:

“The sit­u­a­tion is dif­ferent… where arms sup­plies or advanced mil­i­tary tech­nolo­gies are con­cerned, except for types of equip­ment that by their nature serve purely defen­sive pur­poses.” (p. 58)

In fact, as we shall see later, Tri­lat­eral firms have exported even advanced mil­i­tary tech­nology to Com­mu­nist China.

Fur­ther, as part of one world, Tri­lat­er­al­ists see an ulti­mate merging of free enter­prise Taiwan with the Com­mu­nist main­land. Even more remark­able, the paper envis­ages that Com­mu­nist China will return to an expan­sionist aggres­sive policy under two conditions:

    1. as Com­mu­nist China “gets stronger,”
    2. if rela­tions with the Soviets are “normalized.”

The paper adds, “already now, the activity of Com­mu­nist Guer­rillas in Thai­land and Malaysia, linked to each other and looking to China, per­sists and even seem to be on the increase.” (page 59)

So far as Com­mu­nist China is con­cerned, we may con­clude that Trilaterals:

    • want to build Com­mu­nist China into a mil­i­tary superpower,
    • wish to do this with the full and clear under­standing that China will likely resume its expan­sionist course in the Far East, and
    • are willing to sub­si­dize guer­rilla activ­i­ties in Thai­land and Malaysia (much of the “civilian tech­nology” cur­rently being trans­ferred has use­ful­ness for guer­rilla warfare.)

In hindsight, it’s clear that we absolutely nailed the issue. It wasn’t that we were so smart but that we were simply reading what they themselves wrote and then we reported on it.

It has been widely noted that China was initially brought into the mainstream of global trade by Trilateral Commission co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski. As a failed Communist dictatorship, China was a blank slate with over 1.2 billion citizens under its control. However, Chinese leadership knew nothing about capitalism and free enterprise, and Brzezinski made no effort to teach them about it. Instead, he planted seeds of Technocracy.

Once diplomatic relations were normalized with China, global corporations connected to the Trilateral Commission rushed in to build infrastructure, factories, educational facilities, financial centers, etc. In the 20-year period from 1980 to 2000, a transformation took place that was considered nothing short of an economic miracle; but it was not of China’s doing. Rather, it can be fully attributed to the masters of Technocracy within the ranks of the Trilateral Commission.

In 2001, an article appeared in Time Magazine. The editor of Time, Hedley Donovan, was a founding member of the Trilateral Commission, and his publication was one of several media outlets that collaborated with Trilateral initiatives. The article, Made in China: The Revenge of the Nerds accurately and plainly revealed what had taken place during the prior 20 years:

The nerds are run­ning the show in today’s China. In the twenty years since Deng Xiaoping’s reforms kicked in, the com­po­si­tion of the Chi­nese lead­er­ship has shifted markedly in favor of tech­nocrats. …It’s no exag­ger­a­tion to describe the cur­rent regime as a tech­noc­racy.

After the Maoist mad­ness abated and Deng Xiaoping inau­gu­rated the opening and reforms that began in late 1978, sci­en­tific and tech­nical intel­lec­tuals were among the first to be reha­bil­i­tated. Real­izing that they were the key to the Four Mod­ern­iza­tions embraced by the reformers, con­certed efforts were made to bring the “experts” back into the fold.

During the 1980s, tech­noc­racy as a con­cept was much talked about, espe­cially in the con­text of so-called “Neo-Authoritarianism” — the prin­ciple at the heart of the “Asian Devel­op­mental Model” that South Korea, Sin­ga­pore, and Taiwan had pur­sued with apparent suc­cess. The basic beliefs and assump­tions of the tech­nocrats were laid out quite plainly: Social and eco­nomic prob­lems were akin to engi­neering prob­lems and could be under­stood, addressed, and even­tu­ally solved as such.

The open hos­tility to reli­gion that Bei­jing exhibits at times — most notably in its obses­sive drive to stamp out the “evil cult” of Falun Gong — has pre-Marxist roots. Sci­en­tism under­lies the post-Mao tech­noc­racy, and it is the ortho­doxy against which here­sies are mea­sured. [Emphasis added]

I will take momentary leave to request that my skeptics and critics stop insisting that China is a Communist dictatorship and not a Technocracy. Can you just read the article above?

China’s Technocracy In Full Bloom

Today’s China is a scientific dictatorship nightmare. With 600 million facial recognition cameras to be installed by 2020, China will have one monitoring camera for every seven citizens and facial recognition Artificial Intelligence software to instantly locate, identify and track everyone. In short, China is totally obsessed with surveillance and absolute control over its population using state-of-the-art technology.

Here are some examples of Technocracy at work in China:

China’s Social Credit Scoring system registers all citizens, their activities and their behavior in order to deny or award privileges. Citizens cannot purchase a new cell phone without first providing a facial scan and other identification information.

Companies in China, regardless of national origin, are also assigned Social Credit scores in order to control their behavior. All companies are required to install government-accessed cameras within their own offices and factories.

China supports “anything goes” genetic engineering on plants, animals and humans.

China intends to dominate space and space travel, having recently landed an exploration vehicle on the dark side of the moon. It is already testing a Mars lander and pledges to colonize the red planet.

China currently leads the world in 5G, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Quantum Computing, and it intends to dominate all areas of science and technology.

China is aggressively exporting its surveillance technology to nations around the world, in an effort to establish its Technocracy as widely as possible.

The list goes on, but the evidence supports the analysis: China is a full-blown Technocracy and it is the first of its kind on planet earth, thanks to the clever manipulation and support of Western elites like the Trilateral Commission. Furthermore, its intentional Technocracy is spreading like a cancer to other nations, including India, Asia, Europe, Africa and South America. The combined population of China and India alone represents over 36 percent of world population; by comparison, the number of people living under Marxist-style governments is very small.

In conclusion, the clear and present danger to world domination is not any kind of Marxist derivative, but rather neo-authoritarian Technocracy. Living under such a system will be far more oppressive and painful than Socialism, Communism or Fascism.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-7-china-is-a-technocracy/

 

Day 8: Technocracy And Central Banks

image_pdf

It is common knowledge that the central banks of the world, like the Federal Reserve, control monetary policy for everyone, everywhere. Central banks are an exclusive lot because in each case, each bank has only one customer – namely, the host nation’s government. The Federal Reserve serves only the United States Treasury, for instance. The Bank of England serves only the British government, and so on.

The influence wielded by central banks is felt in all areas of economic activity within the home nation as well as in surrounding countries. In the case of the Federal Reserve, which manages the most important reserve currency in the world, its activities are closely watched by economists and forecasters everywhere.

What most people don’t know, however, is that the central bank collective has a central bank of its own: the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The BIS is located in Basle, Switzerland, and the vast majority of its operations and policies are shrouded in total secrecy. The BIS invents and directs policies for all other central banks and conversely, no central bank acts outside the policy structure set by the BIS.

In a 2018 Bloomberg Markets Special Report titled Welcome to the Elite Private Club Of the World’s Central Bankersa key fact about the BIS was revealed:

There’s been a changing of the guard at the Bank for International Settlements, the little-known organization that sits at the heart of the world’s financial system. Agustín Carstens, former head of Mexico’s central bank, succeeded Jaime Caruana as general manager on Dec. 1. He’s taking charge of an institution that stands out as a bastion of global technocracy in an age of increasing transparency and growing disillusionment with elites.

A “bastion of global technocracy”?

The famous currency expert, Dr. Franz Pick (1898-1985), once stated, “The destiny of the currency is, and always will be, the destiny of a nation.” With the advent of rampant globalization, this concept can certainly be given a global context as well: “The destiny of currencies is, and always will be, the destiny of the world.”

If the Bank for International Settlements is indeed a bastion of global Technocracy, what does that say about all the subsidiary central banks and the rest of the commercial global banks operating in each nation?

Well, it spells big trouble. It portends a total global transformation and a reset of the world’s finance and economic system.

In June 2019, the Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, delivered a speech to the Lord Mayor’s Banquet for Bankers and Merchants of the City of London at the Mansion House in London. The Bank of England is one of most powerful central banks in the world, and its Governor sits on the Executive Committee at the Bank for International Settlements.

Carney stated:

There’s a new economy emerging driven by changes in technology, demographics and the environment. This economy requires a new finance. A new finance to serve the digital economy. A new finance with products that are more cost effective, better tailored, and more inclusive. A new finance to support the transition to a sustainable economy. A new finance that balances innovation with resilience. With its leadership in fintech and green finance, the UK private sector is creating the new finance, but your efforts will be more effective with the right conditions in which to innovate and level the playing fields on which they compete. (emphasis added)

Indeed, the Bank of England is finally revealing itself in the image of green Fintech** (Financial Technologies) which will finance the world into Sustainable Development: “We will support the transition to a carbon-neutral economy.” 

Bank of EnglandInfographic from Bank of England report

In sum, the central banks of the world have revealed that they are 100% complicit with the United Nations’ economic system known as Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy; the Bank for International Settlements has been recognized by a major financial publication as a “bastion of global technocracy”; and individual central banks are reinventing themselves to complete the transition to the new economic system.

Technocracy is upon the world. It is not driven by citizens, but rather by the same global elitists who have been pushing for it for several decades. As such, it is a huckster operation designed to ultimately twist the natural resources of the world out of the hands of citizens and nations, and into the coffers of the elitists.

I hope the reader can see that the clear and present danger to the world is Technocracy, not Communism, Socialism or Fascism. This must be recognized now, while there is still a sliver of time left to do anything to stop it.

(**For a detailed explanation of Fintech, please see Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, Chapter 8, Fintech: Crypto, Cashless and Green.)

https://www.technocracy.news/day-8-technocracy-and-global-banks/

Day 9: Technocracy And Smart Cities
image_pdf

The concept of “smart growth” was a brilliant marketing strategy that was introduced in the early 1990s as an alternative phrase for Agenda 21. Americans don’t like to be included in “agendas” they did not create or approve, but they instantly warmed up to the idea of being “smart”. After all, who wants to be “dumb”?

The concept of Smart Growth has spawned a plethora of derivatives such as Smart City, smart phone, smart network, smart home, smart streets, smart cars, smart grid, smart appliances, etc. Essentially, the inclusion of “smart” has come to mean anything saturated with technology designed to control the object of its focus. 

The Big Tech companies of Silicon Valley and similar tech centers fancy themselves to be urban planners, but that is a misnomer. Traditional urban planners seek to build functional cities that work for people, whereas Smart City planners build functional cities focused on controlling people. 

As you will remember from other essays in this series, one main object of Technocracy, aka Sustainable Development, is to transfer resources from the hands and ownership of people and their representative institutions into the hands of a global common trust operated by the global elite. When David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973 to create a “New International Economic Order”, grabbing resources became the master plan and Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, became the means to that end. 

Cities don’t have physical resources like farming, minerals, timber, etc. Rather, it is the rural areas of the world where such resources are found and developed. So, to prepare for taking over large swaths of rural areas, Technocrats developed two coordinated strategies: First, move people from rural to urban settings and second, keep them there.

The United States contains 2.27 billion acres of land. The federal government owns some 650 million acres, representing over 28% of our total land mass. Most federal land is in the western states, which are rich with natural resources. The U.S. Constitution does not provide for broad federal land ownership, but that has not stopped the government from ever-expanding its portfolio. Apologists for federal ownership use the justification that the American people actually own those acres, but in fact much of the federal property is completely inaccessible to the public. 

In China, where Technocracy reigns, land grab policies are more direct. For instance, China unveiled a plan in 2014 to summarily move 250 million farmers off their land by 2026 and into megacities that had already been constructed but sat vacant. The vacated farm land is being combined into giant factory farms to be operated by advanced technology such as agricultural robots and automated tractors. Ostensibly, the farmers who refuse to leave will be helped along with the barrel of a gun. 

Once relocated into cities of the government’s choosing, these farmers will fall into a social engineering machine that will continuously surveil them, track them, assign social credit scores to limit their access to privileges, etc. They will never regain enough resources or mobility to leave their assigned cities. In other words, they will be trapped. 

Smart City Development

Around the world, there are several Smart City commonalities which can be easily observed in practice and in literature:

  1. Surveillance. Monitor people using biometric facial scanning, geo-spatial tracking, financial data, social media, etc. A population that is surveilled can be easily controlled.
  2. Transportation. Force people out of private vehicles into shared public transportation such as scooters, bicycles, buses, light rail, etc. Without private transportation, they are locked into the city and out of the rural area.
  3. Data. Collect real-time data from the Internet of Everything (IoE). IoE is an expansion of the Internet of Things concept to include people as well. 
  4. Control. Social engineering is always leading the thought process of Smart City development. However, unlike elected political representatives, the social engineers are always self-appointed Technocrats who decide what citizens should or should not do, where citizens should or should not go, with whom citizens should or should not associate with, etc. 

All of this fits the original definition of Technocracy, as seen in The Technocrat magazine in 1939:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.

Original Technocrats viewed people as nothing more than resources on the same level as animals and natural resources on the planet. Their goal was – and still is – to apply “science” to the efficient balancing of resources by controlling production of goods and services as well as their consumption. The objects of this social engineering would have no more control over their own lives than the cattle in a feedlot. 

Smart Cities and Regionalization 

In the United States, Smart City policies are increasingly being imposed by regionalization. 

The National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) is a non-governmental organization that “serves as the national voice for regions by advocating for regional cooperation as the most effective way to address a variety of community planning and development opportunities and issues.” According to its website, there are over 500 regional councils in all 50 states serving population areas ranging from less than 50,000 to more than 19 million. 

These regional entities, known as Councils of Governments (COGs) or Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), impose Sustainable Development policies on all targeted communities, cities and counties within their supposed jurisdiction, bypassing the officially elected representatives. The NARC literature is very clear regarding its purpose. NARC supports:

  • Federal consultation of local governments in formulating environment, energy and land use policies
  • community resilience planning to mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events
  • expand[ing] Federal incentives to reduce energy dependence and promote renewable energy use
  • multi-jurisdictional solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
  • empowering regions to utilize the opportunities created by technology and data, included automated and connected vehicles
  • public and private investments that provide regions with the tools they need to create economically vibrant and sustainable communities. 

In 2019, a new regionalization scheme was launched in Arizona called the Smart Region Initiative (SRI). It will create implementation policies for Smart City technology throughout a given region of cities and counties. As I wrote in February 2019, 

The Phoenix area Smart Region Initiative is a pilot program to see how much sovereignty can be stripped from member cities without a mass uprising by disenfranchised citizens. With no elected officials, SRI seeks domination over 22 cities and 4.2 million people to dictate uniform implementation of Smart City policies and technology.

If this pilot is successful, it will be rolled out across the nation for the rapid installation of Smart City tech, including 5G small cell towers, smart street lights with cameras, sensors, and listening devices, smart street technology for autonomous vehicles, data collection technology, and so on. 

Conclusion

Where I grew up on a farm in northern California, crops like tomatoes and melons required lots of manual labor to pick the fruit during the harvest season. Thousands of workers from Mexico would be granted “green cards” to temporarily enter the U.S. and then would return to their own country when the work was done.

While they moved from farm to farm, they would be housed in dormitory-style facilities known as “labor camps”. These allowed for sleeping and eating, and some facilities were barely better than tents, but the work got done and the workers returned home with their paychecks in hand.

I am reminded of these work camps when I look at today’s modern concept of the Smart City, where captive labor resources are plentiful, accessible and trainable. Is this really the purpose of city life in the 21st century? It would appear so. 

For urban dwellers, what happened to all the physical resources throughout the vast expanse of rural America? Well, that’s none of your business anymore. After all, you are “smart” now. 

https://www.technocracy.news/day-9-technocracy-and-smart-cities/

Day 10: Technocracy And Education
image_pdf

Technocrats have long since hijacked the American education system for their own agenda. What once was a system of actual education of students has now become a system intended to produce nothing more than conditioned Technocrat workers. When this is understood, modern education programs – President George Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” policy and President Barack Obama’s Common Core Education Standards and the Trump Administration signing a UN agreement that states “We commit to facilitating the internationalization of education” – will become crystal clear.

When the Technocracy Study Course was written in 1934 by M. King Hubbert and Howard Scott, it was literally intended to be the “bible” of Technocracy. It contained all of the basic elements of societal construction along with rules and principles for living.

Hubbert and Scott names education as one of the pillar service sectors of Technocracy was education. On page 232, they listed “The end products attained by a high-energy social mechanism on the North American Continent” as:

    1. a high physical standard of living,
    2. a high standard of public health,
    3. a minimum of unnecessary labor,
    4. a minimum of wastage of non-replaceable resources,
    5. an educational system to train the entire younger generation indiscriminately as regards all considerations other than inherent ability—a Continental system of human conditioning. (emphasis added)

William Akin elaborated on this in his book, Technocracy and the American Dream (1978, p. 142).

A continental system of human conditioning will have to be installed to replace the existing insufficient educational methods and institutions. This continental system of general education will have to be organized as to provide the fullest possible conditioning and physical training… It must educate and train the student public so as to obtain the highest possible percentage of proficient functional capacity.

Since the basic need of society was technical expertise, their education system would abolish the liberal arts, which addressed outmoded moralistic solutions to human problems. It would essentially replace the humanities with the machine shop. In the process, members of society would be conditioned to think in terms of engineering rationality and efficiency. Man, in short, would then be conditioned to assume the character of machines, to accept “a reality understood in terms of machine-like function.” 

Early Technocrats, thoroughly captivated by the vain religion of Scientism, believed that truth about man and the universe could only be discovered through science. As a result, the pioneer of behavioral psychology, B.F. Skinner, was a principal contributor to Technocrat understanding of human conditioning. It was a theory that they eagerly embraced and applied to their utopian model of Technocracy.

Skinner’s association with the Technocracy movement has been well documented in academic literature. Alexandra Rutherford, for instance, wrote B. F. Skinner and Technology’s Nation: Technocracy, Social Engineering, and the Good Life in 20th-Century America in the History of Psychology, in which she stated,

Skinner’s efforts were part of a much larger social engineering tradition that received one of its fullest expressions in the Technocracy Movement of the 1930s.

The balance of Rutherford’s paper detailed the “several philosophical and structural similarities between the Technocrats’ and Skinner’s social visions.” 

The Technocracy Study Course is thoroughly dependent on this line of thinking, and every chapter stresses the importance of and need for “conditioning” of all members of society in order for Utopia to materialize. Of course, this goes well beyond just education, but early conditioning of young students was of paramount importance:

No conditioned response to a given stimulus can ever occur unless the subject has previously been through the conditioning experience involving this stimulus and the corresponding response. (p. 187)

Enter Common Core Education Standards

Although the modern drift of education toward Technocratic conditioning started in the early 1980s, it is not the purpose of this paper to present details that others have presented over the years. Rather, I will skip forward to the latest program called the Common Core Education Standards Initiative (CCESI) which has swept the American education system over the last 10 years.

CCESI was sponsored by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), both of which are non-governmental organizations. CCSSO is a progressive advocacy organization that focuses on “education workforce; information systems and research; next generation learners; and standards, assessment, and accountability.”The NGA’s membership is exclusively the Governors of each state and territory, but it presents itself as a political organization. 

It is important to note that both the NGA and CCSSO are completely independent of any government authority or accountability. 

Did funding for CCESI come from the federal government? No! Instead, the primary financier was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, controlled by Microsoft pioneer Bill Gates – a Technocrat. In fact, over a 10 year period, Gates provided almost $500 million to various organizations to develop the curriculum according to his own personal vision of education. 

Furthermore, according to its own website, the resulting copyright for CCESI is tightly held by these same organizations:

NGA Center/CCSSO shall be acknowledged as the sole owners and developers of the Common Core State Standards, and no claims to the contrary shall be made. 

Parents today wonder why the nature and focus of education has changed so radically over the last 10 years. The simple reason is that it has been hijacked by private Technocrat-oriented organizations and funded by Technocrats like Bill Gates. To call this a monumental coup would be an understatement. 

Of course, the Technocrats had help and full cooperation from the federal government which had distributed Common Core to the individual states, -proof of how deep the Technocrat influence runs within our political structures.

In sum, Akin’s observation of Technocracy’s “Continental system of human conditioning” has proven correct: “It would essentially replace the humanities with the machine shop.”

https://www.technocracy.news/day-10-technocracy-and-education/

Day 11: Technocracy And The Rise Of Techno-populism
image_pdf

If you want to start an argument in a room full of political scientists, just ask what they think about Populism. This is a vague term that means something to everyone and nothing to no one.

In the simplest sense, Populism is a movement of ordinary citizens against the elite whom they perceive are wrongly ruling over them. The problem is that it doesn’t matter if the movement is left, right or centrist.

President Donald Trump is said to be riding the wave of Populism because he is perceived to be against the so-called “Deep State” of elites who have a stranglehold on the U.S. political system.

The recently deposed communist leader of Bolivia, Evo Morales, was said to have led a populist movement when he originally rose to power. Alas, things changed when a new and more right-leaning populist movement rose up to throw him out.

The sobering reality about all populist movements is that none of them actually know how to run a country. They know what they don’t like but they have no practical policies that would fix things. Often, a populist group will focus on a single issue or narrow group of issues that have become important to it for any number of reasons, but when they are asked about broader policies to run the entire nation, the discussion falls apart.

The Technocrat Appeal

Typically, Technocrats are viewed as polar opposite to populists, and for good reason. Technocrats are often unelected and unaccountable for their actions, and they make important decisions without any connection to the will of the people.

Nevertheless, Technocrats know how to get things done and make things work. This is the exact point where populists and Technocrats find common ground, giving rise to a new term called “Techno-populism”, or a blending of Populism with Technocracy.

Techno-populism has a broad meaning, as does Populism. Even Wikipedia notes that “[t]he diverse range of movements along the political spectrum indicates that techno-populism can be used as a tool by any ideology that presents itself as a party for the people.” The modern use of the term was popularized just after the 2008 financial meltdown.

Dubbing this trend Techno-populism is very accurate because it describes much of what is happening in the Western world today. President Trump was elected on a populist surge but promotes Technocrats to actually make things run. The military, for instance, is full of Technocrats who prosecute armed conflicts. The Internet of Things and 5G are being promoted from the top down. Technocrat influence is likewise seen in the departments of Energy, Transportation, Homeland Security, Environmental Protection and Education. In fact, it was data-minded Technocrats who manipulated both social and traditional media to make the election possible in the first place.

In Europe, three instances of Techno-populism have been identified by political scientists: the Five Star Movement in Italy, Podemos in Spain, and the Pirate Party in Iceland. England’s BREXIT movement is very close to such a declaration.

Even the elitist London School of Economics blog recognizes Techno-populism:

The Five Star Movement and Lega’s nomination of Italian law professor Giuseppe Conte as the next Prime Minister of Italy presents a puzzle: why would an apparently ‘populist’ government nominate a Prime Minister who fits the mould of a technocrat? Chris Bickerton writes that given the Five Star Movement’s history, we should not be surprised at the nomination of Conte. The party stands for a curious blend of technocracy and populism, and is representative of a new type of ‘techno-populist’ party that is emerging elsewhere across Europe.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was seated as President in 1933, he was challenged by the early Technocrat leaders to declare himself dictator in order to implement Technocracy. He refused the “offer” but had no problem admitting scores of Technocrats into his administration to run the country.

In Nazi Germany, Hitler outlawed the Technocracy, Inc. movement because he could tolerate no competition, but then he relied heavily upon Technocrats to build his Fourth Reich.

At the end of WWII, President Truman authorized top-secret Operation Paperclip to bring some 1,600 Technocrat scientists and engineers from Nazi Germany to America and place them in top positions within our own government. Of special note were rocket scientists and aerospace engineers.

The only valid observation here is that Technocrats are always in demand by political leaders, who have no reservation about using them to further political objectives. Political administrations come and go, but the underlying Technocrats continue on uninterrupted.

In today’s world, the curious attraction between Populists and Technocrats is akin to a moth being attracted to the flame: Populists cannot prevent being ultimately dominated and burned by Technocrats.

https://www.technocracy.news/day-11-technocracy-and-the-rise-techno-populism/

Day 12: Rejecting Technocracy
Technocracy
image_pdf

Having just written eleven essays showing how Technocracy is a malignant cancer growing at breakneck speed all around the world, and especially in the United States, I will not sugar coat either the problem or the solution.

Four years ago, I wrote my first book on Technocracy, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation. I purposely used the term “Trojan Horse” to express that this has been a well-disguised sneak attack from the very beginning.

Today, the trap door is open and the attackers are pouring out. They are in plain view, working their craft to ensnare us into a Scientific Dictatorship.

Yet, Americans continue in oblivion, distracted by every imaginable political sideshow that has no substance, and entertained by a constant parade of bread and circuses.

Our epitaph could well read, “America: Alas, She Died In Her Sleep”.

In the meantime, there are thousands of Americans diligently defending their local communities from the various tentacles of Technocracy: Smart Grid, property rights abuses, 5G rollout, government mandated vaccinations, surveillance cameras, global warming and so many more.

To have any significant impact to actually STOP Technocracy, this force needs to replicate itself at scale and with great speed.

It is essential to understand that the national government will not and cannot save your local community, city or county. Washington is already swimming with Technocrats who are using the Federal apparatus to promote Technocracy throughout America. The last and only line of defense is in your local cities, towns and counties. This successful strategy has been proven time and time again, and it works.

Target The Achilles Heel

In Day 6: Technocracy’s Necessary Requirements, I listed the original items that need to be in place for Technocracy to take hold. These requirements were clearly stated in the Technocracy Study Course and they are just as valid today as they were in 1934.

To the extent that we can block or scramble any of those requirements, we can deal a serious blow to advancement of Technocracy and Technocrats. Thus, it is imperative to focus on these things:

  • Smart Grid, Smart Meters, Alternative Energy – There is no doubt that the national power grid needs to be updated, but not in a way that seeks to control energy. There is no energy shortage and there is no demonstrated need for “alternative energy”. Stop those plans. Expose them. Educate your local officials to not fall prey to the false narrative that the world will end in 12 years if they don’t take action. Demand that your local and elected officials personally write all city and county ordinances and block outside lobbyists from having any foothold.
  • 5G rollout and Internet of Things – If Technocrats fully implement 5G, artificial intelligence programs will take over the Internet of Things. By stoping 5G Small Cell antennas from being erected in your community, you could deal a fatal blow to near-term plans for Technocracy.
  • Surveillance cameras, license plate readers, militarization of police – Again, these are local issues that can only be addressed locally. Demand that your local leaders re-cast your law enforcement as peace keepers instead of military wannabes. Do not trade security for privacy.
  • Demand data privacy – Your local officials can create and pass binding resolutions that literally tie technocrats in knots when they are denied free access to your data. Your city exists to protect the rights of its citizens; make them work at it!
  • Reject regionalization – Most UN policies for Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, are imposed through regional governance entities called Councils of Governments. These organizations are patently unconstitutional and you should demand that your city, town and county withdraw from and reject all such regionalization.
  • Education reform in your local schools – Any and all outside influence over education and curricula must be rejected, with control being returned to parents and local teachers. If they refuse, encourage everyone in your community to get their children out of government schools and into private or home school situations. As documented in Day 10: Technocracy and Education, human conditioning promoted by Technocracy is toxic and NOT eduction.

This is not an exclusive list, and I will reserve the right to edit or add to this article in the future. However, I hope you get the idea that you have the power in your hands to make immense changes in your local community that will stop Technocracy and Technocrats dead in their tracks.

Turn off the TV. Quit wasting time shaking your fist at Washington theatrics. Get up. Get out. Meet people where you live, shop, raise children, etc. Make a difference. Sure, you may get some resistance, but I can virtually guarantee that you will be shocked by the numbers of fellow citizens who are thinking the same as you are.

Despite our efforts to the contrary, it is possible and perhaps even probable, that Technocracy will win and throw us into a Scientific Dictatorship from which there is no escape. On the other hand, Americans have overcome seemingly insurmountable enemies in our past, but only to the extent that we came together as AMERICA and threw off the forces that sought to bury us.

Where do you stand?

https://www.technocracy.news/day-12-rejecting-technocracy/

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 5 The Network of Global Control

Babylon Rising – part 5 The Network of Global Control

The Globalist Web

Part 5 of 7

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

The Global Dictatorship and a Biblical Perspective

In this 5th part of the series I would like to provide evidence to support the fact that there is a conspiratorial agenda to empower a centralised global governance framework which will direct the regional governments of the world in every aspect of life on planet earth. This will not present a ‘one world government’ but will certainly become a powerhouse for global control. A look into the books of Daniel and Revelation in the final part 6 of this series will reveal the nature and driving force behind this global super power.

There may be some readers, who after considering the United Nations Sustainable Development plan, still believe that their approach is the best way forward for the wellbeing of humanity. Well I must admit that if I did not read my Bible, or consider the prophectic implications of Scripture, then I would probably not be writing this series. It is my respect for Biblical obedience, my interest in ‘end-times’ prophecy and my eager desire for the ‘second-coming’ of our Messiah Yahushua that I share my thoughts on this matter.

We must not be beguiled by the virtuous veneer of the United Nations and their Sustainable Development Plan.

This is merely a display of ungodly secular-righteousness, the underlying objective of which is simply a desire for global power and control.

In the final part 7 of this series I will further reveal how this agenda of ‘man’ conflicts with the will of our heavenly Father and what His Word says regarding the outcome of man’s agenda to rule the world.

 

UN Mandela Day Speech

On July 18th 2020 South Africa held the 18th Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture. The UN Secretary-General António Guterres was the guest speaker.
It was timely and opportunistic of the United Nations to utilise this humanitarian platform to address the world on the dire urgency for a solution to address global inequality.

The Lecture title was  – Tackling The Inequality Pandemic – A New Social Compact For A New Era.

With this type of address one must realise that no word used is ‘off the cuff’. The script is well prepared. In light of this it is significant to take note of the meaning in the lecture title of the words ‘social compact’.

The term ‘social compact’ and ‘social contract’ are used synonymously:

‘social compact/contract’ is an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits, for example by sacrificing some individual freedom for state protection.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority (of the ruler, or to the decision of a majority) in exchange for protection of their remaining rights or maintenance of the social order – Celeste Friend. “Social Contract Theory”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 26 December 2019.

Social contract theorists seek to demonstrate why a rational individual would voluntarily consent to give up their natural freedom to obtain the benefits of political order.

This speech was used as an opportunity for the United Nations to highlight and bring to the forefront the goals of their Sustainable Development plan.

Below I have listed some of the speech highlights:

It was mentioned during the opening address how COVID 19 had brought about global solidarity but had also exposed inequality, racism and economic deprivation.

It was also stated that the bigger challenge was that of building a transformation post COVID world (4.33)

A further comment – ‘Cyril Ramaphosa keeps reminding us that the South Africa which will emerge after covet 19 will not be the South Africa of 2019 the world will be a new world’ (13:57)

Cyril Ramaphosa made the following comments:

 ‘His (Nelson Mandela) commitment to advancing freedom made him the father of not just our nation but of every nation’ (16.17)

Nelson Mandela is now to be seen as the father of the world? Where is our Heavenly Father in our plans?

‘inspired by Mandela’s spirit of compassion and care this pandemic has revived the bonds of solidarity amongst nations of the world’ (17.11)

Capitalism came under attack –

‘vast profits can no longer be made at the expense of the vast majority of the peoples of the world’ (25.30)

Antonio Guterres of the UN went on to make some interesting and revealing statements:
He mentions that the 26 richest people in the world  have more than half of the world’s wealth. If this is true. which I believe it is but massively understated because the world’s richest are never identified or listed anywhere, why not just focus on them? Redistribute their wealth and all will be well. Leave the rest of the hard working middle class alone and stop demonising us.
Interestingly Guterres preaches against the ills of colonisation,white supremacy and white male domination in the world. He makes all of these accusations while occupying one of the highest level positions in the world – as a white male from a country of historical colonisers. What is that old saying ‘people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones’? Why does he not simply bow out and vacate his position for a worthy black woman from a previously colonised country?

 ‘the pandemic has demonstrated the fragility of our worlds’

 ‘The vision and promise of the United Nations is that food, healthcare, water and sanitation, education, decent work and Social Security are not commodities for sale to those who can afford them but basic human rights to which we are all entitled. We work to reduce inequality every day everywhere and that vision is as important today as it was 75 years ago.It is at the heart of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development our agreed blueprint for peace and prosperity on a healthy planet and captured in Sustainable Development Goal 10’ 

 ‘Two sources of inequality in the world – colonialism and patriarchy’.(40:42)

 ‘the continent of Europe imposed colonial rule on much of the global source for centuries through violence and coercion. Colonialism created vast inequality within and between countries.(40.54)

 ‘We live in a male-dominated world with a male-dominated culture’ (42:51)

The irony in most of his comments is that although countries are no longer colonised through physical occupation, the vulnerable countries are still colonised through the banking system and massive global corporations who plunder the wealth of these victim countries without any idea that it is taking place. Take note of the continual attack on the male gender and patriarchy. I can agree that masculinity in our world is rather toxic and destructive but a blanket attack on all males is unacceptable. Also, ‘patriarchy’ is a Biblical instituted reality and has deep spiritual meaning. Attacking patriarchy is targeting the very core of the divine design and the Biblical blueprint for mankind.

‘COVID19 is a human tragedy but it has also created a generational opportunity. An opportunity to build back a more equal and sustainable world’ (48.06)

Yes, this opportunity was created, and more and more people are starting to wake up to this fact. This statement reveals the truth behind the COVID crisis. They needed an opportunity that ‘global warming/climate change’ was not presenting. And this is no normal opportunity either. This is a ‘generational’ opportunity – a once in a lifetime opportunity not to be missed. This is the CREATED OPPORTUNITY. The opportunity to fast track the world towards a global dictatorship.

‘the response to the pandemic and to the widespread discontent that preceded it must be based on a new social contract and the new global deal that creates equal opportunities for all and respect the rights and freedoms of all. This is the only way that we will meet the goals of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development’(48.14)

‘Let’s face the facts the global political and economic system is not delivering on critical global public goods public health, climate action, sustainable development, peace’(53.34)

‘We need the new global deal to ensure that power wealth and opportunities are shared more broadly and fairly at international level. A new model for global governance must be based on full inclusive and equal participation in global institutions’ (54.03)

The problem is that this sharing will take place through the demise of the middle class. The end result will be that we will all become poorer as a result. Oh, but not the super wealthy who will remain untouched by this ‘new global deal’.

‘New global deal based on a fair globalization on the rights and dignity of every human being on living in balance with nature and taking account of the rights of future generations and on success measured in human rather than economic terms is the best way to change this.The worldwide consultation process around the 75th anniversary of United Nations has made clear that people want a global governance system that delivers’.(54.41)

‘The developing world must have a far stronger voice in global decision-making we also read the more inclusive and balanced multilateral trading system that enables developing countries to move up global value chains’(55:11)

‘We need a new global deal at global level with an effective transfer of resources to the developing World’ (65.10)

Please take note of the remark ‘transfer of resources to the developing World’. Robin Hood we see you. Disempower those who could and would resist your agenda.

‘We have an opportunity now’ (66.07)

‘We have a problem of power and we have a problem with excess. Our priority at the present moment is in the excess’ (69.33)

Again read ‘middle class’ into this.

‘We need to look into the question of power and I think there is a risk to look into the world and to have a world divided into two blocks by the two biggest economies (70.08)

‘We need a universal system and we need universal rules we need international law prevailing (70.34)

Babylon here we come.

‘Power redistribution and governance. A governance of the digital world that brings equality in the excess but also in the use of the digital world and that allow us to control the negative aspects of digital (71.03)

‘I think this only increases our responsibility to build back based on the sustainable development goals’ (72.41)

‘Let’s organize those investments that will be made for the recovery to make sure that they are based in the principles and in the policies of the Sustainable Development Goals they build an inclusive economy that they build a sustainable economy’ (72.52)

‘That needs obviously a top-down approach we need leaders that are committed that force change and we need to support those leaders’ (74.12)

‘Only with this pressure from below will those that are trying to change things, to change the rules of the game from the top will be able to succeed. If not the lobbies that exist the power structures that exists the interests entrenched interest that exists, the entrenched inequality that exists will of course make life very difficult to all those leaders that are trying to change the world in a better direction based on the agenda 2030 based on the climate agreement; (75.44)

‘These can only be possible if from the bottom comes a very strong pressure to force leaders to move into directions that can lead to sustainability and inclusivity that can address inequality and the fragilities of our present worlds’ (76.27)

Take special note of his comments pertaining to pressure from the bottom. The ‘Black Lives Matter’ campaign is secretly funded and used, as well as the racism narrative, to pressurise society and government to comply with the need for change. In the end the Black people will realise that they have been exploited, yet again, but this time through their mass cooperation. Let’s hope that they wake up to this ploy before we all become victims of this global power takeover. If only we could all see that the ‘divide and conquer’ strategy is being utilised by the ‘globalists’ with great success. The only equality that will emerge from this by 2030 is that we will all become slaves to a New World Order – the New Babylon Beast sytem.

‘We need to really know that we are all in the same sea make sure that we come all into the same boat’ (77)

The reason that ‘democracy’ is pushed internationally as the chosen political model of choice is because it is easy to control the masses to vote for any desired outcome. The lower income masses are more dependent on the state and as such are more easily manipulated and controlled. Being the smaller group of people, the middle class will easily be outnumbered in the voting booth by the controlled masses. Those at the top use the masses to further their agenda but in the end we will all be losers. We will all lose freedom and global poverty will increase exponentially.

There are many voices across the world, and many highly credible ones too, who are speaking out against this COVID scam and the imminent move towards a global dictatorship. The ‘elite’ know this and are not perturbed because the dissenting numbers are few. As long as the masses of the world – probably as much as 95%, continue with the delusion then the plan will succeed. The decieved, democratic voice will ensure this.

Please note that there is not one single reference to Scripture or one single Bible verse mentioned in this discussion and presentation.
This is all about the wisdom and works of man – the praise and exaltation of man and the exclusion of Almighty God.

The UN and its agencies are a power trap. Once entrenched they will grow in power and control  which we will never be able to reverse. No country will be able to break free again as a sovereign nation. The UN is not just an advisory organisation, It was designed to mature into a global governing entity. Anyone trying to break away would probably be demonised as a rogue nation. Oh and yes there will be regional governments that appear to be autonomous but all will be directed and governed by the United Nations Agencies.

Detect the global language throughout the speech. Speaking as one global voice.The problem with a unified global voice is that it involves full inclusivity.- all cultures and all religions. We are being forced into accepting the abomination of all the new norms – ‘gender identification’, ‘LGBTQ’, abortion etc. Biblical guidelines are being displaced by the will of man. And how many realised that the authority of the WHO and Governments overuled our right to gather as Bible Believing Christains, whether in a chuch building or as a group. How can we be prevented from gathering. Rest assured, judgement from the throne of our Heavenly Father is coming – and very soon.

The looming global power grab is the real ‘virus’ threat and as always prevention is better than the cure.

I believe that António Guterres is just a puppet in this agenda. I do not believe that he has any idea about the greater plan for global rulership. The ‘hidden hand’ behind this agenda is just that – hidden. They never expose themselves or appear in the public eye and anyone who does is not from their elite group. They remain the backstage ‘hidden hand’ – the controllers of the puppets. António Guterres is passionate about the Sustainable Development plan and is being used as the frontman because of this energy.

This Sustainable Development plan may all seem like the best approach to many for the equality of all but the Bible reveals a very different picture to me. The Prophets and the book of Revelation suggest a different ending to this agenda. Our Father has His own agenda 2030 and aslo another ‘global reset’ plan.

The Bible is the comprehensive guideline for harmonious life on earth and if recognised and observed would result in a thriving world.

The Creator of this world who is a Loving Father to all of mankind knows best.

Video - Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture by UN Secretary-General António Guterres

Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture by UN Secretary-General António Guterres

This fake COVID 19 global crisis and the resulting ‘social engineering’ program, will leapfrog humanity into the new age of oppressive centralised global governance and  control – ‘The New Normal’

………………………….

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

Isaiah 5:20-21

And the mean man shall be brought down, and the mighty man shall be humbled, and the eyes of the lofty shall be humbled:

But the LORD of hosts shall be exalted in judgment, and God that is holy shall be sanctified in righteousness.

Isaiah 5:15-16

The Global Governance Infrastructure

of

The United Nations

Most people will be aware of the existence of the United Nations organisation and most will now be aware of the affiliated World Health Organisation (WHO) as a result of their involvement with the COVID 19 crisis. But how many are aware of the enormous infrastructure of the United Nations, its Specialized Agencies, Funds, Programmes and their controlling global influence.

The purpose of my providing you with this information is to show you that the infrastructure and programmes are already in place to govern all activities and actions of all governments of the world.

To assume that member governments govern with complete autonomy is naive. Any government that would go against the UN or any of their affiliates and their guidance would more than likely be considered to be roque governments e.g North Korea, Syria etc

 One can not deny that the World Health Organisation has been steering the global reaction to COVID 19 and has provided the detailed guidance to all member governments of the world. We have witnessed some flexibility with regard to the implementation procedures but for the most part the WHO guidelines were adhered to – globally.

And now we see the UN taking full avantage of the opportunity created to fast-track the 18 goals of the  ‘Sustainable Development‘ agenda which is to be fully realised by 2030.

What we are witnessing with this infrastructure and control is the manifestation of Bible Prophecy.

Here is a little overview of the United Nations organisation:

Overview
The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945.  It is currently made up of 193 Member States.  The mission and work of the United Nations are guided by the purposes and principles contained in its founding Charter.
Due to the powers vested in its Charter and its unique international character, the United Nations can take action on the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century, such as peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism, humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality, governance, food production, and more.
The UN also provides a forum for its members to express their views in the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, and other bodies and committees. By enabling dialogue between its members, and by hosting negotiations, the Organization has become a mechanism for governments to find areas of agreement and solve problems together.
The UN’s Chief Administrative Officer is the Secretary-General.
2020 marks the 75th anniversary of the United Nations.
https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/overview/index.html

Below is a list of their Funds, Programmes, Specialized Agencies and Others:

The UN system, also known unofficially as the ‘UN family’, is made up of the UN itself and many programmes, funds, and specialized agencies, all with their own leadership and budget.  The programmes and funds are financed through voluntary rather than assessed contributions. The Specialized Agencies are independent international organizations funded by both voluntary and assessed contributions.

Funds and Programmes

UNDP – Headquarters: New York City, USA
The United Nations Development Programme works in nearly 170 countries and territories, helping to eradicate poverty, reduce inequalities and build resilience so countries can sustain progress. As the UN’s development agency, UNDP plays a critical role in helping countries achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

UNEP – Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya
The United Nations Environment Programme established in 1972, is the voice for the environment within the United Nations system. UNEP acts as a catalyst, advocate, educator and facilitator to promote the wise use and sustainable development of the global environment.

UNFPA – Headquarters: New York City, USA
The United Nations Population Fund – UNFPA is the lead UN agency for delivering a world where every pregnancy is wanted, every birth is safe, and every young person’s potential is fulfilled.

UN-Habitat – Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya
The mission of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme is to promote socially and environmentally sustainable human settlements development and the achievement of adequate shelter for all.

UNICEF – Headquarters: New York City, USA
UNICEF works in 190 countries and territories to save children’s lives, to defend their rights, and to help them fulfil their potential, from early childhood through adolescence.

WFP – Headquarters: Rome, Italy
The World Food Programme aims to eradicate hunger and malnutrition.  It is the world’s largest humanitarian agency. Every year, the programme feeds almost 80 million people in around 75 countries.

UN Specialized Agencies – The UN specialized agencies are autonomous organizations working with the United Nations. All were brought into relationship with the UN through negotiated agreements. Some existed before the First World War. Some were associated with the League of Nations. Others were created almost simultaneously with the UN. Others were created by the UN to meet emerging needs.

FAO – Headquarters: Rome, Italy
The Food and Agriculture Organization leads international efforts to fight hunger. It is both a forum for negotiating agreements between developing and developed countries and a source of technical knowledge and information to aid development.

ICAO – Headquarters: Montreal, Canada
The International Civil Aviation Organization develops standards for global air transport and assists its 192 Member States in sharing the world’s skies to their socio-economic benefit.

IFAD – Headquarters: Rome, Italy
The International Fund for Agricultural Development, since it was created in 1977, has focused exclusively on rural poverty reduction, working with poor rural populations in developing countries to eliminate poverty, hunger and malnutrition; raise their productivity and incomes; and improve the quality of their lives.

ILO – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The International Labor Organization promotes international labor rights by formulating international standards on the freedom to associate, collective bargaining, the abolition of forced labor, and equality of opportunity and treatment.

IMF – Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA
The International Monetary Fund fosters economic growth and employment by providing temporary financial assistance to countries to help ease balance of payments adjustment and technical assistance. The IMF currently has $28 billion in outstanding loans to 74 nations.

IMO – Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
The International Maritime Organization has created a comprehensive shipping regulatory framework, addressing safety and environmental concerns, legal matters, technical cooperation, security, and efficiency.

ITU – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The International Telecommunication Union is the United Nations specialized agency for information and communication technologies. It is committed to connecting all the world’s people – wherever they live and whatever their means. Through our work, we protect and support everyone’s fundamental right to communicate

UNESCO – Headquarters: Paris, France
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization focuses on everything from teacher training to helping improve education worldwide to protecting important historical and cultural sites around the world. UNESCO added 28 new World Heritage Sites this year to the list of irreplaceable treasures that will be protected for today’s travelers and future generations.

UNIDO – Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
The United Nations Industrial Development Organization is the specialized agency of the United Nations that promotes industrial development for poverty reduction, inclusive globalization and environmental sustainability.

UNWTO – Headquarters: Madrid, Spain
The World Tourism Organization is the United Nations agency responsible for the promotion of responsible, sustainable and universally accessible tourism.

UPU – Headquarters: Bern, Switzerland
The Universal Postal Union is the primary forum for cooperation between postal sector players. It  helps to ensure a truly universal network of up-to-date products and services.

WHO – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The World Health Organization is the directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system. The objective of WHO is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health. Health, as defined in the WHO Constitution, is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

WIPO – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The World Intellectual Property Organization protects intellectual property throughout the world through 23 international treaties.

WMO – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The World Meteorological Organization facilitates the free international exchange of meteorological data and information and the furtherance of its use in aviation, shipping, security, and agriculture, among other things.

World Bank – Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA
The World Bank focuses on poverty reduction and the improvement of living standards worldwide by providing low-interest loans, interest-free credit, and grants to developing countries for education, health, infrastructure, and communications, among other things. The World Bank works in over 100 countries.

-International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)
-International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)*
-International Development Association (IDA)
-International Finance Corporation (IFC)
-Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)*
* International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) are not specialized agencies in accordance with Articles 57 and 63 of the Charter, but are part of the World Bank Group.

Other Entities and Bodies

UNAIDS – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads and inspires the world to achieve its shared vision of zero new HIV infections, zero discrimination and zero AIDS-related deaths. UNAIDS unites the efforts of 11 UN organizations—UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, UNDP, UNFPA, UNODC, UN Women, ILO, UNESCO, WHO and the World Bank—and works closely with global and national partners towards ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals.

UNHCR – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – UNHCR protects refugees worldwide and facilitates their return home or resettlement.

UNIDIR – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research is a voluntarily funded autonomous institute within the United Nations. An impartial actor, the Institute generates ideas and promotes action on disarmament and security. UNIDIR brings together states, international organizations, civil society, the private sector and academia to work together—internationally, regionally and locally—to build and implement creative solutions that will benefit all states and peoples.

UNITAR – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
An autonomous UN body established in 1963, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research is a training arm of the United Nations System, and has the mandate to enhance the effectiveness of the UN through diplomatic training, and to increase the impact of national actions through public awareness-raising, education and training of public policy officials.

UNOPS – Headquarters: Copenhagen, Denmark
The mission of the United Nations Office for Project Services is to help people build better lives and help countries achieve peace and sustainable development. UNOPS helps the UN, governments and other partners to manage projects, and deliver sustainable infrastructure and procurement in an efficient way.

UNRWA – Headquarters: Amman, Jordan
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees has contributed to the welfare and human development of four generations of Palestine refugees. It’s services encompass education, health care, relief and social services, camp infrastructure and improvement, microfinance and emergency assistance, including in times of armed conflict.  It reports only to the UN General Assembly.

UNSSC – Headquarters: Turin, Italy
The United Nations System Staff College is the learning organization of the United Nations system. It designs and delivers learning programmes for staff of the UN system and its partners. It helps the United Nations become more effective by fostering a common leadership and management culture across the system.

UN Women – Headquarters: New York City, USA
UN Women merges and builds on the important work of four previously distinct parts of the UN system, which focus exclusively on gender equality and women’s empowerment.

Related Organizations

CTBTO – Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization promotes the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (which is not yet in force) and the build-up of the verification regime so that it is operational when the Treaty enters into force.

IAEA – Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
The International Atomic Energy Agency, is the world’s centre for cooperation in the nuclear field. The Agency works with its Member States and multiple partners worldwide to promote the safe, secure and peaceful use of nuclear technologies.

IOM – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The International Organization for Migration works to help ensure the orderly and humane management of migration, to promote international cooperation on migration issues, to assist in the search for practical solutions to migration problems and to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants in need, including refugees and internally displaced people.

OPCW – Headquarters: The Hague, Netherlands
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is the implementing body of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which entered into force in 1997. OPCW Member States work together to achieve a world free of chemical weapons.

UNFCCC – Headquarters: Bonn, Germany
The UNFCCC Secretariat (UN Climate Change) was established in 1992 when countries adopted the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). With the subsequent adoption of the Kyoto Protocol  in 1997 and the Paris Agreement  in 2015, Parties to these three agreements have progressively reaffirmed the Secretariat’s role as the United Nations entity tasked with supporting the global response to the threat of climate change.

WTO – Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
The World Trade Organization is a forum for governments to negotiate trade agreements, and a place where member governments try to sort out the trade problems they face with each other.

https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/funds-programmes-specialized-agencies-and-others/index.html

ID 2020

If you are not already familiar with the ID 2020 initiative then you may want to review this agenda. The following information is taken fromt the ID2020 website – https://id2020.org

What is really interesting is to see who the funders and Alliance Partners are – see image below. Of particular interest is GAVI – The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations

The GAVI Alliance (formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation) is a global health partnership of public and private sector organizations dedicated to ‘immunisation for all’. The founder of GAVI was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

And what has GAVI, vaccines and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation all have in common? Well this article form Septembe 2019 reveals all. Is this the imminent RFID chip implant on its way to a medical facility near you?:

 – ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with vaccines –

‘The ID2020 Alliance has launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine alliance Gavi, and new partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief.

The program to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity was unveiled by ID2020 in partnership with the Bangladesh Government’s Access to Information (a2i) Program, the Directorate General of Health Services, and Gavi, according to the announcement.’

source article: https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines

 – Back to ID2020 – 

‘In September 2015, all United Nations member states adopted the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, including their commitment to “provide legal identity for all, including birth registration” by 2030.’

‘ID2020 is building a new global model for the design, funding, and implementation of digital ID solutions and technologies. ‘

‘The Need for Good Digital ID is Universal
The ability to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right. Because we live in a digital era, we need a trusted and reliable way to do that both in the physical world and online.’

‘A unique convergence of trends provides an unprecedented opportunity to make a coordinated, concerted push to provide digital ID to everyone.
1.1 billion people worldwide live without a digital ID
Identity is vital for political, economic and social opportunity. But systems of identification are archaic, insecure, lack adequate privacy protection, and for over a billion people, inaccessible.’

‘We Need to Get Digital ID Right
Since 2016, ID2020 has advocated for ethical, privacy-protecting approaches to digital ID. 

For the one in seven people globally who lacks a means to prove their identity, digital ID offers access to vital social services and enables them to exercise their rights as citizens and voters and participate in the modern economy. But doing digital ID right means protecting civil liberties and putting control over personal data back where it belongs…in the hands of the individual. 

Every day, we rely on a variety of forms of identification to go about our lives: our driver’s license, passport, work badge and building access cards, debit and credit cards, transit passes, and more. 

But technology is evolving at a blinding pace and many of the transactions that require identification are today being conducted digitally. From e-passports to digital wallets, online banking to social media accounts, these new forms of digital ID allow us to travel, conduct business, access financial and health records, stay connected, and much more. ‘

‘Bringing privacy-protecting, portable and user-centric digital identity to life.
ID2020 supports digital identity programs that both directly improve lives and generate needed evidence for how we maximize the potential of digital ID for everyone.’

The World Economic forum

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution?

Ubiquitous, mobile supercomputing. Artificially-intelligent robots. Self-driving cars. Neuro-technological brain enhancements. Genetic editing. The evidence of dramatic change is all around us and it’s happening at exponential speed. Previous industrial revolutions liberated humankind from animal power, made mass production possible and brought digital capabilities to billions of people. This Fourth Industrial Revolution is, however, fundamentally different. It is characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries, and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.

http://www.weforum.org/

The World Economic forum - The Fourth Industrial Revolution

A New Global Currency – The Great Reset

The future of Capitalism and Carbon Credits

Most will have heard about the restart of the economies of the world post COVID 19 and are probably optimistic in this regard. But what is the future of ‘money’ and capitalism. Will things return to the way they were pre-COVID? I do not think so. There is a need for a new model – or so the globalsits are advising. When one considers the current global debt of $255 trillion – rising exponentially, compared to the amount of available money in the world ($5-$80 trillion ???), then one can easily see that the system is about to collapse. Debt can never be repaid. There is simply too large a gap between the debt figure and the money available. The monetary model has reached the end of its life and has to change:

Global Debt Monitor – COVID-19 Lights a Fuse

 – Global debt across all sectors rose by over $10 trillion in 2019, topping $255 trillion. At over 322% of GDP, global debt is now 40 percentage points ($87 trillion) higher than at the onset of the 2008 financial crisis—a sobering realization as governments worldwide gear up to fight the pandemic.
– With the COVID-19 fiscal response in full swing, the global debt burden is set to rise dramatically in 2020; gross government debt issuance soared to a record high of over $2.1 trillion last month, more than double the 2017-19 average of $0.9 trillion.

Intitute of International Finance – https://www.iif.com/Portals/0/Files/content/Research/Global%20Debt%20Monitor_April2020.pdf

Here’s how much money there is in the world — and why you’ve never heard the exact number

Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said one part of the answer can be found in information published by the U.S. Federal Reserve.

“It’s a number called M0, which is essentially the number of notes and coins in circulation,” Kirkegaard said. “For the United States, that number on the Federal Reserve website is somewhere in the vicinity of $1.5 trillion.”

Kirkegaard said that a comparable tally of currency in circulation from all over the world, tracked by the Bank for International Settlements, totals about $5 trillion.

But using a more inclusive definition of money, “that amount goes much, much higher,” explained Jeff Desjardins at the financial media website Visual Capitalist, which has published an infographic on the topic.

“Add in checking accounts, savings accounts, money-market accounts — not quite physical money, but you can make a bank transaction digitally and use that as money,” and Desjardins said the total amount of money easily accessible in the world economy grows by several multiples. This is called broad money, and according to the CIA World Factbook, and the global total is in excess of $80 trillion.

Most of the broad money in the world economy isn’t actually cash held in bank vaults, explained Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics. It’s bank balances on digital ledgers, money that people deposited in banks, and banks then lent out again.

https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-much-money-there-is-in-the-world-2017-10?r=US&IR=T

……………………………………..

Having reviewed the above facts consider the World Economic Forum’s 51st Annual Meeting in January 2021 to discuss the ‘Great Reset’. This is not a discussion about restarting the global economy. This is a discussion about RESETTING the global economy. This is a huge difference. Change is coming and the ‘middle class’ are not going to like it:

……………………………………..

WEF sets 2021 agenda: The Great Reset

“The Great Reset” will be the theme of a unique twin summit to be convened by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in January, 2021. The 51st World Economic Forum Annual Meeting will bring together global leaders from government, business and civil society, and stakeholders from around the world in a unique configuration that includes both in-person and virtual dialogues.

“We only have one planet and we know that climate change could be the next global disaster with even more dramatic consequences for humankind. We have to decarbonise the economy in the short window still remaining and bring our thinking and behaviour once more into harmony with nature,” said Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.

“A great reset is necessary to build a new social contract that honours the dignity of every human being,” added Schwab “The global health crisis has laid bare the unsustainability of our old system in terms of social cohesion, the lack of equal opportunities and inclusiveness. Nor can we turn our backs on the evils of racism and discrimination. We need to build into this new social contract our intergenerational responsibility to ensure that we live up to the expectations of young people.”

“Covid-19 has accelerated our transition into the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. We have to make sure that the new technologies in the digital, biological and physical world remain human-centred and serve society as a whole, providing everyone with fair access,” he said.

Mr Schwab also pointed out that the global pandemic had demonstrated again how interconnected the world now is.

“We have to restore a functioning system of smart global cooperation structured to address the challenges of the next 50 years. The Great Reset will require us to integrate all stakeholders of global society into a community of common interest, purpose and action,” said Schwab. “We need a change of mindset, moving from short-term to long-term thinking, moving from shareholder capitalism to stakeholder responsibility. Environmental, social and good governance have to be a measured part of corporate and governmental accountability,” he added.

Other influential leaders echoed Mr Schwab’s call.

“In order to secure our future and to prosper, we need to evolve our economic model and put people and planet at the heart of global value creation,” said HRH The Prince of Wales. “If there is one critical lesson to learn from this crisis, it is that we need to put nature at the heart of how we operate. We simply can’t waste more time.”

The Prince of Wales has long campaigned for environmental issues, not least in Transylvania, Romania, where he has invested in property, restoring a number of cottages in which he stays at least once a year. For the rest of the year he opens them to all comers, declaring his wish (in a personal note handed to all guests) that it “will encourage more people to visit Transylvania, and in this way promote sustainable development.”

António Guterres, secretary-general of the United Nations, called the great reset “a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake-up call. We must build more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies and societies that are more resilient in the face of pandemics, climate change and the many other global changes we face.”

WEF intends its next annual meeting to be a more innovative summit, reflecting the spirit of the great reset. It will provide a unique opportunity at the beginning of 2021 to bring together the key global government and business leaders in Davos, yet framed within a global multi-stakeholder summit driven by the younger generation to ensure that the great reset dialogue pushes beyond the boundaries of traditional thinking and is truly forward-oriented.

To do so, the World Economic Forum will draw on thousands of young people in more than 400 cities around the world, many in emerging Europe, who will be interconnected with a powerful virtual hub network to interact with leaders in Davos. Each of those hubs will have an open house policy to integrate all interested citizens into this dialogue, making the annual meeting open to everyone.

https://emerging-europe.com/news/wef-sets-2021-agenda-the-great-reset/

……………………………………..

If you would like to look a little further into the future of this looming ‘Great Reset’ then have a look at the United Nations Carbon Union. For those with eyes to see you will find that the ‘currency’ will be largely ‘carbon credits’ built around compliance and obedience to prescribed global carbon parameters. Imagine then what your current ‘carbon footprint’ is with your large, non-environmentally friendly home and your multiple fuel driven cars. Couple this with your current lifestyle of jetsetting to foreign destinations on regular holidays. And what about the foods you buy? How ‘carbon friendly’ is your lifestyle? It would seem that by 2040 your life will not resemble your currrent one at all. Unless of course you have another way of accumulating ‘carbon credits’ to offset your poor lifestyle choices that is. Have a look into your future governed by ‘Carbon Credit’ restraints: 

 

THE DEPARTMENT OF CARBON

The Department of Carbon (CUDC) was build with in the Carbon Union for setting and publishing carbon policies, regulations and incentives. It sets mechanisms to set carbon prices, release and track carbon credits, exam and authorize carbon sequestration tools, collecting carbon bills and approve carbon credit transactions. 

Each parities in the Carbon Union has a Department of Carbon branch to manage the carbon emission within the region and will report to the central Department of Carbon. 

THE CARBON AGREEMENT

The Carbon Agreement builds upon the Convention and  brings nations into a common cause to undertake ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so.

​The Carbon Agreement deals with greenhouse gas emissions reduction, sequestration, and finance starting in the year 2040. The language of the agreement was negotiated by representatives of 175 parties at the 36th Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC in Shanghai. The Agreement aims to respond to the global climate change threat by closing the gap between the industry carbon reduction plan and a carbon sustainable life this century and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further.

GLOBAL CARBON GOAL

The goal is to use the collective citizen’s power to make up the huge gap between the industry’s carbon reduction plan and carbon sustainable life.

The gap between current carbon emissions and the Paris Climate Accord was made smaller by factories though carbon cap and trade, technologies inventions and carbon management. What if individuals can similarly reach the carbon emission goal through a personal carbon cap and trade, new technology innovations and personal carbon management? For those challenges The collective and bottom-up power are beyond measure.

NEW CURRENCY – CARBON CREDIT

Within Carbon Union, individuals have to pay for every single gram of carbon dioxide they emit directly or indirectly.

A carbon price has been put on every human activities. This new global currency, called Carbon Credit (emblem on the left), add carbon to the global currency market. Humanity finally steps into the world of Carbon Economy.

PERSONAL CARBON CAP & BILL

CARBON CAP
Every Carbon Union citizen now has a 5.5kg daily carbon cap, which means everyone has 5.5 free carbon credits to spend per day. 

CARBON BILL
If citizens exceed their carbon credit caps, they can make up the difference through an expansive monthly payment to the Carbon Union, or they can earn carbon credits by offsetting carbon emissions on their own.  The exchange rate between the carbon credit and dollar is one carbon credit equals to one dollar.

Carbon Sustainable Code
The carbon offset LOGO is the code for carbon sustainable products that released by CUDC. Manufacturers who use low carbon solutions in their businesses can put this code on their products and can be sold in lower carbon prices than other products in the market.

Double currency experience
3 Feb, 2041
Every product and activity costs carbon credits, and carbon prices vary depending on the carbon emissions created during cultivation, manufacturing and transportation. 

​Some products produced in carbon sustainable ways and get a carbon offset logo on its tag. Such as the Carbon Cowboy Beef (image below). The beef provides customers healthier food but sold at much lower carbon prices than other beef in the market, which making it very popular.

Carbon account connect to your credit card
18 Feb, 2041
Every citizen has a carbon balance in their bank account. Every carbon credit payment will be calculated into their carbon balance automatically. 

Read all about the Carbon Union here: https://www.thecarbonunion.org/copy-of-the-carbon-union

……………………………………………..

Reset the Table – The Rockefeller Foundation

What Covid-19 has revealed
The images of the past few months have been both shocking and heartbreaking.

Families out of work and newly struggling with nutrition insecurity waiting in long car lines for a day’s or a week’s worth of food. School nutrition professionals—wearing whatever protective equipment they or their schools could provide—putting their own health at risk to meet the rising demand for food in their communities. Meat and poultry plant workers suffering disproportionate rates of Covid-19 infections while facing mandatory return-to-work orders. And farmers, with none of their usual buyers in a position to purchase, out of economic necessity dumping millions of gallons of milk, onions, beans, eggs, and more.

These images tell a powerful story of the economic and public health consequences of poor nutrition, with 94 percent of deaths from Covid-19 among individuals with an underlying condition, the majority of which are diet-related. They tell an equally powerful story of a food system struggling to respond to the disruptions wrought by Covid-19.

 

 

……………………………………………..

This 3D-printed steak could help us reduce meat consumption

World Economic Forum

  • Every year, billions of animals are raised and slaughtered for food.
  • This uses huge amounts of water and energy.
  • Some experts believe alternatives could be better for people and the environment.

Billions of animals are killed for food every year. In fact the total number slaughtered every two years exceeds the number of people that have ever lived.

meat alternative vegan vegetarian labirculutre plant based alternatives steak isreal innovation change

 

 

 

Number of animals slaughtered for meat in the world.

Image: Our World in Data

Whether you’re a keen meat eater or not, there’s no ignoring that its production consumes a huge amount of natural resources: 15,000 litres of water to produce a single kilogram of beef.

Many studies highlight the health benefits of reducing meat consumption too. A report published in the JAMA Internal Medicine found that eating two servings of red meat, processed meat or poultry a week was linked to a 3-7% higher risk of cardiovascular disease.

Growing alternatives

It’s no surprise, then, that there’s a growing amount of interest in meat alternatives.

A start-up firm in Israel, Redefine Meat, is using industrial-scale 3D-printing to produce a plant-based ‘alt-steak’ that it says has a structure and texture similar to that of the real thing.

Eshchar Ben-Shitrit, the company’s chief executive and co-founder, told Reuters: “We can do the entire cow, not only one part of the cow.”

In 2019, his firm raised $6 million in funding – an indication of how seriously the non-meat meat market is being taken. According to a report in Vox, demand for meat alternatives in the US leapt by 264% while the coronavirus pandemic was raging. Redefine Meat says it expects the category to be worth $140 billion annually by 2030.

Here’s to your health

Eating too much meat – red meat in particular – has been associated with a range of health problems for decades including heart disease and some forms of cancer. It has been linked with obesity too. In the US, over 70% of people are overweight or obese.

In China, meat consumption has grown as economic development has ushered in a series of societal changes. Rapid urbanization and the adoption of so-called Western lifestyle habits, like eating more fast food and meat in general, are two of the more visible examples. Under the surface, there are signs people’s health is starting to suffer.

A McKinsey report from 2019 sums it up by saying: “Alas, as incomes have grown, so too have waistlines. Diets high in protein and fat have taken hold in China, leading to a 10% urban-area obesity rate projected to increase to 25% by 2030 if left unchecked. Obesity is already costing the country more than $93 billion annually, or 1.1% of GDP.”

What is meat anyway?

Meatless meatballs, burgers, sausages and more have been available in supermarkets around the world for decades. They tend to contain things like soy, rice, peas and other vegetables.

The challenge for such products has tended to be that no matter how they taste, their texture doesn’t resemble meat. That’s something the use of 3D-printing technology could overcome, as it creates layers of interwoven fibres that more closely mimic the real thing.

In 2013, meanwhile, a food scientist in the Netherlands hit upon a different approach. Mark Post of the University of Maastricht unveiled a burger grown in a laboratory from cattle stem cells and muscle tissue. At a biochemical level, his burger is made from the same stuff as a regular burger – meat tissues.

But it didn’t come from an animal. Technically it isn’t the flesh and muscle fibre of any cow. Whether or not that means it is meat may be a question for philosophers to ponder.

A route forward

As well as consuming resources, the meat industry generated considerable amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. Compared with the production of a regular meat burger, plant-based alternatives use up to 99% less water, 95% less land, and 90% less emissions, according to the United Nations.

None of which gets us away from the rising global demand for meat. But there are short- and long-term changes that will help address some of these concerns. The UN cites a study undertaken by the University of Michigan, on behalf of the meat-substitute producer Beyond Meat. It suggests that Americans eat, on average, three burgers per week but could “save the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by 12 million cars, simply by swapping one of those weekly meals with a plant-based alternative.”

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) suggests a series of changes in consumers’ attitude and behaviour will be required to secure a more sustainable global food supply. These include raising awareness among the general public of the importance of tackling food waste: around the world one-third of all food produced ends up in the garbage.

The FAO also calls for a rebalancing of food prices to reflect the total cost of food production and supply. That includes the loss of biodiversity from land-clearance, emissions and pollution, and the consumption of water. And it suggests a reduction in per-capita meat consumption in affluent countries.

In the latest Great Reset dialogue, John Kerry, Jan Vapaavuori, Hilary Cottam, Mohammad Jaafar, Bob Moritz, Geraldine Matchett, Phillip Atiba Goff, Saadia Zahidi and Borge Brende discuss how to rebuild the ‘social contract’ in a world where millions of people have lost their jobs and faith in democracy is under extreme pressure.

 

The World Economic forum - COVID-19: The Great Reset

“The Great Reset” will be the theme of a unique twin summit to be convened by the World Economic Forum in January 2021. In-person and virtual dialogues will address the need for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future, and a new social contract centred on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.

Since it made its entry on to the world stage, COVID-19 has torn up the existing script of how to govern countries, live with others, and take part in the global economy in a dramatic way. Professor Schwab and CEO and Founder of the Monthly Barometer Thierry Malleret explore these disruptions in their new book, COVID-19: The Great Reset. The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.

 

Take a peak into the future – the year 2030

An article on the World Economic Forum website.

Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better

Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, “our city”. I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes.
It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
First communication became digitized and free to everyone. Then, when clean energy became free, things started to move quickly. Transportation dropped dramatically in price. It made no sense for us to own cars anymore, because we could call a driverless vehicle or a flying car for longer journeys within minutes. We started transporting ourselves in a much more organized and coordinated way when public transport became easier, quicker and more convenient than the car. Now I can hardly believe that we accepted congestion and traffic jams, not to mention the air pollution from combustion engines. What were we thinking?

Sometimes I use my bike when I go to see some of my friends. I enjoy the exercise and the ride. It kind of gets the soul to come along on the journey. Funny how some things never seem to lose their excitement: walking, biking, cooking, drawing and growing plants. It makes perfect sense and reminds us of how our culture emerged out of a close relationship with nature.
“Environmental problems seem far away”

In our city we don’t pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there.
Once in a while, I will choose to cook for myself. It is easy – the necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes. Since transport became free, we stopped having all those things stuffed into our home. Why keep a pasta-maker and a crepe cooker crammed into our cupboards? We can just order them when we need them.

Have you read?
2030: the rise of compassion, or a world of warships and walls?
What will we eat in 2030?
What will we eat in 2030?

This also made the breakthrough of the circular economy easier. When products are turned into services, no one has an interest in things with a short life span. Everything is designed for durability, repairability and recyclability. The materials are flowing more quickly in our economy and can be transformed to new products pretty easily. Environmental problems seem far away, since we only use clean energy and clean production methods. The air is clean, the water is clean and nobody would dare to touch the protected areas of nature because they constitute such value to our well being. In the cities we have plenty of green space and plants and trees all over. I still do not understand why in the past we filled all free spots in the city with concrete.
The death of shopping

Shopping? I can’t really remember what that is. For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use. Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me. It knows my taste better than I do by now.
When AI and robots took over so much of our work, we suddenly had time to eat well, sleep well and spend time with other people. The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore, since the work that we do can be done at any time. I don’t really know if I would call it work anymore. It is more like thinking-time, creation-time and development-time.

For a while, everything was turned into entertainment and people did not want to bother themselves with difficult issues. It was only at the last minute that we found out how to use all these new technologies for better purposes than just killing time.
“They live different kinds of lives outside of the city”

My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.

Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth. We had all these terrible things happening: lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment. We lost way too many people before we realised that we could do things differently.

Author’s note: Some people have read this blog as my utopia or dream of the future. It is not. It is a scenario showing where we could be heading – for better and for worse. I wrote this piece to start a discussion about some of the pros and cons of the current technological development. When we are dealing with the future, it is not enough to work with reports. We should start discussions in many new ways. This is the intention with this piece.
Share

Written by
Ida Auken, Member of Parliament, Parliament of Denmark (Folketinget)
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is/

World Economic Forum Presents: The Great Reset—”You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy.”

Beware of the ‘secular righteousness’ of the United Nations Sustainable Development plan which is only a veneer and is opposed to the righteousness of the Almighty Creator, YHWH .

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

Proverbs 14:12

For the LORD knoweth the way of the righteous: but the way of the ungodly shall perish.

Psalm 1:6

Agenda Games

Below I have included some interesting videos from International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA. He has been very outspoken on the deceit of this fake pandemic and how the puppet masters are mind-controlling the population.

His Youtube channel is well worth a visit for  more insightful content.

You may also be amazed at the incredible list of endorsements for Vernon listed on his website. http://www.vernoncoleman.com

Here is a sample to illustrate his credibility:

“Britain’s leading health care campaigner” (The Sun)

“Dr Vernon Coleman is one of our most enlightened, trenchant and sensible dispensers
of medical advice.” (The Observer)

“Sharpest mind in medical journalism.” (Daily Star)

“His message is important.” (The Economist)

“Perhaps the best known health writer in the world today” (The Therapist)

“Probably one of the most brilliant men alive.” (Irish Times)

“The patient’s champion.” (Birmingham Post)

“Britain’s leading medical author.” (The Star)

We Are Victims of the Greatest Crime in History‘ – Dr Vernon Coleman

 

Videos - International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA

Video

The New World Order is Already Launched

Video

Corona World Order

Some are suggesting that the current crisis is the end of globalization, or that it will wipe out the New World Order altogether . . . but they are wrong. In fact, this crisis is the globalists’ dream, and what we are witnessing is the birth of a totalitarian control grid the likes of which could scarcely have been imagined before this pandemic panic kicked off. Welcome to the Corona World Order.

Video

Global Nightmare: Staying Sane During the Madness

International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, explains why paranoia is now the only way to live. He points out that mask wearing collaborators are ignorant and don’t understand what is happening. He gives some shocking facts about GlaxoSmithKline, the vaccine and drug manufacturer, and explains the plans for a Global Church as well as a Global Government. He also gives advice for those who don’t want to wear masks in public.

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 4 Order Out of Chaos

Babylon Rising – part 4 Order Out of Chaos

Deception is The Name of The Game

Part 4 of 7

In this post:

The Series So Far

The concern is not for our Health or wellbeing

Order Out of Chaos

Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development

The Population Control Agenda

The Georgia Guidestones

The United Nations Reveals the Real, Opportunistic, Agenda 

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

The Series So Far

I have provided evidence in parts 1- 3 of this series to illustrate how the COVID 19 pandemic is a fraud and that the objective is to incite fear amongst the people of the world. It is through fear that mankind can be manipulated into obeying otherwise unacceptable regulations and accept outrageous solutions to remedy this manufactured crisis.

 ‘this pandemic is completely manufactured. it’s like the biggest public relations stunt that’s ever been perpetrated on us in the history of humanity’  – Andrew Kaufman MD

In this  part 4 of the series I want to highlight the concealed agenda behind the pandemic and what the ultimate goals of the ‘Hidden Hand’ are. On second thought maybe that may only be fully revealed in the final part 5.

For the sake of clarity let me define who I refer to with the term ‘Hidden Hand’:

The Hidden Hand are the people, for the most part a super wealthy secret brotherhood, who have for centuries been the highest hidden authority. They have traditionally influenced decisions and outcomes through their network of secret societies such as the Illuminati, and Freemasonry. The will of the ‘Hidden Hand’ is filtered down through authorities, governments and organisations. Most people who support the goals, objectives and the desires of this elitist group have no idea who or what the source of the plan was or what the ultimate goal is for that matter. They are simply convinced of the merits of the plan and through loyalty and obedience to their superiors fulfil the agenda. There are many levels of influence in the world today but only a very small, super wealthy group of people decide on what the outcomes should be. For the sake of simplicity I will refer to the broader group of ‘influencers’ as the ‘globalists’ in accord with the subject matter of this series.

Strangely, and not surprisingly, the Forbes list of the richest people in the world does not reflect the top Elite who remain out of sight i.e. the ‘Hidden hand’.

According to the 2020 Forbes richest list the top five are Jeff Bezos founder of Amazon, Bernard Arnault, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison. If you believe that these five men alone are steering the world towards a Global Government then you are mistaken. Yes, Bill Gates is driving the vaccine and population control aspect of the ‘globalist’ agenda on the surface but the real power and influence remains hidden and out of sight.

I do not want to deviate too much from the main subject matter of this post any further with regard to this ‘Hidden Hand’ other than to say the following:

Our Christian Bible records that Our Messiah – Yahushua, appeared two thousand years ago to set man free from sin and slavery. There are evidently a group of ambitious and powerful individuals who do not share this reality. They believe that the Messiah or Messianic age applies to a time when they, or their nominated individual, sits on the throne and rules the whole world.

This imposing messianic rule will however once again enslave mankind in an ungodly system of oppression – albeit for a very short time (according to my Bible that is).

I will further reveal how this agenda of man conflicts with the will of our heavenly Father and what His Word says regarding the outcome of man’s agenda to rule the world in the final part 5 of this series.

 

Video - Giants: The Global Power Elite

Giants: The Global Power Elite – A talk by Peter Phillips

The concern is not for our Health or wellbeing
Most people are supportive of the control measures and regulations for COVID 19 believing that the higher levels of governments and health authorities are concerned for the health and the wellbeing of its citizens. If this were the case then why is this same concern not reflected in other areas of our lives which expose us to health risk and premature death. As mentioned in part one of this series, that at the time of writing this series around 500 000 had supposedly died world-wide with COVID 19.

Figures from  the World Health Organization reveal that tobacco kills more than 8 million people a year. They further reveal that alcohol related deaths amount to 3 million a year. That’s already over 11 million from these two dangers alone.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco.

https://www.who.int/gho/alcohol/en/

https://www.who.int/health-topics/alcohol#tab=tab_1

Why is it that there is not a global outcry over these deaths? Why has there not been a ban on these products? Think about the associated healthcare cost of treating this. Why is there a disproportionate reaction to a seasonal flu which only adversely affects those with underlying health conditions. A condition which the body initiates to assist in self healing. A condition that has occurred every year as a seasonal ‘flu’ without any extraordinary reaction from health officials.

The truth is that this pandemic is not about welfare at all. It is a fabricated event designed to introduce regulations and controls and move us closer to an oppressive global driven governance and reduced freedom.

 

Order Out of Chaos

The new normal

Only one word can really describe what is taking place in the world today with this CoronaVirus deception – CHAOS!

To truly begin to understand what is taking place in our modern world one must first understand the age old motto – ‘Ordo Ab Chao’ which is Latin for ‘order out of Chaos’

According to basic Illuminati or higher Masonic dogma, the New World Order will result after a period of choreographed chaos, which the state will probably implement through war and bloodshed. Masonic initiates who progress and ultimately attain the 33rd degree receive a jewel with the inscription ‘Ordo Ab Chao,’ surrounded with three interlocking triangles. Professor Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a Freemason and a political and social scientist at the University of Berlin (1817-1831), maintained that man could shape history and achieve ultimate peace only through repetitive episodes of controlled conflict between opposing forces. Hegel advocated the idea that men must create, manipulate and manage that conflict in order to create a predetermined outcome – the controlled change, the synthesis.
The website Universal Freemasonry.org has the following to say: 

Of the many symbols and phrases of Freemasonry, a few mottoes are important enough to be prominently, and sometimes publicly displayed on flags, seals, or regalia. The phrase ‘Ordo Ab Chao,’ is the motto of the 33rd degree, which can be found on the grand decorations of the Order of the Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, one of the highest honors and roles which can be bestowed upon a Mason. It is also featured on other seals and flags representing various Orders.

This phrase being depicted so prominently, particularly in relation to the 33rd degree, indicates a tremendous importance to Freemasonry. Indeed, Ordo Ab Chao, translated to ‘Order from Chaos,’ is also associated with another latin phrase, Lux In Tenebris, which translates to “Light from Darkness.”

https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/article/ordo-ab-chao

Order out of chaos, the underhanded process of creating chaos and then seizing control under the pretense of putting things back in order involves cunning planning and implementation to ensure success. 

This principle can be witnessed in many ‘staged events’ across the world throughout history. 

The puppeteers create the ‘dis order’ or ‘chaos’ so that the distressed  people will demand ‘order’. The price of ‘order’ always entails a handing over of control and loss of freedom on the part of the citizenry. Out of ‘chaos’ comes ‘order’ – THEIR order – their totalitarian NEW WORLD ORDER.

The deception of creating chaos and then seizing power under the pretense of bringing about ‘order’ again is a tried and tested method of deception and manipulation. This evil method is also referred to as the Hegelian Dialect  after the philosopher Georg Hegel who wrote about its effectiveness. He described it as: THESIS — ANTI-THESIS — SYN-THESIS.

Others have described it as: PROBLEM — REACTION — SOLUTION. They first create the problem. They await the desperate reaction and thereafter respond with a much awaited solution. The solution is designed after the ‘agenda’ and the objectives of the controller. The outcome is achieved this way because the outcome would more than likely have been resisted and virtually impossible to achieve under normal circumstances.

Orwell described it as REALITY CONTROL. In ‘1984’: he said, ‘The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, ‘just to keep people frightened’.’

I have personally witnessed this type of deception first hand when living in Apartheid South Africa in the 1980’s. The South African intelligence agencies activated bombs in urban areas to increase white patriotism and support for the war against the communist African National Congress (ANC) freedom struggle. It was only many years later after Apartheid that the truth was revealed.

There are literally HUNDREDS of examples of this method having been used effectively throughout the course of history. A well-known example is the bombing of Pearl Harbor which resulted in the United States entering the Second World War. Chaos was required and so chaos was created. That’s how it works.

The New York ‘Twin Tower’ 911 event was another major success for the globalist powers. They wanted war and needed a reason to go to war. And they needed the nation’s backing to go to war. After 911 there was a national outcry for revenge but the real perpetrators of 911 remained hidden, behind the curtain.

In most cases the population are so traumatised by the event/catastrophe that the spirit of fear takes over their sense of reason. Very few people stop and ask the ‘why’ and  ‘what’ caused the event. Reason and logic exit due to the fear factor. Fear results in desperation which in turn leads to eager submission to an unreasonable or what would normally be an unacceptable solution. 

Mankind readily sacrifices liberties and freedom for safety and ‘normality’ again. In reality though ‘normal’ is redefined through the ‘solution’. This we now are now witnessing with COVID 19. We will never return to life as it was. We are being told through the media to be prepared for a ‘new normal’, and it shall be so. 

 Global Warming

For many years the globalists made every effort to bring about chaos and fear through their ‘global warming’ fear mongering narrative. This supposed ‘threat’ to humanity’s future gained very little traction after all their many years of effort. Many knowledgeable academics challenged the manipulated ‘global warming’ science  and stalled the momentum for change. The ‘globalists’ soon realised that this ‘threat’ was doomed to failure and therefore changed their narrative to ‘Climate change’ which, although less dramatic in title, would more readily be accepted by everyone. The ‘Climate Change’ agenda has not gone away but it is not realising the desperate, prioritised reaction for change that the globalists wanted.

 – Climate change and COVID 19 are the  ‘crisis twins’ –

COVID 19

2020 and enter the next act – COVID 19. This was a well planned and implemented strategy for change – see my previous posts describing ‘Event 201’ and the Rockefeller ‘Lock Step’ scenario from 2010. This crisis was discussed and rehearsed for years.

The impact from COVID 19 with regards to chaos was unprecedented. The reaction was widespread fear across the world. The world was thrown into chaos in a matter of weeks. Economies have been destroyed, thousands of businesses closed and millions left unemployed without any income. Control strategies are for the most part bizarre and meaningless. Implementation is contradictory and mostly after the horse has bolted.

The truthful scientific and medical explanation behind this illness and the vast amount of supporting evidence is being ignored and suppressed.

 Those who speak out against the mainstream narrative are mostly silenced with accusations of being heartless haters of those who are ill. Censoring has taken place across all social media platforms of anyone challenging the narrative. Although there are many medical doctors who have spoken out there are many more who would face professional damage or lose complete credibility for doing so. 

Why would any professional Doctor put his livelihood on the line for the sake of speaking out. It would be professional suicide to do so. And so we are left with this pandemic fraud which is destroying life as we know it. Well the pandemic is real but the suggested cause is just plain ridiculous.

We can clearly witness the ‘chaos’, the ‘problem’ and the ‘reaction’. Where is the ‘order’ or the ‘solution’. We must wait. We must first experience a second lockdown and more and more ridiculous controls. We must first become really desperate, frustrated and then the ‘solution’ will come forth. When the population cries out for it. Then, and only then when we are exhausted from the situation will the solution be offered. Big Brother will come forth and save us all – but at a price. A ‘new normal’ will be put forward. Freedoms and liberties will have to be sacrificed as we move ever closer to the goal of  centralised Global Governance and Control.

COVID 19 Primary objectives

It may be difficult to accept but the main agenda behind this ‘plandemic’ is twofold:

Destruction of the ‘middle -class’ and a ‘quick-step’ towards oppressive global governance and control.

‘You can not transform until you’ve destroyed’ – Rosa Koire

For those whose eyes are open this is clear to see. If one considers the ‘Sustainable development goals’ and the agenda behind the ‘Climate change’ narrative, it is clear that the human population are to blame and are responsible for damage to the environment and global inequality. More precisely though it is the ‘middle class’ sector of global society that are the main culprits. 

We are viewed as the compulsive consumers on the planet. We are the ones who supposedly shop and participate in extravagance beyond our needs. We eat out far too much. We continually shop for unnecessary luxuries. We travel on packaged holidays and  flip around the globe far too often resulting in an enormous carbon footprint. We over-consume and are overly wasteful. We are viewed as the ‘virus’ on the planet. We are seen as the pandemic. This is why we will get the toxic vaccine.

This all changed with COVID 19. Shops were closed. Hospitality and travel was shut down. Vast numbers of businesses closed never to reopen. Cafes and coffee shops will be trimmed down. High Street stores have closed never to reopen. The ‘middle’ class were hit for six. This was the plan. To cut back on consumerism and the unnecessary extravagant living on the part of the more affluent ‘middle class’. This is part of the ‘Sustainable Development goal (10), to close the inequality gap by 2030. How do they propose to close the gap? You can’t raise the standard of living and wealth of the 80% low income group. But you can close the gap by substantially reducing the wealth of the middle class.

Whether we like it or not the middle class has been dealt a major blow. We will not recover to the lifestyle enjoyed before COVID 19 either. The future will be different. Shopping is no longer a delight. It is now something to be avoided due to the ridiculous regulations and red tape. Eating out is no longer a relaxing luxury. Shopping and dining out has been made undesirable now. Travel will also become a burdensome reality. Wait until one has to produce vaccination passports etc.

This may seem overly negative but the reality is that consumption and consumerism on the part of the middle class will have been curtailed and massively reduced. The middle class will most certainly be substantially affected by the CoronaVirus and the forthcoming ‘new normal’.

Our quality of life and our freedom to choose is being altered under our very noses during this pandemic. We will not exit this pandemic the same.

Q – Why the middle class? 

A – it is the members of the middle class that make up the resistance to change. The middle class are self-sufficient and comfortable through their wealth and prosperity. It is we that resist and reject the changes required by the ‘globalists’. We must be challenged in order to become more dependent on the state and subordinate to change. The poorer members of society are on the other hand easier to steer towards change and have little or nothing to lose in the process. The lower income/wealth group will more readily take the carrot.

When one reviews the United Nations ‘Sustainable Development’ goals one can not help but be supportive of the desired outcomes. They sound great and all look reasonable.I personally support the belief that we consume too much and that these excessive habites are destructive in the long term and are not sustainable. I do not personally have an issue with the goals but rather the overriding hidden agenda of a centralised global dictatorship that will eventually emerge from the shadows to control and diminish our freedom to choose and erode our social liberties.

The looming New World Order global dictatorship is being disguised through the sustainable development action plan.

 

The fake COVID 19 global crisis and the resulting ‘social engineering’ program, will leapfrog humanity into a new age of oppressive centralised global governance and  control – ‘The New Normal’

Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development

When one reviews and understands the aim of Agenda 21 ( the agenda for the 21st century), Agenda 2030 and the United Nations Sustainable Development plan, then one will begin to see the pathway to a central model of globalised governance and control.

These plans are designed to reduce our negative impact, as a human race, on the planet. The consequence for mankind as a result of this Agenda will be that we will lose much of our freedom. We will be strictly regulated in every aspect of our lives and forced to live in densely populated ‘smart cities’. We will lose our National Sovereignty and identity, our very uniqueness in the world.

The following videos will provide a detailed explanation of the interconnectivity of these plans.

 Below is the official outline and history of the United Nations Sustainable Development plan:

United Nations

Department of Economic and Social Affairs

Sustainable Development

History 

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries – developed and developing – in a global partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.

The SDGs build on decades of work by countries and the UN, including the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs

In June 1992, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, more than 178 countries adopted Agenda 21, a comprehensive plan of action to build a global partnership for sustainable development to improve human lives and protect the environment.
Member States unanimously adopted the Millennium Declaration at the Millennium Summit in September 2000 at UN Headquarters in New York. The Summit led to the elaboration of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to reduce extreme poverty by 2015.
The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development and the Plan of Implementation, adopted at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in South Africa in 2002, reaffirmed the global community’s commitments to poverty eradication and the environment, and built on Agenda 21 and the Millennium Declaration by including more emphasis on multilateral partnerships.
At the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 2012, Member States adopted the outcome document “The Future We Want” in which they decided, inter alia, to launch a process to develop a set of SDGs to build upon the MDGs and to establish the UN High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. The Rio +20 outcome also contained other measures for implementing sustainable development, including mandates for future programmes of work in development financing, small island developing states and more.
In 2013, the General Assembly set up a 30-member Open Working Group to develop a proposal on the SDGs.
In January 2015, the General Assembly began the negotiation process on the post-2015 development agenda. The process culminated in the subsequent adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with 17 SDGs at its core, at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in September 2015.
2015 was a landmark year for multilateralism and international policy shaping, with the adoption of several major agreements:
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (March 2015)
Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development (July 2015)
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with its 17 SDGs was adopted at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in New York in September 2015.
Paris Agreement on Climate Change (December 2015)
Now, the annual High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development serves as the central UN platform for the follow-up and review of the SDGs.
Today, the Division for Sustainable Development Goals (DSDG) in the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) provides substantive support and capacity-building for the SDGs and their related thematic issues, including water, energy, climate, oceans, urbanization, transport, science and technology, the Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR), partnerships and Small Island Developing States. DSDG plays a key role in the evaluation of UN systemwide implementation of the 2030 Agenda and on advocacy and outreach activities relating to the SDGs. In order to make the 2030 Agenda a reality, broad ownership of the SDGs must translate into a strong commitment by all stakeholders to implement the global goals. DSDG aims to help facilitate this engagement.

https://sdgs.un.org/goals

17 Goals to transform our world
The Sustainable Development Goals are a call for action by all countries — poor, rich and middle-income — to promote prosperity while protecting the planet.

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Preamble
This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.

The Goals and targets will stimulate action over the next fifteen years in areas of critical importance for humanity and the planet:

People
We are determined to end poverty and hunger, in all their forms and dimensions, and to ensure that all human beings can fulfil their potential in dignity and equality and in a healthy environment.

Planet
We are determined to protect the planet from degradation, including through sustainable consumption and production, sustainably managing its natural resources and taking urgent action on climate change, so that it can support the needs of the present and future generations.

Prosperity
We are determined to ensure that all human beings can enjoy prosperous and fulfilling lives and that economic, social and technological progress occurs in harmony with nature.

Peace
We are determined to foster peaceful, just and inclusive societies which are free from fear and violence. There can be no sustainable development without peace and no peace without sustainable development.

Partnership
We are determined to mobilize the means required to implement this Agenda through a revitalised Global Partnership for Sustainable Development, based on a spirit of strengthened global solidarity, focussed in particular on the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable and with the participation of all countries, all stakeholders and all people.

The interlinkages and integrated nature of the Sustainable Development Goals are of crucial importance in ensuring that the purpose of the new Agenda is realised. If we realize our ambitions across the full extent of the Agenda, the lives of all will be profoundly improved and our world will be transformed for the better.

https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

 The plan sounds absolutely fantastic doesn’t it. A world made perfect. Peace and harmony with nature. What could be better? But at what cost will this plan be implemented and realised.

It will cost mankind our freedom.

 

Videos - Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development

What Is Sustainable Development?

We’ve all heard of “sustainable development,” but what does it actually mean? Is it really about protecting the earth, or is it just another tool for foisting an agenda of carbon eugenics and technocracy? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we rip off the green mask of the oiligarchs and expose the 2030 Agenda for what it really is.

The Globalist Agenda Explained

The Globalist Agenda Explained

What is globalism, and what will it lead to?

 

Agenda 21 - Communism 2.0

Agenda 21 – Communism 2.0

Agenda 21 – environmental realism or communist ploy?

Rosa Koire Adgenda 21

Rosa Koire Adgenda 21

Rosa Koire author of “Behind the Green Mask” brings her lecture series to Grass Valley to the Vets Hall as guest speaker for this CABPRO sponsored event. Excessive government control and over regulation have long been topics that CABPRO has championed against and Rosa opens your eyes to an insidious new layer of control created by the United Nations Agenda 21 proposal.

Australian Politician Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21 & Club of Rome

Australian Politician Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21 & Club of Rome

Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre.

The Population Control Agenda

The Overpopulation Myth

 There is a view held by many of the ‘great minds’ of this world that the suggested exponential human population growth is unsustainable. For anyone living in a densely populated city across the world this thinking may appear factual and scientifically correct. Deeper investigation into the worlds population growth, from a historical and projected perspective, reveals a totally different picture.

 These very same people believe that mankind are the cause of ‘Global Warming’, which has since been debunked and downgraded somewhat to ‘Climate Change’. Are we thick? Of course the climate changes, my wardrobe proves that.

 The Agenda is all about prodding the guilt of humanity. And now we are responsible for spreading a deadly virus. Yes, we are certainly causing excessive damage to our seas and forests to satisfy our lusts and greed for money, but that could be tackled differently.

 Cows however are not causing the climate to heat up. I disagree with meat farming and I am a vegetarian but to suggest that our appetite for meat is causing global warming is just ridiculous. We should just be convincing people of the health benefits associated with becoming vegetarian, not trying to scare them to death with the ‘Climate Change’ nonsense.

 The controlled mainstream media are pushing this focus on the idea of overpopulation  with no consideration for facts. The reality is that the global population could exist quite comfortably in the US state of Texas – according to ‘overpopulationisamyth.com’ – video below

Urban overcrowding is not over population. One only needs to visit the countryside to understand this.

 The modern idea of overpopulation comes from Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, a man that hypothesised that since food production increased incrementally, while population increased exponentially, this would cause a crisis in the future. Time and again the ‘crisis’ of overcrowding has been foretold. Again it is just the indoctrination of fear, fear and more fear.

 Clearly there is an agenda behind this narrative of the threat of human overpopulation. We are being made to believe and accept that we possibly need to be culled or at least our reproductive patterns must be changed.

 What happened to the instruction from our Creator to go forth and multiply? 

 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

Genesis 1:22

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Genesis 1:28

Did the Almighty not anticipate a world population in excess of 7 billion? This is ridiculous. It is simply man attempting to be ‘god’ and take dominion over life on this planet.

It is clear when one understands the goals of the Sustainable Development plan that there are a number of elitists in this world who want to see the masses of the world reduced in number and fully controlled, in every way possible, while they themselves enjoy full freedom and privilege. 

 We need to consider that the population of the Earth is not increasing exponentially, and is actually increasing at a gradually lower rate. For example, the population of the Earth hit one billion in 1804. 

 Then by 1927 this doubled to 2 billion. Incidentally this coincides with the progress of the industrial era in the 19th Century, and was the most economically free Western era (particularly the US), often known as Laissez-farez. Lifespan has always been a leading indicator of quality of life too, and this increase can be demonstrated from the 19th Century onwards. By 1960 the population had only grown by half to 3 billion, and by 1975 this increased by a third, hitting 4 billion, followed by a fourth, and a fifth. The video then goes on to show that the global fertility rate has been decreasing in the last 40 years. For more information regarding why this is the case let’s take a look at this:

 The global total fertility rate necessary to maintain the population of the world is 2.1, which roughly translates to one child per person, or two children per woman given that men can’t directly have children. Of course, not every woman will have children, and there will always be other factors weighing on population, like infant mortality rates or natural disasters. In less economically developed regions lifespan is shorter due to things like famine, disease, or war, which counteracts the higher birth rates in third world countries. As the quality of life in a region of the world increases so does the ability for women to live safely. 

 Women then enter the workplace as opposed to taking on the more traditional role of nurturer, also statistically having fewer children. This explanation perfectly encapsulates why Feminists are so disingenuous given that they regularly make claims of patriarchal oppression. In reality Western women would struggle to live the lives they do without the safety, comfort, and innovations of the developed world. Meanwhile men evolved to endure the harsh conditions of hostile environments like mines and the prairies when hunting for food, which is why they have always taken a more active role in the forefront of society.

 The growth rate failing to keep up with the mortality rate causes economic problems like shrinking social security, and also leads to immigration policy to keep tax revenues and population steady. The UN’s current data shows that the population of the world will peak at around 8 billion in 2045. From here it will start to decrease, and by the end of the century we’ll be losing 1 billion people every 20 years, meaning that in 75 years we’ll actually be back to 7 billion! Isn’t it amazing what you don’t learn by watching TV?

RockingMrE (http://www.rockingphilosophy.com)

–  There are a few videos included below that should open your eyes to this deceitful narrative. – 

 

Videos - The Population Control Agenda
Population Research Institute

Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth

 

This video takes a fresh, humorous approach to the demographic issues facing the world today.

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

 

 

Stable Population

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

 

 

Food: There’s lots of it

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

 

 

Poverty: Where We All Started

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

 

 

7 Billion People: Everybody Relax!

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

 

 

Urbanization: Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad City

 

Read the science behind this video…

 

 

Bill Gates and the Population Control Grid

The takeover of public health that we have documented in How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health and the remarkably brazen push to vaccinate everyone on the planet that we have documented in Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World was not, at base, about money. The unimaginable wealth that Gates has accrued is now being used to purchase something much more useful: control. Control not just of the global health bodies that can coordinate a worldwide vaccination program, or the governments that will mandate such an unprecedented campaign, but control over the global population itself.

The Georgia Guidestones

When one discusses the ‘over-population’ myth, the conversation will inevitably drift towards considering the sinister population inscription on the Georgia Guidestones. There is no doubt that the designers and sponsors of this monument have a desire for a much reduced global population. That of a mere 500 million people that is. The sponsors have remained anonymous and out of sight. This monument must have cost tens of millions of dollars even back when it was manufactured in 1979/1980.

You can decide for yourself what you believe the intended message pertaining to this ‘ideal’ population number implies. Sounds very much like ‘Sustainable Development’ language to me.

GEORGIA GUIDESTONES: A MYSTERIOUS GRANITE MONUMENT CONTAINING POST-APOCALYPTIC MESSAGES FOR THE WORLD

by UNBELIEVABLE FACTS

In 1980, a nineteen feet three inches tall, granite monument resembling Stonehenge was erected in Georgia. Situated atop a desolate hill, the Georgia Guidestones is made of six granite slabs. There are ten guidelines in eight modern languages inscribed on these slabs. No one knows the designer of this massive structure or its purpose, hence it is shrouded in mystery and surrounded with numerous unanswered questions. Because of this, lots of speculation and conspiracy theories have sprung up around it.

Robert C. Christian approached a granite company in 1979 to commission a huge structure, stating that he represents a small group of anonymous Americans who had been planning it for twenty years. Upon hearing of the project, the president of the granite company thought Christian was “a nut” and tried to discourage him.

In June 1979, a well-dressed man entered the offices of the Elberton Granite Finishing Company. He introduced himself as Robert C Christian, which by his own admission was a pseudonym. Christian met with the president of the company, Joe H Fendley Sr., and commissioned a structure made of six granite slabs. He chose Elberton as the site of construction because this area has huge granite reserves. Christian explained to Fendley that the stones would function as a compass, calendar, and clock. Also, he specified that it should be capable of withstanding catastrophic events.

After hearing about the project, Fendley attempted to discourage Christian. He quoted a price several times higher than any project the company had previously taken. He explained that the extra charges were because the Guidestones would require additional tools and consultants. To his surprise, Christian accepted the quote. While arranging the payment, Christian explained that he was working on behalf of “a small group of loyal Americans.” Also, he stated that this group of people intended to remain anonymous. He later told Fendley that the group had been planning the Guidestones structure for twenty years.

Upon hearing the details about the structure, Fendley put Christian in touch with his banker, Wyatt C Martin, and both the men were sworn to secrecy. Christian delivered a scale model to Fendley and purchased a five-acre plot of land for the project’s construction. After his encounters with Fendley and Martin, Christian left town and was never seen again. 

When Fendley realized that Christian was serious about the Guidestones project, he put him in touch with his banker. Soon, Christian agreed to the banker, Wyatt C Martin, as being the intermediary for the project. When Fendley and Martin agreed to work on this project, they were sworn to secrecy.

After finalizing the plans for the project, Christian delivered a scale model of the Guidestones. He also sent ten pages of specifications along with the model. To construct the monument, Christian purchased a five-acre plot of land in Elbert County, Georgia on October 1, 1979. The farm owner, Wayne Mullinex and his children, were given lifetime cattle grazing rights on the site. Christian later transferred ownership of the land and the Guidestones to Elbert County.

The Georgia Guidestones monument was unveiled on March 22, 1980, before an audience of about 400 people.The structure is made of six slabs of granite with ten guidelines inscribed on them in eight different languages. It is believed that it contains post-apocalyptic messages.

On March 22, 1980, the Georgia Guidestones was publicly unveiled. The ceremony was attended by up to 400 people. The monument consists of six slabs of granite. One slab stands in the center with four arranged around it, all topped by a capstone. All the slabs are astronomically aligned. Due to the granite slabs, the structure shares a resemblance with Stonehenge. That’s why this structure is also known as “America’s Stonehenge.”

On each face of the four upright stones are inscriptions which state:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.

3. Unite humanity with a living new language.

4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.

5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

8. Balance personal rights with social duties.

9.Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.

10.Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

The guidelines are inscribed in eight different languages. They are English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.

The monument also contains several astronomical features. The center column has a hole drilled from one side to the other. The North Star can be seen through this hole. The same pillar has a slot which is aligned with the Sun’s solstices and equinoxes. An aperture in the capstone indicates the day of the year by allowing sunrays to pass through it.

A few feet away from the structure is a tablet which contains information about the structure. It states that a time capsule has been buried underneath the structure, but the date on which to open the capsule is not mentioned.

A tablet bearing inscription about the various features of Georgia Guidestones is placed at the west of the structure. At the top center of the tablet is written:

THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES

CENTER CLUSTER ERECTED MARCH 22, 1980

Below it is written:

LET THESE BE THE GUIDESTONES TO AN AGE OF REASON

The left side of the tablet contains information about its astronomical features, author, and sponsors. Along with it, there is information about a time capsule placed six feet below the structure. The date to open the time capsule is not mentioned. The right side of tablet mentions the physical data of the structure.

Even though the tablet states the purpose of Georgia Guidestones, it has become a subject of interest for conspiracy theorists. Due to the mystery surrounding the structure, it has been vandalized a number of times.

People have different views about the Georgia Guidestones. Some people, such as Yoko Ono, has praised the inscriptions. While others have described the ten commandments as works of the Antichrist. An activist named Mark Dice even demanded that the Guidestones should be smashed into pieces. According to him, the Guidestones has “a deep Satanic origin”. But most people agree that the inscription is actually a post-apocalyptic message.

The true meaning of the stone’s messages have never been understood, nor confirmed. Also, the reason of its existence is not clear. Due to this confusion, the monument has been vandalized a number of times including both physical damage and spray painting. Due to the unexplained origin, the Georgia Guidestones is now considered as one of U.S.’ greatest mystery.

source: https://unbelievable-facts.com/2017/05/georgia-guidestones.html

The United Nations Reveals the Real, Opportunistic, Agenda

– Order out of Chaos-

– Problem…Reaction…Solution – 

How amazingly fortuitous that a global crisis such as COVID 19 has appeared on the scene to provide the opportunity, or in the United Nations lingo – ‘catalyst’, for radical change to our alleged destructive production and consumption habits:

United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12 – Responsible Consumption and Production

The COVID-19 pandemic offers countries an opportunity to build recovery plans that will reverse current trends and change our consumption and production patterns towards a more sustainable future.

Sustainable consumption and production is about doing more and better with less. It is also about decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation, increasing resource efficiency and promoting sustainable lifestyles.

Sustainable consumption and production can also contribute substantially to poverty alleviation and the transition towards low-carbon and green economies.

https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/

Building a ‘different economy’
The better we manage nature, the better we manage human health. This is why the post-2020 biodiversity framework that countries around the world are expected to agree on this year matters greatly. An important pillar in our post-COVID recovery plan must be to arrive at an ambitious, measurable and inclusive framework, because keeping nature rich, diverse and flourishing is part and parcel of our life’s support system. Even more important when you consider that between 25-50 per cent of pharmaceutical products are derived from genetic resources. 

And as the engines of growth begin to rev up again, we need to see how prudent management of nature can be part of this “different economy” that must emerge, one where finance and actions fuel green jobs, green growth and a different way of life, because the health of people and the health of planet are one and the same, and both can thrive in equal measure.”

https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/04/1061082

Sustainable Consumption and Production (known as SCP) is about doing more and better with less. It is also about decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation, increasing resource efficiency and promoting sustainable lifestyles.

We are currently consuming more resources than ever, exceeding the planet’s capacity for generation. In the meantime, waste and pollution grows, and the gap between rich and poor is widening. Health, education, equity and empowerment are all adversely affected.

Crucially, SCP can contribute substantially to poverty alleviation and the transition towards low-carbon and green economies. To do this, SCP requires building cooperation among many different stakeholders as well as across sectors in all countries.

Sustainable consumption and production refers to “the use of services and related products, which respond to basic needs and bring a better quality of life while minimizing the use of natural resources and toxic materials as well as the emissions of waste and pollutants over the life cycle of the service or product so as not to jeopardize the needs of future generations”.

https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/sustainable-consumption-and-production-policies

Climate Change and COVID-19: UN urges nations to ‘recover better’

“We need to turn the recovery into a real opportunity to do things right for the future” – United Nations Secretary-General
“With this restart, a window of hope and opportunity opens… an opportunity for nations to green their recovery packages and shape the 21st century economy in ways that are clean, green, healthy, safe and more resilient” – UN Climate Chief

https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-urges-countries-‘build-back-better’

 Secretary-General’s Message

On this International Mother Earth Day, all eyes are on the COVID-19 pandemic – the biggest test the world has faced since the Second World War.

We must work together to save lives, ease suffering and lessen the shattering economic and social consequences.

The impact of the coronavirus is both immediate and dreadful.

But there is another, deep emergency — the planet’s unfolding environmental crisis.

Climate disruption is approaching a point of no return.

We must act decisively to protect our planet from both the coronavirus and the existential threat of climate disruption.

The current crisis is an unprecedented wake-up call.

We need to turn the recovery into a real opportunity to do things right for the future.

I am therefore proposing six climate-related actions to shape the recovery and the work ahead.

First: as we spend huge amounts of money to recover from the coronavirus, we must deliver new jobs and businesses through a clean, green transition.

Second: where taxpayers’ money is used to rescue businesses, it needs to be tied to achieving green jobs and sustainable growth.

Third: fiscal firepower must drive a shift from the grey to green economy, and make societies and people more resilient.

Fourth: public funds should be used to invest in the future, not the past, and flow to sustainable sectors and projects that help the environment and the climate.

Fossil fuel subsidies must end, and polluters must start paying for their pollution.

Fifth: climate risks and opportunities must be incorporated into the financial system as well as all aspects of public policy making and infrastructure.

Sixth: we need to work together as an international community.

These six principles constitute an important guide to recovering better together.

Greenhouse gases, just like viruses, do not respect national boundaries.

On this Earth Day, please join me in demanding a healthy and resilient future for people and planet alike.

António Guterres

General Assembly President’s Message
As we celebrate International Mother Earth Day we reaffirm our commitment to promote Harmony with Nature to achieve a just, sustainable, and prosperous society.

Today we are experiencing loss, suffering, and unprecedented challenges as a result of the COVID-19. I extend my condolences to all who have lost loved ones. I wish those suffering from the virus and those on the frontlines strength. This global pandemic has affected everyone’s daily lives and has impressed upon us the fact that solidarity is our best and first line of defence.  

I hope that we will learn from this experience and that the spirit of solidarity will extend to all our endeavours.

Our experience with COVID19 demonstrates that we, humanity, are not separate from the world around us. In this Decade of Action and Delivery to implement the Sustainable Development Goals we are focused on nature. We must work together to protect our planet and ecosystems which affect every aspect of human life.

We must prioritise the sustainable use of planetary resources when pursuing industrial growth – notably in food production and agriculture. We need to protect biodiversity in our climate action efforts, industrial practices and urban expansion.

We will only preserve Mother Earth through a paradigm shift from a human-centric society to an Earth-centred global ecosystem. This requires us to engage with everyone, including young people who will inherit this planet. Education is critical to safeguarding Mother Earth: training courses on harmony with nature and earth jurisprudence approaches will be essential in creating a resilient world for everyone, everywhere. I commend Member States who promote teachings from ancient cultures who have a deep connection with nature. 

When it comes to Mother Earth we each have something to teach, and something to learn: by working with civil society, the private sector, academia, and the media we will implement the Sustainable Development Goals in harmony with nature.  

I call on all Member States to reaffirm our commitments to  protect Mother Earth, in particular the 2030 Agenda which calls on us to “ensure that people everywhere have the relevant information and awareness for sustainable development and lifestyles in harmony with nature”.

Tijjani Muhammad-Bande

https://www.un.org/en/observances/earth-day/message

All of this sounds extremely noble and the right route to follow. The problem that I have however is with the deceptive way in which we are being psychologically coerced into adapting to a new way of life – our ‘New Normal’.

Why deceive people with this fake crisis. Just explain the need for change in a mature manner. Or is this too impossible? Are humans too thick to get it and need to be forced, through fear, to accept the change.

Just remeber one thing. It is the despised ‘middle class’, you and me, that will be expected to make the greatest lifestyle adjustments. Can you now see why the reaction to COVID 19 resulted in the clamping down on consumption and consumerism, the volume of which is largely driven by the ‘middle class’.

We are being forced to cut back on consumption by making it very difficult to shop, travel, eat out and enjoy traditional entertainment activities – sport and social gatherings etc 

Oh, and the purpose of this enforced mask wearing is not to protect against the non-existent virus either. No, the mask wearing rule is to totally frustrate the population into not going out to shop or to enjoy life at all. Mask wearing is their way of ensuring that consumerism continues to be contained and further reduced.

 Things will never return to the way that they were before COVID 19. This was the plan.

– And what is it with this ‘Mother Earth’ rubbish? I have a Heavenly Father who provides my guidance and all my needs. I have no ‘Mother Earth’. –

Let us not be deceived by the ‘Green Mask’ of this impressive, but theoretical, Sustainable Development Agenda.

Behind this mask is an ‘age-old’ desire to realise absolute global power and control over all of humanity, planet earth and beyond.

This last statement will be discussed in the final part 5 of this series.

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 3 The Vaccine Agenda

Babylon Rising – part 3 The Vaccine Agenda

Vaccines are Coming

Part 3 of 7

In this post:

 What are Their Intentions?

The Poisoned Needle

Vaccine Debate – Kennedy Jr. vs Dershowitz

Dr. Shelton on Vaccines

Vaccines by Aajonus Vonderplanitz

Unscrupulous Special Interests and Their Vaccine Crusade

Video 1 – Del Bigtree The Coronavirus Vaccine Agenda

Video 2  – Meet Bill Gates

Video 3  – How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

Video 4 – Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World

Vaxxed – The Movie

Latest Additions

Vaccines and Sterilisation – 6 Jan 2021

The Poisoned Needle

The Vaccinantion Supersstition

Dissolving Illusions

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

Whether you want to believe it or not, the COVID 19 hoax was designed to bring about regular vaccination of the whole global population.

If you believe that the anti-vaccine controversy is some sort of ridiculous conspiracy then visit  THE VACCINATION RACKET website and open your eyes.

Every year, just prior to the impending “flu season,” the CDC and their acquiescent media pawns terrorize the American public with false claims regarding annual flu deaths. The CDC boldly asserts that 36,000 people die every year from the flu. Such scare tactics are calculated to increase flu vaccine sales. However, according to the CDC’s own official records documented in National Vital Statistics Reports, only a few hundred people die from influenza (flu) on an average year. And many of these deaths occur in people with preexisting conditions, weakened immune systems, and the elderly. Annual Flu Deaths: The Big Lie By Neil Z. Miller

”The CDC has large numbers of vaccine scandals buried in their files. One of them involves a vast over-exaggeration of flu deaths in the US every year. As researcher Peter Doshi noted, years ago, the old canned figure for annual flu deaths, 36,000, was a gross exaggeration. One year, the actual number of confirmed flu deaths in America—where the flu virus was positively identified—was, wait for it: 18. Of course, the CDC uses those flu-death stats to convince Americans they must take the flu vaccine.”  [2016 April] Former NBC boss asserts his grandson damaged by vaccines by Jon Rappoport

source: Flu vaccination quotes

What are Their Intentions?

Henry Kissinger in 1974 wrote in his report ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200 – Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests’ that reducing the world’s population was paramount to those in power. But when it comes to how they approach this, it becomes quite nefarious. We soon realize that their ideas are not benevolent. Vaccinations are right in line with this agenda. Their approach is to reduce population gradually through tampering and degrading of the food supply, air, and water, and herding people into the medical institutions, ultimately creating a weakened race. 

This is why raw foods are attacked and blamed for disease, because those in power know that they prevent disease and strengthen the population. A strong people can overthrow a corrupt government. This is why throughout history, slaves have been fed rice and the kings dined on meat and fruits of all types.

If we look at their own documentation, we learn a great deal. For instance, in the ‘Event 201’ pandemic exercise hosted by John Hopkins University, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on Friday, October 18, 2019, we see a very similar plan to conduct exactly what is taking place now. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html

All there needs to be is the illusion of a pandemic—that people are dying all around you. The media then confirms this and plants the seed and watches it take root and blossom. There need not be actual coronavirus cases even. They may label them as coronavirus cases, when in actuality, they have designed a fraudulent test that looks for fragments of genetic material shared between most viruses. So then, the case may be flu, or some other virus. This allows statistical manipulation. 

Also, if we read the Rockefellar Foundation’s ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’ https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/RockefellerFoundation.pdf, we can see that these scenarios have been prepared long in advance in order for them to capitalize on their agenda, which is a one world totalitarian government. This is spelled out on page 18 of the report— 

“At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.”

Jeff G

https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/blog/

The Poisoned Needle

For the past 2000 years physicians have been looking in the wrong direction for the cure of disease. Their worse than useless practice of killing germs with poison drugs has never — and can never — solve the problem of disease.

During the Dark Ages, before the introduction of improved nutrition and sanitation, the world was intermittently visited with epidemics of smallpox. The cause was stubbornly ignored and the seeds for more disease were sown when vaccination was brought into popular use. This infusion of poison injected into the blood stream of the masses only served to intensify the disease in some cases, suppress the symptoms in others and create new and more serious diseases in still others. So, with the passing of years we have seen this misbegotten child of ignorance grow into a Frankenstein monster of immense proportions that moves relentlessly forward, grinding under foot the multitudes that throng its path.

Through the lethal power of this poisoned needle, the simple zymotic (contagious) diseases of the past have been devolved into the horrors of the present — our terrifying and expanding crop of “killer diseases”. Many of these strange “mystery diseases” that baffle the entire medical world, are the sordid products of vaccine poisons that disturb the chemical balance of the body and interfere with normal functioning.

All these medically-made atrocities are far worse than smallpox or any of the other eruptive diseases that nature provides as a means of expelling the accumulated poison waste from the abused body. This interference with the balanced economy of nature has multiplied the problems beyond the power of science to control.

Our worst epidemics now are epidemics of vaccination in which more people are killed every year by “vaccinal diseases” than by the diseases that the vaccinations were supposed to combat.

Complete freedom from disease can scarcely be found except in remote islands or isolated communities that have not been invaded by medical mischief and commercialized products. Is our proud civilization to be degraded, corrupted, and destroyed by its own inventions designed for selfish profit and exploitation of the race?

Vaccination, instead of being the promised blessing to the world, has proved to be a curse of such sweeping devastation that it has caused more death and disease than war, pestilence, and plague combined. There is no scourge (with the possible exception of atomic radiation) that is more destructive to our nation’s health than this monument of human deception — this slayer of the innocent —this crippler of body and brain — THE POISONED NEEDLE.

– Eleanor McBean –

Vaccine Debate – Kennedy Jr. vs Dershowitz

– 25 November 2020 –

Heated vaccine debate between Robert Kennedy Jr. and Alan Dershowitz moderated by Patrick Bet-David.

About the Guests:

(Against) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. serves as President of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice.

Mr. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times’ bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto last year, as well as in the DuPont Case that inspired the movie “Dark Waters” (2019).

(For) Professor Alan M. Dershowitz is Brooklyn native who has been called “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer” and one of its “most distinguished defenders of individual rights,” “the best-known criminal lawyer in the world,” “the top lawyer of last resort,” “America’s most public Jewish defender” and “Israel’s single most visible defender – the Jewish state’s lead attorney in the court of public opinion.” He is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Dershowitz, a graduate of Brooklyn College and Yale Law School, joined the Harvard Law School faculty at age 25 after clerking for Judge David Bazelon and Justice Arthur Goldberg.

Dr. Shelton on Vaccines

Dr. Shelton writes: “The whole of the modern medical practice of vaccine, serum and antitoxin therapy is based upon the supposition that the body manufactures substances called anti-toxins, anti-bodies, antigens, etc., which are capable of meeting and destroying toxins that get into the body. The idea seems to be sound, although it is possible that the work of destroying such toxins is that of the detoxification carried on by the liver, and lymph glands, etc. Anti-toxins, antibodies, antigens, etc., have never been isolated. They have only been assumed, while the practice based upon their assumed existence has been both a failure and disaster. However, this may not be due to their non-existence. If they exist it is impossible to separate them from the proteins of the animal’s blood (in making vaccines) and these proteins when injected directly into the blood of another animal (or human being) are very poisonous. Besides this, there is no evidence that the anti-toxins of one species can be made use of by another species. Where vaccines are employed, it constitutes the introduction of actual disease matter into the blood. That is, the supposed causitive germs or some product of the disease is introduced into the body. The consequences are often terrible. Real benefits are never observed.

“If the hypothesis that the body manufactures anti-toxins, anti-bodies, etc., is correct it still remains to be proven that the body ever manufactures these greatly in excess of the need for them. It cannot be shown that ‘free’ anti-toxin, anti-bodies, etc., are suspended in the blood serum and can therefore be transferred to another animal in sufficient quantities to be of use to the receiving animal. In keeping with a general law of life, it is very probable that the body does manufacture an excess of anti-bodies, but it cannot be shown that it retains these after the need for them has ceased. On the contrary, in keeping with another general law of life, it is very probable that the body begins to get rid of them the very instant the need for them ceases. If they exist they are chemical substances produced to meet an emergency and will be cast out as soon as the emergency ceases to exist.”

The renowned Dr. Antoine Bechamp, one of the world’s foremost scientists and bacteriologists, observed that the micro-organisms that are ordinarily called germs, evolve out of decaying cells they helped to build, and take part in the decomposing of the ever-changing life substance and help to form it into material usable again by nature. Thus, when germs are found within a sick body it is not that they entered from outside and caused the disease. It is because they developed from the decaying cells within the body and have an important part to play in helping to handle the waste and destruction brought about by serums, drugs and other poisons forced upon the body from without. Perhaps our modern bacteriologists have seen this activity of the “microzymas” and jumped to the conclusion that they are anti-bodies fighting disease and that they (the doctors) must inject more of them into the body by way of vaccines. But anyone with common sense and reasoning can see that this would only interfere and disrupt the well-organized efforts of nature. This is the reason why vaccination has taken such a heavy toll of lives and has produced such widespread disease.

“The best, indeed the only, method of promoting individual and public health is to teach people the laws of nature and thus teach them how to preserve their health. Immunization programs are futile and are based on the delusions that the law of cause and effect can be annulled. Vaccines and serums are employed as substitutes for right living; they are intended to supplant obedience to the laws of life. Such programs are slaps in the face of law and order. Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity.” (PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL HEALING — p. 478 — Shelton)

VACCINATION LOWERS RESISTANCE AND INVITES DISEASE

Dr. J. W. Hodge had considerable experience with vaccination before he denounced it and wrote a book on his collected data. In his book THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION (p. 41) he states:

“After a thorough investigation of the most authentic records and facts in harmony with the physician’s daily observations and experiences, the conclusion is drawn that instead of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox, vaccination actually renders them more susceptible to it. Vaccination is the implantation of disease — that is its admitted purpose. Health is the ideal state to be sought, not disease . . . Every pathogenic disturbance in the infected organism wastes and lowers the vital powers, and thus diminishes its natural resisting capacity.

“This fact is well known and so universally conceded that it seems superfluous to cite authorities. Nevertheless, I shall mention one. The International Textbook of Surgery. Vol. 1. p. 263, is authority for the following statement:

“‘Persons weakened by disease or worn out by excessive labor yield more readily to infection than healthy individuals.’

“If this is true, it explains why, in various epidemics, smallpox always attacks the vaccinated first, and why these diseases continue to infest the civilized world while its allied (unvaccinated) ‘filth diseases ‘ have disappeared before the advance of civilization, through the good offices of sanitation, hygiene and improved nutrition.”

SUMMARIZING THE CASE AGAINST VACCINATION

Dr. Hodge continues:

“After a careful consideration of the history of vaccination gleaned from an impartial and comprehensive study of vital statistics, and pertinent data from every reliable source and after an experience derived from having vaccinated 3,000 subjects, I am firmly convinced that vaccination cannot be shown to have any logical relation to the diminution of cases of smallpox, and —

1 — That the practice of vaccination has been the means of disseminating some of the most fatal and loathsome diseases, such as leprosy, syphilis, tetanus and tuberculosis;
2 — That vaccination is not only useless, but positively injurious,
of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox, it actually renders them more susceptible to it by depressing the vital power and diminishing natural resistance;
3 — That immunity from all diseases is to be realized through the attainment of health, not by the propagation of disease;
4 — That it is never necessary to set up one disease in a healthy organism to protect against another; that such procedure is an appalling violation of the basic principles of hygiene and sanitary science;
5 — That the performance of the vaccine operation in the very nature of the case, violates the cardinal precepts of modern aseptic surgery, the aim of which is to exclude the products of disease from the organism, and never to introduce them;
6 — That there is no evidence worthy of the name, on record, to prove that vaccination either prevents or mitigates smallpox;
7 — That many healthy children have died from the effects of vaccination;
8 — That millions of vaccinated people have died of confluent smallpox while having the plainest vaccine scars on their bodies;
9 — That smallpox epidemics invariably attack the vaccinated first;
10 — That smallpox follows closely upon flagrant violation of the laws of health, hygiene and sanitation;
11 — That the occurrence of all the great epidemics of smallpox have coincided with periods of sanitary neglect;
12 — That cow-pox and venereal-pox have much in common;
13 — That the analogy between the manifestations of vaccine and those of syphilis is so close that several of the most eminent pathologists of the world regard cow-pox as a modified form of syphilis;
14 — That the so called, ‘spontaneous cow-pox’ is a myth; that cow-pox is a disorder not natural to the cow; that it never occurs in bulls or steers, nor in young heifers that have never been milked; that it is a disease of milk cows, which has been communicated to them from sores on hands of milkers who were suffering from syphilis;
15 — That the serious killer diseases such as cancer, syphilis, heart trouble, polio, tuberculosis, etc., will never be eliminated as long as blood pollution through vaccination is continued;
16 — That the community that has sanitary surroundings, a pure water supply, wholesome food, good health and freedom from the blood-poisoning effects of vaccination, need have no fear of smallpox or any other diseases;
17 — That no man can be truly said to be susceptible to the contagion of smallpox or to that of any other disease so long as he is in a state of perfect health;
18 — That such a state resists and repels the assaults of all morbific influences and is therefore the best protective against disease;
19 — That vaccination has utterly failed to fulfill the promises made for it by Jenner and his followers and that he saddled a legacy of disease and death upon the race for which he was paid $150,000 by the British government;
20 — That compulsory vaccination ranks with human slavery and religious persecution, as one of the most flagrant outrages upon the rights of the human race.”
21 — That Switzerland, England, Australia and other enlightened countries abolished compulsory vaccination after it was tested and proved to be disastrous; but laws sanctioning this crime still disgrace the statute books of “free” America.
22 — That reforms are not made by those who profit by them so the doctors or the government cannot be depended upon to abolish vaccination of their own volition; that the people, themselves, must rise up and make demands for freedom from this curse of greed, ignorance and destruction, for only then can we hope to see the light of a new day of health, progress and harmonious adjustment.

source – The Poisoned Needle author Eleanor McBean

Read the book online

 

Vaccines

by Aajonus Vonderplanitz

I am reluctant to mention the harm that vaccines produce because most everyone is adamantly brainwashed that vaccines produce immunity. However, I would be negligent to ignore how vaccines actually affect health.

    Allopathic medicine is based on the “germ theory”, that microbes and viruses, cause disease. Medical science bases the use of vaccines on the theory that the body forms antibodies to “fight” natural viruses. They believe that these antibodies live on after the virus is contained, thereby creating immunity.

    First we must consider the facts known to evaluate medicine’s viral theory. Science has proved that virus are not alive, that they are predominantly protein but that they contain organic DNA. Science has proved that virus increase only in the presence of live cells, and that they cause certain cells, and/or parts of cells to dissolve. What is believed and taken as fact but not proved, is that viruses are nondiscriminatingly destructive “things” that self-replicate. That is like saying that laundry soap, because it is found in homes inhabited by humans, self-replicates. Those assumption and conclusion are shallow and ludicrous. Medical science operates from fear, and it attacks the body. All medical procedures for treating disease are written by pharmaceutical-related individuals and groups. That is a severe conflict of interest. Self-produced health or medication-dependent profit, which do you think that they want?

    A rational and logical conclusion would be that virus are solvents (cleansers) manufactured by individual cells to dissolve degenerative tissue (disease) caused by accumulated waste and industrial toxins, including medicines. Virus contain DNA because cells have used substances within themselves to synthesize virus; DNA is a part of that. When the cleansing and healing processes cease, cells stop producing large amounts of virus.

    Normally, healthier bodies symbiotically utilize bacteria and parasites to cleanse themselves of cellular degenerative tissue and organic waste. They are the bodies preferred janitors. Bacteria and parasites consume the degenerative tissue and organic waste and reduce it to a tiny fraction of the original mass eaten. They can consume 100 times their weight and reduce it to 1-percent excretion. When eating a healthy raw diet, our bodies easily secrete and/or excrete the 1-percent excretions from bacteria and parasites.

    However, when bodies become too toxic with industrial toxins, including medicines, the bacteria and parasites are poisoned to death. Under such toxic conditions, the only cleansing method that the body can utilize is virus. So, cells synthesize viruses. I reiterate, viruses are solvents that dissolve degenerative tissue and organic waste. They are beneficial in preventing disease; they do not cause disease. The symptoms that accompany viral, bacterial or parasitical detoxifications are a necessary process but can be mitigated with the consumption of plenty of raw eggs and raw dairy fats.

The key is: We should trust, nurture and understand the body and Nature, not fear them. Inoculating people to prevent viral infections is ridiculous and dangerous. After many years of experimentation, Louis Pasteur realized that the idea of vaccination was doomed. He confessed on his deathbed to his assistants that a poor (toxic) environment within the body creates disease. Microbes do not cause disease.

 Regarding the immediate trauma that vaccines cause in many people, the eminent scientist and physician, Dr. William F. Koch, M.D., Ph.D. said: The injection of any serum, vaccine or even penicillin has shown a very marked increase in the incidence of polio – at least 400%. Statistics are so conclusive no one can deny it.

The long term effects of vaccines are just as harmful. Vaccines are made of disease, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other poisonous chemicals. Pharmaceutical houses manufacture diseases in animal tissue. The diseases are sterilized to make vaccines. Sterilization alters the RNA, DNA, structure and actions of diseases and viruses. When a sterilized disease or virus enters the body, the body tries to analyze it and create antibodies to regulate the disease or virus. The body cannot find the logical reason for the unnatural disease or virus. Nor can it find the key to the time that the bacteria or virus will be active. Therefore the body creates mutant antibodies that do not go dormant for up to decades.These mutant antibodies remain active long after the disease or virus becomes inactive. The mutant antibodies eat sub-particles from the inside of amino acids (proteins) in the blood.1 That renders proteins unstable. The amount of proteins damaged and lost to mutant antibodies depends on the number of vaccines. Because amino acids are the primary building blocks of cells, the consequence is cellular malnutrition. In all animals, the malnutrition causes gradual genetic mutations, resulting in weaknesses, diseases, malfunctions and deformities.

source: http://www.whale.to/a/vonderplanitz3.html

Unscrupulous Special Interests and Their Vaccine Crusade

F. William Engdahl

Polio is something I have more than a passing acquaintance with. Two days before my fifth birthday a medical doctor in Minneapolis diagnosed me with polio. I only learned decades later that it was not polio, poliomyelitis or infantile paralysis as it was also called. It was shortly after World War II. Then a few years later we were presented Jonas Salk and the polio vaccine, and the world believed that because of that vaccine and the Sabin variant, polio had been stamped out. The reality was that polio was not and is not a “virus,” nor did the vaccines of Salk or Sabin eradicate.

The symptoms that were given the name “polio” had dramatically declined several years before the first vaccine and Salk claimed the credit for his vaccine which was released in 1955. The symptoms that got the name polio came from a team at the Rockefeller University in 1910. Those symptoms were listed as fever, severe headache, stiff neck and back, deep muscle pain. Pretty vague.

Many, many things can cause fever and such symptoms in a small child, for example being raped by someone they thought loved them or experiencing other trauma. It has been suggested that there was a major wave of in-family child rapes as soldiers returned from the traumas of their own war experiences in World War II. It was convenient for some to label the upsurge in such symptoms as polio and create a national media scare that was to most Americans in the early 1950’s more terrifying than Joe Stalin and communism. The drug industry got a huge boost and today, even newborns are jabbed multiple times in the first weeks of their fragile lives with concoctions that have been documented not to prevent viral infection but to make weak, sick and in some tragic cases autistic or even dead children.

The Rockefeller University in New York had begun literally playing around with children with the symptoms later formalized as polio as far back as 1910. Simon Flexner, first director of the predecessor to the Rockefeller University, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, had produced the symptoms later named polio. He did that in a rhesus monkey which then transmitted the disease from one animal to another. Flexner was a close friend and advisor of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., son of the founder of the Standard Oil trust.

Albert Sabin, creator of the Sabin polio vaccine had come out of the Rockefeller University. Human experiments with untested versions of the polio vaccines were done on already crippled children in care homes, on children in homes for the mentally insane and on that Rockefeller family plantation for human experiments, Puerto Rico.

Since that time the Rockefellers, some of the world’s most ardent financial backers of eugenics, have been at the center of the developments around what was named polio and its “vaccine.”

Eugenics was a fraudulent social theory that a “better society” could be created by eliminating “undesirable” human blood lines and promoting the desirable types like those of Rockefellers or DuPonts or their likes. To the present day eugenics is the guiding ideology of the very rich, loveless American oligarchs including Bill Gates and David Rockefeller. To this day the major financial backers of the criminal activities of the UN WHO (World Health Organization) and their fraudulent swine flu pandemic scares are the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

GAVI

Several years ago, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, along with the World Bank, UNICEF, the WHO and a group of pharmaceutical companies, united all in something called GAVI and set out to bring massive polio vaccination first to India. GAVI: The Vaccine Alliance was founded by the Gates Foundation in 2000 as a “public-private partnership” to unite in assaulting poorer developing countries with the Big Pharma vaccine industry they would otherwise bespared.

In India Gates, Rockefellers and WHO with their Big Pharma partners convinced the Indian government to spend some $8 billion of their scarce funds, along with a tiny amount of “seed” money from GAVI partners, to vaccinate Indian children.

The result?

An article in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics in 2012 concluded,

“In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated.”
Instead, Gates and Company proclaimed India “polio” free.

They ignored the fact their “polio” vaccines were killing and paralyzing 48,000 Indian children because the WHO definition of polio allowed them the casuistry. NPAFP stands for Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis. The medical-industrial complex are masters at coming up with names.

By calling it non-polio, they defined polio as eradicated in India. But their vaccines are killing and paralyzing tens of thousands of children. So by the WHO semantics the GAVI vaccines did not cause a single case of “polio.” It did cause 48,000 cases of something far deadlier and more damaging, Acute Flaccid Paralysis, a condition the WHO admits is clinically indistinguishable from polio and which occurred in direct proportion to the doses of polio vaccine received.

A similar phenomenon took place at the same time in neighboring Pakistan. In 2011 the Paktstan Tribune reported,

“A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan. Geneva-based officials of GAVI, Jeffrey Rowland and Dan Thomas, were contacted by e-mail but they did not respond. “
GAVI spent a mere 7.8% of the total cost of the mass vaccination in Pakistan, of Rs26 billion. The Tribune continued, “Pakistan will be spending Rs24.2 billion from its own resources on the purchase of new and under-used vaccines at much higher cost as compared to their equivalent vaccines.” The Gates-Rockefeller-WHO polio vaccination program in Pakistan killed an estimated 10,000 and crippled tens of thousands more.

Now the focus has moved to another US warzone, Syria.

Read the full article here

CEPI – A global coalition for a global problem

New vaccines for a safer world

Epidemic diseases affect us all. They do not respect borders. CEPI is a innovative global partnership between public, private, philanthropic, and civil society organisations. We’re working together to accelerate the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases and enable equitable access to these vaccines for people during outbreaks.

CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum.

To date, CEPI has secured financial support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,  Wellcome Trust, the European Commission, and the governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Ethiopia, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Norway and the United Kingdom.

Additional investment from sovereign governments, the private sector and philanthropic foundations has also been provided to support our COVID-19 vaccine programmes.

The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations’ (CEPI’s) mission is to stimulate and accelerate the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases and enable access to these vaccines for people during outbreaks.

https://cepi.net/about/whoweare/

Video 1

Del Bigtree The Coronavirus Vaccine Agenda – London Real

EXPOSING THE DANGEROUS TRUTH OF BIG-PHARMA’S MASTER PLAN – Del Bigtree

Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy winning producer of the CBS talk show The Doctors changed abruptly when he produced the documentary VAXXED, which is credited with igniting a revolution against Pharmaceutical Tyranny around the world. Now Del’s internet talk show, The HighWire, is the fastest-growing program in the Natural Health arena with over 40 million views, and his non-profit, ICANdecide.org, is leading worldwide investigations into drug and vaccine fraud that have already resulted in two winning lawsuits against US Government agencies Health and Human Services and National Institute of Health.

Del is probably best known for his powerful speeches that weave shocking truth, searing wit and dynamic passion into an experience that is often described as electrifying.

Chapters 0:29 | Brian Rose Introduces the Business Accelerator program 3:43 | Brian Rose introduces Del Bigtree 6:18 | Del Bigtree talks about being censored and his documentary Vaxxed 9:30 | Del Bigtree talks about Donald Trump going after Twitter censorship 11:09 | Del discusses having Dolores Cahill on his show 14:00 | Brian Rose talks about being censored from YouTube 18:42 | Del Bigtree talks about mandating COVID-19 vaccines 27:40 | They talk about vaccine injuries and chronic health 31:31 | Brian Rose talks interviewing about Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 34:20 | Del Bigtree discusses the link between autism and the MMR vaccination 46:41 | Del Bigtree talks about double blind placebo tests 1:00:00 | Brian asks Del what he thinks about the COVID-19 pandemic 1:08:00 | Del Bigtree discusses the results of initial #COVID_19 vaccine tests 1:09:23 | Del discusses Trump and his response to the pandemic 1:14:00 | Del Bigtree discusses Sweden’s herd immunity 1:15:00 | Brian Rose asks Del about the next 6 months 1:21:04 | Brian talks about the upcoming economic ramifications 1:29:04 | Del talks about his meeting with Dr. Fauci and Trump regarding the CDC’s data on non-vaccinated people vs vaccinated. 1:32:00 | Del discusses the use of Remdesivir 1:34:00 | Brian Rose asks Del about Bill Gates 1:39:00 | Del asks the viewers to keep learning and sharing information about vaccines 1:42:50 | Brian Rose sums up

Video 2 

Meet Bill Gates

There can be no doubt that Bill Gates has worn many hats on his remarkable journey from his early life as the privileged son of a Seattle-area power couple to his current status as one of the richest and most influential people on the planet. But, as we have seen in our exploration of Gates’ rise as unelected global health czar and population control advocate, the question of who Bill Gates really is is no mere philosophical pursuit. Today we will attempt to answer that question as we examine the motives, the ideology, and the connections of this man who has been so instrumental in shaping the post-coronavirus world.

Video 3 

How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

Who is Bill Gates? A software developer? A businessman? A philanthropist? A global health expert? This question, once merely academic, is becoming a very real question for those who are beginning to realize that Gates’ unimaginable wealth has been used to gain control over every corner of the fields of public health, medical research and vaccine development. And now that we are presented with the very problem that Gates has been talking about for years, we will soon find that this software developer with no medical training is going to leverage that wealth into control over the fates of billions of people.

Video 4 

Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World

In January of 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates announced a $10 billion pledge to usher in a decade of vaccines. But far from an unalloyed good, the truth is that this attempt to reorient the global health economy was part of a much bigger agenda. An agenda that would ultimately lead to greater profits for big pharma companies, greater control for the Gates Foundation over the field of global health, and greater power for Bill Gates to shape the course of the future for billions of people around the planet.

Vaccines and Sterilisation

– 6 January 2021 –

The Poisoned Needle

The Book – click on image for link to pdf

The Vaccination Superstition

The Book – click on image for link to pdf

Dissolving Illusions – Suzanne Humphries

Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more.Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true?Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?”Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated.

click on image for book

– Video Interview –

Dissolving Illusions – Suzanne Humphries

THE INFORMATION YOU WISH YOU HAD KNOWN BEFORE

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 2 What Really Makes One Sick

Babylon Rising – part 2 What Really Makes One Sick

The Germ or the Terrain

Part 2 of 7

‘It’s now a ‘conspiracy theory’ to believe that the immune system is capable of doing the job it was designed to do.’

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

All of the online and media discussion pertaining to the control measures implemented by governments across the globe to contain the COVID virus, and the origin of the virus, is all just smoke and mirrors.

 The whole narrative is a massive deception and distraction from the truth. We are being made to fear something that is neither an external threat or contagious.   

Why? Find out in part eight.


And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

John 8:32

Befor you proceed any further in this section, I highly recommend watching the following video first.

The Deception of Virology & Vaccines

 Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious

 – Jeff G –

 This post intends to go to the heart of virology and vaccination itself, and what vaccination is propped up by—the entirety of virology and vaccine science is predicated on one thing—that viruses are infectious agents that cause disease. Without this theory, vaccines would not be ‘effective’ or ‘work’ in the minds of the people. Without the virus theory, vaccines would crumble like a house of cards. I will show the pseudoscience behind the theories that prop up virology, and the vast problems with it.

 FIrstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes. They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system. Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious. The fear behind Coronavirus, for instance, is wholly unwarranted. Forget everything you think you know about viruses and bacteria. You have been lied to.

 – The science of virology is based upon the study of viruses, however, no real footage of viral activity exists (except for a recently released (2018) short footage of an HIV virus which shows merely 20% of the virus theory process). Such footage is merely 3D animation and models. Scientific Encyclopedia states viruses have been obtained for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be specially built. Viruses are so small that they average around 0.1 microns in size for a typical virus.

 Observation Of Viruses Is Inherently Flawed

 Viruses are observed in cell cultures/petri-dish environments:

 Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity. In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.

 Those processes are:

 – Phagocytosis (and all of its processes)

 – Bacterial

 – Fungal

 – Parasitical

 – Viral (virus)

 In the processes of phagocytosis, cellular debris and dead and dying tissue are absorbed and discarded for elimination out of the body. It is bacteria that first and foremost carry out this process in large part—mainly as scavengers. Fungus and parasites are called upon as needed in special cases, and in this process, small amounts of viruses may be utilized to accompany all other processes. All of these processes are alive, but viruses are not alive. In such an artificial environment wherein cells are kept alive but not healthy by serums, cells will degenerate, and their viral janitors will become prominent. Viruses do not multiply on their own. When added to fertile petri-dishes that sustain cellular life, no additional viral protein structures appear. Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. However, this is because petri-dishes are not the proper or healthy environment for cells, and so viral waste occurs. This is because cells must manufacture viruses to cleanse themselves in such a toxic environment since they do not have access to the full range of their cleansing processes as would occur in the body. I will show why—

 Note: Viruses are necessary to dissolve dead and dying tissue when tissue is so toxic that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those tissues, waste, and cellular debris without being poisoned to death.

 When Would Viral Activity Become Prominent?

As stated, viruses may accompany these processes in small amounts. However, viruses will only become prominent when all these other processes have been largely killed due to:

 -Environmental toxicity

– Pollution

– Chemical inundation

– Poor air quality

– Poor water quality

– Poor food quality

– Nutritional deficiencies

– Wrong combination or choice of foods

– Medical treatment, such as antibiotics and medications

 When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death. When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself. When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses. I will show why this is the only logical answer.

 Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract. Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids. Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately. If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not. We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus. There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.

 The True Creation of Viruses (simplistic view):

 The above illustration shows how viruses are actually manufactured. This shows the basic simplistic steps of virus creation. Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus. Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it. RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances within the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not. The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time. Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive. Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.

 

 Steps for Creation of a Virus:

– Viral proteins part of the genome of the living body existing in every cell which determines what type of proteins will be created by a cell is called into action.

– Viral proteins existing in the cell enter the nucleus of the cell. Viruses are manufactured in their whole form within the cell, and sequenced/encoded via RNA/DNA host directives.

– The virus leaves the nucleus and is housed in the cell until it leaves the cell.

– The virus is ejected by the cell, damaging a part of the cell, but not destroying it.

– Viruses change every 72 hours. Virus replication continues and every 72 hours the first strain is exhausted, and an entirely new set of viruses is then manufactured by cells to continue the job of the previous until the process is complete.

How Viruses are Manufactured — The True Processes of the Virus

Viruses do not infect healthy stable cells. They dissolve dead and decaying cells and tissue, dissolving them so that new cellular activity can thrive. A good analogy: Flies appear on dead matter but are not the cause of the dead matter. They are scavengers that break down dead matter. In this way, viruses and bacteria operate in the same exact manner within the body. Without scavengers on Earth to clean up waste, Earth’s air would become toxic. The same processes are carried out in the body on a microscopic macro level. Science states the opposite of what reality dictates to us through our own observation of nature. This is impossible because our bodies are microcosms for the way nature operates outside our bodies. Assuming the opposite of this goes against our observable nature and is foolish.

As stated, when the normal janitorial functions of the body have been largely diminished and killed due to systemic toxicity, cells can no longer maintain themselves. Red blood cells come together as a whole unit to save themselves and conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing solvent protein constructs (virus) that disassemble and break down dead and dying cells, cellular waste, tissue, and foreign debris. Cells manufacture viruses in their whole form cellularly. In this process, viruses are manufactured directly within the cell using pre-existing viral protein in the cell and genome, and are embedded/encoded with RNA and/or DNA by the host cell. The cell ejects the virus, which is then regulated by white blood cells through that encoding (antibodies), which oversee the processes of the virus. This allows the viral activity to be controlled and regulated properly.

These two functions are united as one process, and they do not act separately. Once the cell ejects this virus, the cell is partially damaged but is not destroyed. The viruses, which are many, consume and dissolve dead, dying and foreign tissue, debris, unhealthy cells, and cellular waste. This process takes time depending on the toxicity involved. The effects of their elimination are the symptoms experienced in cold or flu. Viruses break these substances down into tiny particles that can then be expelled via mucous, skin, and bowels. When the process is complete, the body becomes stronger, so long as that person does not continue to toxify his or her body further. If he or she does, such extreme detoxifications will always occur.

Viral Facts:

-Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

– Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

– Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

– Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

– Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

– Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

– Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

– There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

– Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste. Viruses are very specific protein structures.

– Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

– The only way to get a virus outside of natural means is via direct injection (vaccine) or blood transfusions of a patient who has a virus. However, in such cases, the body only analyzes it as foreign tissue that must be eliminated. Since the virus did not originate within the bodily host, that body does not know the time and place that the virus will be active nor does it have the key to decode it (RNA or DNA encoded by the cell) and cannot find the time of its activity. As such, it is analyzed as a foreign substance that must be eliminated. Protein solvents (viruses) are manufactured of varying strengths to discard this waste if living microbes cannot eliminate it.

– Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment. Viruses are cyclical in animals. Viruses feed upon waste products in the blood and tissue. Throughout the year, upon season and climatic/temperature changes, the body will dump mass amounts of toxins into the blood for removal. Some of these toxins are so toxic in nature, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and other chemical byproducts, that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate them without dying. Non-living proteins are then manufactured by each cell in the corresponding location of the body where this cleansing is necessary. Those toxic substances are disassembled and broken down by viruses so that the body can eliminate them, restoring homeostasis.

– The only way viruses can be used as biological weapons is via injection, period. It is possible that such manmade viral strains are included in regular existing vaccines, and this should not be ruled out as a possibility, but as previously stated, viral strains from outside the body are not recognized. However, manmade substances that are injected can be designed to provoke extreme reactions in humans via various levels of tissue sterilization and adjuvants.

– Viruses cannot cross-species ie; from animal to mankind. It is impossible for humans to develop animal flus—A. Because viruses are not contagious, and, B. Because animal RNA/DNA is not compatible with human RNA/DNA. The only way animal tissue can be observed in the blood is through injection of animal tissues, which make their way to the blood, bypassing the digestive tract. Only then will swine tissue, or bird tissue, or any such animal tissue appear in the body. When animal meat is consumed by a human, it is converted into human tissue. Human cells cannot produce animal cells or viruses. If we develop viruses, they are human viruses. Even if animal viruses ‘hijacked’ human cells, human cells cannot possibly produce animal viruses.

Here I will show the important differences between what is now highly adopted in mainstream science, known as the ‘Germ Theory’, and Antoine Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’:

 Table chart by Mister Seun Ayoade. The Differences Between Germ Theory & Terrain Theory, JOJ Nurse Health Care. 2017; 4(2): 555631.

Coronavirus is a respiratory virus manufactured by cells in the lungs and respiratory areas to cleanse themselves of systemic toxicity.

Such a cold virus occurs and functions in the following way:

Coronavirus MERS-CoV (2019-nCoV) is a type of acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) with mild to flu-like symptoms. SARS is caused by man-made environmental toxicity.

Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system>Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature>Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs>Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiates the cleansing and healing process. Coughing brings blood and nutrients to the respiratory system. The symptoms associated with their removal are what occurs during SARS. Such airborne toxic substances are caused by burning plastics, formaldehyde, and factory tainted air, which encompasses a wide array of very toxic byproducts. Older individuals with already weakened immune systems are prone to more advanced respiratory virus detoxifications and will account for most deaths. This illness may crop up in millions due to dense populations like in China breathing in such air on a daily basis. This does not mean it is contagious—it’s not.

The 4 Main Steps For Coronavirus Creation:

– Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system.

– Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature.

– Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs.

– Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiate the cleansing and healing process.

The following images show the changes in pollution levels in the past month, which coincides with a drop in the rate of virus cases:

Sattelite images show drastic drops in pollution in the past month in Wuhan. You can easily see how bad pollution has been in Wuhan and the rest of China.

 Why Viruses Arise In The Body (summary):

As previously stated, the processes of phagocytosis, fungal, parasitical, and bacterial, which are all living microbes, are responsible for consuming and eliminating dead cells, cellular waste, and foreign debris. But when tissue is so toxic that those living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those substances without being poisoned to death, cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses, which break down and disassemble those substances into particles to be expelled out through the skin, mucus, and bowels. Viruses leave the cell, damaging only a part of the cell, but not destroying it. Once out of the cell, they are regulated by white blood cell antibodies to dissolve specific tissues and debris necessary to restore relative homeostasis. Viruses do not destroy the cell wherein they are replicated, yet science states they infect other cells and DO destroy other cells indescrimantly, which has no proof and makes no logical sense. Such a theory is obviously untrue because then viruses would attack every living cell without a cause, killing the body every time, but this does not happen. Viruses only dissolve dead and dying waste in almost all circumstances.

The only time a virus would appear to attack living tissue is when metals are embedded in the tissue, such as polio cases, where viruses have to get into spinal column areas and cleanse tissue. Since metal is hard to remove from the body, it is natural for viruses to break down living tissue to remove those metals, which gives the illusion that the virus is somehow working against the body. In reality, the virus is attempting to heal the systemic toxicity of the body and reverse it. Metals accumulate from the body from many various sources, one of which is vaccine adjuvants.

Conclusion:

There is no other explanation for how the human body maintains itself. It is the only logical answer. The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependant, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within, not from without. Viruses are nothing more than proteins that cleanse. The same is true about cancer. Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time. The body is miraculous and finds ways to heal no matter the circumstances. It has ways of shortcircuiting and shortcutting pathways in times of trouble.

It is sad that modern science has led so many astray in their thinking with regard to their own bodies and how it functions creating nothing but fear and panic, whilst reaping massive amounts of money for those in power as a result. Such fear places a distrust in our own bodies, our neighbors, and nature itself, making it appear as if we are powerless in the face of disease; that it is beyond our control and only the medical establishment can save us from ourselves. What might those in power benefit from such chaos? Explore that thought. This confusion has led to the coronavirus ‘outbreak’, and the resulting fear and chaos which surrounds this manufactured and blown out of proportion event. This virus is being used to institute police state style laws and measures around the world, and will only increase if the majority do not wake up to the lies surrounding the nature of viruses and disease.

References:

– The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, 1956, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D. (shows the many dangers of vaccinations, manipulated statistics throughout history, how polio arose, and the nature of virus and disease.)

– Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923

– The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912

– Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)

– The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’. Shows that Louis Pasteur plagiarized and distorted the work of professor Antoine Béchamp. The author propounds the viewpoint that bacteria in the body are a result, not a cause of disease, that vaccinations are harmful or at best, ineffective, and that Pasteur did not realize the consequences of the vaccines he and his followers created.)

 

“The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything” — Claude Bernard 1813-1878 (widely regarded to be the father of modern physiology).

“The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us” — Professor Pierre Antoine Bechamp, 1883.

source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XYUzgUacJQ-qYeWY7k61lLWGFoTicVyVCMB4UgmJxas/edit

www.virusesarenotcontagious.com

 

Germ Theory Of Disease Is One Of The False Foundations Of Modern Medicine

Joyce Marshall, N.D., Ph.D. Pasteur realizes mistake!

Around 1880, Pasteur himself admitted his mistake regarding the “Germ Theory of Infectious Disease.” Pasteur finally realized that microbial species can undergo many transformations. These facts were not consistent with his germ theory and destroyed its very basis. It is overlooked by modern medicine that Pasteur changed his theory. Pasteur admitted that germs were “ordinarily kept within bounds by natural laws, but when conditions change, when its virulence is exalted, when its host is enfeebled, the germ is able to invade the territory which was previously barred it.” This is the premise that a healthy body is resistant and not susceptible to disease. With the advent of Pasteur’s mysterious germ, medicine cloaked itself under the guise of “science” and ever since has succeeded in keeping the public ignorant of the true nature of disease. Yet upon a theory so constantly at fault when thoroughly sifted there has been erected a whole system of inoculation. Had it not been for the sale of sera and vaccines, nowadays grown to

such vast proportions, Pasteur’s germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity. Thus it can hardly be denied that Pasteur committed an offense in dragging medical science down to a commercial level.

Eminent bacteriologist Dr. Rene J. Dubos, the 1968 Pulitzer prizewinner, contradicted the “germ” theory assumption by showing that the virulence of microbial species is variable. Considering that bacteria are not fixed monomorphic entities as the germ theory insists they are, but are in fact, form changing or pleomorphic. So- called germs are not hardwired but are capable of adapting to their terrain or environment. As more and more bacteria are becoming resistant to antibiotics and actually using antibiotics as a food source we are seeing an epidemic of virulent forms of pathological bacteria.

At the Mayo Biological Laboratories as early as 1910 Dr. E. C. Rosenow began a series of experiments in which he took bacterial strains from many different disease sources and concluded that

they all had the capacity to change their structure with the changes in their nutriments. The virulence of germs can likewise be altered in the laboratory at will by the technician. This completely contradicts

the germ theory that states that diseases are due solely to invasion by specific aggressive micro-organisms.

On May 10, 1999 U.S. News and World Report reported in its cover story “The Battle of the Bugs” that common bacteria are building resistance to most of the antibiotics on the market. Research into new drugs has languished, and the public-health system is faltering. Scientists are scrambling to come up with new plans. Common bacteria are now so resistant to antibiotics that they can kill. Up to 40% of pneumococcal infections have become RESISTANT to a variety of antibiotics. Doctors are resorting to increasingly powerful drugs. In 1980, 876,000 prescriptions for cephalosporins were recorded for the treatment of acute otitis media. By 1992, the number had jumped to nearly 7 million, a 687 percent increase. In 1999, 30 million prescriptions will be written to treat an estimated 10 million cases of acute otitis media in children. (May 10, 1999 U.S. News and World Report)

In 1993 H. Hugh Fudenberg, M.D., a pioneer in the field of immunology, in an interview for the University of Natural Healing explained, “I can trace down almost all of the cases of viral infection or exposure to someone who has been immunized with a virus vaccine.” Dr. Fudenberg also explained that there is “a risk from being exposed to a child who was just immunized.” Dr. Fudenberg further warned, “One should be cautious around recently- vaccinated babies, children, adults, and pets.”

 

With the germ theory of disease we do not have to take responsibility for sickness caused by our own transgressions of the laws of health. Instead, we can blame germs that invaded the body. The germ theory shifts our personal responsibility for health and well being onto the shoulders of the medical profession who are the ONLY ones who supposedly know how to kill off the offending germs. Our own personal health slips from our control. We have found a soothing complacency in placing the blame for our ill health on malevolent, microscopic “invaders,” rather than face responsibility for our lifestyle habits. We have been educated to be terrified of bacteria and to believe in the idea of contagion. We have also been programmed to believe that healing requires some powerful force to remove whatever is at fault. The acceptance of the germ theory and widespread bacteriaphobia resulted in frenzied efforts to avoid the threat of germs. The medical-pharmaceutical industry began the relentless search for the perfect drug to combat each disease-causing microbe. A whole new era of modern medicine was inaugurated including vaccination, which was instituted to

confer “immunity” against specific germs by way of vaccines and sera.

Not many people realize that germs, viruses and bacteria are the result, not the cause, of disease. Bacteria have an important role to perform in the vital process of healing. Germs take part in virtually all disease phenomena that require the disintegration of refuse and toxic matter within the body that the system is endeavoring to remove. They act as scavengers in cleaning up the affected area of toxic saturation. As soon as their role is complete, their numbers decline. For this reason, bacteria are associated with disease processes but are not its cause, for bacteria no more cause disease than flies cause garbage.

Bacteria are capable of only one action in regard to the disease process: the processing of dead materials as their food. Bacteria proliferate because there is dead organic matter for them to feed on, not because they suddenly become malevolent. It is inappropriate to call bacterial activity an “attack” or an “invasion” on the part of germs, unless we mean it is an attack on the toxins. The only real attack that takes place is the one we make upon our own body as we continually assault ourselves on the average of some

30 poisoning acts each day including the devitalized foods and beverages we consume, the drugs we take, the vaccines we blindly accept all of which create enervation and exhaustion of the body. Pathogens cannot thrive in healthy blood. It is the environment and the host that determine disease symptoms and the type of bacteria that proliferate. Germs do not cause disease; rather, the body generates disease occasions for the germ proliferation that takes place. In order for a particular germ to exist, it has to have a suitable environment created by the toxic and pathological pollution saturating the body. Systemic poisoning then creates the specific germ culture, depending upon where the body has accumulated the wastes and according to the unhealthful lifestyle habits of the sufferer.

The key point is that it is the diseased toxemic condition, where the body is overwhelmed with poisonous waste, which creates an environment favorable to the mutation of bacteria into those commonly associated with particular diseases. The disease condition favors proliferation and increasing virulence until their function of devouring toxic debris is accomplished.

When a bacteriologist is asked what comes first, the soil or the bacteria, the answer is always the tainted environment, in order for the bacteria to thrive. Germs do not directly produce disease; rather, the body-generated healing crisis produces the germ by

providing a suitable environment where non-toxic bacteria mutate into toxic micro-organisms within septic surroundings. For germs to become dangerous, they must be intermingled with concentrated waste products before a germ metamorphoses into a toxic entity. It is true that germs and bacteria exist everywhere, the micro- organisms only proliferate in the body when a person develops toxemia as a result of an unhealthy lifestyle. A state of internal cleanliness is essential for health and well-being. A pure bloodstream, free unimpeded circulation of all body fluids, and unobstructed excretion generate and maintain healthy tissue. Virulent bacteria soon die in this environment for want of suitable nourishment.

 

The following article was authored by a Dr Michelle Retz who is a Naturopathic Physician and is a  Chief Medical Director at Naturopaths Without Borders.

Dr Retz iz also a Professor of gastroenterology.

For more qualification details please refer to her video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nUr-okFlGo

Cold and Flu

Dr. Michelle Retz – Aug 11, 2018

 We are quickly approaching cold and flu season. One of the questions I am most frequently asked is, Starve a cold and feed a fever, or feed a cold and starve a fever? The answer is, Starve both! 

Ironic as it may seem, a cold is NOT an illness, its a cleansing, detoxification process. 
A cold or flu is simply an acute presentation of an internal disease state, or a short-term state of toxins building up in the body.
Why does so much cold and flu occur in the fall and winter, in comparison to the warmer times of the year? There are several factors that contribute to this process. Simply getting a chill from the change in weather can cause a cold. Chills cause the blood vessels to constrict, making toxins less likely to be released through the skin. As the skin is the largest detox organ in our bodies, when it shuts off, toxins (from bacteria and viruses, as well as the environment) inherently build up. If the other detox organs, such as the liver and digestive system, cant pick up the slack, they continue to circulate and be reabsorbed. If your vitality, or ability to heal, is low, say from overwork, poor diet, lack of sleep, stress or anxiety, nutrient deficiencies, lack of hygiene, lack of fresh air or sunlight, or lack of exercise, toxins are more likely to build up.
So, is a fever a good or bad thing? A fever is a sign that the bodys vital force, its ability to heal itself, is working very hard to kill whatever bug or toxin is in the system. Bacteria and viruses love to live at 98.6 degrees, but they cant survive at 100-103 degrees. So the body increases its temperature to kill the invader. The entire process of creating a fever to kill a bug may be a very unenjoyable situation, but perfect in its application. The trouble is, we are taught that fevers are a sign of increasing illness and an indication that we are losing the battle against the bug. NOT SO! Think about it why would our bodies make us feel achy, lose our appetite, and want to nothing more than lay around and sleep? So they can expend every ounce of energy getting rid of the illness. Your body is trying to stop you in your tracks so that it can solely focus on one thing, getting well.
Studies show that fevers are a good thing, and actually INCREASE survival. And suppressing fevers with Tylenol or Ibuprofen increases the time we are sick, and our chances of becoming severely ill, or even dying. There are some common fears surrounding fevers, like, My childs brain will boil, or a fever seems dangerous, like the body doesnt know what its doing. In truth, brains do not boil unless a fever gets above 106F. There are safe ranges of fevers, and temperatures at which we should naturally begin to worry. A good, safe fever that will kill an infection is usually 102-103F. However, I will caution you that a fever is no indication of how bad an illness is when it comes to little ones and the elderly. Toddlers will get an ear infection, have a fever of 105F, and be up and running around. Adults usually make fevers around 100-103F. Seniors may not make a fever, even if they are seriously ill. But in general, for good long-term health, its a good thing to get sick, cleanse, and spike a fever once a year. At the very least, it lets us know that we are healthy enough to get sick.
How do we set ourselves up to be sick? Diet is a big one. During the summer and fall when it’s hot in Arizona we eat cold, sugary foods like ice cream, but in general we snack, eat hot dogs, and drink soda. Sugar is a #1 contributor to decreasing your immune system. Even 1 tablespoon of sugar can decrease your immune system for 8 hours! In the summer its hot, so its much easier for the body to stay at 98.6 degrees. But when fall and winter come, the body has to work harder to stay at that temperature. Anything that stands in its way of doing so must be eliminated, like toxins from bugs. So we usually get sick around this time of year, its the bodys housecleaning party. This simple, quick cleansing process helps the body to be better prepared to face the winter months.
So we recognize this cleansing process as short-term illness, the common cold or flu. Toxins that build up start to interfere with the bodys normal function, which weakens the immune system. The body is clogged up! A bacteria or virus takes advantage of this situation, and comfortably settles into our system, creating an immune reaction, stimulating our bodies to get rid of it. This cleansing to us looks like a cough, runny nose, vomiting, or even diarrhea. We feel achy, fatigued, and lose our appetite. How could that possibly be beneficial? Your body doesnt want you to spend energy on anything else other than fighting the bug. Your muscles become sore, you feel tired, and you dont want to eat, because being active and eating food takes energy away from fighting an infection. And your body is doing everything it can to tell you to rest and fast, so that it can focus on ridding itself of this bug.
Even with our good intentions to be healthy, what are we doing wrong? Typically, the things weve been taught to treat ourselves during illness actually go against the bodys ability to heal itself. Any over-the-counter medicines that suppress any symptoms you have are suppressing your bodys ability to heal itself. Yes, you will feel better in the short-term, but your illness will last much longer than if you had just allowed your body the chance to fight the bug and heal itself, in the best way it knows how. Decongestants, antitussives, anti-diarrheals, drugs that reduce fevers, all prevent the body from getting rid of toxins from bacteria and viruses. So you feel better sooner, and the bugs get to hang around longer, driving the illness deeper inside the body. Instead of your cold or flu lasting one week, it could last 3-6 weeks. And instead of having a simple head cold, you may wind up bronchitis or pneumonia. Suppression of the natural healing process leads to decreased immune factors, and a lack of excretion of infectious toxins, causing them to build up and damage more organ systems.
What will help your immune system fight harder? How can you get better faster? The best things to do when youre not feeling well are common sense things we already know. And they are actually the most beneficial, and effective. If youre not hungry, dont eat! Fluids, like water and teas, are important to keep us hydrated. If you begin to have an appetite, eat clean, and light: vegetable broths and soups, lightly cooked or steamed vegetables, white meats like turkey and chicken, and avoid sugar, soda, alcohol, and caffeine. If you are achy, tired, or sleepy, REST! Your immune system is actually increased by 10 times if you simply lay down, even if you dont sleep! So ignore our societys standard that we must always go, go, go, no matter what is happening in our lives, and allow yourself 2-3 days to pause, heal, and recoup. You will be healthy much faster if you do.
Additionally, hydrotherapy, homeopathy, nutrient supplementation and IVs can be very beneficial, so please consult your naturopathic doctor to assist you in any way possible. Honor the process, and the wisdom your body was given to do the incredible things it does. As complex as we are, its amazing that we dont break down at every second! So thank your body for ONLY having a cold or flu, in order to keep you as healthy as you can be, so you can continue to be your best.

 Dr. Michelle Retz, ND is a Naturopathic Doctor in Phoenix, AZ.

 source: https://www.longevitymedical.com/blog/cold-and-flu

The Greatest Medical Deception

You Cannot Catch Bugs, Germs, Bacteria or Candida/Fungi

© Copyright Bee Wilder April 3, 2015

The following text disproves “The Germ Theory of Disease,” as promoted by the medical industry today, which was initiated by Louis Pasteur in the early 1800s and it confirms that you cannot catch bugs, germs, bacteria or candida/fungi.

 

Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895), Plagiarist, Impostor!

A plagiarist is someone who uses another person’s words or ideas as if they were his own.

An imposter is someone who attempts to deceive.

Louis Pasteur was a French microbiologist and chemist, born on December 27, 1822 in Dole, in the region of Jura, France. His discovery that most infectious diseases are caused by germs, known as “the germ theory of disease,” became the foundation for the science of microbiology, and a cornerstone of modern medicine.

“Pasteur also developed ‘pasteurization’, which was named after him. Pasteurization is a process by which harmful microbes in perishable food products are destroyed using heat, without destroying the food.” However, this is not true. Pasteurization does NOT kill ALL “supposedly” harmful microbes (harmful according to the medical industry) and it definitely DOES damage the food by destroying natural enzymes and nutrients.

However, Louis Pasteur was not an honest, creditable individual. If you look back into the history of the medical profession and the various ideas regarding the cause of disease that were held by leading physicians before Pasteur first promulgated his notorious “germ theory”, you will find convincing evidence that Pasteur discovered nothing, and that he deliberately appropriated, falsified and perverted another man’s work.

His true character and methods were brought to light by Miss Ethel Douglas Hume in her book “Pasteur or Béchamp” written in 1923, the title of which has since been changed to Pasteur Exposed.”

Another book by R.B. Pearson “Pasteur, Plagiarist, Impostor” was originally published in the 1940s, with a new edition entitled “The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur.”

Interestingly enough Pasteur instructed his family never to release his lab notes. After his grandson died in 1975, they were finally released. Gerald Geison, a science historian, was among the first people to thoroughly review those notes.

In 1995, which was “ironically” proclaimed “The Year of Pasteur,” Geison’s article was published in the New York Times proclaiming that Pasteur had lied about his research on vaccines and germs and that most of his ideas had been plagiarized from his contemporaries. His article, “Pasteur’s Deception” claimed that Pasteur was, in the end, a fraud.

It was Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908), a contemporary of Pasteur, who discovered the true nature of germs, bacteria, viruses, etc., and that they were pleomorphic (capable of changing from one type of organism to another). Later on another colleague of Pasteur’s colleague’s, Claude Bernard, described the “milieu” or environment that affected/caused those changes.

On his deathbed, Pasteur recanted, saying that Bernard [Claude Bernard] was right; “the Terrain is everything, the Germ is nothing!” However, since the “Germ Theory of Disease” is so profitable, the medical world has written off his final statements as the madness of a dying man. We should all be so mad!

Another problem with the germ theory of disease is discovered when we look at “Koch’s Postulates” [Dr. Robert Koch]:

Postulates means accepted statements of fact.

  1. The germ which causes a disease must be found in every case of the disease under the conditions which could explain the disease.
  2. The germ must not be found in other diseases or healthy people.
  3. The germ could be isolated and used to induce an experimental disease in animals which resembles (is like) the original disease in humans.

Pasteur never quite fulfilled all of these rules. He was not able to find the germ in all cases of a disease and this is where his research became fraudulent. Additionally, many so-called pathogenic germs are often found in healthy people.

And finally, when Pasteur passed a germ from one animal to another to cause the disease, he did not pass the germ alone, but took some blood with it. Injecting toxic blood from one animal to another will guarantee the receiving animal becomes sick.

Antoine Béchamp’s Discoveries

Professor Antoine Béchamp, a French biologist (1816 – 1908), who was Pasteur’s contemporary (lived at the same time and they knew each other), developed and demonstrated a pleomorphic (many forms – see a more complete description below) theory – essentially that bacteria change form and are not the cause of, but the result of, disease, arising from tissues rather than from a germ of constant form. This has also been called the “cellular disease theory.”

Béchamp discovered that these micro-organisms (germs) feed upon the poisonous material which they find in the sick organism and prepare it for excretion. These tiny organisms are derived from still tinier organisms called microzyma.

These microzyma are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms where they remain normally quiescent (quiet and not acting) and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation (change) takes place [also called pleomorphism].

The microzyma changes into a bacterium or virus which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the microzyma stage.” –Béchamp. Sourced: Vaccination The “Hidden” Facts by Ian Sinclair, p62

Béchamp himself wrote: “I draw the conclusion that normal air never contains morbid microzymas, or what used to be called germs of diseases and are now called microbes; maintaining, in accord with the old medical aphorism (general truth) that diseases are born of us and in us, that no one has ever been able to communicate a characteristic disease of the nosological class [scientific classification of disease], such as anthrax, smallpox, typhoid fever, cholera, plague, tuberculosis, hydrophobia, syphilis, etc., by taking the germ in the air, but they are isolated from a patient, at some particular moment.”

Béchamp’s academic record includes:

– Master of Pharmacy

– Doctor of Science

– Doctor of Medicine

– Professor of Medical Chemistry and Pharmacy at Montpellier

– Fellow and Professor of Physics and Toxicology – Strasbourg Higher School of Pharmacy

– Professor of Chemistry at Strasbourg

– Professor of Biological Chemistry and Dean of Faculty of Medicine of Lille; etc., etc.

Pleomorphism versus Monomorphism

Pleo-morphism means many forms; many or more (pleo-), forms or bodies (morph-), capable of changing from one type of organism to another.

This is in contradistinction (distinction by contrast) to Mono-morphism which means one (mono-) body or form.

Modern medicine, bacteriology, is founded on the idea of Mono-morphism where once a germ is a particular germ it always stays that way. According to this way of thinking, a streptococcal germ is always a streptococcus. It only has one (mono-) form; it doesn’t change into anything else.

However, that is not true. Streptococcal germs and many other kinds of germs, bacteria and viruses can, and do, change into other forms, proven to occur by many eminent researchers since the early 1800s, including Gaston Naessens, Gunther Enderlein, Royal Rife, Antoine Béchamp, and others. Even modern medicine recognizes that bacteria, viruses change into stronger ones, becoming resistant to antibiotic drugs.

Pleomorphism is a concept discovered in the early 1800’s. It shows that germs, bacteria and viruses come from inside the body; from the “tiny dots” you can see in the blood with any microscope. These “tiny dots” of course are the colloids of life or protits.

Pleomorphism is a concept that today sounds very strange. What pleomorphism is however, cannot be denied as the vast amount of data that has been obtained over the last 180 years confirms what modern microbiologists are discovering, re-discovering today. As noted, many people have been involved in this debate for a long time.

Tiny microbes are “tiny dots” in our blood that change form into microorganisms that clean up the garbage, dead cells, toxins and the like. This is what bacteria, germs, and viruses are for. They change first into viruses, then into bacteria and finally into fungal forms. Each of these stages is progressively more hostile to surrounding tissue cells.

Germs, all micro-organisms, (viruses, bacteria, fungi and everything in-between) are the result, not the cause of disease!

Louis Pasteur was wrong! His idea of the bacterial cause of disease was wrong!

If “germs” are there as a result, not a cause, then to treat the resultant germs with antibiotics is in theory and in fact, wrong! This basic misconception about disease affects all aspects of medicine.

This is why this is a “new”… biology, even though it has been proved by many doctors and scientists starting in the early 1800s.

Béchamp stated, in an address before the Academy of Medicine on the 3rd of May, 1870, “that nothing is more obscure than the cause which presides over the development of diseases and their communicability.

But what we can affirm is that when we are sick, it is we who suffer, and that the suffering is a cruel reality. This is because the cause of our diseased condition is always within ourselves.”

External causes contribute to the development of the affliction and hence of the disease only because they have brought about some material modification of the medium (our body, animals, and even soil) in which live the ultimate particles of the organized matter which constitutes us, namely, the microzymas.

These external causes, by a succession of changes brought about, and depending on a crowd of variables, bring about correlatively a further change, which then bears precisely upon the physiological and chemical status of the microzymas. The living being, filled with microzymas, carries in itself the elements essential for life, disease, death and destruction.

Note: Béchamp called these tiny microbes microzymas, while Gaston Naessens called them somatids, and Gunther Enderlein called them protits.

Antibiotics, Immunization or Improved Nutrition?

In 1973 Dr. D. Powles observed: “The major contributing factor toward improved health over the past 200 years has been improved nutrition. Nearly 90% of the total decline in the death rate in children between 1860 and 1965 due to whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria and measles occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization against diphtheria” (Powles, 1973).

Epidemiologist Dr. G.T. Stewart made a similar statement which was reported in Lancet of May 18,1968; and prior to this Sir Robert McCarrison, the great English physician, wrote:

“Obsessed with the invisible microbe, virus, protozoa as all important excitants of disease, subservient to laboratory methods of diagnosis, hidebound by our system of nomenclature, we often forget the most fundamental of all rules for the physician, that the right kind of food (nutrition) is the most important single factor in the promotion of health and the wrong kind of food the most important single factor in the promotion of disease” (McCarrison, 1936).

In a personal communication (1974), Dr. Klenner made the following important observations: “Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin vaccine, being made of monkey kidney tissue, has been directly responsible for the major increase of leukemia in this country.

Your own Dr. Nossal from the Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia made the statement which was published in our Medical Tribune that, ‘Most killed vaccine in use today was not fit for a mouse.’ “

Elsewhere in the same communication Dr. Klenner astutely sums up some pertinent reasons for our inability to make successful viral vaccines as follows: “I am of the opinion that virus units have the potential of going from one type to another by just altering their protein coat.

We see chicken pox at Thanksgiving, mumps by Christmas, red measles in the spring and polio and what we now know was Coxsackie in the summer. When the red measles vaccine was given to the children in our community we immediately had an epidemic of sore throats and many of the older people demonstrated Koplik’s spots” (Klenner, 1974).

These viewpoints appear to constitute food for thought. Moreover, it is disappointing to observe the futility and ineffectiveness of many “flu” vaccines that have been accepted by an unwary public.

If we consider Béchamp’s thesis that viruses and bacteria can be extensions of enzymes (“microzymas”), that there are specific disease conditions rather than specific diseases, that the virus and the bacterium are the concomitants, not the antecedents of disease, is it not conceivable that these entities may become, by evolution and nutritional breakdown, the viruses and bacteria we are studying so intently? Is Klenner right? Was Béchamp right? Is this why we cannot make a successful vaccine?

Disease and Béchamp’s Hypothesis: A Final Consideration

A further search of the relevant literature produced the following: “S. Typhi has been isolated from surgical wounds and gall bladders of patients not known to be typhoid carriers” (Arch. Surg., 1972).

Showing the influence of orthodoxy the article then concludes that these patients are infection hazards. We wonder aloud how many “infection hazards” we would detect if we did a bacteriological survey upon all the passengers of a jumbo jet?

Surveys that we have participated in show that a large percentage of the sample may indeed “carry” so-called pathogens without any clinical symptoms of disease. Perhaps it is time we revised the word pathogen?

  1. A. Altemeier describes the increase of mixed infections which he alleges are due to indiscreet use of antibiotics, which produces viral, fungal and L-forms which are much more difficult to control.

Altemeier then describes how the bacterial flora is ever changing and cites a case of septicemia: this commenced as a staphylococcal infection and then successively became pseudomonas, bacteroides. E. Coli. Enterobacter, aerogenes, anaerobic streptococci, serratia and finally proteus (Altemeier, 1975).

How many realize that the results of a culture and sensitivity collected from a patient the day before may have changed by the time the result is readable in the laboratory? In other words, yesterday’s tests may be today’s mistakes! 

This behavior of the micro-organism might appear much less strange if we adopt more the viewpoint of Béchamp who described the microzymian endogenous (developing inside the body) evolution of micro-organisms some 100 years ago.

If a child develops measles, chicken pox, whooping cough, mumps, rubella or any of the other common childhood infections, it is not because of germs, but because of the accumulated toxic waste within the body, a condition known as Toxaemia.

Royal Raymond Rife’s Discoveries

One day, the name of Royal Raymond Rife may ascend to its rightful place as the giant of modern medical science. Until that time, his fabulous technology remains available only to the people who have the interest to seek it out.

While perfectly legal for veterinarians to use anything to save the lives of animals, Rife’s brilliant frequency therapy remains taboo to orthodox mainstream medicine because of the continuing threat it poses to the international pharmaceutical medical monopoly that controls the lives – and deaths – of the vast majority of the people on this planet.

Rife’s inventions include a heterodyning ultraviolet microscope, a microdissector, and a micromanipulator. When you thoroughly understand Rife’s achievements, you may well decide that he has the most gifted, versatile, scientific mind in human history.

The result of using a resonant wavelength is that micro-organisms which are invisible in white light suddenly become visible in a brilliant flash of light when they are exposed to the color frequency that resonates with their own distinct spectroscopic signature.

Rife was thus able to see these otherwise invisible organisms and watch them actively invading tissue cultures. Rife’s discovery enabled him to view organisms that no one else could see with ordinary microscopes.

By 1920, Rife had finished building the world’s first virus microscope. By 1933, he had perfected that technology and had constructed the incredibly complex Universal Microscope, which had nearly 6,000 different parts and was capable of magnifying objects 60,000 times their normal size.

With this incredible microscope, Rife became the first human being to actually see a live virus, and until quite recently, the Universal Microscope was the only one which was able view live viruses.

Modern electron microscopes instantly kill everything beneath them, viewing only the mummified remains and debris. What the Rife microscope can see is the bustling activity of living viruses as they change form to accommodate changes in environment, replicate rapidly in response to carcinogens, and transform normal cells into tumor cells.

But how was Rife able to accomplish this, in an age when electronics and medicine were still just evolving? Here are a few technical details to placate the skeptics…

Rife painstakingly identified the individual spectroscopic signature of each microbe, using a slit spectroscope attachment. Then, he slowly rotated block quartz prisms to focus light of a single wavelength upon the microorganism he was examining. This wavelength was selected because it resonated with the spectroscopic signature frequency of the microbe based on the now-established fact that every molecule oscillates at its own distinct frequency.

The atoms that come together to form a molecule are held together in that molecular configuration with a covalent energy bond which both emits and absorbs its own specific electromagnetic frequency. No two species of molecule have the same electromagnetic oscillations or energetic signature. Resonance amplifies light in the same way two ocean waves intensify each other when they merge together.

More than 75% of the organisms Rife could see with his Universal Microscope are only visible with ultra-violet light. But ultraviolet light is outside the range of human vision; it is ‘invisible’ to us. Rife’s brilliance allowed him to overcome this limitation by heterodyning, a technique which became popular in early radio broadcasting.

He illuminated the microbe (usually a virus or bacteria) with two different wavelengths of the same ultraviolet light frequency which resonated with the spectral signature of the microbe. These two wavelengths produced interference where they merged.

This interference was, in effect, a third, longer wave which fell into the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. This was how Rife made invisible microbes visible without killing them, a feat which today’s electron microscopes cannot duplicate.

By this time, Rife was so far ahead of his colleagues of the 1930’s(!), that they could not comprehend what he was doing without actually traveling to San Diego to Rife’s laboratory to look through his Virus Microscope for themselves. And many did exactly that.

One was Virginia Livingston. She eventually moved from New Jersey to Rife’s Point Loma (San Diego) neighborhood and became a frequent visitor to his lab. Virginia Livingston is now often given the credit for identifying the organism which causes human cancer, beginning with research papers she began publishing in 1948.

In reality, Royal Rife had identified the human cancer virus first…in 1920! Rife then made over 20,000 unsuccessful attempts to transform normal cells into tumor cells. He finally succeeded when he irradiated the cancer virus, passed it through a cell-catching ultra-fine porcelain filter, and injected it into lab animals.

Not content to prove this virus would cause one tumor, Rife then created 400 tumors in succession from the same culture. He documented everything with film, photographs, and meticulous records. He named the cancer virus ‘Cryptocides primordiales.’

Virginia Livingston, in her papers, renamed it Progenitor Cryptocides. Royal Rife was never even mentioned in her papers. In fact, Rife seldom got credit for his monumental discoveries. He was a quiet, unassuming scientist, dedicated to expanding his discoveries rather than to ambition, fame, and glory.

His distaste for medical politics (which he could afford to ignore thanks to generous trusts set up by private benefactors) left him at a disadvantage later, when powerful forces attacked him. Coupled with the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in purging his papers from medical journals, it is hardly surprising that few have heard of Rife today.

Nevertheless, many scientists and doctors have since confirmed Rife’s discovery of the cancer virus and its pleomorphic nature, using darkfield techniques, the Naessens microscope, and laboratory experiments.

Rife also worked with the top scientists and doctors of his day who also confirmed or endorsed various areas of his work.

They included: E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (long-time Chief of Bacteriology, Mayo Clinic); Arthur Kendall (Director, Northwestern Medical School); Dr. George Dock (internationally-renowned); Alvin Foord (famous pathologist); Rufus Klein-Schmidt (President of USC); R.T. Hamer (Superintendent, Paradise Valley Sanitarium; Dr. Milbank Johnson (Director of the Southern California AMA); Whalen Morrison (Chief Surgeon, Santa Fe Railway); George Fischer (Children’s Hospital, N.Y.); Edward Kopps (Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla); Karl Meyer (Hooper Foundation, S.F.); M. Zite (Chicago University); and many others.

By increasing the intensity of a frequency which resonated naturally with these microbes, Rife increased their natural oscillations until they distorted and disintegrated from structural stresses. Rife called this frequency ‘the mortal oscillatory rate,’ or ‘MOR’, and it did no harm whatsoever to the surrounding tissues.

Today’s Rife instruments use harmonics of the frequencies shown on the display screen. The wavelength of the actual frequency shown (770hz, 880hz, etc.) is too long to do the job.

This principle can be illustrated by using an intense musical note to shatter a wine glass: the molecules of the glass are already oscillating at some harmonic (multiple) of that musical note; they are in resonance with it.

Because everything else has a different resonant frequency, nothing but the glass is destroyed. There are literally hundreds of trillions of different resonant frequencies, and every species and molecule has its very own.

It took Rife many years, working 48 hours at a time, until he discovered the frequencies which specifically destroyed herpes, polio, spinal meningitis, tetanus, influenza, and an immense number of other dangerous disease organisms.

In 1934, the University of Southern California appointed a Special Medical Research Committee to bring terminal cancer patients from Pasadena County Hospital to Rife’s San Diego Laboratory and clinic for treatment. The team included doctors and pathologists assigned to examine the patients – if still alive – in 90 days.

After the 90 days of treatment, the Committee concluded that 86.5% of the patients had been completely cured. The treatment was then adjusted and the remaining 13.5% of the patients also responded within the next four weeks. The total recovery rate using Rife’s technology was 100%.

On November 20, 1931, forty-four of the nation’s most respected medical authorities honored Royal Rife with a banquet billed as The End To All Diseases at the Pasadena estate of Dr. Milbank Johnson.

But by 1939, almost all of these distinguished doctors and scientists were denying that they had ever met Rife. What happened to make so many brilliant men have complete memory lapses?

It seems that news of Rife’s miracles with terminal patients had reached other ears. Remember our hypothetical question at the beginning of this report: What would happen if you discovered a cure for everything? You are now about to find out….

At first, a token attempt was made to buy out Rife. Morris Fishbein, who had acquired the entire stock of the American Medical Association by 1934, sent an attorney to Rife with ‘an offer you can’t refuse.’ Rife refused. We may never know the exact terms of this offer.

But we do know the terms of the offer Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for control of his herbal cancer remedy. Fishbein’s associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits.

Hoxsey decided that he would rather continue to make all the profits himself. When Hoxsey turned Fishbein down, Fishbein used his immensely powerful political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practice without a license) were always thrown out of court, but the harassment drove Hoxsey insane.

But Fishbein must have realized that this strategy would backfire with Rife. First, Rife could not be arrested like Hoxsey for practising without a license. A trial on trumped-up charges would mean that testimony supporting Rife would be introduced by prominent medical authorities working with Rife.

And the defense would undoubtedly take the opportunity to introduce evidence such as the 1934 medical study done with USC. The last thing in the world that the pharmaceutical industry wanted was a public trial about a painless therapy that cured 100% of the terminal cancer patients and cost nothing to use but a little electricity. It might give people the idea that they didn’t need drugs.

And finally, Rife had spent decades accumulating meticulous evidence of his work, including film and stop-motion photographs. No, different tactics were needed…

The first incident was the gradual pilfering of components, photographs, film, and written records from Rife’s lab. The culprit was never caught.

Then, while Rife struggled to reproduce his missing data (in a day when photocopies and computers were not available), someone vandalized his precious virus microscopes. Pieces of the 5,682 piece Universal microscope were stolen.

Earlier, an arson fire had destroyed the multi-million dollar Burnett Lab in New Jersey, just as the scientists there were preparing to announce confirmation of Rife’s work. But the final blow came later, when police illegally confiscated the remainder of Rife’s 50 years of research.

Then in 1939, agents of a family which controlled the drug industry assisted Philip Hoyland in a frivolous lawsuit against his own partners in the Beam Ray Corporation. This was the only company manufacturing Rife’s frequency instruments (Rife was not a partner).

Hoyland lost, but his assisted legal assault had the desired effect: the company was bankrupted by legal expenses. And during the Great Depression, this meant that commercial production of Rife’s frequency instruments ceased completely.

And remember what a universal cure meant to hospitals and research foundations? Doctors who tried to defend Rife lost their foundations grants and hospital privileges.

On the other hand, big money was spent ensuring that doctors who had seen Rife’s therapy would forget what they saw. Almost no price was too much to suppress it. Remember that, today, treatment of a single cancer patient averages over $300,000. It’s BIG business.

Thus, Arthur Kendall, the Director of the Northwestern School of Medicine who worked with Rife on the cancer virus, accepted almost a quarter of a million dollars to suddenly ‘retire’ in Mexico. That was an exorbitant amount of money in the Depression.

Dr. George Dock, another prominent figure who collaborated with Rife, was silenced with an enormous grant, along with the highest honors the AMA could bestow. Between the carrots and the sticks, everyone except Dr. Couche and Dr. Milbank Johnson gave up Rife’s work and went back to prescribing drugs.

To finish the job, the medical journals support almost entirely by drug company revenues and controlled by the AMA, refused to publish any paper by anyone on Rife’s therapy. Therefore, an entire generation of medical students graduated into practice without ever once hearing of Rife’s breakthroughs in medicine.

The magnitude of such an insane crime eclipses every mass murder in history. Cancer picks us off quietly…but by 1960 the casualties from this tiny virus exceeded the carnage of all the wars America ever fought. In 1989, it was estimated that 40% of us will experience cancer at some time in our lives.

In Rife’s lifetime, he had witnessed the progress of civilization from horse-and-buggy travel to jet planes. In that same time, he saw the epidemic of cancer increase from 1 in 24 Americans in 1905 to 1 in 3 in 1971 when Rife died.

He also witnessed the phenomenal growth of the American Cancer Society, the Salk Foundation, and many others collecting hundreds of millions of dollars for diseases that were cured long before in his own San Diego laboratories. In one period, 176,500 cancer drugs were submitted for approval.

Any that showed ‘favorable’ results in only one-sixth of one percent of the cases being studied could be licensed. Some of these drugs had a mortality rate of 14-17%.

When death came from the drug, not the cancer, the case was recorded as a ‘complete’ or ‘partial remission’ because the patient didn’t actually die from the cancer. In reality, it was a race to see which would kill the patient first: the drug or the disease.

Gaston Naessens’ (1924 – ) Discoveries

What Rife accomplished optically in the 1930s with his Universal Microscope, Gaston Naessens accomplished with a combination of optics and electronics in the 1940s in his Somatoscope.

Born on 16 March 1924 in Roubaix, France, Gaston displayed a predisposition to be an inventor when at the age of five he built a little moving autolike toy from a Meccano set and powered it with an alarm clock spring. Later, he built a home-made motorcycle and a mini-airplane!

Gaston Naessens is a Québec biologist who, many believe, has made fundamental discoveries relating to cancer, AIDS, and the nature of life itself. Through the use of a unique microscope of his own invention, the Somatoscope, the 70-year-old French-born Canadian has discovered a primitive biological entity, which he calls the “somatid.”

While attending the University of Lille, Gaston nearly had his education disrupted by the German invasion. Fortunately, Gaston and his fellow students escaped to Nice where they carried on their education in exile.

He was awarded a diploma from the Union Nationale Scientifique Francaise–a quasi-official institution under whose auspices the education of the displaced students continued. He did not bother seeking an equivalency degree from the de Gaulle government when French rule was restored.

At the young age of twenty-one, frustrated by the limitations of conventional microscopes, Gaston set out to build a superior microscope. Technical assistance was provided by German craftsmen from Wetzlar, Germany, who checked out many of Gaston’s original ideas on optics.

Privately, Gaston devised the electrical manipulation of the light source. Once the technical aspects were resolved, Gaston had the body of his microscope constructed by Barbier-Bemard et Turenne, technical specialists and defence contractors near Paris.

Naessens claims that the somatid is found in all biological fluids he has looked at, including plant sap and human blood.

In a long lost chapter of history in science, a violent controversy took place in France between the illustrious Louis Pasteur and Antoine Béchamp, a noted professor of physics, toxicology, medical chemistry, and biochemistry. Béchamp’s work led him to discover ‘microzymas’ (tiny ferments) which were characterised by a host of small bodies in his fermenting solutions.

After years of study, Béchamp came to the conclusion that these microzymas were more basic to life than cells. Even with his crude equipment, he was able to observe that the microzymas underwent dramatic transformations during their life cycle.

This caused Béchamp to champion the idea that the cause for disease lay within the body. Pasteur’s germ theory held that the cause came from without, so Pasteur’s outspokenness helped the germ theory win out and dominate medical philosophy for the past century.

Now, a hundred years later, Gaston Naessens has discovered an ultramicroscopic, subcellular, living and reproducing microscopic form which he christened a ‘somatid’ (tiny body).

This new particle could be cultured outside the bodies of the host. Naessens also observed that the particle had a pleomorphic (form-changing) life cycle, and had a sixteen-stage life cycle. Only the first three stages of the somatid life cycle are normal.

Naessens discovered that when the immune system is weakened or disrupted, the somatids go through the other thirteen stages. The weakening of the immune system could be brought about by a number of reasons such exposure to chemical pollution, ionising radiation, electric fields, poor nutrition, accidents, shock, depression, and many more. See ‘ The Somatid Cycle of Life by Naessens’ at the end of this article.

Incredibly, Naessens’ research has resulted in the association of degenerative diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, lupus, cancer and AIDS) with the development of forms in the sixteen-stage pathological cycle. The ability to associate the disease with specific stages has enabled Naessens to ‘prediagnose’ conditions in advance of when they would clinically appear.

This discovery puts Gaston Naessens at odds with the orthodox medical philosophy today which has embraced Pasteur’s germ theory wholeheartedly. Naessens’ work is repeatable. The ability to culture somatids is a bellwether (a person or thing that assumes the leadership or forefront) to the rewriting of microbiology!

Naessens stated: “I’ve been able to establish a life cycle of forms in the blood that add up to no less than a brand new understanding of the basis of life.

What we’re talking about is an entirely new biology, one out of which has fortunately sprung practical applications of benefit to sick people, even before all of its many theoretical aspects have been sorted out.”

Gunther Enderlein’s (1872 – 1968) Discoveries

Enderlein maintains that “germs” occur in many forms beginning with the protit (the same microbe found by Béchamp, Naessens, Rife & others, but called different names by each researcher), which can change into a virus, which can change into a bacteria, which can change into a fungus.

Any of these forms; bacterial, viral or fungal can and do eventually break all apart and turn back into the protits from whence they came, and so it starts all over again, life. The protit never dies. This is a nature of life. It goes on no matter what.

These protits in our blood develop or change according to the condition of the body. At some stages of their development they are outright pathogenic (make you sick) and parasitic.

These are our internal parasites. These protits can go in the other direction too and turn into cells we need, i.e. Live Cell Therapy. They can help regenerate organs.

These adaptive necessities are called diseases, but they are healing processes, attempts to shunt a disturbed symbiosis (a relationship between two organisms defined as ‘living together”) back to the original healthy track.

As these “little dots,” protits, change form, they can change into organisms that are more and more detrimental to the body. They become independent and no longer live in harmony and in support of their host body.

As they develop their individual form, they create their own metabolism and waste products of that metabolism, which is harmful to the local body fluids, causing pain and inflammation. Finally, this local process, which develops in the body’s ‘weakest organ’, affects the whole body.

It is not the organisms (germs, viruses, bacteria) that make you sick, it is the waste products of the metabolism of those organisms that make you sick.

“In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease, but we believe it is the chemical constituents of these micro-organisms enacting upon the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce the disease.

We also believe if the metabolism of the human body is perfectly balanced or poised, it is susceptible to no disease.” (From the Annual Report of the Board of Regents of The Smithsonian Institution, 1944).

These disease processes, these changes in the blood, are difficult to fathom at first because they only effect functioning but not yet structures of the body. This happens in the most diversified organs such as manifesting as; headaches, high or low blood pressure, feeling poorly, unmotivated attitude, lack of appetite, drab complexion, coated tongue, wounds in the mouth, pimples, acne, sores, hoarseness, runny nose, ear noises, diarrhea, lowered capacity for seeing and hearing, depression, weak concentration or poor memory.

Bacteria are being found in the diseased tissues of all chronic, degenerative diseases; from The Atlantic Monthly, A New Germ Theory by Judith Hooper, February 1999. These bacteria are there as a result, not the cause.

Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) was wrong, these organisms are not caught from the outside, they come from within.

These germs come from inside the body, from “tiny dots” that you can see in the blood of any living thing, with any microscope. All microorganisms, all living things come from these “tiny dots” and all living things turn back into these “tiny dots”.

These “tiny dots” themselves, never die. The cell is not the smallest living thing, these “little dots” are. These “tiny dots” are called Protits in German and Somatides in French. There isn’t even a name for them in the English language. Isn’t that strange?

If the environment in the body becomes toxic, polluted, or doesn’t have the nutrients it requires to maintain health these “tiny dots” hook together into long threads and change into the viruses, bacteria and finally the fungi (candida albicans) that clean up a corpse, if things get that bad.

This is what the bacteria, viruses and germs are there for. They clean up old, diseased tissues. The germs are not the problem, the conditions, environment they are in IS. Do you treat the problem or the result?

Thought Provoking Conclusions

If the “Germ Theory of Disease” were true no one could ever get over a cold or flu, or any other disease caused by bugs, since they would constantly be re-infecting themselves.

Also, if the “Germ Theory of Disease” were true we would ALL have ALL of the bugs ALL of the time since they are “everywhere” and so would all other life on Earth, i.e. plants, trees, animals, insects, birds, etc., so life on Earth could not have happened.

References 

– “The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur” 

– “Antoine Béchamp.org” 

– “Second Thoughts on Disease – A Controversy and Béchamp Revisited“, by Drs Kalokerinos & Dettman 1977 

– “The Amazing Wonders of Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick. Editor, Extraordinary Science 

– “The Persecution & Trial of Gaston Naessens” 

– “Vaccine Website

Source – https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/

The Somatid Cycle of Life by Naessens

Somatids are tiny micro-organisms (germs) that feed upon the poisonous material which they find in the sick organism and prepare it for excretion. These tiny organisms are derived from still tinier organisms called “somatids” by Gaston Naessens. Other researchers discovered these same microbes and called them protits, microzyma, etc.

Somatids are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms, and also in plant sap, where they remain normally quiescent (quiet and not acting) and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation (change) takes place called pleomorphism. The ‘somatid’ changes into a virus or bacterium which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the somatid stage.

If the environment in the body becomes toxic, polluted, or doesn’t have the nutrients it requires to maintain health these “tiny dots” hook together into long threads and change into the viruses, bacteria and finally the fungi (candida albicans) that clean up a corpse, if things get that bad.

Source: https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/the-somatid-cycle-of-life-by-naessens/

The Truth About Viruses, including the Coronavirus

– Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner –

Dear Family and Friends,

 The purpose of this email is to open your mind to the illusion of the germ theory that imprisons many us and to encourage you to study the history of how this illusion was created.

 One must challenge everything in the modern construct of immunology and what is said to be the immune system. The basis of modern immunology is founded on Louis Pasteur, the fraud, impostor, deceiver and self promoter. There is a serious problem to where every word and part of the anatomy must be questioned to find their use and function because of the fraud of Louis Pasteur.

 For example, the word influenza means influence. Originally, influenza was said to come from the stars or heavens. The Avian Influenza is an influenza of a bird influence. More specifically, it is an influence of bird waste. The bird consumption industry in Southeast Asia is overcrowded to the point that the chickens are consuming their own waste, producing an over-acidification of the birds and workers that must work in the acidic air and waste.

It could be more accurately called Acidic Bird or Chicken Excrement Influenza that is only contagious to those consuming acidic birds, like chicken or breathing chemically altered air from chicken excrement. Because chickens do not have a urinary tract system, like humans and animals, they are more likely to absorb their own acidic urine into their tissues. I guess you could say that’s what makes chicken flesh or turkey flesh taste so juicy and why chicken or turkey flesh should never be consumed by humans!

Here is a second example of Pasteurian scientific dogma. The word virus is originally Latin meaning poison, as in snake venom, (being too acidic). When a serious snake bite releases venom or acid into the skin and soft tissues, the small sweat vessels become so enlarged that red corpuscles can flow into the tiny seat glands, showing red skin patterns and allowing the venom or acids to escape through the skin. Acidity dissolves and enlarges blood vessels for the movement of acidic fluids or gases. Alkalinity constricts and normalizes the blood vessels.

The point being that viruses, including the coronavirus are molecular liquids or gases (venom) that can be created by chemical imbalances in humans, plants and animals (by malnutrition or toxic acidic food and/or drink consumption), also created in humans, plants and animal glands, sometimes used in defense (snake venom) or emergency (overactive adrenals), also can be crystallized in laboratories, rarely, if ever crystallized in vivo, and foolish to call viruses, like coronavirus contagious when viruses are nothing more than acidic liquids or gases from biological transformation or rotting matter.

In snake bites, lifestyle choices and diets — it is not the bite or food that kills it is the venom or acid from the bite or food that kills. Ultimately, it is in ones personal choice that gives life or takes life! Life and death is a consequence of choice!

My final example is in defining the truth about antibodies and antigens. Antibodies are chemical clusters or alkaline buffers to a typical acidic condition properly referred to as antigens or enzymes. So called antibodies are released from healthy organ cells, such as the liver, in response to buffer and neutralize the acidity or liquid acid antigen that was first introduced. It must be noted that the word, antibody and antigen, are a Pasteurian dogma construct. The mind set being that an antibody or now even antibiotics, are defending or responding to bodies, microbes or invisible bodies or what I call phantom viruses, like Corona, Zika, Avian, SARS, or even HIV — even though HIV is not a virus but an alkaline antibody to buffer acid or antigens. The chemical response is actually due to an introduction, vector or antigen of a chemical nature, typically acidic, not a body, microbe or bacteria or yeast.

If bacteria, yeast, fungus or mold are transferred into another individual it must be made in a balanced liquid medium to support that fragile microbe or insignificant entity in order to survive. The main point here is that bacteria, yeast, fungus or mold do not cause sickness and disease (including cancer) as theorized by Pasteur and suggested by Dr. Simoncini, an oncologist from Rome, Italy — sickness and disease (including cancer, Corona and HIV) is a result of excess acidity or antigens that have not been properly buffered by antibodies or bases such as sodium bicarbonate. These fragile microforms or microbes are the expression of cellular transformation from once healthy human, plant or animal cells due to an over acidic environment. Sickness and disease can only be caused by an over acidification (abundance of antigens) of the fluids of the body due to our own personal lifestyle and dietary choices.

As you contemplate the cause of the flu, cold or any so-called infection, may I suggest that each of us take personal responsibility for the consequences of our choices, rather than blame a phantom Coronavirus, Avian Influenza virus, cold virus, flu virus, cancer virus or some non-existent HIV virus. If you get sick, it is your own fault and not the cause of some phantom virus that you can blame to cover your own toxic lifestyle and dietary transgressions. Save your money and save your life by making alkalizing and energizing lifestyle and dietary choices. This is where true immunity is found — not in a vaccine or a drug which are all acidic and poisonous to the body but in living an alkaline lifestyle.

I love the words of Hippocrates when he said, ‘Let your medicine be your food and your food be your medicine.

In closing, I quote Abraham Lincoln who said ‘ . . . but you can’t fool all the people, all of the time.’ In other words, do NOT be fooled by this non-existent coronavirus.

Is it now time that we wake up from the fraud and deception of Louis Pasteur’s medical science and break the chains that can prevent us from incredible outstanding good health, energy and a long a prosperous life free from all sickness and disease? It is now time for us to be truly free in all ways — physically, emotionally and spiritually?

I believe with all my heart that the answers to all questions can be found and realized in understanding and choosing truth, light and life over deception, darkness and death. For the truth can and will always set us free, in all ways!

In love, light and life, Dr. Robert O. Young www.drrobertyoung.com www.drrobertyoung.com/blog

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-truth-about-viruses-including-the-coronavirus

Scientific articles written by Dr. Young

The following are links to scientific articles written by Dr. Young that will be helpful in understanding that disease is born in us and from us. We are the authors and creators of our own sickness and diseases:

1) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/autopsies-prove-death-by-disseminated-intravascular-coagulation-or-pulmonary-thrombosis

2) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/do-germs-cause-infection

3) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/do-you-really-trust-vaccines-to-protect-you-against-a-phantom-virus

4) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/lies-and-viruses-have-a-lot-in-common

5) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/a-pandemic-of-lies

6) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/a-pandemic-of-stupidity

7) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/is-acid-raining-on-our-planet-and-on-us

8) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-can-happen-from-prolonged-use-of-wearing-a-n95-mask-1

9) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-corona-virus-is-just-a-concept-that-only-exists-on-paper

10) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-is-the-1-contributing-factor-to-the-corona-effect

11) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/who-had-their-finger-on-the-magic-of-life-antoine-bechamp-or-louis-pasteur

12) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/adverse-health-effects-of-5g-mobile-networking-technology-under-real-life-conditions

13) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/inventing-the-corona-virus-or-sars-convid-2-convid-19

14) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-connection-between-5g-and-the-corona-virus

15) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/are-we-making-ourselves-sick-a-story-about-toxicity-sickness-and-recovery

16) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/to-vax-or-not-to-vax-that-is-the-question

17) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/why-are-populations-of-cities-from-some-countries-more-affected-than-others-for-con-vid-19

18) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-is-a-virus

19) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/are-you-following-a-con-vit-die-it-or-a-ph-miracle-alkaline-live-it-lifestyle

20) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/untitled

21) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-can-i-do-to-prevent-or-reverse-the-symptoms-of-the-corona-effect-in-3-to-5-days

22) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-real-corona-virus

23) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-does-corona-blood-look-like-after-exposure-to-radiation-poisoning-emf-to-a-smart-meter

24) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-acid-bowl-of-shit-do-you-live-in

25) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/birth-of-virology-a-miscarriage

26) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/there-is-no-slow-virus-just-slow-virologists

27) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-truth-about-corona-and-how-to-prevent-and-or-reverse-the-corona-effect

28) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/have-you-had-your-covid-19-meal-today

29) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-real-threat-to-humanit

30) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-effects-electromagnet-frequencies-on-the-blood-and-biological-terrain

31) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-effects-electromagnet-frequencies-on-the-blood-and-biological-terrain

32) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-is-the-pathology-of-covid-19

33) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/hydrogen-peroxide-good-or-bad-for-protection-against-covid2-19

34) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/are-corona-cells-caused-from-a-viral-infection-or-from-a-toxic-acidic-internal-environment

35) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-cause-and-the-cure-for-corona

36) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/18-different-ways-to-reverse-the-symptoms-of-so-called-coronavirus-with-the-phour-salts

37) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-truth-about-viruses-including-the-coronavirus

38) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dumbing-down-the-world-s-population

39) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-truth-about-viruses-including-the-coronavirus

40) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/fear-mongering-or-facts

41) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/protect-yourself-from-environmental-acids-viruses-like-corona-flu-for-true-immunity

42) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/do-germs-like-the-coronavirus-cause-disease

43) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-alkalizing-benefits-of-chlorine-dioxide-clo2-in-human-health

44) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/are-you-prepared-for-the-bio-hazardous-effects-from-5g-emf-radiation

45) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/pathological-blood-coagulation-and-systemic-acidosis

46) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/it-is-raining-acid-on-your-lungs

47) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/can-the-chemistry-ph-of-the-blood-and-interstitial-fluids-of-the-interstitium-be-altered

48) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/purified-alkaline-water-with-puriphy-for-ultimate-environmental-protection

49) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/does-the-stomach-digest-food

50) https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dismantling-the-viral-theory

– Alternative Principles For Health –

Adrian has, through life experience and many years of research, uncovered a treasure chest of truth pertaining to illness and the path to wellness which he shares through his Youtube channel and his website. He has also compiled all of his learning into a book which is available for an extremely low fee – link below

Below is Adrian’s reply to my email pertaining to COVID 19:

You have about 38 trillion viruses in your bodyt all doing very specific things. we would be dead with without them.

The cleansing you mentioned is bang on the money, if the toxcic load is too great for the bacteria to deal with then viruses / exosomes (think soap or solvents)  which are solvents are produced to handle the load. Very specifically for the problem at hand.

Pretty much everything that we have been taught about disease is based on germ theory which turns out just to be an unproven theory hence the name.  This then draws into question much of what we thought to be true and influences much of what we observe.

 Your body and immune system is a complex arrangement of systems and subsystems all working together.  The immune system is a beautifully orchestrated group of systems that all work together in order to keep you healthy.  It is possible that things in the system can be compromised and then rather than a working is a beautifully orchestrated system can start to malfunction.  Perhaps he’s just to think of it this way: let us say that you are having to defend yourself but had your hands tied behind your back and were only able to use your legs.  It is quite possible in this state that not only are you off balance but you might also damage both yourself and innocent bystanders if there were any.  In situations like that in your body your immune system can harm healthy tissue as well as the actual problem.  In situations like that it helps to get the immune system back into balance.

 There are multiple parts to the immune system and this includes, but is not limited to, bacteria, viruses, your micro biome, mould, white blood cells.

 There are as I understand it five ways to create problems in the human body:
Toxicity-this can be toxic thinking, toxic chemicals in food, air, water (chlorine, fluoride, oestrogen from birth-control pills and other chemicals – many water supply systems are closed loops especially in cities and use aggressive cleaning and chemical to create drinking water), household products, personal care products and so forth.

 Nutrition-much of the food we eat these days has been growing by big agriculture and is unfortunately treated with all sorts of noxious chemicals like glyphosate and other pesticides and herbicides all of which have no place in the human body. I have read (might be true or not – I have no proof but it makes sense to me) that an apple that was growing on a tree in my grandparents day has the same amount of nutrition as 40 apples grown on a farm today.  People eat all sorts of processed and packaged foods full of all sorts of chemicals and additives all of which have an effect on the human body.  Food is also irradiated in microwaves when it is cooked if they are used.  We are also eating foods from all over the world and not necessarily eating much locally grown organic produce where the plants have developed specific nutrients and defences against local diseases which would be useful to us. Minerals and vitamins are deficient in much of the food yet are vital to our overall functionality.

 Electromagnetic frequencies and electromagnetic radiation.  We are electrical beings and are massively affected by exposure to all forms of EMR/EMF.  There is plenty of research tying in extreme suffering and ill health due to electrification of the planet.  We are bathed in electricity, AC wiring, radio waves, TV, Wi-Fi, mobile phones and so on.  They all have an effect that is felt much more so in some than others.

 Stress-this has an enormous impact on our bodies and our immune systems.

 Beliefs-the placebo effect is well known.  It can also work in the reverse if you believe you will get sick you do.  This happens in new medical students as an example.

 We get sick body has certain methods of dealing with it and we display these as symptoms.  Be it skin eruptions, coughs, sneezes, fluid in the lungs, mucus, vomiting,  diarrhoea and so on. The symptoms are not the cause of the problem they are the effect of the problem. It is a sign that our body’s immune system is functioning correctly and dealing with toxins.  Many people run out to take symptoms suppressants thereby causing even greater problems particularly as they are adding back in more toxicity to an already overloaded system.  This appears to be much of the medical industry has been intentionally incorrectly trained around this area.

Our body is constantly dealing with toxicity as this is part of everyday living.  With a fully functioning and balanced immune system we don’t really notice this going on.  However with an imbalanced or compromised immune system and/or high levels of toxicity then our body has to go through more of the detoxification.  Bacteria form an important part of your immune system.  In addition the body cells can produce soaps or solvents in order to remove toxicity internally or outside the cell.  Cells communicate with each other and they produce the solvents to clean up the problem.  These are what I understand viruses to be. Our body I have read has many tens of trillions of viruses they are a perfectly normal state of being. 

 Your body knows when the time of year is right to have a detoxification and this can lead to the seasonal flu.  Depending on functionality of the immune system and the overall toxic load in the body this can be pretty much a nonevent or can be a major or even a deadly event for some people.  Cells detoxify at different rates may be every few months every half year, every year or every 10 or so years or more.  It all depends on a variety of factors. The flu is, as an example, a sign of a well-functioning immune system.

 I have found what I’ve read of the book so far which, being rather busy right now, is only a few chapters that it is very well put together an extremely enlightening even given the knowledge I have gained over 20 odd years of studying health.

 Here are some quotes I found recently that might also give you some more insight into germ theory:
Some quotations that refute the Germ Theory:

“Medical doctors are working on the germ theory of disease… But the germ theory is already weakening and is due for being thrown aside. Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California have experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have been unable to produce a single disease by the introduction of germs into human subjects. Dr. Waite tried for years to prove the germ theory, but he could not do so. During the World War an experiment was conducted at Gallop’s Island Massachusetts, in which millions of influenza germs were injected into over one hundred men at the Government hospital, and no one got the flu. Germs are scavengers.” — Principles and Practice of Naturopathy. E.W. Cordingley, M.D.., N.D.,A.M.

 “We said before that so-called “germs” are ubiquitous. They are ever present, in many varying forms in both healthy and sick people. These microbes kick into what modern scientists call ‘pathogens’, when the media is toxic and conducive to clean up. When you enter into a healing crisis, and your body is throwing off toxins, these “germs” appear out of your very substance, to help eliminate, process and break down these toxins. Germs have absolutely no causal relationship to disease. But germs do appear to help you clean out, because put quite simply, your disease is your cure!” – Dr. William P. Trebing – Good-Bye Germ Theory – P.154

 “… Viruses are simply the excretions of a toxic cell. Viruses are pieces of DNA or RNA, with a few other proteins. They butt out from the cell. They happen when the cell is poisoned. They are not the cause of anything.” – Thomas Cowan MD on Rudolf Steiner’s insights.

 “The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of the unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infections and contagious disorders are caused by germs.” – M.L. Leverson, M.D

 “If the Germ Theory were true, no one would be alive to believe it.” BJ Palmer, D.C.

 “Three criteria are, according to the scientific method needed to properly identify a virus. It must be isolated from a host cell. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. It must be photographed and its diameter measured. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. It must be biochemically characterized. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. This has never been done with any virus (herpes, hepatitis, h1n1, bird flu, swine flu, influenza, polio, measles) let alone HIV, HPV, SARS, Zika or Ebola.”- Viruses. How Much is that Dogma in the Window? – New Medicine Online

“We agree with those members of the profession who hold that no germ causes tuberculosis. Germs do not cause any disease. Further, we agree that there is more harm in the fear of germs than there is in the germs themselves.” — Timely Truths on Human Health – Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. 1921

“The general public have been told that we do not become ill except when germs penetrate into from without. The germ theory of disease is ridiculous.” — Bechamp or Pasteur, A lost chapter in the History of Biology – E. Douglas Hume

“You’re working under a wrong premise to begin with and you’re never going to find the answer if you do that. Viruses have no nucleus. There’s no respiratory system. There’s no circulatory system. There’s no digestive system. Viruses are not alive. That’s like saying soap is alive. They’re not alive. They are solvents. They are soaps. However, more accurately, they are enzymes to fractionate tissue for waste elimination.” – Aajonus Vonderplanitz

 “We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur’s vaccine, as did uncounted people later on….Only one thing is sure: ever since Pasteur developed his “vaccine,” the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished.” – Hans Ruesch

“Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur’s germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity.” — E. Douglas Hume

“In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that “Pasteur had created a new form of disease.” — The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory by Tim O’Shea

“The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream.” — Good-Bye Germ Theory, Dr. William P. Trebing 2006

“In all that I have witnessed inside and outside of laboratories, there is only one cause of disease: Industrial pollution in medication, food, air, soil and water. Strengthening a body’s constitution and lymphatic system is the first step to reversing/curing disease” – Aajonus Vonderplantiz.

“Germs cannot be the cause of disease, because disease germs are also found in healthy bodies.” — NATURE CURE H. Lindlahr,M.D.

“What’s happening is, like I said, we have colds, which are mainly bacterial, which go feed on toxic tissue that’s been damaged – we don’t eat well enough, we don’t eat all raw and therefore we accumulate toxicity. So bacteria have to come in and eat that waste product because we can’t keep up with all the waste. OK. So that’s what a cold is. Flu is mainly viral. Some bacteria may be active during flu. Some areas of our bodies may not be so contaminated that bacteria – the natural way that we cleanse with bacteria when we’re overloaded with toxicity or waste products, will help us. But when we are so toxic that the bacteria are poisoned by the tissue, from chemical inundation, then we have to make solvents. Each cell makes a solvent. Each cell makes a soap to help clean itself. And it’s a union. It’s like a factory. All the particular cells get together and say, “Let’s make this to help clean ourselves.” So they make enzymes which we will call soap to do that. So there’s nothing dormant about it. It’s just that when the accumulation of industrially contaminated waste is so great and you can’t use microbes then the cells make solvents, that is, viruses we call flu.” Aajonus Vonderplanitz

“Any kind of flu is the same thing. When the climate and temperature are right, certain tissues will cleanse. They may have a 7-years cycle. They may have a 6-months cycle. It depends upon the tissue and how contaminated it is. If certain tissue needs to cleanse every two years, our bodies will create, if waste tissue is too toxic for mircrobes, our bodies will create a solvent (a virus) that fractionates and cleanses that particular tissue every two years, every 6 months, every 3 months, every 7 years, every 12 years, depending upon that tissue and how contaminated it is. The myth that herpes is contagious is pharmaceutical industry fiction to scare you into taking medication.” – Aajonus Vonderplanitz

“Rudolph Virchow, a great German scientist, repudiated the germ theory of disease. He said that disease brought on germs rather than the germs caused disease. Claude Bernard, Bechamp and Tissot – great French scientists – all disproved the germ theory of disease. In Hans Selye’s book Stress of Life (Page 205), an account is recorded that Louis Pasteur, inventor of the germ theory of disease, admitted he was wrong. Sanitation is the only factor that has reduced the spread of the old-time scourges. If the germ theory were founded on facts, there would be no living being to read what is here in written, for germs are ubiquitous – they exist everywhere. In many diseases supposedly caused by a specific germ, that germ is not present. Contrariwise, specific germs said to cause a specific disease are present in huge proportions without the specific disease manifesting itself.
” – Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D

VIRUS FACTS
Viruses cannot enter through the skin, lungs or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste. Viruses are very specific protein structures.

There is more you can find but that should help you along – The book What Really Makes You Ill__ Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong is excellent as well. 

 Hope that helps you along.

 Best wishes

 A

linkshttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyIhHTLqM1noQbdFuX45EaA/about

http://alternativeprinciplesforhealth.info

 

Adrian’s interview with Dawn Lester and David Parker – Authors of the book ‘What really makes you ill?’

Interesting and Revealing Quotes Refuting 'Germ Theroy'

CONTAGIOUS DISEASES and the GERM THEORY

(All these quotes are from this article. More Doctors and Scientists refuting the Germ Theory)

 By Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D.

 …………………………..

T.C. Fry wrote, “Actually bacteria are our symbiotic partners in both health and disease. They serve a useful role. As scavengers they make harmless or remove undesirable substances within our bodies. They also elaborate certain of our body needs. That is, they help build complex organic compounds from simple ingredients. A notable example of this is the production of vitamin B-12 in our intestines.”

…………………………..

 T.C. Fry also wrote, “‘Infection’ is no war in which the body is fighting invaders. The bacteria that come to these sites are symbiotic and help the body in elaborating dead cells and tissues for expulsion-they are partners in the cleanup process. When this has been accumulated the bacteria disappear and the wound heals. Infection…is a body-cleaning process for a body burdened with toxic materials.”

…………………………..

 Dr. Paul Goldberg writes, “We need to redirect our perspectives of microbes and see them in a new light. In terms of bacteria, for example, we need to appreciate them as: Bodily inhabitants who assist us in such ways as protecting us from other organisms (e.g. fungi), assisting in digestion and metabolism of food, synthesizing vitamins, and helping to eliminate waste materials.”

…………………………..

 Dr. Alec Burton writes, “DO GERMS CAUSE DISEASE? Or could it be the other way around…first, the disease, then the germs. Natural Hygiene contends that germs do not cause disease. They are not the originators. Most diseases occur when people allow themselves to become enervated, that is, low in nerve energy. As a consequence, the organs of excretion fail to function normally and waste material accumulates in the body. When this waste continues to build up, exceeding the body’s toleration point, a crisis arises. The body, to offset this overabundance of poisonous matter, begins to react. The result of this reaction is sometimes a cold, the flu, pneumonia, or some such, depending on the individual. At this crisis point of elimination, germs may or may not be present. They are sure to come later, not to attack, but to assist in the cleanup or cleansing process.”

…………………………..

 Dr. Virginia Vetrano writes, “Hygienists object to the germ theory of disease because germs do not cause disease. They may be present in disease processes, and they many complicate a disease with their waste products which can be very toxic at times, but the germ or virus alone is never the sole cause of disease.”

 “Germs are saprophytes; that is, they live off dead and decaying organic matter. Bacteria are actually our benefactors. They decompose our excretions, helping to rid the system of them. Bacteria are non-toxic, and non-virulent as long as body secretions and excretions are normal. When toxemia exists, that is, when metabolic wastes accumulate in the system in excess, causing the secretions and excretions of the body to become abnormal and poisonous, a non-pathogenic bacterium can turn into a so-called pathogenic one simply by feeding on toxic wastes. Bacteria excrete toxic waste only when human secretions are abnormal and when the cells of the body are killed by excessive toxic saturation, bacteria go to work to disorganize them and help the body rid itself of dead tissue. ‘Disease producing’ germs are often present in the absence of the disease they are supposed to cause. They are often found when an individual has not had the disease that a particular germ is supposed to cause and when the individual never develops the disease. Furthermore, in myriads of cases, a particular pathogenic germ is not present when the disease it is supposed to cause exists.”

…………………………..

 Dr. Robert R. Gross wrote, “Germs do not cause disease! Nature never surrounded her children with enemies. It is the individual himself who makes disease possible in his own body because of poor living habits… Do mosquitoes make the water stagnant; or does stagnant water attract the mosquitoes? We should all be taught that germs are friends and scavengers attracted by disease, rather {than} enemies causing disease…As their internal environment is, so will be the attraction for any specific micro-organism…The germ theory and vaccination are kept going by Commercialism.”

…………………………..

 Dr. Herbert Shelton wrote, “Warmth, moisture, food – these are the causes that activate latent germs and arouse them to activity. They exist, all except the food, in the mouth, nose and throat at all times. The food is thrown out into these, as excretions, in disease. The germs feed on the excretions. They are scavengers. They were never anything else and will never be anything else. They break up and consume the discharge from the tissues. This is the function ascribed to germs everywhere in nature outside the body and is their real and only function in disease. They are purifying and beneficial agents. The medical profession has worked itself into hysteria over the germ theory and is using it to exploit an all too credulous public. Germs are ubiquitous. They are in the air we breathe, the food we eat, the water we drink. We cannot escape them. We can destroy them only to a limited extent. It is folly to attempt to escape disease by attempting to destroy or escape germs. Once they are in the body the physician has no means of destroying them that will not, at the same time, destroy the patient. We cannot avoid germs. We must be proof against them. We have to accept them as one of the joys of life.”

…………………………..

 Rudolph Virchow, a great German scientist, repudiated the germ theory of disease. He said that disease brought on germs rather than the germs caused disease. Claude Bernard, Bechamp and Tissot – great French scientists-all disproved the germ theory of disease. In Hans Selye’s book Stress of Life (Page 205), an account is recorded that Louis Pasteur, inventor of the germ theory of disease, admitted he was wrong. Sanitation is the only factor that has reduced the spread of the old-time scourges. If the germ theory were founded on facts, there would be no living being to read what is herein written, for germs are ubiquitous-they exist everywhere. In many diseases supposedly caused by a specific germ, that germ is not present. Contrariwise, specific germs said to cause a specific disease are present in huge proportions without the specific disease manifesting itself.

…………………………..

 Dr. Virginia Vetrano writes, “Just remember that there are no contagious diseases, just contagious habits which lower your vitality. There have been many people who have had diphtheria and yet no germ could be found. The same can be said of tuberculosis and other diseases. This is why the virus had to be discovered – to save the germ theory. Now we have virus infections instead of germ infections because pathologists could not find a germ for all the diseases of mankind. If a germ does not cause disease, what does? Soon everyone will learn that it is the individual’s way of life that produces disease and not the saprophytes of earth, which are actually beneficial to us. Without them we would all succumb. They do so many jobs for us that it would take volumes to tell you about them. In fact without bacterial life, all animal and plant life would soon wither and die. On second thought, without bacteria we can’t even wither.”

…………………………..

 Some more information on the Germ Theory:

 “Medical doctors are working on the germ theory of disease… But the germ theory is already weakening and is due for being thrown aside. Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California have experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have been unable to produce a single disease by the introduction of germs into human subjects.  Dr. Waite tried for years to prove the germ theory, but he could not do so. During the World War an experiment was conducted at Gallop’s Island Massachusetts, in which millions of influenza germs were injected into over one hundred men at the Government hospital, and no one got the flu. Germs are scavengers.” — Principles and Practice of Naturopathy. E.W. Cordingley, M.D.., N.D.,A.M.

 …………………………..

 “Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur’s germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity.” — E. Douglas Hume

 …………………………..

 “We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur’s vaccine, as did uncounted people later on….Only one thing is sure: ever since Pasteur developed his “vaccine,” the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished.” –  Hans Ruesch

…………………………..

 “In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that “Pasteur had created a new form of disease.” — The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory by Tim O’Shea

 …………………………..

 “The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream.” — Good-Bye Germ Theory, Dr. William P. Trebing  2006

…………………………..

 “We said before that so-called “germs” are ubiquitous. They are ever present, in many varying forms in both healthy and sick people. These microbes kick into what modern scientists call ‘pathogens’, when the media is toxic and conducive to clean up. When you enter into a healing crisis, and your body is throwing off toxins, these “germs” appear out of your very substance, to help eliminate, process and break down these toxins. Germs have absolutely no causal relationship to disease. But germs do appear to help you clean out, because put quite simply, your disease is your cure!” – Dr. William P. Trebing – Good-Bye Germ Theory – P.154

…………………………..

 “We agree with those members of the profession who hold that no germ causes tuberculosis. Germs do not cause any disease. Further, we agree that there is more harm in the fear of germs than there is in the  germs themselves.” —  Timely Truths on Human Health – Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. 1921

 …………………………..

 “We must look rationally at the bacterial issue. Consider the fact that many tribes ate primarily unsalted raw meat, unsalted raw fats and/or unsalted raw dairy products from the beginning. They did not wash their hands or sterilize their food before eating. Every form of natural bacteria, including salmonella, E. coli and campylobacter were eaten with their food abundantly and constantly. Why were they vibrant, healthy and disease free if microbes are the culprits?”  _ Aajonus Vonderplanitz (1947) The Recipe for Living Without Disease 

 …………………………..

 “The general public have been told that we do not become ill except when germs penetrate into from without. The germ theory of disease is ridiculous.”  — Bechamp or Pasteur, A lost chapter in the History of Biology – E. Douglas Hume

…………………………..

 “Germs cannot be the cause of disease, because disease germs are also found in healthy bodies.” — Nature Cure,  H. Lindlahr,M.D.

…………………………..

 “The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of the unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infections and contagious disorders are caused by germs.” – M.L. Leverson, M.D

…………………………..

 “Give me fever and I can cure every disease.” Hippocrates

…………………………..

 ‘Like the seasons, the body is on a cycle. All things in nature, including animals and humans, are on a cycle. Cleansing functions in the body usually express themselves when temperature and climate are just right. This almost always occurs in large swaths of the population during seasonal changes. This is why we have a flu season’. – Jeff G

…………………………..

 Some quotations from Doctors, Scientists and Nutritionists:

  “…Viruses are simply the excretions of a toxic cell. Viruses are pieces of DNA or RNA, with a few other proteins. They butt out from the cell. They happen when the cell is poisoned. They are not the cause of anything.” – Thomas Cowan MD on Rudolf Steiner’s insights

 …………………………..

 “You’re working under a wrong premise to begin with and you’re never going to find the answer if you do that. Viruses have no nucleus. There’s no respiratory system. There’s no circulatory system. There’s no digestive system. Viruses are not alive. That’s like saying soap is alive. They’re not alive. They are solvents. They are soaps. However, more accurately, they are enzymes to fractionate tissue for waste elimination.” – Aajonus Vonderplanitz

 …………………………..

 “We agree with those members of the profession who hold that no germ causes tuberculosis. Germs do not cause any disease. Further, we agree that there is more harm in the fear of germs than there is in the germs themselves.” — Timely Truths on Human Health – Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. 1921

 …………………………..

 “The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of the unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infections and contagious disorders are caused by germs.” – M.L. Leverson, M.D

 …………………………..

 Dr. Robert R. Gross wrote, “Germs do not cause disease! Nature never surrounded her children with enemies. It is the individual himself who makes disease possible in his own body because of poor living habits… Do mosquitoes make the water stagnant; or does stagnant water attract the mosquitoes? We should all be taught that germs are friends and scavengers attracted by disease, rather {than} enemies causing disease…As their internal environment is, so will be the attraction for any specific micro-organism… The germ theory and vaccination are kept going by Commercialism.”

 …………………………………

People die due to viruses breaking down toxic matter and not being able to properly eliminate that matter. Of course, death would only occur because the person had a system or area that was highly toxic and compromised, and was without enough proper neutralizing minerals and other nutrients to suspend toxins and waste debris. Jeff G.

…………………………………

The immune system is only as strong as the body is. The immune system is the whole of the body, with key components that make it up, such as lymph nodes throughout the body, including lymphatic fluid, etc. If the body is not strong enough to cleanse properly, it will become overly weak and sick. Detoxification can be hard to deal with if the body is severely imbalanced and weak. That is mainly why such a severe reaction to a virus occurs in the first place. Those with a moderately healthy body, but still need viruses to cleanse, usually overcome a virus with only mild symptoms. Jeff G.

…………………………………

 Coronaviruses are not caused in any way shape or form by 5G, and we can easily verify this by looking back into history and understanding the human functions. In 2003 there was a SARS outbreak, and at this time 5G did not exist, nor did 4G. SARS and coronavirus are one in the same and are caused by environmental pollution from industry, and accumulated toxicity inhaled into the lungs. 

 Exosomes are merely parts of viral actions. Exosomes are communication agents with varying functions—they’re part of the immune response of viral creation.  So I disagree with those saying that it is merely just exosomes. I agree in part, but not wholly.

The problem with ventilators is that it restricts the muscles in the lungs and starves the person of oxygen after long periods, causing tension and cellular starvation. The lungs are meant to breathe normally without long periods of constriction and muscle strain. This causes the lungs to utilize nutrients to keep muscle tension at ease in the lungs. The result is that the lungs cannot manufacture enough mucus to bind with toxins, causing dryness and loss of mucus—this due to nutrient loss. Pneumonia and likened problems occur as a result. 

 Also, the reason that severe lung problems occur in these patients is because viral symptoms, like pneumonia, usually always occur after a long period of detoxification as the final phase of cleansing (during the healing phase). If the person’s detoxification was exhaustive prior, wherein the body utilized a large amount of nutrients to help cleanse toxins over a period of weeks or months, the body will not be able to sustain normal lung cleansing in the final stages. Therefore, the lungs will become overly dried and their ability to remove air debris will cause fluids to build in the lungs since mucus cannot be properly formulated due to this loss of nutrients. This means that even a speck of dust can cause an issue since there is inadequate mucus to bind with debris.

 Along with this, the fact that the medical field treats a person with immune-suppressing antiviral drugs and antibiotics at the same time does not help. The lungs expel a large portion of accumulated toxins in the body. Alcoholics, for instance, expel alcohol poisons from the lungs.

 I agree with your original comment: Exosomes are communication agents BUT are parts and actions of viral activity.

Jeff G. 

…………………………………

 “If Germ Theory were true, no one would be alive to believe it!” BJ Palmer, D.C.

 

 

The Contagion Myth

– 24 November 2020 –

Thomas S. Cowan, MD, and Sally Fallon Morell ask the question: are there really such things as “viruses”? Or are electro smog, toxic living conditions, and 5G actually to blame for COVID-19?

The official explanation for today’s COVID-19 pandemic is a “dangerous, infectious virus.” This is the rationale for isolating a large portion of the world’s population in their homes so as to curb its spread.  From face masks to social distancing, from antivirals to vaccines, these measures are predicated on the assumption that tiny viruses can cause serious illness and that such illness is transmissible person-to-person.

It was Louis Pasteur who convinced a skeptical medical community that contagious germs cause disease; his “germ theory” now serves as the official explanation for most illness. However, in his private diaries he states unequivocally that in his entire career he was not once able to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria (he obviously wasn’t able to purify viruses at that time). He admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous death bed confession that “the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.” 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Thomas S. Cowan, MD has a general medical practice in San Francisco, California.  He has served as vice president of the Physicians Association for Anthroposophical Medicine and was a founding board member of the Weston A. Price Foundation. He currently serves as vice president. Dr. Cowan has given countless lectures and workshops all over the United States and Canada about a variety of subjects in health and medicine. He is the author of five books, including Human Heart, Cosmic Heart, Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, and Cancer and the New Biology of Water; with Sally Fallon Morell, he’s co-authored The Fourfold Path to Healing and The Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby & Child Care.

Sally Fallon Morell is best known as the author of Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats (over 700,000 copies sold). She is the founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation and editor of the Foundation’s quarterly magazine.  She is also president and owner of NewTrends Publishing, serving as editor and publisher. She is the author of eight books, including Eat Fat Lose Fat, co-authored with Dr. Mary Enig; Nourishing Broth, co-authored with Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN; Nourishing Fats; and Nourishing Diets.

Video 1

Viral Misconceptions – Presentation on The True Nature of Viruses – Jeff G

Purchase Book: https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/

Link to written interview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C6S…

Viral Misconceptions – Presentation on The True Nature of Viruses Jeff G., Researcher & Alternative Nutrition Introduction – 00:26 The Virus & Its Purpose – 2:09 Viral Infection – Medical Deception – Contagious Trap 11:28 Viral Cycles – Coronavirus 14:10 Science of Virology Exposed – 19:50 Viruses Do Not Cross Species – 25:24 Sanitizers and Vectors of Transmission – 29:39 Coronavirus p2. – How Viruses are Manufactured – 32:33

Correction at 40:33: should be “cell wall will rupture” not “‘virus wall will rupture”.

Note: The final video is not of a virus—it is meant to approximate how a cell ruptures once it is full of viruses during viral replication.

THE VIRAL MISCONCEPTION – ENTIRE 5 PART SERIES, INTERVIEW OF JEFF GREEN BY ALANA FOURNET

Video 2 

WHY THEY ARE LYING US ?

People Need To Know The Truth !! – Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Video 3 

What really makes you ill? Viruses? – Andrew Kaufman, Dawn Lester and David Parker

What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong book by Dawn Lester and David Parker on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/What-Really-Makes You ill..

Video 4 

It’s not the virus STUPID,What really makes you ill?

Do virus cause disease? Kaufman,Lester, Parker

AUDIOBOOK Interview, by Dawn Lester & David Parker Interviewer: Andrew Kaufman MD (Andy Kaufman MD)

NB: this video has been deleted from Youtube. Hopefully the new link below will stay up.

Video 5

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Interview – Virus Isolation, Terrain Theory & COVID-19

Video 6

The Myth Of Contagion, a discussion with T.C. Fry

Interview of T.C. Fry author of “The Great AIDS Hoax” by Dr. Henry L.N. Anderson

This is a very interesting interview which is largely focused on AIDS but the message is the same for all disease. For the crux of the message rearding what causes illness forward video to 29:45 minutes.

Video 7

Biochemistry Debunks Corona

Biochemistry proves you are afraid of and social distancing from yourself, not others.

Educate Yourself with Amandha Vollmer

Professional Holistic Practitioner
Amandha Dawn Vollmer holds a degree of Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine from the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine in Toronto and a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Biotechnology. 

https://yummy.doctor

Amandha has a wealth of information in her Covid 19 video library – https://yummy.doctor/video-category/covid/

Video 8 – Germ Theory Interview

 

AIDS – The Precursor to Covid

Dr David Rasnick is an American biochemist with decades of specialisation in AIDS; arthritis; cancer; proteases in emphysema and parasites; drug design; and clinical diagnostics.

He also participated as a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel Of South Africa, under then-president Thabo Mbeki. Which, of course, is where it gets interesting. Mbeki was recalled for being an “AIDS denialist” because he questioned the link between HIV and AIDS.

The former president famously said that “AIDS is a disease of poverty”.

David agrees.

And it’s at this point I stop typing and you start watching. The conversation is simply too mind-blowing.

Unfortunately, we had a lot of technical challenges. Chunks of this conversation were lost. I’m very sorry.

Video 9 – “HIV does not cause AIDS” – Prof David Rasnick

 

Video 10 – Root Cause

Get rid of your root canals and mercury fillings – in a safe way.

“Root Cause is one man’s extraordinary, personal journey of self-discovery set to send ripples through the dental profession and expose perhaps one of the world’s greatest medical industry cover-ups.”

““You’re going to need a root canal”. Those seven little words rolled off the Dentist’s tongue so completely naturally, but trust me; there is nothing natural about a root canal. After years of searching for cures to my panic attacks, anxiety, chronic fatigue, nausea, dizziness, agitation and impotence I finally tracked down the root cause of the problem causing my health issues – A ROOT CANAL.

25 million are performed each year in the USA alone – and root canals are one of root causes of cancer, heart disease and chronic illness. Root Cause is my extraordinary, personal journey of self-discovery set to send ripples through the dental profession and expose perhaps one of the world’s greatest medical industry cover-ups.”

Video 11 – The Measles Myth

What causes Measles? We are told that it is a virus, but is there any evidence for this?
We examine the 100k Euro court case that Dr. Stefan Lanka offered for proof of the virus.

Video 12 – HIDDEN SCIENCE GREATER CAUSE OF DISEASE

WITH Dr Robert Young and Dr ANDREW KAUFMAN

Ramola D Reports facilitates a fantastic discussion between Dr. Robert Young and Dr. Andy Kaufman. Young and Kaufman break from away from the dishonest mainstream narratives, spreading truth and encouraging holistic natural health and medicine techniques.

Antoine Bechamp – The Real Hero

Quotes about Bechamp
Antoine Bechamp, from whose research Pasteur plagiarized whatever he thought was useful, came up with an interesting point of view that has never been refuted. Bechamp discovered tiny organisms he called “microzymas” which are present in all things – animal, vegetable, and mineral, whether living or dead. Depending upon the condition of the host, these microzymas could assume various forms. Bad bacteria and viruses were simply the forms assumed by the microzymas when there was a condition of disease. In a diseased body, the microzymas became pathological bacteria and viruses. In a healthy body, microzymas formed healthy cells. When a plant or animal died, the microzymas lived on. To this day, the whole theory of microzymas has never been disproved.
Later researchers like Naessens and Enderlein followed the same line of reasoning and developed their own systems of how these microzymas operate. Although their ideas were never proven false by opposing research, they were generally persecuted by mainstream medicine, which makes sense. Because without an enemy that can be identified and killed, what good is it to develop weapons? And developing weapons, that is, drugs, has been the agenda of the industry set up by Carnegie and Rockefeller even down to the present day, as we shall see. New drugs mean new research funding and government money and the need for prescriptions and for an entire profession to write those prescriptions. The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory by Tim O’Shea

“These microorganisms (germs) feed upon the poisonous material which they find in the sick organism and prepare it for excretion. These tiny organisms are derived from still tinier organisms called microzyma. These microzyma are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms where they remain normally quiescent and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation takes place. The microzyma changes into a bacterium or virus which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the microzyma stage”.–Bechamp.  Sourced: Vaccination The “Hidden” Facts by Ian Sinclair p62

ACADEMIC RECORD
Master of Pharmacy
Doctor of Science
Doctor of Medicine
Professor of Medical Chemistry and Pharmacy at Montpellier
Fellow and Professor of Physics and Toxicology — Strasbourg Higher School of Pharmacy
Professor of Chemistry at Strasbourg
Professor of Biological Chemistry and Dean of Faculty of Medicine of Lille
Chevalier of the Legion of Honour — Commander of the Rose of Brazil etc., etc.

Professor Bechamp’s name has been covertly erased from medical history text books.

http://www.whale.to/v/bechamp1.html

Click on the image to be taken to the book

You Can not ‘Catch’ a FLU

What’s called “Infection” is actually “Decomposition”

The belief in contagion is rooted in pseudoscience and superstition, not Science.
Contagion is an illusion created by false beliefs and reinforced by invalid laboratory experimentations.
You don’t “catch” a cold or flu, but rather your body creates them.
You can’t “catch” it from someone, and you can’t “give” it to someone, but you can surely create it for yourself by living in an unhealthy manner.
You can’t “catch” anyone’s illness anymore than you can “catch” their health.
It’s just as absurd to believe you can catch someone’s flu as it’s to believe you can catch someone’s #Cancer .
Cold or Flu including COVID-19 isn’t a contagious disease. It’s an emergency cleansing intensive initiated by the body when toxins and debris in it reach dangerous levels.
If you get a cold or flu including COVID-19, it’s not because some bacteria or virus invaded your body. It’s because your body is overloaded with toxins and debris, which is most likely from your dietary and lifestyle habits.

A large group of people who attended a weekend convention at a hotel.
All returned home with the symptoms of difficulty of breathing, cough, and fever.
The doctors immediately assumed that they were exposed to some virus that someone must have brought with them and it spread to the others.
What they didn’t know was that an open container of pesticide that was placed on top of an air duct had tipped over and leaked into the ventilation system
The moral of the story is we need to look beyond the current UNPROVEN theory that “viruses cause disease”, and consider the multitude of other factors that have been PROVEN to affect our health, such as nutrition-less and toxin-filled foods, overeating, a lack of exercise, fresh air and sunshine, mental and emotional stress, toxins in our environment, EMF, radiation, toxic medications and vaccines, etc.
A medical professional that has been hijacked by the pharmaceutical industry would like us to believe that certain microbes and genes cause disease.
Medical professionals who have a medical degree claim that there is nothing beyond germs and viruses.
So they can sell you medications and vaccines.
Do you really believe that you’re going to be told that medications and vaccines damage the body or that bacteria and viruses don’t cause disease, from someone who has had over 11 years of indoctrination in pharmaceutical industry controlled institutions

Ever since Pasteur came out with his germ theory, and later we developed the knowledge of the virome, doubts have been expressed regarding the role of germs and viruses in disease. Dr Antoine Bechamp, MD was the first to counter with his “Terrain Theory”. He stated that our thoughts, actions, diet, and lack of sanitation led to disease and germs appeared after the disease to clean up the waste. “The waste heap attracts the flies, the flies do not cause the waste heap”.
During the “Spanish Flu” 100 years ago, No transmission. No Contagion to over 400 people .
A group in Boston funded by the US Public Health Service tried to spread the “disease” to a group of 100 volunteer prisoners. They did 3 separate experiments trying to get them sick, putting all kinds of body fluids (from the sick people) into the healthy volunteers. Not a single one got sick. NOT ONE.

There is NO contagion human to human spread, which has EVER been proven in an experiment.

Dr Stephan Lenka, MD has similarly challenged the virus theory, and famously won a court case where the existence of the measles virus c

ould not be proven. Scientists have drunk glassful of cholera bacteria (Dr Claude Bernard) and injected themselves with the AIDS virus ( Dr Robert Willner) to prove that bacteria and viruses do not cause disease.

https://www.facebook.com/Phizal.P.H.I/posts/702001443771011/

Good-bye Germ Theory is a must read for all those who love children. It is especially written for parent’s education. You will learn pertinent facts about an ever growing and oppressive medical system that has been rooting themselves into the lives of each American for over 75 years. Unlike other books of its’ kind, Good-bye Germ Theory attacks the actual core of medical belief which is portrayed as science, but turns out to be more like dogmatic religion. Also unique to this book is its’ legal research section. Parents often feel so overwhelmed with the complexities of the legal system, that they succumb to unwanted medical treatment for their children. This book will show you how to know your particular State’s vaccination laws inside-out, so that any person may effectively challenge an oppressive vaccination law using the many legal forms provided.

Babylon Rising – part 6a The Final World Dictatorship

Babylon Rising – part 1 The Fear Pandemic

Babylon Rising – part 1 The Fear Pandemic

COVID 19 and Project Fear

Part 1 of 7

Disclaimer:

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).

My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.

My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.

The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.

The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them.

Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)

*(expose, bring to the light)

The misconception of viruses has gone viral’ – Alana Fournet

Introduction – COVID 19

 Disclaimer:

I am not a medical doctor and neither am I a scientist and therefore any statements made by myself in the following content is my personal opinion based on my own observation and research. I, therefore, do not offer any medical opinion or advice to the reader who must take full personal responsibility for their own conclusions drawn from the content offered.

 What is Coronavirus and COVID 19

 As stated above, I am not a doctor and will therefore not attempt to offer any detailed description of what Coronavirus is other than to say that Coronavirus is nothing new. 

 COVID 19 is simply a Coronavirus strain that was identified in 2019 hence the name COVID 19. 

 The World Health Organisation states the following:

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus.

Most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment.  Older people, and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness.

https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1

Most people, including myself, would most probably only have become familiar with the term ‘Coronavirus’ for the first time in 2020 as a result of the Covid 19 pandemic.

…………………………………………………

The following is an article outling the history of the various Coronavirus discoveries:

The Secret History of The First Coronavirus.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2020/04/11/the-secret-history-of-the-first-coronavirus-229e/

 

CORONAVIRUS: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COVID-19 AND THE COMMON COLD AND FLU?

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that can cause illnesses ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV).

A novel coronavirus (nCoV) like Covid-19 is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans.

Read more…

 

 My personal interest and initial reaction

 From the very first time back in January of this year, when the News media in the UK presented their headlines on the outbreak of an illness in Wuhan China, I turned to my wife and said to her ‘this is being blown out of proportion’. It was the way that the news outlets presented the news of the illness that made me become suspicious and sceptical. It was as though they had been pre-briefed that this isolated virus outbreak in the Wuhan wet market was about to become a global pandemic.

 All of a sudden this outbreak was ‘big’ global news before it had spread anywhere. This was strange to me.

As the story and the spread of the virus grew I became totally absorbed in the subject and watched and read as much as I possibly could on the subject. I was stranded in an overseas country in COVID lockdown and so had plenty of time to research the subject.

 Conspiracy Theory

Before I delve into this ‘pandemic’ any further I feel the need to address the ‘Conspiracy Theory’ labeling of any alternative, unorthodox views.

 The moment that one deviates from the mainstream narrative and presents an alternative, more sceptical opinion on such a high profile matter then the accusations of ‘conspiracy theory’ are launched. 

This label has the immediate effect of branding the provider of the alternative view as a nutcase and a bearer of fake news. Conspiracy theorists are considered the enemy of truth in the minds of most people. Conspiracy Theories are considered by most peope to be madness and only to be repeated by fools.

 I feel that it is important for me to discuss this matter before I continue otherwise I fear that I may lose most readers.

 So what is a ‘conspiracy theory’?

 Here is one definition:

 conspiracy theory

noun

– a theory that rejects the standard explanation for an event and instead credits a covert group or organization with carrying out a secret plot:

One popular conspiracy theory accuses environmentalists of sabotage in last year’s mine collapse.

– a belief that a particular unexplained event was caused by such a covert group:

A number of conspiracy theories have already emerged, purporting to explain last week’s disappearance of a commercial flight over international waters.

– the idea that many important political events or economic and social trends are the products of deceptive plots that are largely unknown to the general public:

The more I learn about the activities of intelligence agencies, the less far-fetched I find many geopolitical conspiracy theories.

 Let’s break down the two words ‘conspiracy’ and ‘theory’:

 Conspiracy – A secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

 1 the act of conspiring.

2 an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

3 a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:

He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.

4 Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.

5 any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/conspiracy

 Theory – What is a simple definition of theory?

A theory is a group of linked ideas intended to explain something. A theory provides a framework for explaining observations. The explanations are based on assumptions. From the assumptions follows a number of possible hypotheses. They can be tested to provide support for, or challenge, the theory.

 The widely accepted theory for the origin and evolution of the universe is the Big Bang model, which states that the universe began as an incredibly hot, dense point roughly 13.7 billion years ago

 

Can we all agree from the above definitions that a ‘conspiracy theory’ is just a set of ideas, or an explanation based on evidence and assumptions, to support a claim that something unlawful or harmful is taking place.

Author and deprogrammer Fritz Springmeier ‘The Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines’ says that most people have built in ‘slides’ that short circuit the mind’s critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. ‘Slides’, Springmeier reports is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person’s thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic at hand.

For example the mention of the word ‘conspiracy’ often solicits a ‘slide’ response with many people. What most people believe to be ‘public opinion’ is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are taken with the intent of gauging the public’s acceptance of the ‘New World Orders’ planned programs. A strong showing in the polls tells them that the programming is ‘taking’, while the poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or ‘tweak’ the programming until the desired response is achieved.

 The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this ‘Globalist’ conspiracy is mind-boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and skepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been brainwashed or conditioned to react with skepticism by institutional and media influences

Any ‘truth’ seeker should approach any such matter like a court judge or a jury would when considering a verdict for a case. One should study the evidence put before him and make an informed decision. 

Approaching a matter in such a way would prove any ‘conspiracy theory’ or for that matter any theory either true or false. 

Think of how many people in the world today, even many Christains, believe in the theory of evolution without any consideration or evaluation of the evidence. In reality the evidence offered does not support the theory but most are simply misled by popular consensus.

 Rejecting any theory of a conspiracy as nonsense without due consideration of the evidence is just plain foolish in my opinion – a special note to my brother. Many have been brainwashed to believe that information labelled as ‘conspiracy theories’ are simply just false. This attitude or belief is counter-intuitive and will lead many to being deceived.

 The Bereans in the book of Acts were considered more ‘noble’ because they tested all matters to see whether they were in fact true. Let us be the same.

 Overwhelming virus commentaries and media coverage

I have watched many videos and read many articles which I consider of great interest, but in my opinion, most of them did not provide satisfactory scientific or medical proof of any fraudulent misconduct by high level health/scientific professionals with regard to the global reaction to the pandemic. I now view most of the earlier content as interesting and possibly only entertaining. I say this because the content was focused mainly on the implementation of the regulations to control the spread and although some did delve into the possible scam aspect of the pandemic they did not offer a suitable or convincing argument as to why people were becoming ill and the related death rates.

 Most of the earlier articles that I read I would compare to a critique of a ‘Punch and Judy’ show. They focused on the upfront puppet activities of the show and interrogated the dramatic actions and storyline of the puppets. This may provide interest and some reading entertainment, but to unravel the truth one would need to seek out the puppet master backstage, who is the one in full control of all upfront activity. 

 Eventually, it was the skills, the script and the motives of the puppet master that drew my attention in order to understand what this COVID 19 pandemic was all about.

 Discussing the validity of COVID mask-wearing, the most appropriate social distance, how to wash and how long to sanitise hands for, the necessity for directional arrows to control shopper movement etc etc is all the ‘Punch and Judy’ theatrics. The focus on such matters is just a distraction. 

Don’t waste your effort on such trivialities. Make every effort to understand the mind and agenda of the ‘puppeteer’. 

 Don’t stand in the street marvelling and discussing the ‘Emperor’s New Clothes’ that don’t exist. Recognise that he is naked and proclaim it to the world. Yes, you will be viewed by most as being the fool but tell the truth when you see it. Don’t uphold the lie.

 Did our Messiah Yahushua not look the fool to most in his day from all that he proclaimed. No servant is greater than his master.

 

 The Wuhan and bio-weapon theory

There are many articles and videos out there that focus on the debate as to whether the COVID 19 virus was manufactured in a laboratory – initially in the USA under the management of Dr Fauci and then later moved to a laboratory in Wuhan China (Wuhan Institute of Virology)  for further development. 

 The mainstream media has covered this aspect as well – see the following BBC report:

 Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? – https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52318539

*Anthony Stephen Fauci is an American physician and immunologist who has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984.

This discussion and debate is just a distraction. And when you see the topic discussed in the mainstream press then you know that it is just that. It is all ‘smoke and mirrors’ to distract the population from researching the virus and from discovering the truth. Most people become weary and fed up with the fear mongering, the confusion etc and stop researching. 

 The elephant in the room is that this deadly, contagious, airborne COVID 19 virus has no clothes on. It does not exist as portrayed through the media. But this is the purpose of this six part series, to prove this fact to you.

 Persevere until you find truth

It was only through my perseverance that I eventually came across material, pertaining to viruses and illness in general, that provided irrefutable, convincing evidence that the Covid 19 pandemic claims were false and misleading. I uncovered what I believe to be the truth regarding the real risks of this pandemic and also recognised an agenda behind the COVID reaction and control measures enforced worldwide. It is this ‘conspiracy’ that I wish to share in this series.

 I must state that I am not a denyer of the existence in the world of widespread ‘illness’. I am well aware that illness is growing and many people worldwide have become increasingly ill . I am also absolutely sympathetic to anyone who knows someone that has succumbed to a disease and has passed away prematurely through illness. 

I do believe though that this high mortality rate is exacerbated by the lack of knowledge pertaining to the underlying causes of illness  across the world and the almost total absence of any advice from the medical profession in this regard.

 I do believe that there is illness out there and that people are dying in unnecessary high numbers. It is abundantly clear when one considers the growing medical industry sector and the attendance at doctors surgeries and hospitals that illness is on the increase and is out of control globally. Medical science is clearly not getting on top of this reality either with effective remedies.

 My hope is that the content of this seven part series of posts will educate some to take responsibility for their own health and change their unhealthy lifestyles and eating habits.

 My research into this virus pandemic has revealed to me that there is a LIE, a FRAUD and an AGENDA behind COVID 19. The LIE is that there is a contagious airborne  virus spreading throughout the world. The FRAUD pertains to ‘Germ Theory’ and the AGENDA pertains to the pursuit of global power and control over all of humanity.

 This series sets out to explore all of these areas. And of course, most importantly there is the Word of Truth from our loving Father to guide us as we consider this Agenda.

 My particular overarching interest in this life-changing event though was on how it would fit into Bible prophecy and how it was being used to further a perceived secular agenda.

 It has taken many months for me to acquire a level of understanding that I am now comfortable with sharing and feel is my duty as a Bible believer to share to any who will listen. 

I take the words of our Messiah seriously when he said to Peter on three occasions – ‘if you love me, feed my lambs/sheep John 21:15-17.

 My main focus in this article is to present my thoughts and beliefs on how this Covid 19 pandemic fits into Bible prophecy and what it reveals about the end times that we live in today.

I will provide this information in a five part series so please ensure to read all posts to acquire the full picture that I wish to present to you.

 I would like to appeal to all readers to stay with me on this to the end of this series and I will reveal to you what is actually causing illness and why we are being misled, through fear, by the media and the medical profession. I will show you that there is a much larger agenda at play and I will reveal to you how this ‘conspiracy’ links into end-time Bible Prophecy.

 This is exciting content and should help all to understand that there is no external ‘boogey man’ virus stalking you. We must not fear as our Heavenly Father has instructed us:

 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind. 

2Timothy 1:7

So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.

Hebrews 13:6

Fear ye not therefore, ye are of more value than many sparrows. 

Matthew 10:31

And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. 

Matthew 10:28  

According to the word that I covenanted with you when ye came out of Egypt, so my spirit remaineth among you: fear ye not. 

Haggai 2:5  

At the time of writing this article the mortality associated with the Coronavirus worldwide was 500 000. This represents a global mortality rate of 0.00714% based on a global population of 7 Billion. The 500 000 deaths also reflects those deaths which reflected a positive trace of COVID 19. The deaths were not reported to have resulted from the COVID 19 virus.  This, I believe, puts the global risk into perspective – after more than six months. 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?%2

If the COVID 19 virus was as contagious and as serious as portrayed in the mainstream press then after six months the whole world population would have become infected and deaths would have been in the tens of millions across the globe. And why is it that this ‘ruthless’, ‘deadly virus’ has such respect for the younger population.

Why is the media and health authorities not promoting good health through diet to reduce risk? It is a well understood fact that a good immune system will defend against illness. This is achieved through diet and improving the living environment. Why is the focus only on the threat and promoting fear?

This series will reveal why this virus, or the real illness, is mainly affecting the health of the older generation and having little effect on the young. It will reveal why fear is a vital element to achieve the end goals. 

– Project Fear –

It is absolutely clear that the world populace are completely overcome with fear of the COVID 19 virus. One only has to walk down the road and see how people scurry onto the other side to avoid coming into close proximity to you. If you dare to move in closer than the 2-meter distancing regulation then you receive scornful looks from people. 

People have so readily accepted the wearing of masks, social distancing regulations, the repeated washing of hands and compulsive sanitising of everything. 

You are perceived as a hater or someone with no concern for others if you object in any way to these rules. 

 It has been made very clear to me that fear can be used to manipulate almost anyone into doing anything – even the ridiculous and totally absurd.

Fear has made many sick people stay away from visiting doctors or hospitals for other ailments which has been to their detriment.

People have avoided visiting extended family members due to fear.

 Why are we so fearful when the Bible tells us so many times not to fear. The Bible tells us that our heavenly Father did not give us the spirit of fear. I can understand non-believers behaving the way that they do but not Bible-believing Christians.

 The concept of an external enemy disease ready to invade our bodies produces fear. How can one not fear if ‘Germ Theory’ were true? This concept is clearly not one that our loving Father would endorse. How could our Father instruct us not to fear if there are external enemy viruses and bacteria waiting to invade and destroy our bodies? This concept does not align with my understanding of Scripture.

The fact that people are walking around wearing face masks, neurotically washing their hands at any given opportunity, or social distancing, is proof of the element of fear. People are literally being scared to death. 

It is absolutely clear to me that the medical and scientific establishment advising on this pandemic are deliberately promoting the sense of fear with regard to the supposed COVID 19 threat. One needs to ask why they would do this when fear itself is such a destructive emotion.

Fear itself can result in or compound existing illness and weakens one’s immune system according to medical professionals – see supporting article by Dr. Michele Neil-Sherwood below.

 Health is our own responsibility. Stop fearing a non-existent external enemy and take responsibility for your own wellbeing. And most of all stop fearing that which does not exist. Fear is not from our Father. He did not give us the spirit of fear and tells us hundreds of times in Scripture not to fear:

For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

2Timothy 1:7

Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.

Isaiah 41:10

How Fear Causes Sickness and Disease
by Dr. Michele Neil-Sherwood

Fear is one of the main spiritual roots of sickness and disease. It runs deep, requires enormous emotional energy, and demands action.

Fear is a human emotion that is triggered by a perceived threat. It is a basic survival mechanism that signals our bodies to respond to danger with a fight or flight response. As such, it is an essential part of keeping us safe. It is a NORMAL emotion that drives the Sympathetic Nervous System (fight, freeze, or flight). However, people who live in constant fear, whether from physical dangers in their environment or threats they perceive, can become incapacitated.

How Fear Affects Our Bodies
Fear prepares us to react to danger. Once we sense a potential danger, our body releases hormones that slow or shut down functions not needed for survival (such as our digestive system) and sharpen functions that might help us survive (such as eyesight). Our heart rate increases, and blood flows to muscles so we can run faster. Our body also increases the flow of hormones to an area of the brain known as the amygdala to help us focus on the presenting danger and store it in our memory.

Once the fear pathways are ramped up, the brain short-circuits more rational processing paths and reacts immediately to signals from the amygdala. When in this overactive state, the brain perceives events as negative and remembers them that way.

It also stores all the details surrounding the danger—the sights, sounds, odors, time of day, weather, and so forth. These memories tend to be very durable, although they may also be fragmented.

Later, the sights, sounds, and other contextual details of the event can become stimuli themselves and trigger fear. They may bring back the memory of the fearful event, or they may cause us to feel afraid without consciously knowing why.

Because these cues were associated with previous danger, the brain may see them as a predictor of threat. This often happens with post-traumatic stress disorder (PSTD). For example, a soldier who experienced a bombing on a foggy day might find himself panicking when the weather turns foggy—without knowing why.

Impact of chronic fear in our lives is catastrophic.
Living under constant threat weakens our immune system and can cause cardiovascular damage, gastrointestinal problems such as ulcers and irritable bowel syndrome, and decreased fertility. Fear can impair formation of long-term memories and cause damage to certain parts of the brain, such as the hippocampus. This can make it even more difficult to regulate fear and can leave a person anxious most of the time.

To someone in chronic fear, the world looks scary and their memories confirm that. Moreover, fear can interrupt processes in our brains that allow us to regulate emotions, read non-verbal cues and other information presented to us, reflect before acting, and act ethically. This impacts our thinking and decision-making in negative ways, leaving us susceptible to intense emotions and impulsive reactions.

All of these effects can leave us unable to act appropriately. Other consequences of long-term fear include fatigue, inflammation, yellow fat accumulation, type 2 diabetes, clinical depression, accelerated aging, and even premature death. So whether threats to our security are real or perceived, they impact our mental and physical wellbeing.

As you can see, chronic fear is the driving force behind the cause or the continuance of common disease conditions.

How Fear Impacts Our Relationships
Fear can further impact our behavior with others where we fear admission or even condemnation. It can impact our own lives with the following: constant paranoia, losing, success, giving up routine, not having enough money, not being good enough.

Where does fear really come from?
2 Timothy 1:7 tells us clearly that this spirit (yes fear is a spirit) does NOT come from God. Instead, God gives us power, love, and a sound mind. Therefore, when we are driven by fear, this blocks our ability to be all we can be for God. Understand that He sees us as perfect even when we see ourselves with shame and inadequacy. We must see ourselves as God sees us!

What do we really have to fear? After all God gave us more than adequate power, unexplainable love, and a perfectly sound mind. We have assurance of this and our responsibility lies with simply letting go of the fear and letting God become our personal healer. We MUST let go and quit trying to do it on our own.

To receive healing from the roots, we must let go of the fear that prevents us from receiving all of God’s blessings. Blessings require obedience. How many have asked God for healing? Maybe He is waiting for you to drop fear and embrace faith.

The ONLY fear we should have is reverent fear of our Heavenly Father. When our relationship with Him is in a state of dis-ease, we open ourselves up to physical disease. Healing rests in the recognition of God as the healer. Recognition of God as the healer begins with surrendering to Him.

 Extract from source: https://fmidr.com/fear-causes-sickness/

– COVID 19 – Planned or Predicted –

– Coincidence or Conspiracy –

It is of particular interest to find that the Rockefeller Foundation produced a document in 2010 wherein a scenario was outlined describing a global pandemic which very closely describes the 2020 COVID 19 outbreak. This scenario was entitled ‘Lock Step’. I have heard news presenters use this term when reporting on the COVID 19 pandemic. Now one may say that of course a scenario would closely describe an actual event because certain detail is known in the scientific/medical fraternity about such pandemic manifestations. Well I leave you with some detail to peruse on this scenario for your consideration. I have also included an extract from an online article by Haley Kennington for your interest with a link at the end to the complete piece. 

 

LOCK STEP: The Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 Plan To Enslave the World Using Future ‘Plandemic’Haley Kennington

In May of 2010, The Rockefeller Foundation, along with the Global Business Network (GBN) published ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’ (pg. 18) which uses game theory to map out different scenarios that both reduce and enslave the world’s population, all under the guise of helping solve hypotheticals. 

Though this document states it’s simply “academic scenario planning” through philanthropic missions, the reader cannot ignore their tyrannical and totalitarian motives to enslave us all. This is, of course, after they are successful at diminishing the world’s population through different extermination techniques. 

“A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”

Lock Step 

In the Lock Step scenario, and speaking in past tense, they use a pandemic “unlike 2009’s H1N1” – but rather one from an influenza strain that takes out 20% of the world’s population, killing 8 million – in order to plan out the various reactions in different political, economic and industrial sectors, and the issues that might arise as the pandemic spreads. They mention deadly effects on the economy with businesses shut down for months, broken global supply chains, famine, and disease pushing citizens to BEG for government surveillance and control. 

The Lock Step Scenario also details their fantasy of enforcing mandatory wearing of face masks and the checking of body-temperature at entry points in different nations, airports, and other public venues like train stations or supermarkets. Sounds legit and certainly not authoritarian or dystopian in any way.

“Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.”
This reminds me of a 1992 quote from Henry Kissinger during one of their Bilderberg meetings: 

“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.”

 

What should stand out to you most about this quote is that they don’t care if they create panic through natural means, or constructed lies. It doesn’t matter to them how they reach their end goal, they want to be the ones ruling over whatever population is left after their attempts to decrease the population as much as possible. It’s much easier to rule over a smaller group of individuals, and if those citizens are now ill, with lowered immune systems, they’ll be much easier to control and less likely to fight back. 

While citizens are currently battling an “invisible enemy,” those who seek to profit from the pandemic are now front and center. All of a sudden we’re seeing the same group of people telling us how to react, how close we can get to other people, and their plans to eradicate COVID-19 by ways of vaccines, surveillance, and testing. 

You can read the full article here: http://kenningtonpress.com/index.php/2020/04/17/lock-step-the-rockefeller-foundations-2010-plan-to-enslave-the-world-using-future-plandemic/

 Below is a link to the full Rockefeller Scenario document –  ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development – The Rockefeller Foundation – May 2010’

     https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

You may not consider the Rockefeller scenario too disturbing at all but what I will now show you should surely attract your attention. At the end of 2019 the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security facilitated an event to consider a possible global pandemic outbreak. The exercise was called Event201

 

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security provides the following outline of the exercise:

Event 201 is a pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.  The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic.

 Drawing from actual events, Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.

 EVENT 201 IS A FICTIONAL EXERCISE AND DISEASE

 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about

 Below is the scenario outline:

 The Event 201 scenario

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings. When it starts to spread efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely packed neighborhoods of some of the megacities in South America, the epidemic explodes. It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries are able to control it, it continues to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country can maintain control.

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths. The pandemic is beginning to slow due to the decreasing number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue at some rate until there is an effective vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population has been exposed. From that point on, it is likely to be an endemic childhood disease.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html

 

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security mentions on their website that COVID 19 was identified in December 2019. This is just as they were concluding their scenario workshop for such an event. If this does not shock you and make you sit back and question this COVID 19 pandemic then nothing ever will. Either the outbreak of COVID 19 was an enormous coincidence or one must consider the presence of a colossal global conspiracy.

COVID-19
Coronaviruses are a family of RNA viruses that typically cause mild respiratory disease in humans. A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in December 2019.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/resources/COVID-19/index.html

Below is one of the event recordings: Intro and Medical Countermeasures: 

THE HAMBURG SYNDROME (1979) AND COMPARISONS TO THE COVID SCAM

– Added to site 14 January 2021 –

We Are Being Played

The Multi-Decade Globalist Plan

– Original blog Post – 

The PCR Test Deception

– The Manipulation of the False Positive –

This article . . .

Its about the testing we do with something called PCR, an amplification technique, better known to biologists as a research tool used in our labs, when trying to unpick mechanisms of disease. I was frankly astonished to realise they’re sometimes used in population screening for diseases – astonished because it is a very exacting technique, prone to invisible errors and it’s quite a tall order to get reliable information out of it, especially because of the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code. The test cannot distinguish between a living virus and a short strand of RNA from a virus which broke into pieces weeks or months ago.

I believe I have identified a serious, really a fatal flaw in the PCR test used in what is called by the UK Government the Pillar 2 screening – that is, testing many people out in their communities. I’m going to go through this with care and in detail because I’m a scientist and dislike where this investigation takes me.

Dr Michael Yeadon – the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.

..……………………………………………………

COVID – why terminology really, really matters

[And the consequences of getting it horribly wrong]

When is a case not a case?

Since the start of the COVID pandemic I have watched almost everyone get mission critical things wrong. In some ways this is not surprising. Medical terminology is horribly imprecise, and often poorly understood. In calmer times such things are only of interest to research geeks like me. Were they talking about CVD, or CHD?

However, right now, it really, really, matters. Specifically, with regards to the term COVID ‘cases.

Dr Malcolm Kendrick

..……………………………………………………

– Video –

Paul Weston – This One Covid Lie Will Bring Down The British Government

Dr Mike Yeadon explains False Positives: https://lockdownsceptics.org/lies-dam… Professor Carl Heneghan explains False Positives: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/h… Government Report Re False Positives, Page two Re 2.3% Average false Positive Figure: https://assets.publishing.service.gov…

– The Deceptive Death Count Scandal –

New PCR Test update

18 December 2020

– WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives –

The PCR Pandemic: Interview with Virus Mania’s Dr Claus Köhnlein

– Dr Sam Bailey –

The Truth About PCR Tests

14 January 2021

– Dr Sam Bailey –

THE EMPEROR HAS NO CORONA

– The Virus (Covid 19) has never been isolated and therefore does not exist as claimed i.e. an infectious virus –

– Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) –

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)
by Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Sally Fallon Morell
February 19, 2021

PDF Download

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone;
separation from other things or persons; solitariness.
– Oxford English Dictionary

The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:

– the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
– the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
– “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
– it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3

1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019.   https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 — accessed 2/15/21

2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2.   https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full — accessed 2/15/21

3 “The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May

If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.

None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.

Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.

From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

1 There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2 Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?

Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?

Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.

– The Truth will set you free –

 I call on all who read this article to reconsider their diet from a Biblical perspective and to please make the necessary changes.  ‘We are what we eat’ (quote traced back to Anthelme Brillat-Savarin, in 1826) as the age-old saying goes. We must stop eating dead flesh and contaminated rubbish if we want to stand any chance at better health. I have been challenged in the same way and have suffered many hard challenges and sacrifices along the way. Most of what I write here is a message and record for myself and my family – this is a challenge for all of us.

Yahushua states in John 8.32 that ‘the truth shall make you free’. I believe that this is true for this subject matter as well. You will be freed from the bondage of fear when you know the truth

John 8:32  And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

 John 16:13 states that when the Spirit of Truth comes that he will guide one into all truth. As spirit filled believers then we should be guided into all truth:

 John 16:13  Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth

 Our Father declares in the book of Hosea 4:6 that His people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Let us therefore rather seek and embrace knowledge as put forward in the Words of Scripture. 

 Hosea 4:6  My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:

 I believe that this subject matter is extremely serious and will require time and attention to understand. It is critical for our personal wellbeing and health. There is a lot of content to read through and to watch but a shortened offering would have been of far less value to you.

 Please give it the time and effort that it deserves.

 We are being deceived and it is costing us our health, longevity and in the near future, our freedom.

 I am not a medical doctor and as such will not provide any interpretation or medical advice of my own in this series with regards to this COVID 19 pandemic. I have endeavored to provide credible evidence from respected professionals with sound scientific and medical credentials. Please listen to what they are saying. 

 What I provide you with in this series is some evidence and content from medical and scientific professionals to guide you with your decision making and stimulate you into researching the subject further according to your own needs.

 As a closing thought, for this 1st post on the subject, I would like to leave you with this:

 To suggest that the human body was so weak and susceptible to external viral/bacterial enemies would suggest a weakness in the design of the human body. This I believe is an insult towards our Maker, The sovereign Designer and the Creator of all things. When our Heavenly Father created man we were designed to survive for eternity. It was man’s sin that changed that lifespan. We were marvelously and wonderfully made – certainly to be greater than any supposed microscopic virus. 

Psalm 139:14  I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works

 We were created in the image of the Almighty himself – Genesis 1:27. Only the vile, carnal mind of man could come up with such a blasphemous insult as to suggest a design predisposed to illness.

 ‘The body is a self maintaining and self correcting organism in order to heal itself’ Dr. Barre Paul Lando 

 At the end of the day the choice remains yours to do whatever you wish with this information.

Write it off as ‘Conspiracy Theory’ or consider and act upon the Conspiracy Theory outlined in this series.

At the very root of this global ‘Virus’ deception, or at the very least misinformation, is a ‘theory’ that very few people understand or question. This ‘Theory’ is ‘Germ Theory’. ‘Germ Theory’ is the foundational theory that underpins the very approach of modern medicine to the diagnosis and treatment of infectious disease. It is this ‘theory’ that requires critical evaluation, understanding and consideration . ‘Germ Theory’ drives the medical treatment procedures for infectious diseases, including the necessity for vaccination. 

I implore the reader to diligently review the following material pertaining to ‘Germ Theory’ and consider the dire consequences of such an approach to disease.

‘Germ Theory’ is exactly what the term suggests i.e. a theory. A theory proposed by a man who is widely considered to have been a fraud. This theory has never, and can never to be proven to be true.

Question: Why then does modern medicine continue with such a theory?

Answer: follow the money.

For the love of money is the root of all evil: 1Timothy 6:10

The Truth will set you free:

‘And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’ John 8:32  

When I was setting out to compile these posts on this Virus deception, I did have to consider the implications and consequences of what I was about to share. I was pondering these thoughts at my computer when an email message popped up on my screen reflecting the Bible verse for the day. The verse was:

 One night the Lord spoke to Paul in a vision: ‘Do not be afraid; keep on speaking, do not be silent. For I am with you, and no one is going to attack and harm you, because I have many people in this city.’

Acts 18:9-10

– Delving into the truth – The Two Theories –

At the crux of the matter with regard to unveiling the truth about COVID 19 are two theories;   ‘Germ theory’(Antoine Bechamp) and ‘Terrain theory’(Louis Pasteur). 

 Antoine Bechamp (1816 – 1908), through his experiments promoted the pleo-morphic ‘Terrain Theory’ which stated that if the terrain or soil (the tissues) were dirty or congested it was the function of the bacteria to digest this material for excretion by the body.

 In 1861, Louis Pasteur published his ‘Germ Theory’ which proved that bacteria caused diseases. This idea was taken up by Robert Koch in Germany, who began to isolate the specific bacteria that caused particular diseases, such as TB and cholera. Germ theory, the theory that certain diseases are caused by the invasion of the body by microorganisms, organisms too small to be seen except through a microscope is currently the accepted scientific theory by the medical profession for many diseases.

 An extract from an open-source online article reads:

Had the profound voice of Bechamp’s science not been silenced, much of humankind may have been spared the worst aspects of the infectious or vital stresses of the 20th century. Since the case can be made that the approved but improper and dangerous treatment of infectious “diseases” over the last century has in large part given rise io the present epidemic wave of degenerative “disease,” including cancer, AIDS Syndrome or Ebola, we might have been spared these miseries as well. At the least, we would have understood much more clearly why we have them. Fortunately, however, Bechamp’s [1] work has been kept alive by small, successive bands of truth-seekers. 

The adoption by science of Louis Pasteur’s germ theory as the whole truth, without regard to the subtleties and deep insight of Bechamp’s [1] microzymian principle, represents one paraphrased: “There is no medical doctrine as potentially dangerous as a partial truth implemented as whole truth.” Any medical professional, bioscientist, health care practitioner, or lay person for that matter, who wishes to gain insight into the origins and nature of infectious and chronic illness, against the backdrop of a marvelous view of the life process, must consider Bechamp. And they must entertain one of the most important concepts to come out of his illustrious career-microbiological pleomorphism as it relates to disease and its symptoms.

Also perversely awe-inspiring is the fact that a person of Bechamp’s [1] extraordinary accomplishments has been written out of history books, textbooks and all encyclopedias. It is sobering to consider the required degree of authoritarian control over key academic elements in our culture. It is not my intention to belabor the politics, but as the wonders of Bechamp’s work unfold to the mind, the question simply arises, “Why is this not common knowledge?” Yet, we must be grateful that his “erasure” was far from complete. 

It is difficult to do full justice to Bechamp [1] without recourse to a book. His work was incessant and prodigious, and his observations prolific. I will attempt to convey some essentials of his biological work-only a part of the picture, as the total output includes chemistry, medicine and pharmacy. He left a remarkable legacy of scientific insight that borders on the spiritual, yet died in relative obscurity with virtually no recognition by peers or the public. Having outlived his wife, his beloved associate Professor Estor, and his four children, he had to endure those hard lessons of life in addition to the one of professional anonymity. However, in keeping with his extraordinary mind, he never lost conviction that the truth would come to light, as would his role in its revelation.

Reference
Bechamp A (1912) The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element. In: Montague R Leverson & translator (Eds.), John Ouseley Limited, London, UK.

The basis for understanding what causes disease and illness in humans is largely founded upon one of the theories mentioned above, i.e. Germ Theory vs the Terrain Theory.

The reader is now faced with a choice: choose, through the evaluation of the evidence provided in this series, which theory makes the most sense to you.

Modern medicine, with regards to treating disease is based upon the ‘Germ Theory’ of Louis Pasteur.

We are faced with many theories in life all of which command one to accept or reject. Most of mankind appears to accept the Big Bang Theory account of creation or Darwin’s theory of Evolution.

I accept the Theory of Creation as put forward in the Bible. Based on my research into disease and illness and the two theories mentioned, I choose the  Bechamp ‘Terrain Theory’. I believe that this Terrain theory aligns with the Words of Scripture and the original dietary instructions put forward by our Creator in the book of Genesis.

Genesis 1:29  And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

It seems however that most people choose to believe that they are not the one responsible for their illness, hence the ready acceptance of sickness being inflicted upon them from an external enemy virus or bacteria etc.

This is the same thinking that Christians have pertaining to their sin. That an external influencing enemy called satan made them sin. This belief is false and not Biblical.

No, we are the cause of our own illnesses due to our very own poor and improper diets. Compounding this is the toxic environment in which we live. We are also responsible for our own sin through our very own ‘satan’ within – this is one’s rebellious, carnal nature.

Why would one consume dead flesh and expect to be healthy? Yes, I am saying that we should not consume animal flesh at all.

But the Bible states we can! I hear some say (Gary, is that you?).

Well, that was because those Old Testament Israelites walked in darkness and did not yet have the Greater Light of our Messiah.

Consider that the Old Testament Torah made provision for divorce as well. What insight did our Messiah Yahushua offer to the religious Pharisees on this matter in Matthew 19:

3  The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

4  And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

5  And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

7  They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

8  He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

9  And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

Matthew 19:3-9

Likewise, what was the Biblical diet from the beginning: it was vegetarian. Do we accept this fact or are we just going to behave like the stiff-necked Israelites, with their ‘hardness of heart’, who just wanted to eat meat and satisfy the evil lust of their fleshly desires?

The Torah of the Old Testament was the ‘lesser light’ to rule the night. It was provided to guide the Israelites who walked in a time of darkness. It was not a perfect light. It was a ‘lesser’ light –  a mere reflection of the ‘Greater Light’. One can not accurately discern detail from a reflection. We needed the ‘Greater Light’ – wisdom/insight of our Messiah Yahushua to guide us into correct interpretation of the Torah and the will of our Heavenly Father.

Consider the following verse from John chapter 1 that states that Truth came by our Messiah:

John 1:17  For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

As New Testament believers we now have the ‘Greater Light’ – our Messiah. We are meant to walk in the light:

John 8:12  Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

1 Thessalonians 5:5  Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.

Ephesians 5:8  For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:

For further insight please read my other article entitled ‘The Greater Light’.

Below are some additional articles to explain the Terrain and Germ theories for your consideration. The videos provided herein also provide detail pertaining to these two theories. Please take the time to work through all of the content. There are unfortunately no short cuts to discovering the truth on this subject.

 

Pasteur vs. Bechamp: An Alternative View of Infectious Disease

“Le microbe n’est rien, le terrain est tout.” (The microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything) –

The last words of Louis Pasteur (Father of the “Germ Theory” of disease)

 – an article from Marone Family Wellness

Pasteurization, named after scientist Louis Pasteur who developed it, involves heating raw milk to very high temperatures in order to kill the germs and bacteria inside the milk and prevent infections. The idea is that “germs are bad” and that they are the cause of disease and ill health. Following that assumption, it makes sense that “killing germs” would be the solution to both treating and preventing states of disease. This is the basic concept—that germs (virus, bacteria, etc.) are the cause of illness—upon which Western medicine is based.

But there is a fascinating history behind both the “germ theory” of disease as well as its controversial proponent…Louis Pasteur. I invite you to do your own research by Googling “Pasteur vs. Bechamp” to see the many sources of information on this controversy. Meanwhile I will try to summarize our thoughts on this issue and how it relates to patients who come to us with illness related to chronic infections.

In 19th century France, while Pasteur was advocating the notion of germs as the cause of disease, another French scientist named Antoine Bechamp advocated a conflicting theory known as the “cellular theory” of disease.

Bechamp’s cellular theory is almost completely opposite to that of Pasteur’s. Bechamp noted that these germs that Pasteur was so terrified of were opportunistic in nature. They were everywhere and even existed inside of us in a symbiotic relationship. Bechamp noticed in his research that it was only when the tissue of the host became damaged or compromised that these germs began to manifest as a prevailing symptom (not cause) of disease.

To prevent illness, Bechamp advocated not the killing of germs but the cultivation of health through diet, hygiene, and healthy lifestyle practices such as fresh air and exercise. The idea is that if the person has a strong immune system and good tissue quality (or “terrain” as Bechamp called it), the germs will not manifest in the person, and they will have good health. It is only when their health starts to decline (due to personal neglect and poor lifestyle choices) that they become victim to infections.

You can see this when a group of people go hiking in the woods. It often seems that the mosquitoes attack only one or two people out of the group. And as it turns out, it’s always the same person that always gets attacked by the mosquitoes. This person is usually the one who always catches the latest flu and has the weakest immune system. This is because these germs (including insects) are opportunistic in nature and only attack the weak.

To treat illness, Bechamp’s cellular theory also applied. Bechamp was less concerned with killing the infection and focused more on restoring the health of the patient’s body through healthy lifestyle choices. Bechamp saw the infection as a footnote to the state of illness and not the primary cause. As the person restored health through diet, hygiene, and detoxification the infection went away on its own–without needing measures to kill it.

Pasteur and Bechamp had a long and often bitter rivalry regarding who was right about the true cause of illness. Ultimately Pasteur’s ideas were accepted by society and Bechamp was pretty much forgotten. The practice of Western medicine is based on Pasteur’s germ phobia which gives rise to the use of vaccinations, antibiotics, and other anti-microbials.

The irony is that towards the end of his life, Pasteur renounced the germ theory and admitted that Bechamp was right all along. In the 1920’s medical historians also discovered that most of Pasteur’s theories were plagiarized from Bechamp’s early research work.

At Marone Family Wellness, we make recommendations to patients analyzed with infectious illness using the guidelines set forth by Antoine Bechamp:

“Treat the patient, not the infection.”

We do this through our threefold approach of detoxification, nutritional healing, and restoring internal communication through chiropractic.

We feel that Bechamp was indeed right when he said that as health returns to the patient, the germs and infections leave on their own and do not come back unless health becomes compromised again. We have found this approach to be very satisfying in terms of results for the patient.

We feel that it is a mistake to try to kill the infection directly rather than searching for the cause as to why that person’s immune system did not handle the infection on its own. Sadly, Pasteur’s approach of killing germs is used by a large number of so-called “natural” healers who use large amounts of anti-microbial herbs in the same philosophical fashion as antibiotics. We feel that if all you do is kill the infection without addressing the dysfunction in the patient’s immune system (which allowed the infection to manifest in the first place), the patient will simply become sick again at a later date.

Another problem with this approach is that in chronic infections you almost never see just one type of infection. When a person’s immune function becomes compromised, one infection such as a bacteria will open the door to other infections such as viruses, parasites, and fungi. It’s like when one burglar enters your home and holds the door open for his friends to come in. When this occurs, as it does in almost all immuno-compromised patients, focusing on treating the infection directly becomes a never-ending nightmare. Once one bug is gone, the next one appears. However, if you focus on treating the body’s self-defense mechanism against infections (immune function), the body will handle the infections on its own, as it should have in the first place. We hope you understand how big of a difference in approach it is to treat the patient’s immune system and not the infection. Treat the cause of the infectious illness, the underlying dysfunction of the host’s immunity, and the infection will leave on it’s own as the health of the patient’s body returns.

Disclaimer: Regarding the controversial topic of vaccinations and antibiotics…we at Marone Family Wellness take a completely neutral stance on the topic. We neither advocate nor discourage their use and leave that up to the patient to decide. We do this mainly due to legal reasons being that it is against the law for us to advocate one position vs. another. We only ask that you become as educated on this topic as possible and make your own informed decision. We will respect your decision either way

source: http://maronewellness.com/pasteur-vs-bechamp-an-alternative-view-of-infectious-disease/

*******************

What You Absolutely Need to Know About Your Biological Terrain

by ARIC COX, DC

Many of you have been on protocol, after protocol, after protocol.  You have probably taken more supplements than food on some days too.  How many times have you tried a homeopathic remedy that “lined up perfectly with your symptoms” or an herbal remedy that “has worked for everyone with your condition” only to find no relief?  

The answer may be in your biological terrain.  If you have never heard of your biological terrain, then you’re likely still using treatment methods that are stuck in the past.  

There’s been a paradigm shift in the making for the last decade or so that is putting our understanding of microbes to the test.  Our “kill the bug” approach may not be the complete story.

Since childhood, I’ve had a fascination with the natural world.  Whether it was studying it in a textbook, under a microscope, or fully immersing myself in it with my back up against a tree while listening to the sound of a lazy creek. I couldn’t get enough!  When it came to school, I especially loved the detail of diagrams and charts from anatomy and cell biology courses. I would spend too much time absorbing their detail and not enough time reading the material.  

These pictures and renderings held my attention because I wondered, what connected everything together?  There always seemed to be a disconnect between the classroom and the real, dynamic, living world. Sure, the near artistry in the diagrams of cellular structures, biochemical molecules, and anatomy caught my eye and attention during my studies.  However, the context in which they existed never seemed to be of importance. No course in high school or college could give me an answer. It wasn’t until much later in my studies that biological medicine taught me the invaluable aspect of context.

Context is commonly overlooked in modern healthcare.  In particular, the human body has been reduced to mere parts and pieces only to be treated the same way a clock would be repaired.  We have inside of us the most impressive and wonderful design that is infinitely more complex than even the farthest reaches of the universe.

 Germ Theory and the Microbiome
In the middle of the 19th century, it was context that escaped one French scientist. Louis Pasteur put forth and popularized the “Germ Theory” based on his elaboration of an unproven hypothesis.  He found that “germs” are to receive the full blame as the cause of illness. This model of disease coming from outside our body has fostered our modern static cling to viewing microbes as perpetual nuisances and pathogens that threaten our health.

Despite the discovery of the microbiome (the complex world of bacteria that live within the human body) and the growing body of research showing just how vital it is to our health, modern healthcare is still failing to grasp the role of microbes in our body.

The bacteria present in our body outnumber our human cells.  If “Germ Theory” was true then we’d all be a living, breathing, walking infection!  Consider the fact the total weight of the microbiome is only about 3-4 pounds, but our body depends upon this tiny contingent of genetic information to facilitate key functions like immunity, digestion, detoxification, and brain activity.

By taking a “kill the bug” approach to healing in this day and age is equivalent to claiming the Earth to be the center of the universe.  It is a gross over-simplification and misses the point completely. We need to understand the bigger picture and how everything fits together.

“Terrain Theory” and the Context to Healing
It was the work of Antoine Bechamp and Claude Bernard that produced “Terrain Theory.”  Context must have been at the front of their minds during their research, for these two men surely saw the bigger picture of how our 100 trillion human cells interacted and benefited from the trillions of viruses, fungi, and bacteria that are woven into the tapestry of our body.  

They found that it was a healthy terrain within our body that creates health.  This paradigm shift places us in a more hopeful light as having control over our condition and not as victims.  

While the microbe plays a part, Terrain Theory explains that a bacteria, virus, or fungus is only pathogenic in response to its surroundings.  Bechamp’s years of research showed that the microbe’s infective character only came to being as a consequence of disease and not the cause of disease.  This change in character is described by the phenomenon of pleomorphism (from latin pleo meaning “many” and morph meaning “form”).  This means that a virus can become a bacterium and then mature into a yeast or fungus should the environment of the human body allow this change to occur.

With this concept in mind, we can see that improving and maintaining the biological, chemical, emotional, and energetic landscape of the body is to be the focus for health and wellbeing.  Much as it is the case for the health of a plant depends upon the health of the soil, so it is the case that our cells require healthy terrain for proper function.

 Understanding Mesenchyme
This biological terrain is the landscape of our internal environment that surrounds all of our cells and supports the microbes that support us.  Another term for this is mesenchyme, or ground substance.  The mesenchyme is the context, the backdrop, for every building block, every scaffold, and every component of the network that weaves the human body together.  It is the mesenchyme that affords our body the ability to connect, communicate and regulate every cell and every organ together.

The mesenchyme surrounds every cell and allows for distribution of nutrients and oxygen, elimination of waste, and immune support.   This is also where our lymph vessels, nerve endings, and smallest blood vessels are housed. If our mesenchyme is not in top condition, then our cells begin to be malnourished, garbage piles up around them, and the ability for our cells to repair and regenerate becomes compromised.

Modern medicine does nothing to treat the mesenchyme.  Most natural medicine practitioners aren’t even aware of it.  It doesn’t matter how perfect the herb is for the patient’s condition or that blood labs confirmed the need for a specific mineral, if the biological terrain is not supported then it is all for naught.  

The Institute for Restorative Health places an emphasis on supporting your biological terrain as one part of our whole body approach.  With every step of the healing process, we understand how every cell (including your microbes) needs to be addressed for complete body restoration.

Has your protocol been missing this much-needed component?  The biological terrain impacts every part of how our mind, body, and spirit function.  Without tending to this “soil” of our body, we cannot establish proper roots. Without proper roots, our healing can only go so far.  

Whether you are struggling with chronic pain or infection, anxiety, autoimmune conditions, depression, or any other chronic condition, make sure that your biological terrain is not overlooked.

source: https://instituteforrestorativehealth.com/2019/01/16/what-you-absolutely-need-to-know-about-your-biological-terrain/

If the Antoine Bechamp ‘Terrain Theory’ was accepted by the medical profession as the foundational theory for wellness then the mammon driven, colossal pharmaceutical industry would collapse.

‘Germ Theory’ is like the Satanic Bible is to the Holy Christian Bible.

Those who study and follow the Satanic Bible script will never see the Light or walk in Truth.

Likewise, those who study and follow ‘Germ Theory’ principles, will always walk in darkness and believe that they have the truth.

As children of the light we must not walk in darkness.

  Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.1Thessalonians 5:5 

  While ye have light, believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light – John 12:36

The Cat is Out of the Bag

Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner

THE CDC, THE WHO, AND ALL THE SO-CALLED SCIENTIFIC COVID 19 EXPERTS HAVE LIED TO US ALL

 EVERYONE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY NEEDS TO READ THIS AND ABSORB THE TRUTH ABOUT SARS COVID 2 AND 19. THOSE WHO ARE STILL ASLEEP, YOU BETTER WAKE UP BECAUSE THIS SHAM/DRESS REHEARSAL WILL CERTAINLY BE THE LAST CHANCE; THOSE CHOOSING TO REMAIN IN DENIALand IGNORING REALITY WILL NOT WORK and will LEAVE THE DOUBTERS ON THEIR OWN TO SUFFER WHAT HAS BEEN IN THE PLANNING FOR YEARS UNLESS STOPPED by the SILENT MAJORITY!

 1. The CDC admitted they incorrectly reported the COVID19 infection counts and intentionally misled the public and have apologized, clarifying that the amount of people truly infected is much lower than what was originally reported — an error so egregious it made the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute say “how could the CDC make this mistake? This is a mess.”[1]

 2. The American Coronavirus Task Force also admitted to fudging the National COVID19 death count when Dr. Birx said the deaths are people who died “with” COVID19 not “from” COVID19, thus making the real death count much lower than what is currently being reported. [2][3]

 3. Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted masks won’t help against the virus and mask manufacturers are now including warnings that their products do not deter COVID19.[4]

 4. Dr. Anthony Fauci did admit that continuing to close the country could cause irreparable damage.

CDC backtracked their initial claim that led governors to shutdown their states & clarified that COVID19 does not spread easily on surfaces.[5]

 5. Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo confirmed a recent health study showing that 66% of new infections actually originate at home, thus making stay at home orders one of the most dangerous mandates currently in place.[6]

 6. President Trump stopped funding the WHO and threatened to cut off money permanently until they can prove they are no longer corruptly influenced by communist China after they lied to our country about human to human transmission of COVID 19 in January, 2020.[7]

 7. The SARS COVID 19 curve (based upon number of deaths) has flattened, the CDC, WHO, Dr. Fauci, our governors, and many more were completely wrong about the potential threat of this virus.[8][9] There was only one governor who got it right, the governor of the great state of South Dakota, Kristi L. Noem.[10]

 8. California is opening up its economy sooner than anyone expected because the scientific evidence contradicts the long standing and inaccurate narrative still upheld by the extremely dishonest & corrupt media.[11]

 If you are still living in fear, don’t be. The media, global organizations, the government, and its agencies have “mislead” humanity!.

 The ‘bad actors’ have called those of us who have known the truth all along, conspiracy theorists, but it turns out we were the few who have been following the scientific facts!

 Open up your businesses, churches, and homes. Don’t fall for the infectious disease lies any longer. If you have fallen for the germ theory lies, wake up and join the army of truth seekers fighting on the front lines for the restoration of our God-given freedoms..

 9. WHO has just admitted that transmission of the corona virus from asymptomatic carriers – the whole reason for the lockdown, is rare!![12] So you cannot not spread a fake virus before showing any symptoms!!

 10. The CDC just confirmed a .4 to .26% death-rate for COVID 19. The death rate for the flu shot is .6. Twice as high as COVID 19![13]

 Following the advise of the so-called mainstream germ theory scientists and their political and media minions, have:

– Added nearly 6 trillion to national debt

– Laid-off or furloughed 50 million workers

– Placed 60 million on food stamps

– Gone from 3.5% to 14.7% unemployment

– Crippled the petroleum industry

– Ruined the tourism industry

– Bankrupted the service industry

– Threatened, fined, and arrested church leaders

– Exacerbated mental health problems

– Shut down schools and colleges

– Given unbridled power to unelected officials

– Increased suicides higher than SARS COVID 19 deaths

– Place our most vulnerable, those over the age of 65 at risk

– Delayed surgeries and treatments for profound illnesses

– Infringed upon countless important civil liberties

– Placed 327 million Americans on house arrest

 Bill Gates a self-appointed expert who has heavily funded all corners of the Pandemic to make this Plandemic happen. [14][15]

 We need to start treating the Plandemic for the the lie that it is![16]

 Our whole way of life is at stake, and the ‘bad-actors’ have plans to make it much worse now introducing it as “the grand reset”, “the beginning of the 4th revolution” (ie a surveillance state of control, where everyone lives in what is essentially a strict open air prison where you are tracked, nothing is private, and everything is decided for you, and you have no rights whatsoever, and there can be no resistance.[17]

 Welcome to the “New World Order”[18]

 Please don’t forget, we can imagine and bring about our own future! So together let’s make it much different from the radical elite’s plan for us and get these people involved, jailed for fraud and terrorism and inducing sheer boredom! Let’s share the riches of this beautiful world to make it an incredible place where everyone can live together in abundance, peace, harmony and celebration!

 Pasteur vs. BeChamp or the Germ Theory or the Terrain Theory[19]

Louis Pasteur led many to believe that germs are contagious and are the cause of disease.

 Antione BeChamp explains that disease is the result of toxic or acidic conditions found in the body fluids, (from an acidic diet, poor nutrition, the retention or build up of acidic waste or toxins – radiation poisoning, chemical poisoning, pesticides, preservatives, stress, or the lack of exercise). On the death bed of Louis Pasteur he stated to his grandson, “BeChamp was right, the germ is nothing the terrain is everything.”[19]

 The virus has never been proven nor isolated, purified and identified biochemically using the scientific method know as Koch’s postulates.  Sickness and disease related to these phantom viruses, like Spanish Flu, Polio, Measles, HIV, Ebola, Hepatitis, Herpes, Influenza, SARS, Zika and now COVID 19 have never individually been isolated, purified and cultured to scientifically demonstrate their virulence and therefore are only assumed that they exist and may cause a specific sickness or disease, without a single thread of evidence![20]

 Friedberg in The Invisible Electric Rainbow shows Boston Health Dept. carried out over 300 experiments and could never use an so-called infected sick person the cause a healthy person to contract the fake “Spanish flu” (virus). This has also been the case with all other so-called viruses. How can a virus be contagious when it doesn’t even exist?[21]

 You don’t get sick you do sick with how you live, what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, what you think, what you feel and what you believe.[22][23]

References

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/

[2] https://live.healthday.com/coronavirus-death-us-classification-2645672483.html

[3] https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/dr-deborah-birx-on-covid-19-death-toll-in-us-timeline-for-coronavirus-vaccine

[4] https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/outdated-fauci-video-on-face-masks-shared-out-of-context/

[5] https://www.foxnews.com/health/fauci-says-extended-stay-home-orders-could-cause-irreparable-damage

[6] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/06/ny-gov-cuomo-says-its-shocking-most-new-coronavirus-hospitalizations-are-people-staying-home.html

[7] https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/29/trump-us-terminate-who-relationship/

[8] https://www.facebook.com/CitizensOnTheRiseI/posts/2950658288349980

[9] https://reason.com/2020/06/28/cdc-antibody-studies-confirm-huge-gap-between-covid-19-infections-and-known-cases/

[10] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/south-dakotas-governor-resisted-ordering-people-to-stay-home-now-it-has-one-of-the-nations-largest-coronavirus-hot-spots/2020/04/13/5cff90fe-7daf-11ea-a3ee-13e1ae0a3571_story.html

[11] https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article243014991.html

[12] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission.html

[13] www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/05/.

[14] https://thefederalist.com/2017/10/25/bill-gates-tacitly-admits-common-core-experiment-failure/

[15] https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/2/bill-gates-and-his-coronavirus-conflicts-of-intere/

[16] https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dr-robert-o-young-speaks-out-about-covid-other-matters

[17] https://townhall.com/columnists/christalgo/2020/07/09/beware-of-calls-for-new-world-orders-especially-wefs-great-reset-n2572153

[18] https://www.compellingtruth.org/new-world-order.html

[19] https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/do-germs-cause-infection

[20] https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-viruses-vaccines-and-the-science-of-virology

[21] https://phibetaiota.net/2020/02/arthur-firstenberg-the-invisible-rainbow-a-history-of-electricity-and-life-radiation-sickness-explains-all-past-and-present-flu-outbreaks-including-wuhan-virus-and-radiation-sickness-on-cruise-shi/

[22] https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-causes-oxygen-deprivation

[23] https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-pathology-for-all-sickness-disease

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-cat-is-out-of-the-bag

 p.s please visit Robert Youngs website for many revealing articles on what causes illness and how to reverse the effects of disease.

Exposing the Myth of the GERM THEORY

‘Not many people realize that bacteria and viruses are the result not the cause of disease. Our best defence is good health.’

by Arthur M. Baker
Self-Health Care Systems 1800 S.
Robertson Boulevard, Suite 239-50 Los
Angeles, CA 90035, USA Phone/fax:
(310)2021170.

Extracted with permission from “Bactena, Germs
and VIRUSES Do Not Cause Disease:
Discriminating between Medical Myth and
Biological Fact, excerpted from the book,
Awakening Our Self-Healing Body.

Video 1 

Germs, The Terrain & Our Future with Andrew Kaufman MD

Andrew Kaufman MD is a healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, while a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology. Andrew has conducted and published original research and lectured, supervised, and mentored medical students, residents, and fellows in all psychiatric specialties.He has been qualified as an expert witness in local, state, and federal courts, and held leadership positions in academic medicine and professional organizations. Dr. Kaufman has gained tremendous popularity in recent months sharing a different perspective on the role of health and disease within the context of current pandemic fears. 

Video 2

Viruses & Contagion, A Bioterrain Perspective w/ Dr. Barre Lando

Amidst the present climate of unprecedented fear & confusion, people are seeking answers. No longer trusting ‘official’ channels of information, and for good reason, all we want is the truth! Dubious statistics & conflicting reports only amplify the collective anxiety. The Alfacast community has been encouraged with recent discussions within the ‘authentic media’ from medical experts that paint a not-so dire prognosis on the CV19 issue. Dr. Lando & Mike Winner hope to contribute additional perspective to this dialogue from the lens of Bioterrain Medicine. Dr. Lando draws from 40 years of clinical practice applying principles and modalities unique to his specialization in classical German Biological Medicine.

Video 3

What is the Covid-19 test testing for? | Can you catch a virus?

In this episode we shine a light onto the whole “show” from its start in Wuhan. What is actually being tested for, how your body produces viruses as part of its normal methods of dealing with toxicity or insult. This then calls into question, if we are producing this in response to a cause, then what is the cause of the toxicity, and if we are producing it, can we catch it? The answer the last question is you cannot. I am making particular reference to the excellent work of Dr Andrew Kaufman. After a brief intro by me you will be watching Dr Kaufman’s presentation webinar.

 

(video deleted from YouTube)

If the video fails to load below then watch here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Thj4S4xWXtK3/

 

Why are few people comparing previous years flu deaths to COVID?

CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in U.S., highest death toll in 40 years
By ASSOCIATED PRESS

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

‘In recent years, flu-related deaths have ranged from about 12,000 to — in the worst year — 56,000, according to the CDC.’

‘Last fall and winter, the U.S. went through one of the most severe flu seasons in recent memory. It was driven by a kind of flu that tends to put more people in the hospital and cause more deaths, particularly among young children and the elderly.’

https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/

Why are few people comparing previous years flu deaths to COVID?

CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in U.S., highest death toll in 40 years
By ASSOCIATED PRESS

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

‘In recent years, flu-related deaths have ranged from about 12,000 to — in the worst year — 56,000, according to the CDC.’

‘Last fall and winter, the U.S. went through one of the most severe flu seasons in recent memory. It was driven by a kind of flu that tends to put more people in the hospital and cause more deaths, particularly among young children and the elderly.’

https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/

Virus Mania

Virus Mania is a social disease of our highly developed society. To cure it will require conquering fear, fear being the most deadly contagious virus, most efficiently transmitted by the media.

Errare humanum est sed diabolicum preservare… (to err is human, but to preserve an error is diabolic).

Whenever we try to understand how some highly questionable therapeutic policies have been recommended at the highest levels of public health authorities (WHO, CDC, RKI etc.), we frequently discover either embarrassing conflicts of interests, or the lack of essential control experiments, and always the strict rejection of any open debate with authoritative scientists presenting dissident views of the pathological processes. Manipulations of statistics, falsifications of clinical trials, dodging of drug toxicity tests have all been repeatedly documented. All have been swiftly covered up, and none have been able to, so far, disturb the cynical logic of today’s virus research business.

Etienne de Harven, MD

………………………………………………………………………

 

Virus Mania

Foreword by Etienne de Harven

The Content of this Book Has To Be Read, Quickly and Worldwide

The book Virus Mania by Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Köhnlein presents a tragic message that will, hopefully, contribute to the re-insertion of ethical values in the conduct of virus research, public health policies, media communications, and activities of the pharmaceutical companies. Obviously, elementary ethical rules have been, to a very dangerous extent, neglected in many of these fields for an alarming number of years.

When American journalist Celia Farber courageously published, in Harper’s Magazine (March 2006) the article “Out of control—AIDS and the corruption of medical science,” some readers probably attempted to reassure themselves that this “corruption” was an isolated case. This is very far from the truth as documented so well in this book by Engelbrecht and Köhnlein. It is only the tip of the iceberg. Corruption of research is a widespread phenomenon currently found in many major, supposedly contagious health problems, ranging from AIDS to Hepatitis C, Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow disease”), SARS, Avian flu and current vaccination practices (human papillomavirus or HPV vaccination).

In research on all of these six distinct public health concerns scientific research on viruses (or prions in the case of BSE) slipped onto the wrong track following basically the same systematic pathway. This pathway always includes several key steps: inventing the risk of a disastrous epidemic, incriminating an elusive pathogen, ignoring alternative toxic causes, manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable numbers to maximize the false perception of an imminent catastrophe, and promising salvation with vaccines. This guarantees large financial returns. But how is it possible to achieve all of this? Simply by relying on the most powerful activator of human decision making process, i.e. FEAR!

We are not witnessing viral epidemics; we are witnessing epidemics of fear. And both the media and the pharmaceutical industry carry most of the responsibility for amplifying fears, fears that happen, incidentally, to always ignite fantastically profitable business. Research hypotheses covering these areas of virus research are practically never scientifically verified with appropriate controls. Instead, they are established by “consensus.” This is then rapidly reshaped into a dogma, efficiently perpetuated in a quasi-religious manner by the media, including ensuring that research funding is restricted to projects supporting the dogma, excluding research into alternative hypotheses. An important tool to keep dissenting voices out of the debate is censorship at various levels ranging from the popular media to scientific publications.

We haven’t learnt well from past experiences. There are still many unanswered questions on the causes of the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic, and on the role of viruses in post-WWII polio (DDT neurotoxicity?). These modern epidemics should have opened our minds to more critical analyses. Pasteur and Koch had solidly constructed an understanding of infection applicable to many bacterial, contagious diseases. But this was before the first viruses were actually discovered. Transposing the principles of bacterial infections to viruses was, of course, very tempting but should not have been done without giving parallel attention to the innumerable risk factors in our toxic environment; to the toxicity of many drugs, and to some nutritional deficiencies.

Cancer research had similar problems. The hypothesis that cancer might be caused by viruses was formulated in 1903, more than one century ago. Even today it has never been convincingly demonstrated. Most of the experimental laboratory studies by virus-hunters have been based on the use of inbred mice, inbred implying a totally unnatural geneticbackground. Were these mice appropriate models for the study of human cancer? (we are far from being inbred!) True, these mice made possible the isolation and purification of “RNA tumor viruses,” later renamed “retroviruses” and well characterized by electron microscopy.

But are these viral particles simply associated with the murine tumors, or are they truly the culprit of malignant transformation? Are these particles real exogenous infective particles, or endogenous defective viruses hidden in our chromosomes? The question is still debatable.

What is certain is that viral particles similar to those readily recognized in cancerous and leukemic mice have never been seen nor isolated in human cancers. Of mice and men…However, by the time this became clear, in the late 1960s, viral oncology had achieved a dogmatic, quasi-religious status. If viral particles cannot be seen by electron microscopy in human cancers, the problem was with electron microscopy, not with the dogma of viral oncology! This was the time molecular biology was taking a totally dominant posture in viral research. “Molecular markers” for retroviruses were therefore invented (reverse transcriptase for example) and substituted most conveniently for the absent viral particles, hopefully salvaging the central dogma of viral oncology. This permitted the viral hypothesis to survive for another ten years, until the late 1970s, with the help of increasingly generous support from funding agencies and from pharmaceutical companies. However by 1980 the failure of this line of research was becoming embarrassingly evident, and the closing of some viraloncology laboratories would have been inevitable, except that…

Except what? Virus cancer research would have crashed to a halt except that, in 1981, five cases of severe immune deficiencies were described by a Los Angeles physician, all among homosexual men who were also all sniffing amyl nitrite, were all abusing other drugs, abusing antibiotics, and probably suffering from malnutrition and STDs (sexually transmitted diseases). It would have been logical to hypothesize that these severe cases of immune deficiency had multiple toxic origins. This would have amounted to incrimination of these patients’ life-style…

Unfortunately, such discrimination was, politically, totally unacceptable. Therefore, another hypothesis had to be found—these patients were suffering from a contagious disease caused by a new…retrovirus! Scientific data in support of this hypothesis was and, amazingly enough, still is totally missing. That did not matter, and instantaneous and passionate interest of cancer virus researchers and institutions erupted immediately. This was salvation for the viral laboratories where AIDS now became, almost overnight, the main focus of research. It generated huge financial support from Big Pharma, more budget for the CDC and NIH, and nobody had to worry about the life style of the patients who became at once the innocent victims of this horrible virus, soon labeled as HIV.

Twenty-five years later, the HIV/AIDS hypothesis has totally failed to achieve three major goals in spite of the huge research funding exclusively directed to projects based on it. No AIDS cure has ever been found; no verifiable epidemiological predictions have ever been made; and no HIV vaccine has ever been successfully prepared. Instead, highly toxic (but not curative) drugs have been most irresponsibly used, with frequent, lethal side effects. Yet not a single HIV particle has ever been observed by electron microscopy in the blood of patients supposedly having a high viral load! So what? All the most important newspapers and magazine have displayed attractive computerized, colorful images of HIV that all originate from laboratory cell cultures, but never from even a single AIDS patient. Despite this stunning omission the HIV/AIDS dogma is still solidly entrenched. Tens of thousands of researchers, and hundreds of major pharmaceutical companies continue to make huge profits based on the HIV hypothesis. And not one single AIDS patient has ever been cured…

Yes, HIV/AIDS is emblematic of the corruption of virus research that is remarkably and tragically documented in this book.

Research programs on Hepatitis C, BSE, SARS, Avian flu and current vaccination policies all developed along the same logic, that of maximizing financial profits. Whenever we try to understand how some highly questionable therapeutic policies have been recommended at the highest levels of public health authorities (WHO, CDC, RKI etc.), we frequently discover either embarrassing conflicts of interests, or the lack of essential control experiments, and always the strict rejection of any open debate with authoritative scientists presenting dissident views of the pathological processes. Manipulations of statistics, falsifications of clinical trials, dodging of drug toxicity tests have all been repeatedly documented. All have been swiftly covered up, and none have been able to, so far, disturb the cynical logic of today’s virus research business. The cover-up of the neurotoxicity of the mercury containing preservative thimerosal as a highly probable cause of autism among vaccinated children apparently reached the highest levels of the US governement… (see article “Deadly Immunity” from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in chapter 8)

Virus Mania is a social disease of our highly developed society. To cure it will require conquering fear, fear being the most deadly contagious virus, most efficiently transmitted by the media.

Errare humanum est sed diabolicum preservare… (to err is human, but to preserve an error is diabolic).

Etienne de Harven, MD

Professor Emeritus of Pathology at the University of Toronto and

Member of the Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York (1956 – 1981)

Member of Thabo Mbeki’s IDS Advisory Panel of South Africa

President of Rethinking AIDS (www.rethinkaids.net)

Read the Book:

 

 

Corona Inquiry Committee 

A group of German Doctors have launched a Corona Inquiry Committee to review the handling of the Corona virus by Governments around the world. They have appealed to all medical and scientific stakeholders to participate and contribute to this review process. 

EXTRA-PARLIAMENTARY CORONA INQUIRY COMMITTEE (ACU)

www.acu2020.org

ACU – EXTRA-PARLIAMENTARY CORONA INQUIRY COMMITTEE 

“We won’t let ourselves be delayed any longer. We citizens have the strength. We’ll do it!” With these words, Heiko Schöning announced the Extra-Parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee (ACU) on May 31, 2020 in Stuttgart in front of 5000 demonstrators. On July 1, 2020, we put further information on the Corona Committee online as an interview and on July 3 as an ACU information conference. 

MORE THAN 4 MILLION CALLS FROM THE 1ST ACU CONFERENCE WORLDWIDE ON YOUTUBE! THANK YOU. 

All citizens can make suggestions for experts (kontakt@aerzte-fuer-aufklaerung.de). The ACU spokesperson (Heiko Schöning, Bodo Schiffmann, Martin Haditsch) invites the experts to public evidence. The evidence will be put online at www.acu2020.org. The first information conference is already available in several languages. 

 Many experts and witnesses from all walks of life have already accepted for the ACU. Nobody is particularly emphasized; neither man nor woman, neither politically above nor below, neither fat nor thin. Everyone is invited to support and contribute. 

 SCHEDULE: The public hearings will begin in July 2020. In August 2020, the final report will be presented by the ACU speakers at an international press conference.

Corona has kept the whole world in suspense for months. Corona concerns us all. Many of the measures taken by the government to fight the disease from COVID-19 are disproportionate and harmful to the population. Since no independent committee of inquiry has yet been convened, the Extra-Parliamentary Corona Committee of Inquiry, ACU for short, was announced in front of 5,000 people in Stuttgart on May 31, 2020. The ACU was also referred to in the June 20, 2020 issue of the weekly newspaper with the highest circulation, “Democratic Resistance”.  

This Corona Committee stands for well-founded, free and broad education for all citizens on a multimedia basis. In addition, information is provided internationally in several languages ​​in order to achieve the broadest possible reach. 

The ACU is intended as a cross-generational participatory project that is organized by citizens for citizens. This means that people like you and me as well as experts in their special field can support the ACU with their knowledge, experience and contributions in the form of lectures and interviews. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn’t work without support. Thus, the ACU is financed through donations through individual or regular donations. Foundations, old or newly established, are also welcome. The content-related work of the Corona Committee is independent of the support services. 

Details and translations in 8 languages ​​(English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Russian, Romanian, Spanish) on: 

www.acu2020.org/international

https://acu2020.org/english-versions/

The DOCTORS-FOR-ENLIGHTENMENT are politically, financially and denominationally independent . The following call is not from us, but external. It is noteworthy that on May 8, 2020, cardinals such as Gerhard Muller, bishops, medical professionals and intellectuals such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. published this appeal ; Verbatim excerpts (with your own emphasis):

 … This call has also been signed by intellectuals, medical professionals, lawyers, journalists and other professionals who agree with the content; it can be signed by those who wish to adopt it. 

It is a fact that, on the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, inalienable rights of citizens have been violated in many cases and their fundamental freedoms have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted , including the right to religious freedom, freedom of expression and freedom of movement. Public health must not and cannot become an alibi for violating the rights of millions of people around the world, let alone releasing civil authorities from their duty to act wisely for the common good. This applies all the more urgently, the more doubts arise from different sides about the actual risk of infection, the danger and the resistance of the virus: Many authoritative voices in the world of science and Medicine confirm that this alarmism from the media towards Covid-19 does not seem to be justified in any way. 

We have reason to believe – based on official data from the epidemic in terms of the number of deaths – that there are forces interested in creating panic among the population. In this way, they want to permanently enforce forms of unacceptable limitation of freedom and the associated control over people and the tracking of all their movements. These illiberal attempts at steering are the disturbing prelude to the creation of a world government that is beyond control. 

We also believe that, in some situations, the containment measures taken, including the cessation of commercial activities, have resulted in a crisis that has devastated entire sectors of the economy. This in turn encourages interference by foreign powers and has serious social and political ramifications.

These forms of “social engineering” must be prevented by those who have governmental responsibilities by taking measures to protect the citizens whom they represent and in whose interests they have to act, as is their serious duty. You must help the family, the cell of society, and avoid inappropriately punishing the weak and the elderly and forcing them into painful separations from loved ones. The criminalization of personal and social relationships must be judged as an unacceptable part of a project that promotes the isolation of people in order to better manipulate and control them.

We call on the scientific community to ensure that the medical treatment of Covid-19 is promoted with sincere concern for the common good and therefore carefully avoided that dubious economic interests influence the decisions of governments and international authorities. It does not make sense, on the one hand, to ostracize drugs that have been shown to be effective and often inexpensive, and, on the other hand, to prioritize treatments or vaccines that guarantee pharmaceutical companies higher profits but are not equally effective. ….

 https://www.xn--rzte-fr-aufklrung-pqbn68b.de/       

 We also call on those in power to ensure that forms of human control are strictly avoided, whether through tracking systems or any other form of localization. The fight against Covid-19, however serious it may be, must not be used as a pretext to support the ambiguous intentions of supranational entities that pursue very strong political and economic interests. In particular, citizens must be given the opportunity: to reject restrictions on personal freedoms, to evade impending vaccination with impunity, and not to use tracing systems or similar instruments.

Those who pursue a policy of drastic population reduction and at the same time present themselves as the savior of humanity – without any political or social legitimacy – are in obvious contradiction to themselves. Ultimately, the political responsibility of those who represent the people can be on under no circumstances will “experts” be assigned who – and this is indeed worrying – demand forms of criminal immunity for themselves.

We urge the media to make an active effort to pass on information correctly, in which dissent is possible and not, as is now widespread in social media, in the press and on television, with a kind of censorship is punished. Correct passing on of information means that room is also given to other voices that deviate from the generally prevailing opinion. This allows the citizens to be able to assess the facts with confidence and not be influenced by strong statements from those who are party to it. A democratic and honest confrontation is the best antidote to the risk of subtle forms of dictatorship,probably even worse than those our society has seen rise and fall in the recent past.

….

Let us not be intimidated or even frightened by those who want us to believe that we are only a minority : the good is much more widespread and more powerful than what the world tries to make us believe. We are fighting against an invisible enemy that separates citizens from one another, children from their parents, grandchildren from grandparents, believers from their pastors, students from teachers, and customers from salespeople. We are not allowing centuries of Christian civilization to be wiped out under the pretext of a virus to create a hateful technocratic tyranny in which people whose names and faces are unknown can decide the fate of the world to keep us in one. ..

8 May 2020, hs

https://www.xn--rzte-fr-aufklrung-pqbn68b.de/informationen/externer-aufruf/

 

Video:

 Germany – The COVID – 19 Extra – Parliamentary Inquiry Committee – Start Conference 03rd July 2020 ” We will not be delayed any longer . We citizens have the power . We are doing it ” , with these words Heiko Schöning announced the Extra – Parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee ( ACU ) on 31st May 2020 in Stuttgart in front of 5000 demonstrators . On 3rd July 2020 the ACU started with an information conference in several languages . All citizens , national and international , can make suggestions for experts and witnesses (kontakt@ärzte-für-aufklärung.de)

The speakers of the ACU ( Heiko Schöning , Bodo Schiffmann , Martin Haditsch ) invite the experts and witnesses to the public hearing of evidence . 

 Original in German :  https://youtu.be/jb7WON_YVJw

 For more details , please visit https://acu2020.org/international/

APPEAL FOR THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD

The Appeal for the Church and for the world is an initiative of H.E.R. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop and Apostolic Nuncio. Some cardinals, bishops and numerous priests have joined this appeal, as well as an increasing number of leading personalities of society (doctors, researchers, journalists, professors, lawyers), associations and private citizens. Those who adhere to the appeal share its content, but their adherence is obviously not extended to the personal ideas of all the signatories.

………………………………..

In this time of great crisis, we Pastors of the Catholic Church, by virtue of our mandate, consider it our sacred duty to make an Appeal to our Brothers in the Episcopate, to the Clergy, to Religious, to the holy People of God and to all men and women of good will. This Appeal has also been undersigned by intellectuals, doctors, lawyers, journalists and professionals who agree with its content, and may be undersigned by those who wish to make it their own.

The facts have shown that, under the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, the inalienable rights of citizens have in many cases been violated and their fundamental freedoms, including the exercise of freedom of worship, expression and movement, have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted. Public health must not, and cannot, become an alibi for infringing on the rights of millions of people around the world, let alone for depriving the civil authority of its duty to act wisely for the common good. This is particularly true as growing doubts emerge from several quarters about the actual contagiousness, danger and resistance of the virus. Many authoritative voices in the world of science and medicine confirm that the media’s alarmism about Covid-19 appears to be absolutely unjustified.

We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.

We also believe that in some situations the containment measures that were adopted, including the closure of shops and businesses, have precipitated a crisis that has brought down entire sectors of the economy. This encourages interference by foreign powers and has serious social and political repercussions. Those with governmental responsibility must stop these forms of social engineering, by taking measures to protect their citizens whom they represent, and in whose interests they have a serious obligation to act. Likewise, let them help the family, the cell of society, by not unreasonably penalizing the weak and elderly, forcing them into a painful separation from their loved ones. The criminalization of personal and social relationships must likewise be judged as an unacceptable part of the plan of those who advocate isolating individuals in order to better manipulate and control them.

We ask the scientific community to be vigilant, so that cures for Covid-19 are offered in honesty for the common good. Every effort must be made to ensure that shady business interests do not influence the choices made by government leaders and international bodies. It is unreasonable to penalize those remedies that have proved to be effective, and are often inexpensive, just because one wishes to give priority to treatments or vaccines that are not as good, but which guarantee pharmaceutical companies far greater profits, and exacerbate public health expenditures. Let us also remember, as Pastors, that for Catholics it is morally unacceptable to develop or use vaccines derived from material from aborted fetuses.

We also ask government leaders to ensure that forms of control over people, whether through tracking systems or any other form of location-finding, are rigorously avoided. The fight against Covid-19, however serious, must not be the pretext for supporting the hidden intentions of supranational bodies that have very strong commercial and political interests in this plan. In particular, citizens must be given the opportunity to refuse these restrictions on personal freedom, without any penalty whatsoever being imposed on those who do not wish to use vaccines, contact tracking or any other similar tool. Let us also consider the blatant contradiction of those who pursue policies of drastic population control and at the same time present themselves as the savior of humanity, without any political or social legitimacy. Finally, the political responsibility of those who represent the people can in no way be left to “experts” who can indeed claim a kind of immunity from prosecution, which is disturbing to say the least.

We strongly urge those in the media to commit themselves to providing accurate information and not penalizing dissent by resorting to forms of censorship, as is happening widely on social media, in the press and on television. Providing accurate information requires that room be given to voices that are not aligned with a single way of thinking. This allows citizens to consciously assess the facts, without being heavily influenced by partisan interventions. A democratic and honest debate is the best antidote to the risk of imposing subtle forms of dictatorship, presumably worse than those our society has seen rise and fall in the recent past.

Finally, as Pastors responsible for the flock of Christ, let us remember that the Church firmly asserts her autonomy to govern, worship, and teach. This autonomy and freedom are an innate right that Our Lord Jesus Christ has given her for the pursuit of her proper ends. For this reason, as Pastors we firmly assert the right to decide autonomously on the celebration of Mass and the Sacraments, just as we claim absolute autonomy in matters falling within our immediate jurisdiction, such as liturgical norms and ways of administering Communion and the Sacraments. The State has no right to interfere, for any reason whatsoever, in the sovereignty of the Church. Ecclesiastical authorities have never refused to collaborate with the State, but such collaboration does not authorize civil authorities to impose any sort of ban or restriction on public worship or the exercise of priestly ministry. The rights of God and of the faithful are the supreme law of the Church, which she neither intends to, nor can, abdicate. We ask that restrictions on the celebration of public ceremonies be removed.

We should like to invite all people of good will not to shirk their duty to cooperate for the common good, each according to his or her own state and possibilities and in a spirit of fraternal charity. The Church desires such cooperation, but this cannot disregard either a respect for natural law or a guarantee of individual freedoms. The civil duties to which citizens are bound imply the State’s recognition of their rights.

We are all called to assess the current situation in a way consistent with the teaching of the Gospel. This means taking a stand: either with Christ or against Christ. Let us not be intimidated or frightened by those who would have us believe that we are a minority: Good is much more widespread and powerful than the world would have us believe. We are fighting against an invisible enemy that seeks to divide citizens, to separate children from their parents, grandchildren from their grandparents, the faithful from their pastors, students from teachers, and customers from vendors. Let us not allow centuries of Christian civilization to be erased under the pretext of a virus, and an odious technological tyranny to be established, in which nameless and faceless people can decide the fate of the world by confining us to a virtual reality. If this is the plan to which the powers of this earth intend to make us yield, know that Jesus Christ, King and Lord of History, has promised that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail” (Mt 16:18).

Let us entrust government leaders and all those who rule over the fate of nations to Almighty God, that He may enlighten and guide them in this time of great crisis. May they remember that, just as the Lord will judge us Pastors for the flock which he has entrusted to us, so will He also judge government leaders for the peoples whom they have the duty to defend and govern.

With faith, let us beseech the Lord to protect the Church and the world. May the Blessed Virgin, Help of Christians, crush the head of the ancient Serpent and defeat the plans of the children of darkness.

8 May 2020
Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii

source: https://veritasliberabitvos.info/appeal/

Main signatories – https://veritasliberabitvos.info/signatories/

Robert Francis Kennedy Jr signs the appeal: https://veritasliberabitvos.info/new-signatory/

 

Corona: Conservatives warn against “creation of a world government”

Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller and others sense a conspiracy at work

The German curia cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, along with other conservative clergy and intellectuals, have signed an “appeal for the Church and for the world”, which questions the risk of infection by Covid-19. You see a conspiracy of secret forces, which sought the “creation of a world government”. There is no evidence for the theses in the document. Müller was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in the Vatican until 2017.

The appeal was signed by twelve cardinals, bishops and auxiliary bishops as well as a few dozen international journalists, doctors, lawyers and organizations – including the former Vatican diplomat Carlo Maria Vigano, who was reprimanded by the Vatican, and the Salzburg auxiliary bishop Andreas Laun. First on the list was Cardinal Robert Sarah, incumbent Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship in the Vatican. His name disappeared this morning.

“Unjustified Alarmism”

First of all, Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship in the Vatican, was also on the list of signatories. On the morning of May 8, 2020, his name was gone.

In the document, the signatories complain that “under the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, inalienable rights of citizens have been violated in many cases and their fundamental freedoms have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted, including the right to religious freedom”. Public health should “not become an alibi for violating the rights of millions of people around the world”.

There is also talk of unjustified “media alarmism” and “interference by foreign powers”. Without further details or evidence, the undersigned warn Catholics with a view to the Corona crisis against “being treated with vaccines made from material from aborted fetuses”.

“Fighting an Invisible Enemy”
The document emphasizes the full autonomy of the church vis-à-vis state authorities in matters of religious practice. “This autonomy and freedom of the church is a fundamental right that the Lord Jesus Christ has given her.” Therefore, the state has no right to “interfere for any reason in the sovereignty of the church” – for example by prohibiting or restricting public worship and pastoral care: “God’s rights and those of his believers are the supreme law of the church.”

The undersigned call for a “fight against an invisible enemy”: “We will not allow centuries of Christian civilization to be wiped out under the pretext of a virus to establish a hateful, technocratic tyranny.”

Markus Nolte

https://www.kirche-und-leben.de/artikel/corona-konservative-warnen-vor-schaffung-einer-weltregierung/